Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 159-169.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2019.12.2
Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Qinghai1(), HE Tong1, ZHUANG Yaqin1, LUO Jin2, ZHANG Canhai3
Received:
2019-06-02
Revised:
2019-10-20
Online:
2020-01-20
Published:
2020-01-20
CLC Number:
GUO Qinghai, HE Tong, ZHUANG Yaqin, LUO Jin, ZHANG Canhai. Expansion of fracture network in granites via chemical stimulation: a laboratory study[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(1): 159-169.
实验条件 | 注入流速 /(mL·min-1) | 岩心裂隙渗透率/(10-4μm2) | 渗透率比值 k3-avg/k1-avg | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
注前置液 | 注中置液 | 注后置液 | ||||||||||
k1-avg | k2-avg / k2-max | k3-avg | ||||||||||
1 | 2.60 | 3.85 | / | 4.65 | 4.37 | 1.68 | ||||||
10% HCl | 3 | 7.61 | 11.09 | / | 14.53 | 9.51 | 1.25 | |||||
5 | 3.01 | 4.13 | / | 5.56 | 4.76 | 1.56 | ||||||
1 | 0.48 | 1.76 | / | 3.31 | 3.41 | 7.15 | ||||||
10% HCl+0.5% HF | 3 | 1.67 | 21.7 | / | 90.95 | 18.93 | 11.34 | |||||
5 | 2.98 | 16.61 | / | 27.47 | 21.16 | 7.11 | ||||||
1 | 5.87 | 3.55 | / | 4.90 | 1.24 | 0.21 | ||||||
10% NaOH | 3 | 6.18 | 1.74 | / | 2.82 | 0.30 | 0.05 | |||||
5 | 9.76 | 0.84 | / | 1.59 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
Table 1 Permeability change of rock samples in different stages of chemical stimulation test
实验条件 | 注入流速 /(mL·min-1) | 岩心裂隙渗透率/(10-4μm2) | 渗透率比值 k3-avg/k1-avg | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
注前置液 | 注中置液 | 注后置液 | ||||||||||
k1-avg | k2-avg / k2-max | k3-avg | ||||||||||
1 | 2.60 | 3.85 | / | 4.65 | 4.37 | 1.68 | ||||||
10% HCl | 3 | 7.61 | 11.09 | / | 14.53 | 9.51 | 1.25 | |||||
5 | 3.01 | 4.13 | / | 5.56 | 4.76 | 1.56 | ||||||
1 | 0.48 | 1.76 | / | 3.31 | 3.41 | 7.15 | ||||||
10% HCl+0.5% HF | 3 | 1.67 | 21.7 | / | 90.95 | 18.93 | 11.34 | |||||
5 | 2.98 | 16.61 | / | 27.47 | 21.16 | 7.11 | ||||||
1 | 5.87 | 3.55 | / | 4.90 | 1.24 | 0.21 | ||||||
10% NaOH | 3 | 6.18 | 1.74 | / | 2.82 | 0.30 | 0.05 | |||||
5 | 9.76 | 0.84 | / | 1.59 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
Fig.6 SEM images of the fracture surfaces of rock samples treated by various chemical agents, showing the overall erosion. (a) After hydrochloric acid injection; (b) After mud acid injection; and (c) After injection of sodium hydroxide solution.
实验条件 | 注入流速 /(mL·min-1) | pH | 化学组分质量浓度/(mg·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | Na | Ca | Mg | Al | Fe | Si | Cl | F | |||
1 | -0.42 | 220.3 | 384.3 | 334.4 | 265.4 | 265.4 | 603.9 | 57.8 | 106.5 | n.d. | |
10% HCl | 3 | -0.43 | 179.5 | 358.7 | 291.3 | 194.1 | 182.3 | 404.9 | 47.4 | 107.2 | n.d. |
5 | -0.42 | 98.5 | 352.2 | 255.2 | 127.6 | 103.2 | 457.8 | 46.1 | 105.1 | n.d. | |
1 | -0.37 | 195.7 | 614.8 | 434.6 | 122.3 | 396.1 | 277.1 | 373.7 | 103.5 | 5.1 | |
10% HCl+0.5% HF | 3 | -0.37 | 277.1 | 665.4 | 464.1 | 172.5 | 414.7 | 308.0 | 770.0 | 102.8 | 4.9 |
5 | -0.37 | 266.4 | 654.2 | 393.2 | 156.3 | 445.8 | 303.5 | 438.6 | 103.2 | 5.0 | |
1 | 14.04 | 144.7 | 1 217.6 | 127.5 | 13.7 | 13.0 | n.d. | 47.4 | n.d. | n.d. | |
10% NaOH | 3 | 14.04 | 143.9 | 742.7 | 103.8 | 13.8 | 3.5 | n.d. | 31.1 | n.d. | n.d. |
5 | 14.05 | 154.0 | 1 216.0 | 195.9 | 25.4 | 4.2 | n.d. | 52.9 | n.d. | n.d. |
Table2 PHs and major constituent concentrations of the liquid phase after chemical stimulation test
实验条件 | 注入流速 /(mL·min-1) | pH | 化学组分质量浓度/(mg·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K | Na | Ca | Mg | Al | Fe | Si | Cl | F | |||
1 | -0.42 | 220.3 | 384.3 | 334.4 | 265.4 | 265.4 | 603.9 | 57.8 | 106.5 | n.d. | |
10% HCl | 3 | -0.43 | 179.5 | 358.7 | 291.3 | 194.1 | 182.3 | 404.9 | 47.4 | 107.2 | n.d. |
5 | -0.42 | 98.5 | 352.2 | 255.2 | 127.6 | 103.2 | 457.8 | 46.1 | 105.1 | n.d. | |
1 | -0.37 | 195.7 | 614.8 | 434.6 | 122.3 | 396.1 | 277.1 | 373.7 | 103.5 | 5.1 | |
10% HCl+0.5% HF | 3 | -0.37 | 277.1 | 665.4 | 464.1 | 172.5 | 414.7 | 308.0 | 770.0 | 102.8 | 4.9 |
5 | -0.37 | 266.4 | 654.2 | 393.2 | 156.3 | 445.8 | 303.5 | 438.6 | 103.2 | 5.0 | |
1 | 14.04 | 144.7 | 1 217.6 | 127.5 | 13.7 | 13.0 | n.d. | 47.4 | n.d. | n.d. | |
10% NaOH | 3 | 14.04 | 143.9 | 742.7 | 103.8 | 13.8 | 3.5 | n.d. | 31.1 | n.d. | n.d. |
5 | 14.05 | 154.0 | 1 216.0 | 195.9 | 25.4 | 4.2 | n.d. | 52.9 | n.d. | n.d. |
[1] | 郑克棪, 陈梓慧. 中国干热岩开发: 任重而道远[J]. 中外能源, 2017, 22(2):21-25. |
[2] | 汪集旸, 胡圣标, 庞忠和, 等. 中国大陆干热岩地热资源潜力评估[J]. 科技导报, 2012 (32):25-31. |
[3] | TESTER J W, ANDERSON B, BATCHELOR A, et al. The future of geothermal energy:impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century[C]. Cambridge : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. |
[4] |
HOFMANN H, BABADAGLI T, ZIMMERMANN G. Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113:524-547.
DOI URL |
[5] | 郭亮亮, 张延军, 胡忠君, 等. 增强型地热系统压裂和开采方案研究[C]// 2015年全国工程地质学术年会论文集. 长春: 中国地质学会, 2015. |
[6] | 雷宏武. 增强型地热系统(EGS)中热能开发力学耦合水热过程分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014. |
[7] |
BROWN D W, DUCHANE D V. Scientific progress on the Fenton Hill HDR project since 1983[J]. Geothermics, 1999, 28(4/5):591-601.
DOI URL |
[8] | 郭剑, 陈继良, 曹文炅, 等. 增强型地热系统研究综述[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(4):10-24. |
[9] | SANDRINE P, LAURRENT A, FRANCOIS-D.V. Review on chemical stimulation techniques in oil industry and applications to geothermal systems[C]. Basel: Deep Heat Mining Association, 2007. |
[10] |
ZIMMERMANN G, BLÖCHER G, REINICKE A, et al. Rock specific hydraulic fracturing and matrix acidizing to enhance a geothermal system: concepts and field results[J]. Tectonophysics, 2011, 503(1):146-154.
DOI URL |
[11] | CORREIA H, SIGURDSSON O, SANJUAN B, et al. Stimulation test of a high-enthalpy geothermal well by cold water injection[J]. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 2000, 24:129-136. |
[12] |
PORTIER S, VUATAZ F-D, NAMI P, et al. Chemical stimulation techniques for geothermal wells: experiments on the three-well EGS system at Soultz-sous-Forêts, France[J]. Geothermics, 2009, 38(4):349-359.
DOI URL |
[13] |
BREEDE K, DZEBISASHVILI K, LIU X, et al. A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future[J]. Geothermal Energy, 2013, 1(1):4.
DOI URL |
[14] | 王敏黛, 郭清海, 严维德, 等. 青海共和盆地中低温地热流体发电[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2014(9):1317-1322. |
[15] |
DAVIES D, FABER R, NITTERS G, et al. A novel procedure to increase well response to matrix acidising treatments[J]. SPE Advanced Technology Series, 1994, 2(1):5-14.
DOI URL |
[16] | PERTHUIS H, TOUBOUL E, PIOT B. Acid reactions and damage removal in sandstones: a model for selecting the acid formulation[C]. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1989. |
[17] | NASR-EI-DIN H A. Surfactant:use in acid stimulation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. |
[18] | 康燕. 长岩心流动实验评价酸液酸化效果[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005, 24(3):77-78. |
[1] | XU Jiading, ZHANG Chongyuan, ZHANG Hao, BAI Jinpeng, ZHANG Shi’an, ZHANG Shengsheng, QIN Xianghui, SUN Dongsheng, HE Manchao, WU Manlu. In-situ stress measurements in hot dry rock, Qinghai Gonghe Basin and simulation analysis of reservoir fracture modification [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(6): 130-144. |
[2] | QI Xiaofei, XIAO Yong, SHANGGUAN Shuantong, SU Ye, WANG Hongke, LI Yingying, HU Zhixing. Fracture propagation mechanism in artificial reservoir of deep hot dry rock, Matouying and its applications [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(6): 224-234. |
[3] | JIANG Zheng, SHU Biao, TAN Jingqiang. Heat transfer in geothermal reservoir of CO2-based enhanced geothermal systems—current research status and prospects [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(6): 235-251. |
[4] | SHANGGUAN Shuantong, TIAN Lanlan, PAN Miaomiao, YANG Fengliang, YUE Gaofan, SU Ye, QI Xiaofei. Fault slip tendency and induced-earthquake risks in hot dry rock development: A case study in the Tangshan Matouying HDR site [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(6): 252-260. |
[5] | SONG Dekun, LIU Lele, WANG Dong. Experimental study on the sensitivity of hydraulic permeability of fine-grained sediments sampled from a gas hydrate distribution area in the northern South China Sea [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(6): 405-414. |
[6] | YANG Liqiang, YANG Wei, ZHANG Liang, GAO Xue, SHEN Shilong, WANG Sirui, XU Hantao, JIA Xiaochen, DENG Jun. Developing structural control models for hydrothermal metallogenic systems: Theoretical and methodological principles and applications [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(1): 239-266. |
[7] | ZHANG Baojian, LEI Yude, ZHAO Zhen, TANG Xianchun, LUO Yinfei, WANG Guiling, GAO Jun, ZHANG Dailei. Geodynamic processes and mechanisms of the formation of hot dry rock in the Gonghe Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(5): 384-401. |
[8] | HU Guonong, HAO Shiyan, FAN Pingtian, LI Yu, GAO Qinghua. Redevelopment potential of NNW oil field, Ordos Basin—an analysis [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 106-115. |
[9] | HE Bizhu, ZHENG Menglin, YUN Xiaorui, CAI Zhihui, JIAO Cunli, CHEN Xijie, ZHENG Yong, MA Xuxuan, LIU Ruohan, CHEN Huiming, ZHANG Shengsheng, LEI Min, FU Guoqiang, LI Zhenyu. Structural architecture and energy resource potential of Gonghe Basin, NE Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 81-105. |
[10] | WANG Genjiu, SONG Xinmin, LIU Bo, SHI Kaibo, LIU Hangyu. High permeability zone of Cretaceous porous carbonate reservoir of A Field, Iraq: Genesis and distribution characteristics [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(5): 483-496. |
[11] | WEN Dongguang, SONG Jian, DIAO Yujie, ZHANG Linyou, ZHANG Fucun, ZHANG Senqi, YE Chengming, ZHU Qingjun, SHI Yanxin, JIN Xianpeng, JIA Xiaofeng, LI Shengtao, LIU Donglin, WANG Xinfeng, YANG Li, MA Xin, WU Haidong, ZHAO Xueliang, HAO Wenjie. Opportunities and challenges in deep hydrogeological research [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(3): 11-24. |
[12] | ZHANG Ying, FENG Jianyun, LUO Jun, HE Zhiliang, WU Xiaoling. Screening of hot dry rock in the south-central part of the Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(1): 35-47. |
[13] | LUO Wenxing, SUN Guoqiang, ZHOU Yang, LIU Demin, CHEN Qi. Discussion on the mechanism of deep geothermal energy transmission [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(1): 10-16. |
[14] | WANG Guiling, LIU Yanguang, ZHU Xi, ZHANG Wei. The status and development trend of geothermal resources in China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(1): 1-9. |
[15] | LIU Demin, ZHANG Genyuan, GUAN Junpeng, ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Jingqi, KONG Linghao, SHAO Junqi. Analysis of geothermal resources potential for hot dry rock in the Subei Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(1): 48-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||