全球典型大陆造山带中榴辉岩的折返机制:来自变质岩和地球物理的限制

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.12.37

地学前缘 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 303-315.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.12.37

• "印度-欧亚大陆碰撞及其远程效应"专栏之三 • 上一篇下一篇

全球典型大陆造山带中榴辉岩的折返机制:来自变质岩和地球物理的限制

张丁丁(), 张衡^*()

中国科学院青藏高原研究所青藏高原地球系统与资源环境国家重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2021-11-15 修回日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-22
通讯作者: 张衡
作者简介:张丁丁(1988—),女,博士后,主要从事变质岩石学研究。E-mail: zhangdingding@itpcas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(41702060);中国科学院战略先导项目(XDA20070301);中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2018097);国家自然科学基金项目(1974109);国家自然科学基金项目(41776201);中国科学院王宽诚率先人才计划项目(GJTD-2019-04);国家自然科学基础科学基金项目(BSCTPES);国家自然科学基础科学基金项目(41988101);国家科技基础资源调查专项第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0708)

The exhumation mechanism of eclogites in continental orogenic belts: Metamorphic petrology and geophysical constraints

ZHANG Dingding(), ZHANG Heng^*()

State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2021-11-15 Revised:2021-12-22 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-22
Contact: ZHANG Heng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大陆岩石圈深俯冲作用是地球科学领域的前沿热点,榴辉岩的折返机制是板块构造及动力学的关键科学问题。全球著名的大陆造山带中榴辉岩的p-T轨迹呈现差异性折返特征,为了揭示榴辉岩的折返机制,本文结合变质岩石学和地球物理学研究,选取3个典型大陆造山带——中生代—新生代的阿尔卑斯造山带、中生代的苏鲁—大别造山带和新生代的喜马拉雅造山带中的榴辉岩进行阐述。在阿尔卑斯造山带地区,地球物理研究结果发现,欧洲板块的俯冲造成了Adria地区下方的岩石圈存在明显厚度差异。同时,阿尔卑斯造山带Doria Maria和Pohorje地区以及Pohorje地区内部,榴辉岩折返历史也不尽相同,原因可能是亚德里亚大洋岩石圈断离后不同期次的逆冲推覆作用使其差异性斜向挤出。苏鲁—大别造山带中榴辉岩的快速折返,原因可能是华南板块与华北板块碰撞后岩石圈的拆沉或断离作用。在喜马拉雅造山带,西构造结和中喜马拉雅榴辉岩的折返存在差异性。在西构造结,那让和卡甘榴辉岩呈现不同的p-T轨迹和折返速率,变质岩石学和地球物理研究结果都表明它们的差异性折返很可能与印度-欧亚大陆碰撞过程中的构造挤压作用以及印度大陆岩石圈的断离作用有关。喜马拉雅造山带是年轻的正在进行造山活动的造山带,相较于古老的苏鲁-大别造山带,它更适合变质岩石学和地球物理学的综合研究。因此西构造结高压/超高压榴辉岩的折返机制——构造挤压和俯冲板块断离可应用于全球造山带。

关键词: 造山带, 高压/超高压, 榴辉岩, 折返, 地球物理, 变质岩石学

Abstract:

The deep subduction of the continental lithosphere is a frontier hotspot in the field of earth science, and the exhumation mechanism of eclogite is a key scientific issue in plate tectonics and continental dynamics. The p-T paths of eclogites from the world-famous continental orogenic belts show differential exhumation characteristics. To explore the exhumation mechanism in this study, metamorphic petrology and geophysical investigations were conducted on eclogites from three typical continental orogenic belts-Mesozoic-Cenozoic Alps, Mesozoic Sulu-Dabie, and Cenozoic Himalayas. The geophysical investigation found that, in the Alpine orogenic belt, subduction of the European plate resulted in large variations in lithospheric thickness beneath the Adria area. At the same time, the exhumation histories of eclogites are not the same in the Doria Maria and Pohorje areas of the Alpine orogenic belt versus in the greater Pohorje area, which, then, is probably due to the differential oblique extrusion of thrusting nappes from different periods after the break-off of the Adriatic ocean lithosphere. In the Sulu-Dabie orogenic belt, rapid exhumation of eclogites is likely be caused by the delamination or break-off of the lithosphere after the collision of the South and North China blocks. In the Himalayan orogenic belt, there are differences in the exhumation histories of eclogites in the middle Himalayas, and so are the differences in the p-T path and exhumation rate of eclogites from Naran versus from the Upper Kaghan Valley in the Western Himalayan Syntaxis. The differential exhumation, according to both metamorphic petrology and geophysical studies, is likely related to the tectonic extrusion and the break-off of the Indian continental lithosphere during the collision of the Indian and European plates. The Himalayan Orogen is a young and ongoing orogeny, thus it is more suitable for comprehensive metamorphic petrology and geophysical studies compared to the ancient Sulu-Dabie Orogen. Therefore, the exhumation mechanism of (ultra)-high-pressure eclogites in the Western Himalayan Syntaxis, i.e., tectonic compression and the break-off of subducting plate, can be applied to global orogenic belts.

Key words: orogenic belt, UP/UHP, eclogite, exhumation, geophysics, metamorphic petrology

中图分类号:

张丁丁, 张衡. 全球典型大陆造山带中榴辉岩的折返机制:来自变质岩和地球物理的限制[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 303-315.

ZHANG Dingding, ZHANG Heng. The exhumation mechanism of eclogites in continental orogenic belts: Metamorphic petrology and geophysical constraints[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(1): 303-315.

图/表 7

图1 全球大陆和大洋高压/超高压变质岩分布 (据文献[4,5]修改)

Fig.1 Distribution of global continental and oceanic HP/UHP metamorphic rocks. Modified from [4,5].

图2 阿尔卑斯造山带中不同榴辉岩p-T轨迹比较图(据文献[12,13,14,15]修改) P—葡萄石-绿纤石相;Z—浊沸石相;GS—绿片岩相;B—蓝片岩相;EA—绿帘角闪岩相; A—角闪岩相;EC—榴辉岩相;EC-HPG—榴辉岩-高压麻粒岩相;G—麻粒岩相;UHP—超高压相;UHT—超高温相。

Fig.2 Comparison of the p-T paths of eclogites from the Alps orogenic belt. Modified after [12-15]. P: prehnite-pumpellyite facies; Z: laumontite facies; GS: greenschist facies; A: amphibolite facies; EA: epidote-amphibolite facies; B: blueschist facies; EC:eclogite facies; EC-HPG: eclogite-high-pressure granulite; G: granulite-facies; UHP: ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism; UHT: ultrahigh-temperature metamorphism.

图3 阿尔卑斯地壳地幔构造示意图 (据文献[16,17]修改)

Fig.3 Schematic diagram showing the crust-mantle structure beneath the Alps. Modified after [16-17].

图4 大别山不同地区榴辉岩p-T轨迹比较图(据文献[29]修改) P—葡萄石-绿纤石相;Z—浊沸石相;GS—绿片岩相;B—蓝片岩相;EA—绿帘角闪岩相; A—角闪岩相;EC—榴辉岩相;EC-HPG—榴辉岩-高压麻粒岩相;G—麻粒岩相;UHP—超高压相;UHT—超高温相。

Fig.4 Comparison of the p-T paths of eclogites from the Dabie orogenic belt. Modified after [29]. P: prehnite-pumpellyite facies; Z: laumontite facies; GS: greenschist facies; A: amphibolite facies; EA: epidote-amphibolite facies;B: blueschist facies; EC: eclogite facies; EC-HPG: eclogite-high-pressure granulite; G: granulite-facies;UHP: ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism; UHT: ultrahigh-temperature metamorphism.

图5 东大别中榴辉岩的折返模型 (据文献[32]修改)

Fig.5 Exhumation model for eclogites from the Eastern Dabie orogenic belt. Modified after [32].

图6 喜马拉雅西构造结和中喜马拉雅中榴辉岩p-T轨迹比较图 (据文献[52,55,59-60,62]修改) P—葡萄石-绿纤石相;Z—浊沸石相;GS—绿片岩相;B—蓝片岩相;EA—绿帘角闪岩相; A—角闪岩相;EC—榴辉岩相;EC-HPG—榴辉岩-高压麻粒岩相;G—麻粒岩相;UHP—超高压相;UHT—超高温相。

Fig.6 Comparison of the p-T paths of eclogites from the Western Himalaya Syntaxis and central Himalaya. Modified after [52,55,59-60,62]. P: prehnite-pumpellyite facies; Z: laumontite facies; GS: greenschist facies; A: amphibolite facies; EA: epidote-amphibolite facies;B: blueschist facies; EC:eclogite facies; EC-HPG: eclogite-high-pressure granulite; G: granulite-facies;UHP: ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism; UHT: ultrahigh-temperature metamorphism.

图7 西构造结地壳地幔构造示意图(据文献[63,68]修改)

Fig.7 Schematic diagram showing the crust-mantle structure beneath the Western Himalayan Syntaxis. Modified after [63,68].

参考文献 89

[1]	CHOPIN C. Coesite and pure pyrope in high-grade blueschists of the Western Alps: a first record and some consequences[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1984, 86(2):107-118. DOI URL
[2]	SMITH D C. Coesite in clinopyroxene in the Caledonides and its implications for geodynamics[J]. Nature, 1984, 310(5979):641-644. DOI URL
[3]	YE K, CONG B, YE D. The possible subduction of continental material to depths greater than 200 km[J]. Nature, 2000, 407:734-736. DOI URL
[4]	ERDMAN M E, LEE C T A. Oceanic-and continental-type metamorphic terranes: occurrence and exhumation mechanisms[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 139:33-46. DOI URL
[5]	CHEMENDA A I, MATTAUER M, BOKUN A N. Continental subduction and a mechanism for exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic rocks: new modelling and field data from Oman[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1996, 143(1/2/3/4):173-182. DOI URL
[6]	LIU L, ZHANG J, HARRY I I, et al. Evidence of former stishovite in metamorphosed sediments, implying subduction to >350 km[J]. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2007, 263(3/4):0-191.
[7]	WILKE F D H, O’BRIEN P J, GERDES A, et al. The multistage exhumation history of the Kaghan Valley UHP series, NW Himalaya, Pakistan from U-Pb and ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages[J]. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2010, 22(5):703-719. DOI URL
[8]	DONG S, CHEN J, HUANG D. Differential exhumation of tectonic units and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks in the Dabie Mountains, China[J]. Island Arc, 1998, 7(1/2):174-183. DOI URL
[9]	WHITNEY D L, EVANS B W. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals[J]. American Mineralogist, 2010, 95(1):185-187. DOI URL
[10]	DALPIAZ G, BISTACCHI A, MASSIRONI M. Geological outline of the Alps[J]. Episodes, 2003, 26:175-180. DOI URL
[11]	MALUSÀ M G, GUILLOT S, ZHAO L, et al. The deep structure of the Alps based on the CIFALPS seismic experiment: a synjournal[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2021, 22(3): e2020GC009466.
[12]	RUBATTO D, HERMANN J. Exhumation as fast as subduction?[J]. Geology, 2001, 29(1):3-6. DOI URL
[13]	HAUZENBERGER C A, TAFERNER H, KONZETT J. Genesis of chromium-rich kyanite in eclogite-facies Cr-spinel-bearing gabbroic cumulates, Pohorje Massif, Eastern Alps[J]. American Mineralogist, 2016, 101:448-460. DOI URL
[14]	LI B, HANS-JOACHIM M, KOLLER F, et al. Metapelite from the high-ultrahigh pressure terrane of the eastern Alps (Pohorje Mountains, Slovenia): new pressure, temperature, and time constraints on a polymetamorphic rock[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2021, 39(1):695-726. DOI URL
[15]	VRABEC M, JANÁK M, FROITZHEIM N, et al. Phase relations during peak metamorphism and decompression of the UHP kyanite eclogites, Pohorje Mountains (Eastern Alps, Slovenia)[J]. Lithos, 2012, 144:40-55.
[16]	GIACOMUZZI G, CHIARABBA C, GORI P D. Linking the Alps and Apennines subduction systems: new constraints revealed by high-resolution teleseismic tomography[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 301(3/4):531-543. DOI URL
[17]	ZHAO L, MALUSÀ M G, YUAN H, et al. Author Correction: evidence for a serpentinized plate interface favouring continental subduction[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1):1-8. DOI URL
[18]	BUTLER R, MAZZOLI S, CORRADO S, et al. Applying thick-skinned tectonic models to the Apennine thrust belt of Italy: limitations and implications[J]. AAPG Memoir, 2005, 82:647-667.
[19]	ZHAO L. First seismic evidence for continental subduction beneath the Western Alps[J]. Geology, 2015, 43(9):815-818. DOI URL
[20]	ZHANG R Y, LIOU J G, ERNST W G. The Dabie-Sulu continental collision zone: a comprehensive review[J]. Gondwana Research, 2009, 16(1):1-26. DOI URL
[21]	ZHENG Y F, FU B, BING G, et al. Stable isotope geochemistry of ultrahigh pressure metamorphic rocks from the Dabie-Sulu orogen in China: implications for geodynamics and fluid regime[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2003, 62(1/2):105-161. DOI URL
[22]	WANG X, JING Y, LIOU J G, et al. Field occurrences and petrology of eclogites from the Dabie Mountains, Anhui, central China[J]. Lithos, 1990, 25(1/2/3):119-131. DOI URL
[23]	XU S T, SU W, LIU Y C, et al. Diamond from the Dabie Shan metamorphic rocks and its implication for tectonic setting[J]. Science, 1992, 256(5053):80-82. DOI URL
[24]	CONG B, WANG Q. Ultra-high-pressure metamorphic rocks in China[J]. Episodes, 1995, 18(1):91-94. DOI URL
[25]	LIOU J G, ZHANG R Y, JAHN B M. Petrology, geochemistry and isotope data on a ultrahigh-pressure jadeite quartzite from Shuanghe, Dabie Mountains, East-central China[J]. Lithos, 1997, 41(1):59-78. DOI URL
[26]	HACKER B R, RATSCHBACHER L, WEBB L, et al. Exhumation of ultrahigh-pressure continental crust in east central China: Late Triassic-Early Jurassic tectonic unroofing[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2000, 105(B6):13339-13364.
[27]	FAURE M, LIN W, SCHÄRER U, et al. Continental subduction and exhumation of UHP rocks. Structural and geochronological insights from the Dabieshan (East China)[J]. Lithos, 2003, 70(3/4):213-241. DOI URL
[28]	石永红. 大别山太湖地区榴辉岩变质p-T条件及构造意义[D]. 北京: 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所, 2004.
[29]	王清晨. 大别山造山带高压-超高压变质岩的折返过程[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(5):1607-1620.
[30]	ZHENG Y F. Subduction zone geochemistry[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2019, 10(4):1223-1254. DOI URL
[31]	索书田, 钟增球, 游振东. 大别—苏鲁超高压-高压变质带伸展构造格架及其动力学意义[J]. 地质学报, 2001, 75(1):14-24.
[32]	郑永飞. 超高压变质与大陆碰撞研究进展: 以大别—苏鲁造山带为例[J]. 科学通报, 2008, 53(18):2129-2152.
[33]	吴萍萍, 王椿镛, 丁志峰, 等. 大别—苏鲁及邻区上地幔的各向异性[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(8): 12:2539-2550.
[34]	徐佩芬, 刘福田, 王清晨, 等. 大别—苏鲁碰撞造山带的地震层析成像研究: 岩石圈三维速度结构[J]. 地球物理学报, 2000, 43(3):377-385.
[35]	YANG W, WANG J. Geophysical evidences for magmatic underplating in the Sulu Area, East China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2002, 76(2):173-179.
[36]	杨文采, 方慧. 苏鲁超高压变质带北部地球物理调查(Ⅱ): 非地震方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 1999, 42(4):508-519.
[37]	杨文采. 大别苏鲁地区层状地幔反射体及其解释[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(2):191-196.
[38]	CAI F, DING L, YUE Y. Provenance analysis of upper Cretaceous strata in the Tethys Himalaya, southern Tibet: implications for timing of India-Asia collision[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 305(1/2):195-206. DOI URL
[39]	DING L, ZHONG D. Metamorphic characteristics and geotectonic implications of the high-pressure granulites from Namjagbarwa, eastern Tibet[J]. Science in China: Series D, 1999, 42(5):491-505. DOI URL
[40]	DING L, KAPP P, ZHONG D, et al. Cenozoic volcanism in Tibet: evidence for a transition from oceanic to continental subduction[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2003, 44(10):1833-1865. DOI URL
[41]	DING L, KAPP P, WAN X. Paleocene-Eocene record of ophiolite obduction and initial India-Asia collision, South central Tibet[J]. Tectonics, 2005, 24(3): TC3001.
[42]	DING L, QASIM M, JADOON I A K, et al. The India-Asia collision in north Pakistan: insight from the U-Pb detrital zircon provenance of Cenozoic foreland basin[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2016, 455:49-61. DOI URL
[43]	DING L, SPICER R A, YANG J, et al. Quantifying the rise of the Himalaya orogen and implications for the South Asian monsoon[J]. Geology, 2017, 45(3):215-218. DOI URL
[44]	DECELLES P G, KAPP P, GEHRELS G E, et al. Paleocene-Eocene foreland basin evolution in the Himalaya of southern Tibet and Nepal: implications for the age of initial India-Asia collision[J]. Tectonics, 2014, 33(5):824-849. DOI URL
[45]	GUILLOT S, MAHÉO G, SIGOYER J, et al. Tethyan and Indian subduction viewed from the Himalayan high- to ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks[J]. Tectonophysics, 2008, 451(1/2/3/4):225-241. DOI URL
[46]	WU F Y, JI W Q, WANG J G, et al. Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic constraints on the onset time of India-Asia collision[J]. American Journal of Science, 2014, 314(2):548-579. DOI URL
[47]	ZHANG Q, DING L, WILLEMS H. Initial India-Asia continental collision and foreland basin evolution in the Tethyan Himalaya of Tibet: evidence from stratigraphy and paleontology[J]. Journal of Geology, 2012, 120(2):175-189. DOI URL
[48]	DING H X, ZHANG Z M, DONG X, et al. Early Eocene (c. 50 Ma) collision of the Indian and Asian continents: constraints from the North Himalayan metamorphic rocks, southeastern Tibet[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2016, 435:64-73. DOI URL
[49]	MUKHERJEE B K, SACHAN H K. Discovery of coesite from Indian Himalaya: a record of ultra-high pressure metamorphism in Indian continental crust[J]. Current Science, 2001, 81(10):1358-1361.
[50]	O’BRIEN P J, ZOTOV N, LAW R, et al. Coesite in eclogite from the Upper Kaghan Valley, Pakistan: a first record and implications[J]. Terra Nostra, 1999, 99(2):109-111.
[51]	O’BRIEN P J, ZOTOV N, LAW R, et al. Coesite in Himalayan eclogite and implications for models of India-Asia collision[J]. Geology, 2001, 29(5):435-438. DOI URL
[52]	PARRISH R R, GOUGH S J, SEARLE M P, et al. Plate velocity exhumation of ultrahigh-pressure eclogites in the Pakistan Himalaya[J]. Geology, 2006, 34(11):989-992. DOI URL
[53]	ZHANG Z M, DONG X, DING H X, et al. Metamorphism and partial melting of the Himalayan orogen[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(8):2313-234.
[54]	ZHANG Z, DING H, PALIN R M, et al. On the origin of high-pressure mafic granulite in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis: implications for the tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen[J]. Gondwana Research, 2021 (in press).
[55]	WILKE F D H, O’BRIEN P J, ALTENBERGER U, et al. Multi-stage reaction history in different eclogite types from the Pakistan Himalaya and implications for exhumation processes[J]. Lithos, 2010, 114(1/2):70-85. DOI URL
[56]	KANEKO Y, KATAYAMA I, YAMAMOTO H, et al. Timing of Himalayan ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism: sinking rate and subduction angle of the Indian continental crust beneath Asia[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2003, 21(6):589-599. DOI URL
[57]	O’BRIEN P J. Eclogites and other high-pressure rocks in the Himalaya: a review[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2019, 483(1):183-213. DOI URL
[58]	ZHANG D D, DING L, CHEN Y, et al. Two contrasting exhumation scenarios of deeply subducted continental crust in North Pakistan[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2022 (in press).
[59]	WANG Y, ZHANG L, ZHANG J, et al. The youngest eclogite in central Himalaya: p-T path, U-Pb zircon age and its tectonic implication[J]. Gondwana Research, 2017, 41:188-206. DOI URL
[60]	LI Q, ZHANG L, FU B, et al. Petrology and zircon U-Pb dating of well-preserved eclogites from the Thongmön area in central Himalaya and their tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2019, 37(2):203-226. DOI URL
[61]	WANG J M, LANARI P, WU F Y, et al. First evidence of eclogites overprinted by ultrahigh temperature metamorphism in Everest East, Himalaya: implications for collisional tectonics on early Earth[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2021, 558:116760. DOI URL
[62]	GROPPO C, LOMBARDO B, ROLFO F, et al. Clockwise exhumation path of granulitized eclogites from the Ama Drime range (eastern Himalayas)[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2007, 25(1):51-75. DOI URL
[63]	KUFNER S K, KAKAR N, BEZADA M, et al. The Hindu Kush slab break-off as revealed by deep structure and crustal deformation[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1):1-11. DOI URL
[64]	ISCHUK A, BENDICK R, RYBIN A, et al. Kinematics of the Pamir and Hindu Kush regions from GPS geodesy[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2013, 118(5):2408-2416. DOI URL
[65]	SHAH S T H, ZHAO J, XIAO Q, et al. Electrical resistivity structures and tectonic implications of Main Karakorum Thrust (MKT) in the Western Himalayas: NNE Pakistan[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2018, 279:57-66. DOI URL
[66]	SIPPL C, SCHURR B, TYMPEL J, et al. Deep burial of Asian continental crust beneath the Pamir imaged with local earthquake tomography[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2013, 384:165-177. DOI URL
[67]	李玮, 陈赟, 谭萍, 等. 大陆深俯冲的深浅动力学响应: 来自帕米尔高原地壳精细结构的约束[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50(5):663-676.
[68]	LI W, CHEN Y, YUAN X, et al. Continental lithospheric subduction and intermediate-depth seismicity: constraints from S-wave velocity structures in the Pamir and Hindu Kush[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2018, 482:478-489. DOI URL
[69]	ZHAO L, XU X, MALUSÀ M G. Seismic probing of continental subduction zones[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017, 145:37-45. DOI URL
[70]	ZHAO L, MALUSÀ M G, YUAN H, et al. Author correction: evidence for a serpentinized plate interface favouring continental subduction[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1):1-8. DOI URL
[71]	ZHAO L, PAUL A, GUILLOT S, et al. First seismic evidence for continental subduction beneath the Western Alps[J]. Geology, 2015, 43(9):815-818. DOI URL
[72]	刘福田, 徐佩芬, 刘劲松, 等. 大陆深俯冲带的地壳速度结构: 东大别造山带深地震宽角反射/折射研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(3):366-372.
[73]	范桃园, 石耀霖, 汪集旸, 等. 影响超高压变质岩p-T-t轨迹特征的主要因素[J]. 地球物理进展, 2007, 22(5):1352-1360.
[74]	ERNST W G, MARUYAMA S, WALLIS S. Buoyancy-driven, rapid exhumation of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphosed continental crust[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997, 94(18):9532-9537. DOI URL
[75]	MARUYAMA S, LIOU J G, ZHANG R. Tectonic evolution of the ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) and high-pressure (HP) metamorphic belts from central China[J]. Island Arc, 1994, 3(2):112-121. DOI URL
[76]	MERLE O, GUILLIER B. The building of the Central Swiss Alps: an experimental approach[J]. Tectonophysics, 1989, 165(1/2/3/4):41-56. DOI URL
[77]	WHEELER J. Structural evolution of a subducted continental sliver: the northern Dora Maira massif, Italian Alps[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 1991, 148(6):1101-1113. DOI URL
[78]	CLOOS M, SHREVE R L. Subduction-channel model of prism accretion, melange formation, sediment subduction, and subduction erosion at convergent plate margins: 1. Background and description[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1988, 128(3):455-500. DOI URL
[79]	BEAUMONT C, JAMIESON R A, NGUYEN M H, et al. Himalayan tectonics explained by extrusion of a low-viscosity crustal channel coupled to focused surface denudation[J]. Nature, 2001, 414(6865):738-742. DOI URL
[80]	GERYA T V, STOCKHERTÖ B, PERCHUK A L. Exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic rocks in a subduction channel: a numerical simulation[J]. Tectonics, 2002, 21(6):1056.
[81]	郑永飞, 张立飞, 刘良, 等. 大陆深俯冲与超高压变质研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2013, 32(2):135-158.
[82]	MALUSÀ M G, FACCENNA C, GARZANTI E, et al. Divergence in subduction zones and exhumation of high pressure rocks (Eocene Western Alps)[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 310(1/2):21-32. DOI URL
[83]	ANDERSEN T B, JAMTVEIT B, DEWEY J F, et al. Subduction and eduction of continental crust: major mechanisms during continent-continent collision and orogenic extensional collapse, a model based on the south Norwegian Caledonides[J]. Terra Nova, 1991, 3(3):303-310. DOI URL
[84]	BRUN J P, FACCENNA C. Exhumation of high-pressure rocks driven by slab rollback[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2008, 272(1/2):1-7. DOI URL
[85]	DURETZ T, PETRI B, MOHN G, et al. The importance of structural softening for the evolution and architecture of passive margins[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1):1-7. DOI URL
[86]	WANG Y, ZHANG L F, LI Z H, et al. The exhumation of subducted oceanic-derived eclogites: insights from phase equilibrium and thermomechanical modeling[J]. Tectonics, 2019, 38(5):1764-1797. DOI URL
[87]	HACKER B R, GERYA T V, GILOTTI J A. Formation and exhumation of ultrahigh-pressure terranes[J]. Elements, 2013, 9(4):289-293. DOI URL
[88]	李忠海. 大陆俯冲-碰撞-折返的动力学数值模拟研究综述[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2014, 44(5):817-841
[89]	张建新. 俯冲隧道研究: 进展, 问题及其挑战[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50(12):1671-1691.

全球典型大陆造山带中榴辉岩的折返机制:来自变质岩和地球物理的限制

The exhumation mechanism of eclogites in continental orogenic belts: Metamorphic petrology and geophysical constraints

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 89

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨文采. 固体地球物理学与板块大地构造学的交汇[J]. 地学前缘, 20140101, 21(1): 89-99.
[2]	曾忠诚, 洪增林, 边小卫, 陈宁, 张若愚, 李琦. 阿尔金造山带南缘晚奥陶世赞岐质闪长岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 345-357.
[3]	张洪瑞, 侯增谦. 碰撞带热结构与碰撞成矿系统[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 1-13.
[4]	李文辉, 王海燕, 高锐, 卢占武, 李洪强, 侯贺晟, 熊小松, 叶卓. 秦岭造山带及邻区上地壳精细速度结构研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 198-209.
[5]	寇彩化, 刘燕学, 李江, 李廷栋, 丁孝忠, 刘勇, 靳胜凯. 江南造山带西段桂北四堡地区830 Ma辉长岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学特征及其岩石成因研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 218-233.
[6]	Valentina V. MORDVINOVA, Maria A. KHRITOVA, Elena A. KOBELEVA, Mikhail M. KOBELEV, Evgeniy Kh. TURUTANOV, Victor S. KANAYKIN. 远震数据显示贝加尔裂谷带北穆伊斯克(Severomuysk)段地壳和上地幔的精细结构[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 378-392.
[7]	刘勇, 李廷栋, 肖庆辉, 张克信, 朱小辉, 丁孝忠. 洋板块地质研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 79-93.
[8]	黄冉笑, 王果胜, 袁国礼, 邱坤峰, Hounkpe Jechonias BIDOSSESSI. 伟晶质岩浆的同化混染与分离结晶(AFC)作用及铀成矿效应:以纳米比亚湖山铀矿为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 377-402.
[9]	张宝林, 吕古贤, 余建国, 梁光河, 李志远, 徐兴旺, 胡宝群, 王红才, 毕珉峰, 焦建刚, 王翠芝. 基于深部地球物理信息的构造变形岩相分类研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 413-426.
[10]	赵俊猛, 张培震, 张先康, Xiaohui YUAN, Rainer KIND, Robertvander HILST, 甘卫军, 孙继敏, 邓涛, 刘红兵, 裴顺平, 徐强, 张衡, 嘉世旭, 颜茂都, 郭晓玉, 卢占武, 杨小平, 邓攻, 琚长辉. 中国西部壳幔结构与动力学过程及其对资源环境的制约:“羚羊计划”研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(5): 230-259.
[11]	黄海永, 徐扬, 尹须伟, 杨坤光, 刘雨. 西大别桥店花岗斑岩脉的形成时代、岩石成因及其大地构造意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(5): 380-412.
[12]	Evgeny Kh. TURUTANOV, Evgeny V. SKLYAROV, Valentina V. MORDVINOVA, Anatoly M. MAZUKABZOV, Viktor S. KANAYKIN. 俄罗斯-蒙古地学断面地壳模型的地质-地球物理资料综合研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(5): 260-282.
[13]	曾庆栋, 底青云, 薛国强, 王功文, 荆林海. 成矿模式与找矿模式研究的现代科学技术[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 295-308.
[14]	张嘉玮, 陈建书, 吴滔, 叶太平, 陈明华, 代雅然, 邓小杰, 牟军. 湘黔桂新元古代拉伸纪晚期地层年代格架对比及关键地质事件初探[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 1-16.
[15]	韩瑶, 张传恒, 李利阳, 蒋先强, 刘子荟. 皖南前南华纪浅变质岩系的沉积地质特征及其构造古地理意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 282-293.