Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 436-447.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.7.5
Previous Articles Next Articles
FAN Qi1,2(), FAN Tailiang2,*(), LI Qingping1, ZHANG Yan3, GU Yu2, SHANG Yaxin2
Received:
2020-02-20
Revised:
2020-06-15
Online:
2021-09-25
Published:
2021-10-30
Contact:
FAN Tailiang
CLC Number:
FAN Qi, FAN Tailiang, LI Qingping, ZHANG Yan, GU Yu, SHANG Yaxin. Carbon isotope excursion and its genetic mechanism during the Sinian to Cambrian transition in the northern Tarim Basi[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(5): 436-447.
地层 | 样品号 | 岩性 | 深度/ cm | TC含量/ % | TOC含量/ % | δ13Ccarb/ ‰ | δ18Ocarb/ ‰ | w(Fe)/ % | Mn/Sr | Mg/Ca | U/Al | Th/U |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
奇格布 拉克组 | SG8-1 | 白云岩 | 2 020.00 | 12.16 | 0.33 | 1.90 | -5.20 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 7.35 | 0.35 |
SG8-2 | 白云岩 | 1 975.00 | 12.08 | 0.30 | 2.40 | -6.00 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 1.82 | 1.41 | |
玉尔吐 斯组 | SG8-3 | 磷块岩 | 1 957.00 | 5.03 | 2.87 | 1.40 | -8.90 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 5.33 | 0.25 |
SG8-4 | 磷块岩 | 1 947.00 | 0.11 | 0.08 | — | — | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 5.08 | 0.29 | |
SG8-5 | 磷块岩 | 1 920.00 | 0.40 | 0.21 | -10.30 | -6.00 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 96.66 | 0.00 | |
SG8-6 | 页岩 | 1 872.00 | 1.28 | 1.11 | -6.90 | -7.20 | 7.35 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 44.47 | 0.02 | |
SG8-7 | 页岩 | 1 847.00 | 3.87 | 3.70 | -6.80 | -9.20 | 6.93 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 29.67 | 0.04 | |
SG8-8 | 磷块岩 | 1 841.00 | 0.16 | 0.12 | -7.80 | -11.80 | 6.05 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 3.88 | 0.36 | |
SG8-9 | 泥灰岩 | 1 826.00 | 10.80 | 0.32 | 3.20 | -7.50 | 1.69 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 7.74 | 0.45 | |
SG8-10 | 砂屑灰岩 | 1 808.00 | 5.96 | 0.25 | 2.70 | -8.20 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 12.38 | 0.15 | |
SG8-11 | 白云岩 | 1 786.00 | 12.40 | 0.24 | 4.10 | -8.30 | 1.19 | 0.02 | 0.57 | 1.92 | 1.28 | |
SG8-12 | 白云岩 | 1 594.00 | 12.00 | 0.23 | 1.40 | -7.40 | 3.29 | 0.01 | 0.54 | 4.11 | 0.77 | |
SG8-13 | 白云岩 | 1 575.00 | 6.37 | 0.18 | 0.20 | -5.00 | 1.77 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 2.46 | 0.81 | |
SG8-14 | 石膏 | 1 544.00 | 8.28 | 0.09 | -1.90 | -5.20 | 6.15 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 3.45 | 0.74 | |
SG8-15 | 泥灰岩 | 1 530.00 | 7.42 | 0.18 | -1.00 | -7.00 | 3.44 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 11.86 | 0.39 | |
SG8-16 | 泥灰岩 | 1 495.00 | 2.19 | 0.52 | -0.40 | -5.40 | 3.85 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 2.10 | |
SG8-17 | 重晶石 | 1 452.00 | 11.36 | 0.10 | -2.70 | -7.20 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 3.11 | 0.56 | |
SG8-18 | 泥灰岩 | 1 420.00 | 2.03 | 0.89 | 0.30 | -4.40 | 3.03 | 0.02 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.56 | |
SG8-19 | 粉砂岩 | 1 387.00 | 10.50 | 0.12 | -2.70 | -7.30 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 11.09 | 1.22 | |
SG8-20 | 页岩 | 1 360.00 | 1.67 | 1.29 | 0.20 | -6.00 | 3.67 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 1.88 | 0.96 | |
SG8-21 | 重晶石 | 1 317.00 | 10.10 | 0.11 | -2.50 | -6.60 | 2.67 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 2.72 | 0.72 | |
SG8-22 | 页岩 | 1 295.00 | 2.34 | 0.60 | 0.60 | -3.10 | 3.70 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 2.66 | 0.82 | |
SG8-23 | 泥灰岩 | 1 255.00 | 10.90 | 0.14 | -2.80 | -7.20 | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 6.19 | 0.26 | |
SG8-24 | 重晶石 | 1 100.00 | 11.00 | 0.02 | -2.10 | -7.40 | 1.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.51 | 1.31 | |
SG8-25 | 泥灰岩 | 1 075.00 | 11.60 | 0.04 | -1.60 | -6.80 | 1.16 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 3.74 | 0.51 | |
SG8-26 | 云灰岩 | 978.00 | 11.50 | 0.02 | -0.50 | -7.30 | 1.96 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 2.92 | 0.88 | |
SG8-27 | 云灰岩 | 864.00 | 2.72 | 0.14 | 0.40 | -5.50 | 3.54 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.69 | 3.23 | |
SG8-28 | 泥灰岩 | 810.00 | 11.10 | 0.08 | 0.30 | -6.40 | 2.81 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 1.42 | 2.33 | |
SG8-29 | 灰岩 | 762.00 | 10.40 | 0.06 | 0.70 | -6.70 | 2.05 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.75 | 3.56 | |
SG8-30 | 白云岩 | 714.00 | 11.10 | 0.07 | 0.40 | -7.40 | 1.59 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 2.49 | 1.28 | |
SG8-31 | 页岩 | 694.00 | 4.28 | 0.79 | 0.40 | -6.80 | 3.68 | 0.10 | 0.37 | 1.78 | 1.35 | |
SG8-32 | 泥灰岩 | 575.00 | 11.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | -7.70 | 1.18 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 1.32 | 1.84 | |
SG8-33 | 云灰岩 | 544.00 | 11.00 | 0.12 | -0.10 | -7.40 | 1.15 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 1.23 | 2.27 | |
SG8-34 | 云灰岩 | 496.00 | 10.10 | 0.09 | 0.20 | -6.80 | 2.11 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.77 | 3.91 | |
SG8-35 | 白云岩 | 396.00 | 11.00 | 0.19 | -1.00 | -7.20 | 1.40 | 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 2.67 | |
SG8-36 | 白云岩 | 326.00 | 10.70 | 0.12 | -1.00 | -7.40 | 1.03 | 0.04 | 0.56 | 1.79 | 1.52 | |
SG8-37 | 云灰岩 | 251.00 | 8.74 | 0.18 | -2.00 | -7.90 | 3.65 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 18.11 | 0.44 | |
SG8-38 | 白云岩 | 216.00 | 12.30 | 0.24 | -1.70 | -7.80 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 7.67 | 0.38 | |
肖尔布 拉克组 | SG8-39 | 硅质岩 | 116.00 | 6.64 | 0.98 | -1.10 | -8.00 | 1.62 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 17.10 | 0.17 |
SG8-40 | 白云岩 | 47.00 | 12.90 | 0.63 | -3.40 | -7.50 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 109.93 | 0.04 |
Table 1 Geochemical data, results of carbon and oxygen isotopic analysis, and redox indexes of samples from the Sugaitebulake section
地层 | 样品号 | 岩性 | 深度/ cm | TC含量/ % | TOC含量/ % | δ13Ccarb/ ‰ | δ18Ocarb/ ‰ | w(Fe)/ % | Mn/Sr | Mg/Ca | U/Al | Th/U |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
奇格布 拉克组 | SG8-1 | 白云岩 | 2 020.00 | 12.16 | 0.33 | 1.90 | -5.20 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 7.35 | 0.35 |
SG8-2 | 白云岩 | 1 975.00 | 12.08 | 0.30 | 2.40 | -6.00 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 1.82 | 1.41 | |
玉尔吐 斯组 | SG8-3 | 磷块岩 | 1 957.00 | 5.03 | 2.87 | 1.40 | -8.90 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 5.33 | 0.25 |
SG8-4 | 磷块岩 | 1 947.00 | 0.11 | 0.08 | — | — | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 5.08 | 0.29 | |
SG8-5 | 磷块岩 | 1 920.00 | 0.40 | 0.21 | -10.30 | -6.00 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 96.66 | 0.00 | |
SG8-6 | 页岩 | 1 872.00 | 1.28 | 1.11 | -6.90 | -7.20 | 7.35 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 44.47 | 0.02 | |
SG8-7 | 页岩 | 1 847.00 | 3.87 | 3.70 | -6.80 | -9.20 | 6.93 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 29.67 | 0.04 | |
SG8-8 | 磷块岩 | 1 841.00 | 0.16 | 0.12 | -7.80 | -11.80 | 6.05 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 3.88 | 0.36 | |
SG8-9 | 泥灰岩 | 1 826.00 | 10.80 | 0.32 | 3.20 | -7.50 | 1.69 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 7.74 | 0.45 | |
SG8-10 | 砂屑灰岩 | 1 808.00 | 5.96 | 0.25 | 2.70 | -8.20 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 12.38 | 0.15 | |
SG8-11 | 白云岩 | 1 786.00 | 12.40 | 0.24 | 4.10 | -8.30 | 1.19 | 0.02 | 0.57 | 1.92 | 1.28 | |
SG8-12 | 白云岩 | 1 594.00 | 12.00 | 0.23 | 1.40 | -7.40 | 3.29 | 0.01 | 0.54 | 4.11 | 0.77 | |
SG8-13 | 白云岩 | 1 575.00 | 6.37 | 0.18 | 0.20 | -5.00 | 1.77 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 2.46 | 0.81 | |
SG8-14 | 石膏 | 1 544.00 | 8.28 | 0.09 | -1.90 | -5.20 | 6.15 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 3.45 | 0.74 | |
SG8-15 | 泥灰岩 | 1 530.00 | 7.42 | 0.18 | -1.00 | -7.00 | 3.44 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 11.86 | 0.39 | |
SG8-16 | 泥灰岩 | 1 495.00 | 2.19 | 0.52 | -0.40 | -5.40 | 3.85 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 2.10 | |
SG8-17 | 重晶石 | 1 452.00 | 11.36 | 0.10 | -2.70 | -7.20 | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 3.11 | 0.56 | |
SG8-18 | 泥灰岩 | 1 420.00 | 2.03 | 0.89 | 0.30 | -4.40 | 3.03 | 0.02 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.56 | |
SG8-19 | 粉砂岩 | 1 387.00 | 10.50 | 0.12 | -2.70 | -7.30 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 11.09 | 1.22 | |
SG8-20 | 页岩 | 1 360.00 | 1.67 | 1.29 | 0.20 | -6.00 | 3.67 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 1.88 | 0.96 | |
SG8-21 | 重晶石 | 1 317.00 | 10.10 | 0.11 | -2.50 | -6.60 | 2.67 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 2.72 | 0.72 | |
SG8-22 | 页岩 | 1 295.00 | 2.34 | 0.60 | 0.60 | -3.10 | 3.70 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 2.66 | 0.82 | |
SG8-23 | 泥灰岩 | 1 255.00 | 10.90 | 0.14 | -2.80 | -7.20 | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 6.19 | 0.26 | |
SG8-24 | 重晶石 | 1 100.00 | 11.00 | 0.02 | -2.10 | -7.40 | 1.10 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.51 | 1.31 | |
SG8-25 | 泥灰岩 | 1 075.00 | 11.60 | 0.04 | -1.60 | -6.80 | 1.16 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 3.74 | 0.51 | |
SG8-26 | 云灰岩 | 978.00 | 11.50 | 0.02 | -0.50 | -7.30 | 1.96 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 2.92 | 0.88 | |
SG8-27 | 云灰岩 | 864.00 | 2.72 | 0.14 | 0.40 | -5.50 | 3.54 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.69 | 3.23 | |
SG8-28 | 泥灰岩 | 810.00 | 11.10 | 0.08 | 0.30 | -6.40 | 2.81 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 1.42 | 2.33 | |
SG8-29 | 灰岩 | 762.00 | 10.40 | 0.06 | 0.70 | -6.70 | 2.05 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.75 | 3.56 | |
SG8-30 | 白云岩 | 714.00 | 11.10 | 0.07 | 0.40 | -7.40 | 1.59 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 2.49 | 1.28 | |
SG8-31 | 页岩 | 694.00 | 4.28 | 0.79 | 0.40 | -6.80 | 3.68 | 0.10 | 0.37 | 1.78 | 1.35 | |
SG8-32 | 泥灰岩 | 575.00 | 11.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | -7.70 | 1.18 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 1.32 | 1.84 | |
SG8-33 | 云灰岩 | 544.00 | 11.00 | 0.12 | -0.10 | -7.40 | 1.15 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 1.23 | 2.27 | |
SG8-34 | 云灰岩 | 496.00 | 10.10 | 0.09 | 0.20 | -6.80 | 2.11 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.77 | 3.91 | |
SG8-35 | 白云岩 | 396.00 | 11.00 | 0.19 | -1.00 | -7.20 | 1.40 | 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 2.67 | |
SG8-36 | 白云岩 | 326.00 | 10.70 | 0.12 | -1.00 | -7.40 | 1.03 | 0.04 | 0.56 | 1.79 | 1.52 | |
SG8-37 | 云灰岩 | 251.00 | 8.74 | 0.18 | -2.00 | -7.90 | 3.65 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 18.11 | 0.44 | |
SG8-38 | 白云岩 | 216.00 | 12.30 | 0.24 | -1.70 | -7.80 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 7.67 | 0.38 | |
肖尔布 拉克组 | SG8-39 | 硅质岩 | 116.00 | 6.64 | 0.98 | -1.10 | -8.00 | 1.62 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 17.10 | 0.17 |
SG8-40 | 白云岩 | 47.00 | 12.90 | 0.63 | -3.40 | -7.50 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 109.93 | 0.04 |
Fig.6 Stratigraphic correlation framework comparing the Tarim (Sugaitebulake section) and Yangtze (Three Gorges, Ladin and Xiaotan sections) platforms. Modified from [18-19,25].
Fig.7 Stratigraphic correlation framework comparing the Tarim Platform (Sugaitebulake section) with other plates (Siberia, Oman and Morocco) in the Sinian-Cambrian transition period. Modified after [25-27].
[1] |
BAMHACH R K. Phanerozoic biodiversity mass extinctions[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2006, 34(1):127-155.
DOI URL |
[2] |
ZHU M Y, STRAUSS H, SHIELDS G A. From snowball earth to the Cambrian bioradiation: calibration of Ediacaran-Cambrian Earth history in South China[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2007, 254(1/2):1-6.
DOI URL |
[3] | 史晓颖, 李一良, 曹长群. 生命起源、早期演化阶段与海洋环境演变[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(6):128-139. |
[4] | 陈斐然, 张颖, 徐祖新, 等. 全球前寒武—寒武系含油气盆地石油地质特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4):974-989. |
[5] | 许效松, 汪正江, 万方, 等. 塔里木盆地早古生代构造古地理演化与烃源岩[J]. 地学前缘, 2005, 12(3):49-57. |
[6] | 贾建忠, 万晓樵, 张翼翼, 等. 白垩纪中期海相富有机碳沉积的地球生物学背景[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(5):143-152. |
[7] | 钱建新, 肖兵. 新疆阿克苏—乌什地区早寒武世小壳动物群[G]//地层古生物论文集. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984: 65-90. |
[8] | 肖兵, 段承华. 新疆早寒武世玉尔吐斯小壳动物群再研究[J]. 新疆地质, 1992(3):212-232. |
[9] | 肖兵. 化石Anabarites的发现及再论玉尔吐斯组的时代归属[J]. 新疆地质, 1989(4):35-39. |
[10] | 钱逸, 冯伟民, 李国祥, 等. 新疆寒武纪早期单壳类软体动物化石分类学与生物地层学[J]. 微体古生物学报, 2009, 26(3):193-210. |
[11] | 张光亚, 刘伟, 张磊, 等. 塔里木克拉通寒武纪—奥陶纪原型盆地、岩相古地理与油气[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(3):269-276. |
[12] | 李日俊, 张洪安, 钱一雄, 等. 关于南天山碰撞造山时代的讨论[J]. 地质科学, 2010, 45(1):57-65. |
[13] | 陆松年, 李怀坤, 陈志宏. 塔里木与扬子新元古代热-构造事件特征、序列和时代: 扬子与塔里木连接(YZ-TAR)假设[J]. 地学前缘, 2003, 10(4):321-326. |
[14] | 樊奇, 樊太亮, 李一凡, 等. 塔里木地台北缘早寒武世古海洋氧化-还原环境与优质海相烃源岩发育模式[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(1):285-302. |
[15] | 樊茹, 邓胜徽, 张学磊. 寒武系碳同位素漂移事件的全球对比性分析[J]. 中国科学: D辑, 2011, 41(12):1829-1839. |
[16] |
GUO Q J, DENG Y N, HU J, et al. Carbonate carbon isotope evolution of seawater across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: evidence from the Keping area, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Geological Magazine, 2017, 154(6):1244-1256.
DOI URL |
[17] |
WANG X L, HU W X, YAO S P, et al. Carbon and strontium isotopes and global correlation of Cambrian Series 2 to Series 3 carbonate rocks in the Keping area of the northwestern Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(5):992-1002.
DOI URL |
[18] |
ISHIKAWA T, UENO Y, KOMIYA T, et al. Carbon isotope chemostratigraphy of a Precambrian/Cambrian boundary section in the Three Gorge area, South China: prominent global-scale isotope excursions just before the Cambrian explosion[J]. Gondwana Research, 2008, 14(1/2):193-208.
DOI URL |
[19] |
KIKUMOTOI R, TAHATA M, NISHIZAWA M, et al. Nitrogen isotope chemostratigraphy of the Ediacaran and Early Cambrian platform sequence at Three Gorges, South China[J]. Gondwana Research, 2014, 25(3):1057-1069.
DOI URL |
[20] | 旷红伟, 李家华, 彭楠, 等. 燕山地区1.6~1.0 Ga时期碳酸盐岩碳、氧同位素组成、演化及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(5):118-133. |
[21] |
VEIZER J, ALA D, AZMY K, et al. 87Sr/86Sr, δ13C and δ18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater[J]. Chemical Geology, 1999, 161(1):59-88.
DOI URL |
[22] |
MARSHALL J D. Climatic and oceanographic isotopic signals from the carbonate rock record and their preservation[J]. Geological Magazine, 1992, 129(2):143-160.
DOI URL |
[23] | PENG S, BABCOOK L E, COOPER R A. The geological time scale, Chapter 19: the Cambrian Period[M]//The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012: 1-52. |
[24] |
GUO Q, STRAUSS H, ZHU M, et al. High resolution organic carbon isotope stratigraphy from a slope to basinal setting on the Yangtze Platform, South China: implications for the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition[J]. Precambrian Research, 2013, 225:209-217.
DOI URL |
[25] |
LI D, LING H F, SHIELDS-ZHOU G A, et al. Carbon and strontium isotope evolution of seawater across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: evidence from the Xiaotan section, NE Yunnan, South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2013, 225:128-147.
DOI URL |
[26] | KAUFMAN A J, KNOLL A H, SEMIKHATOV M A, et al. Integrated chronostratigraphy of Proterozoic-Cambrian boundary beds in the western Anabar region, northern Siberia[J]. Geological Magazine, 1996, 133(5):505-553. |
[27] |
AMTHOR J E, GROTZINGER J P, SCHRODER S, et al. Extinction of Cloudina and Namacalathus at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary in Oman[J]. Geology, 2003, 31(5):431-434.
DOI URL |
[28] | 何秀彬, 徐备, 袁志云. 新疆柯坪地区新元古代晚期地层碳同位素组成及其对比[J]. 科学通报, 2007, 52(1):107-113. |
[29] |
GROTZINGER J P, BOWRING S A, SAYLOR B Z, et al. Biostratigraphic and geochronologic constraints on early animal evolution[J]. Science, 1995, 270(5236):598-604.
DOI URL |
[30] |
BOWRING S A, GROTZINGER J P, ISACHSEN C E, et al. Calibrating rates of Early Cambrian evolution[J]. Science, 1993, 261(5126):1293-1298.
DOI URL |
[31] | 杜小弟, 刘万洙, 王东坡. 碳氧同位素与海平面变化: 以新疆柯坪地区上震旦统—奥陶系碳氧同位素剖面为例[J]. 世界地质, 1994, 13(3):120-123. |
[1] | MENG Qingxiu, CAO Zicheng, DING Wenlong, YANG Debin, MA Hailong, DIAO Xindong, WANG Ming, HAN Pengyuan, WANG Huanhuan. Fracture stages and distribution patterns in Cambrian fractured dolomite reservoirs, Sandaoqiao gas field [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(5): 247-262. |
[2] | GU Yu, WU Jun, FAN Tailiang, LÜ Junling. Lithological associations, deformation characteristics of the Lower-Middle Cambrian and their influence on oil and gas migration in the North-central Tarim Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(5): 313-331. |
[3] | LI Fenglei, LIN Chengyan, REN Lihua, ZHANG Guoyin, GUAN Baozhu. Characteristics of deep karst fracture-cavity reservoir formation controlled by multi-phase faults matching in the northern Tarim Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(4): 219-236. |
[4] | CHEN Changjin, CHENG Xiaogan, LIN Xiubin, LI Feng, TIAN Hefeng, QU Mengxue, SUN Siyao. Modeling of the Cenozoic subsidence of northern Tarim Basin using elastic plate numerical model: Implications for uplift of South Tian Shan [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(4): 340-353. |
[5] | WANG Junpeng, ZENG Lianbo, XU Zhenping, WANG Ke, ZENG Qinglu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHANG Ronghu, JIANG Jun. The impact of diagenetic fluids on the structural fracture filling and dissolution alteration of ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoirs: a case study of the Kelasu oil and gas field in the Tarim Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(3): 312-323. |
[6] | XU Zhaohui, HU Suyun, ZENG Hongliu, MA Debo, LUO Ping, HU Zaiyuan, SHI Shuyuan, CHEN Xiuyan, TAO Xiaowan. Distribution and hydrocarbon significance of source rock in the Upper Xiaoerbulake Formation, Tarim Basin, NW China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(2): 343-358. |
[7] | WANG Ruimin, SHEN Bing. The disappearance of banded iron formations: Research progress and perspectives on the origin of rhythmic Fe-rich/Si-rich laminae [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(1): 111-126. |
[8] | REN Jishun, LIU Jianhui, ZHU Junbin. Mesozoic superposed orogenic system in eastern China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(1): 142-153. |
[9] | GAO Wei, HU Ruizhong, LI Qiuli, LIU Jianzhong, LI Xianhua. Research advances on the geochronology of Carlin-type gold deposits in the Youjiang Basin, southwestern China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(1): 267-283. |
[10] | WU Chun, LIU Hangyu, LU Feifan, LIU Bo, SHI Kaibo, HE Qing. Storm deposition characteristics and models for the Middle and Upper Cambrian in Xiaweidian, Xishan area, Beijing [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 110-124. |
[11] | LI Dan, CHANG Jian, QIU Nansheng, XIONG Yujie. Thermal analysis of ultra-deep layers and its influence on reservoir utilization in platform area, Tarim Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 135-149. |
[12] | CHEN Jianfa, XU Jin, WANG Jie, LIU Peng, CHEN Feiran, LI Maowen. Paleo-environmental variation and its control on organic enrichment in the black rock series, Cambrian Yuertusi Formation in northwestern Tarim Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 150-161. |
[13] | ZHANG Liyu, CHEN Qianglu, LI Maowen, YUAN Kun, MA Xiaoxiao, XI Binbin, YUE Yong, HUANG Taiyu. Comparative study on the organic enrichment mechanisms between western Hubei and northeastern Guizhou during the Early Cambrian [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 181-198. |
[14] | QIU Nansheng, CHANG Jian, FENG Qianqian, ZENG Shuai, LIU Xiaoyu, LI Huili, MA Anlai. Maturation history of deep and ultra-deep source rocks, central and western basins, China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 199-212. |
[15] | CHEN Zeya, CHEN Jianfa, LI Maowen, FU Rao, SHI Xiaofei, XU Xuemin, WU Jianjun. The hydrogen isotopic composition of methane from Lower Paleozoic natural gases, cratonic platform areas, Tarim Basin and its geological significance [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 232-246. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||