Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 156-173.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.32
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-07-07
Revised:
2022-08-09
Online:
2023-01-25
Published:
2022-10-20
CLC Number:
HE Wenyuan. Preliminary study on nanopores, nanofissures, and in situ accumulation of Gulong shale oil[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 156-173.
点号 | wB/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | O | Na | Mg | Al | Si | K | Fe | |
70 | 41.12 | 21.54 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 9.31 | 17.56 | 5.15 | 2.31 |
71 | 35.66 | 23.55 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 10.95 | 20.03 | 5.79 | 2.55 |
72 | 40.83 | 13.53 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 11.13 | 22.84 | 7.19 | 3.02 |
73 | 50.95 | 20.26 | 0.83 | 0.35 | 5.56 | 15.22 | 2.42 | 1.66 |
74 | 56.44 | 18.07 | 0.89 | 0.25 | 4.19 | 12.99 | 1.72 | 2.18 |
75 | 26.41 | 32.72 | 4.84 | 7.50 | 23.59 | 0.26 | 3.63 | |
76 | 16.99 | 33.35 | 4.11 | 10.53 | 32.09 | 2.08 | 0.85 | |
77 | 60.47 | 12.55 | 1.11 | 0.12 | 3.12 | 13.24 | 0.98 | 5.39 |
78 | 41.42 | 16.36 | 2.08 | 37.15 | 2.34 | 0.65 | ||
79 | 31.26 | 19.41 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 8.05 | 34.64 | 3.78 | 1.77 |
82 | 72.24 | 15.66 | 0.46 | 0.13 | 1.70 | 6.56 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
80 | 31.84 | 19.42 | 0.28 | 0.81 | 11.65 | 27.72 | 5.78 | 2.50 |
81 | 82.69 | 10.77 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 2.17 | 0.24 | 0.36 | |
83 | 44.19 | 21.45 | 0.51 | 1.21 | 6.72 | 13.73 | 3.43 | 3.68 |
84 | 53.87 | 21.30 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 5.33 | 13.99 | 2.78 | 1.31 |
85 | 80.18 | 7.19 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 2.39 | 5.72 | 1.29 | 1.26 |
86 | 91.46 | 0.21 | 1.51 | 3.70 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.76 | 1.36 |
87 | 89.24 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 1.80 | 4.42 | 0.90 | 1.21 | |
平均值 | 52.63 | 18.08 | 1.04 | 0.68 | 5.73 | 16.87 | 2.65 | 2.02 |
Table 1 Analysis results of energy spectrum of the Qing 1 section of Guye 3HC well
点号 | wB/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | O | Na | Mg | Al | Si | K | Fe | |
70 | 41.12 | 21.54 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 9.31 | 17.56 | 5.15 | 2.31 |
71 | 35.66 | 23.55 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 10.95 | 20.03 | 5.79 | 2.55 |
72 | 40.83 | 13.53 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 11.13 | 22.84 | 7.19 | 3.02 |
73 | 50.95 | 20.26 | 0.83 | 0.35 | 5.56 | 15.22 | 2.42 | 1.66 |
74 | 56.44 | 18.07 | 0.89 | 0.25 | 4.19 | 12.99 | 1.72 | 2.18 |
75 | 26.41 | 32.72 | 4.84 | 7.50 | 23.59 | 0.26 | 3.63 | |
76 | 16.99 | 33.35 | 4.11 | 10.53 | 32.09 | 2.08 | 0.85 | |
77 | 60.47 | 12.55 | 1.11 | 0.12 | 3.12 | 13.24 | 0.98 | 5.39 |
78 | 41.42 | 16.36 | 2.08 | 37.15 | 2.34 | 0.65 | ||
79 | 31.26 | 19.41 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 8.05 | 34.64 | 3.78 | 1.77 |
82 | 72.24 | 15.66 | 0.46 | 0.13 | 1.70 | 6.56 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
80 | 31.84 | 19.42 | 0.28 | 0.81 | 11.65 | 27.72 | 5.78 | 2.50 |
81 | 82.69 | 10.77 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 2.17 | 0.24 | 0.36 | |
83 | 44.19 | 21.45 | 0.51 | 1.21 | 6.72 | 13.73 | 3.43 | 3.68 |
84 | 53.87 | 21.30 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 5.33 | 13.99 | 2.78 | 1.31 |
85 | 80.18 | 7.19 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 2.39 | 5.72 | 1.29 | 1.26 |
86 | 91.46 | 0.21 | 1.51 | 3.70 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.76 | 1.36 |
87 | 89.24 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 1.80 | 4.42 | 0.90 | 1.21 | |
平均值 | 52.63 | 18.08 | 1.04 | 0.68 | 5.73 | 16.87 | 2.65 | 2.02 |
Fig.14 Field mission scanning electron microscopic characteristics of shale of Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation in different hydrocarbon generation simulation stages, Gulong area. Modified after [23].
Fig.19 Correlation between pressurization (a) or resistances (b, c) of shale oil and gas and organic matter Ro in the Gulong area. Modified after [23].
[1] | 何文渊, 崔宝文, 王凤兰, 等. 古龙凹陷青山口组页岩储集空间及其油态的研究[J]. 地质论评, 2022, 68(2): 693-741. |
[2] | 陈昭年, 陈发景. 松辽盆地反转构造运动学特征[J]. 现代地质, 1996, 10(3): 390-396. |
[3] | 王广昀, 王凤兰, 蒙启安, 等. 古龙页岩油战略意义及攻关方向[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(3): 8-19. |
[4] | 孙龙德. 古龙页岩油(代序)[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(3): 1-7. |
[5] | 王凤兰, 付志国, 王建凯, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油特征及分类评价[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40 (5): 144-156. |
[6] | 崔宝文, 张顺, 付秀丽, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩有机层序划分及影响因素[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5): 13-28. |
[7] | 庞彦明, 张元庆, 蔡敏, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油水平井开发技术经济界线[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5): 134-142. |
[8] | 王永卓, 王瑞, 代旭, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油箱体开发设计方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(3): 157-169. |
[9] | 冯子辉, 霍秋立, 曾花森, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩有机组成与有机孔隙形成演化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2021, 40(5): 40-55. |
[10] |
KRIZEK R J, EDIL T B, OZAYYDIN I K. Preparation and identification of clay samples with controlled fabric[J]. Engineering Geology, 1975, 9: 13-38.
DOI URL |
[11] | BENNETT R H, BRYANT W R, KELLER G H. Clay fabric and geotechnical properties of selected submarine cores from the Mississippi Delta[C]//NOAA Professional Perer No.9. Washington:Department of Commerce/NOAA/ERL, 1977: 86. |
[12] | BRYANT W R, KELLER G H. Clay fabric of selected submarine sediments: fundamental properties and models[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1981, 51: 217-232. |
[13] | SCHIEBER J, REMUS L, KEVIN B, et al. An SEM study of porosity in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas: pore types and porosity distribution in a depositional and sequencestratigraphic context[M]//BREYER J A. The Eagle Ford Shale: a renaissance in U. S. oil production. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 2016, 110: 167-186. |
[14] | BENNETT R H, O’BRIEN N R, HULBERT M H. Determinants of clay and shale microfabric signatures: processes and mechanisms[M]//BENNETT R H, BRYANT W R, HULBERT M H. Microstructure of fine-grained sediments from mud to shale. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991: 22. |
[15] | AVNIMELECH Y, MENZEL R G. Coflocculation of algae and clay to clarify turbid impoundments[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1984, 39(3): 200-203. |
[16] |
AVNIMELECH Y, TROEGER B W, REED L W. Mutual flocculation of algae and clay: evidence and implications[J]. Science, 1982, 216: 63-65.
PMID |
[17] | VAN OLPHEN H. An introduction to clay colloid chemistry[J]. Soil Science, 1964, 97(4): 290. |
[18] | DEGENS E T. Geochemistry of sediments: a brief survey[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1965: 342. |
[19] | SWAIN F M. Geochemistry of humus[M]//BREGER I A. Organic geochemistry. New York: Pergamon Press, 1963: 81-147. |
[20] | HARE E. Geochemistry of proteins, peptides and amino acids[M]//EGLINTON G, MURPHY M T J. Organic geochemistry: methods and results. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1969: 438-63. |
[21] |
MOON C F, HURST C W. Fabric of muds and shales: an overview[J]. Geological Society London Special Publications, 1984, 15: 579-593.
DOI URL |
[22] | 梁光河. 大陆板块漂移是海底扩张驱动的吗?[C]//中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集. 北京: 中国地球物理学会, 2014: 541. |
[23] |
何文渊, 蒙启安, 冯子辉, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油原位成藏理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 1-13.
DOI |
[24] | 傅容珊, 黄建华, 李力刚, 等. 地球在膨胀吗? 板块运动与地球几何尺度变化[C]//中国地球物理学会第 14 届年会论文集. 西安: 西安地图出版社, 1998: 385. |
[25] | GERASIMENKO M D. The problem of the change of the Earth dimension in the light of space geodesy data[M]//SCALERA G, JACOB K H. Why expanding Earth? Berkeley: INGV Publisher, 2003: 395-405. |
[26] | 孙榕, 申文斌. 由空间大地测量数据探测地球膨胀[C]//中国地球物理学会第26届年会、中国地震学会第13次学术大会论文集. 北京: 地震出版社, 2010: 719-720. |
[27] | 何永祥. 天然沸石对水体中甲基橙和亚甲基蓝的吸附研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2007. |
[28] |
梁狄刚, 冉隆辉, 戴弹申, 等. 四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 8-17.
DOI |
[29] | 柳波, 吕延防, 冉清昌, 等. 松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩油形成地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2): 280-285. |
[30] | 金旭, 李国欣, 孟思炜, 等. 陆相页岩油可动用性微观综合评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 222-232. |
[31] | 冯子辉, 柳波, 邵红梅, 等. 松辽盆地古龙地区青山口组泥页岩成岩演化与储集性能[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(3): 72-85. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||