Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 370-383.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.10.40
Previous Articles Next Articles
SHEN Junfeng1(), YAN Guoying2, ZHANG Mengmeng1, WANG Zhaojing2, XU Kexin1, MENG Wenxiang2
Received:
2022-10-17
Revised:
2022-10-29
Online:
2023-03-25
Published:
2023-01-05
CLC Number:
SHEN Junfeng, YAN Guoying, ZHANG Mengmeng, WANG Zhaojing, XU Kexin, MENG Wenxiang. REE enrichment process in the Bayan Obo Fe-REE-Nb deposit: Genetic and mineralogical evidence[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(2): 370-383.
矿物名称 | wB/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | F | Cl | O | Si | K | Na | Fe | Mn | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Pm | ||||||||||
萤石1 | 44.65 | 55.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.02 | 0.08 | — | — | 0.03 | |||||||||
萤石2 | 46.65 | 53.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||||||||
矿物名称 | wB/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sm | U | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | Y | Sc | ||||||||||||
萤石1 | — | 0.05 | — | — | — | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.10 | — | — | 0.09 | — | |||||||||||
萤石2 | — | 0.02 | — | — | — | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.06 | — | 0.03 | 0.11 | — |
Table 1 The compositions of fluorite coexisting with bastnaesite
矿物名称 | wB/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | F | Cl | O | Si | K | Na | Fe | Mn | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Pm | ||||||||||
萤石1 | 44.65 | 55.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.02 | 0.08 | — | — | 0.03 | |||||||||
萤石2 | 46.65 | 53.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||||||||
矿物名称 | wB/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sm | U | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | Y | Sc | ||||||||||||
萤石1 | — | 0.05 | — | — | — | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.10 | — | — | 0.09 | — | |||||||||||
萤石2 | — | 0.02 | — | — | — | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.06 | — | 0.03 | 0.11 | — |
矿物名称 | wB/% | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | F | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Pm | Sm | U | ||||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿1 | 1.58 | 11.70 | 13.31 | 32.77 | 3.67 | 13.65 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.64 | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿2 | 2.29 | 13.69 | 12.70 | 31.95 | 3.47 | 12.92 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 0.56 | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿3 | 1.95 | 13.30 | 13.88 | 32.87 | 3.34 | 12.81 | 0.23 | — | 0.61 | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿4 | 0.62 | 12.27 | 16.87 | 34.84 | 3.04 | 8.62 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.38 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早) 1 | 0.15 | 11.52 | 13.14 | 33.42 | 3.94 | 14.58 | 0.16 | 0.92 | 0.39 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早)2 | 0.33 | 12.04 | 14.17 | 33.20 | 3.68 | 13.23 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.48 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚) 1 | 2.03 | 13.49 | 10.22 | 34.64 | 3.54 | 16.90 | 0.05 | — | 0.69 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚)2 | 2.88 | 14.23 | 9.57 | 34.39 | 3.11 | 16.48 | — | — | 0.82 | |||||||||
矿物名称 | wB/% | |||||||||||||||||
Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | Y | Sc | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿1 | 0.24 | — | — | 0.06 | — | — | 0.04 | 0.13 | — | 0.08 | ||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿2 | 0.34 | — | 0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.07 | ||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿3 | — | — | — | — | 0.09 | — | 0.04 | 0.05 | — | 0.06 | ||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿4 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.07 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早) 1 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.51 | — | — | — | 0.04 | 0.49 | — | 0.08 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早)2 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.06 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚) 1 | 0.23 | — | — | — | 0.46 | — | — | — | — | 0.09 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚)2 | 0.16 | — | — | — | 0.77 | — | 0.32 | 0.71 | — | 0.12 |
Table 2 The compositions of different types of bastnaesite wrapped by dolomite
矿物名称 | wB/% | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | F | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Pm | Sm | U | ||||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿1 | 1.58 | 11.70 | 13.31 | 32.77 | 3.67 | 13.65 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.64 | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿2 | 2.29 | 13.69 | 12.70 | 31.95 | 3.47 | 12.92 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 0.56 | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿3 | 1.95 | 13.30 | 13.88 | 32.87 | 3.34 | 12.81 | 0.23 | — | 0.61 | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿4 | 0.62 | 12.27 | 16.87 | 34.84 | 3.04 | 8.62 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.38 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早) 1 | 0.15 | 11.52 | 13.14 | 33.42 | 3.94 | 14.58 | 0.16 | 0.92 | 0.39 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早)2 | 0.33 | 12.04 | 14.17 | 33.20 | 3.68 | 13.23 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.48 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚) 1 | 2.03 | 13.49 | 10.22 | 34.64 | 3.54 | 16.90 | 0.05 | — | 0.69 | |||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚)2 | 2.88 | 14.23 | 9.57 | 34.39 | 3.11 | 16.48 | — | — | 0.82 | |||||||||
矿物名称 | wB/% | |||||||||||||||||
Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | Y | Sc | |||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿1 | 0.24 | — | — | 0.06 | — | — | 0.04 | 0.13 | — | 0.08 | ||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿2 | 0.34 | — | 0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.07 | ||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿3 | — | — | — | — | 0.09 | — | 0.04 | 0.05 | — | 0.06 | ||||||||
白云石包裹的氟碳铈矿4 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.07 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早) 1 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.51 | — | — | — | 0.04 | 0.49 | — | 0.08 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(早)2 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.06 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚) 1 | 0.23 | — | — | — | 0.46 | — | — | — | — | 0.09 | ||||||||
氟碳铈矿(晚)2 | 0.16 | — | — | — | 0.77 | — | 0.32 | 0.71 | — | 0.12 |
独居石 | wB/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | Ca | La | Ce | Nd | Si | Mn | O | Cl | |||
早结晶 | 13.15 | 0.06 | 18.78 | 29.61 | 2.90 | 8.38 | 0.08 | 27.15 | 0.01 | ||
晚结晶 | 13.73 | 0.07 | 19.50 | 30.57 | 6.09 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 30.65 | 0.01 |
Table 3 The compositions of different stages of monazite
独居石 | wB/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | Ca | La | Ce | Nd | Si | Mn | O | Cl | |||
早结晶 | 13.15 | 0.06 | 18.78 | 29.61 | 2.90 | 8.38 | 0.08 | 27.15 | 0.01 | ||
晚结晶 | 13.73 | 0.07 | 19.50 | 30.57 | 6.09 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 30.65 | 0.01 |
矿物名称 | wB/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | Ca | F | O | La | Ce | Nd | Fe | Mn | Na | Si | |
磷灰石 | 17.60 | 34.71 | 6.28 | 37.89 | 0.69 | 1.56 | 0.76 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.50 | — |
17.06 | 32.94 | 5.85 | 38.44 | 0.99 | 2.52 | 1.26 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.96 | — | |
独居石 | 13.69 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 30.22 | 19.57 | 30.65 | 5.95 | — | 0.07 | — | 0.05 |
13.84 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 30.44 | 19.51 | 30.42 | 6.14 | — | 0.08 | — | 0.03 |
Table 4 The compositions of monazite vein and wrapped apatite
矿物名称 | wB/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | Ca | F | O | La | Ce | Nd | Fe | Mn | Na | Si | |
磷灰石 | 17.60 | 34.71 | 6.28 | 37.89 | 0.69 | 1.56 | 0.76 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.50 | — |
17.06 | 32.94 | 5.85 | 38.44 | 0.99 | 2.52 | 1.26 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.96 | — | |
独居石 | 13.69 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 30.22 | 19.57 | 30.65 | 5.95 | — | 0.07 | — | 0.05 |
13.84 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 30.44 | 19.51 | 30.42 | 6.14 | — | 0.08 | — | 0.03 |
白云石类型 | wB/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mg | Ca | Fe | Mn | Sr | O | ||
交代前 白云石 (暗色) | 1 | 12.66 | 23.77 | 4.76 | 1.66 | 0.42 | 56.72 |
2 | 11.75 | 24.83 | 6.50 | 2.21 | 0.21 | 54.52 | |
3 | 12.57 | 23.63 | 4.97 | 1.95 | 0.17 | 56.71 | |
4 | 11.81 | 23.76 | 5.76 | 2.23 | 0.16 | 56.28 | |
平均值 | 12.20 | 24.00 | 5.50 | 2.01 | 0.24 | 56.06 | |
交代后 白云石 (浅色) | 1 | 9.56 | 22.95 | 8.63 | 3.62 | 0.25 | 54.99 |
2 | 9.45 | 22.91 | 9.01 | 3.35 | 0.25 | 55.03 | |
3 | 8.89 | 22.98 | 10.67 | 1.40 | 0.25 | 55.82 | |
4 | 9.12 | 22.78 | 10.59 | 1.42 | 0.22 | 55.87 | |
平均值 | 9.26 | 22.91 | 9.73 | 2.45 | 0.24 | 55.43 |
Table 5 The compositions of dolomite before and after Fe, Mn metasomatism
白云石类型 | wB/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mg | Ca | Fe | Mn | Sr | O | ||
交代前 白云石 (暗色) | 1 | 12.66 | 23.77 | 4.76 | 1.66 | 0.42 | 56.72 |
2 | 11.75 | 24.83 | 6.50 | 2.21 | 0.21 | 54.52 | |
3 | 12.57 | 23.63 | 4.97 | 1.95 | 0.17 | 56.71 | |
4 | 11.81 | 23.76 | 5.76 | 2.23 | 0.16 | 56.28 | |
平均值 | 12.20 | 24.00 | 5.50 | 2.01 | 0.24 | 56.06 | |
交代后 白云石 (浅色) | 1 | 9.56 | 22.95 | 8.63 | 3.62 | 0.25 | 54.99 |
2 | 9.45 | 22.91 | 9.01 | 3.35 | 0.25 | 55.03 | |
3 | 8.89 | 22.98 | 10.67 | 1.40 | 0.25 | 55.82 | |
4 | 9.12 | 22.78 | 10.59 | 1.42 | 0.22 | 55.87 | |
平均值 | 9.26 | 22.91 | 9.73 | 2.45 | 0.24 | 55.43 |
[1] | 王凯怡, 张继恩, 方爱民, 等. 白云鄂博矿床成因: 矿体内霓长岩化成矿作用与赋矿白云岩的联系[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(3): 785-798. |
[2] | 柯昌辉, 李以科, 李立兴, 等. 白云鄂博矿区赋矿“白云岩”地质特征与成因再认识[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(9): 3047-3063. |
[3] |
YANG K F, FAN H R, PIRAJNO F, et al. The Bayan Obo (China) giant REE accumulation conundrum elucidated by intense magmatic differentiation of carbonatite[J]. Geology, 2019, 47(12): 1198-1202.
DOI URL |
[4] | 于俊芳, 沈茂森, 郭爱芳. 白云鄂博矿萤石浮选分析[J]. 现代矿业, 2018, 34(9): 245-246. |
[5] | 郝美珍, 赵永岗, 张顺, 等. 白云鄂博超大型Nb-Fe-REE矿床主矿矿体形态变化及深部找矿方向的探讨[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2018, 41(3): 167-175. |
[6] | 杨占峰, 李强, 王振江, 等. 白云鄂博矿床萤石型铁矿石中稀土分布规律研究[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2017, 35(4): 520-527. |
[7] | 王凯怡, 张继恩, 郝美珍, 等. 白云鄂博赋矿白云岩的稀土地球化学及对稀土矿化的制约[J]. 地质科学, 2020, 55(2): 439-458. |
[8] | 郝梓国, 王希斌, 李震, 等. 白云鄂博碳酸岩型REE-Nb-Fe矿床: 一个罕见的中元古代破火山机构成岩成矿实例[J]. 地质学报, 2002, 76(4): 525-540. |
[9] | 中国科学院地球化学研究所. 白云鄂博矿床地球化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1988. |
[10] | 白鸽, 袁忠信, 吴澄宇, 等. 白云鄂博矿床地质特征和成因论证[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996. |
[11] | CHAO E C T, BACK J M, MINKIN J A, et al. The sedimentary carbonate-hosted giant Bayan Obo REE-Fe-Nb ore deposit of Inner Mongolia, China; a cornerstone example for giant polymetallic ore deposits of hydrothermal origin[R]. Reston: US Geological Survey, 1997. |
[12] | 杨占峰, 朱智慧, 王振江, 等. 白云鄂博主矿霓石型稀土铁矿石中稀土元素在独立矿物中的富集状况研究[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2019, 37(6): 769-776. |
[13] | 范宏瑞, 杨奎锋, 胡芳芳, 等. 内蒙古白云鄂博地区基底岩石锆石年代学及对构造背景的指示[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(5): 1342-1350. |
[14] |
邓淼, 韦春婉, 许成, 等. 白云鄂博超大型稀土矿床成因评述[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 14-28.
DOI |
[15] | 胡乐. 再论白云鄂博稀土矿床成因: 来自白云岩研究的新证据[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2019. |
[16] | 范宏瑞, 胡芳芳, 杨奎锋, 等. 内蒙古白云鄂博地区晚古生代闪长质-花岗质岩石年代学框架及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(11): 2933-2938. |
[17] | 潘启宇. 白云鄂博铌、稀土铁矿的成矿地质条件及矿床成因[J]. 内蒙古地质, 1997(1): 1-17. |
[18] | 杨学明, 杨晓勇, 陈天虎, 等. 白云鄂博富稀土元素碳酸岩岩墙的地球化学特征及稀土富集机制[J]. 矿床地质, 1998, 17(3):527-532. |
[19] | 倪培, RANKIN A H, 周进. 白云鄂博地区碳酸岩墙及岩墙旁侧石英岩中的包裹体研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2003, 19(2): 297-306. |
[20] | 王凯怡, 范宏瑞, 谢奕汉. 白云鄂博碳酸岩墙的稀土和微量元素地球化学及对其成因的启示[J]. 岩石学报, 2002, 18(3): 340-348. |
[21] | 张培善, 陶克捷, 杨主明, 等. 白云鄂博稀土、铌钽矿物及其成因探讨[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2001, 19(2): 97-102. |
[22] | 范宏瑞, 陈福坤, 王凯怡, 等. 白云鄂博REE-Fe-Nb矿床碳酸岩墙锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2002, 18(3): 363-368. |
[23] | 张鹏远, 李双庆, 王长尧, 等. 白云鄂博地区地质构造特征[J]. 中国地质科学院天津地质矿产研究所所刊, 1993, 28: 1-86. |
[24] |
YANG K F, FAN H R, SANTOSH M, et al. Mesoproterozoic carbonatitic magmatism in the Bayan Obo deposit, Inner Mongolia, North China:constraints for the mechanism of super accumulation of rare earth elements[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2011, 40(1): 122-131.
DOI URL |
[25] | 谢玉玲, 曲云伟, 杨占峰, 等. 白云鄂博铁、铌、稀土矿床:研究进展、存在问题和新认识[J]. 矿床地质, 2019, 38(5): 983-1003. |
[26] | 韦春婉, 许成, 付伟, 等. 稀土元素在岩浆和水热系统的实验岩石学和地球化学研究进展[J]. 岩石学报, 2022, 38(2): 455-471. |
[27] | 袁忠信, 白鸽, 张宗清. 白云鄂博矿床赋矿岩石的自交代现象及其意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2004, 23(1): 19-25. |
[28] |
LIU S, FAN H R, YANG K F, et al. Fenitization in the giant Bayanobo REE-Nb-Fe deposit: implication for REE mineralization[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2018, 94: 290-309.
DOI URL |
[29] | 佘海东, 范宏瑞, 胡芳芳, 等. 稀土元素在热液中的迁移与沉淀[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(12): 3567-3581. |
[30] |
SHE H D, FAN H R, YANG K F, et al. Complex, multi-stage mineralization processes in the giant Bayan Obo REE-Nb-Fe deposit, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 139: 104461.
DOI URL |
[31] | 朱祥坤, 孙剑. 内蒙古白云鄂博矿床的稀土矿化时代与期次[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(6): 845-856. |
[1] | MO Tian-Feng. Discussion on some important problems in structural geology and tectonics. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 20140101, 21(1): 132-149. |
[2] | WAN Yusheng, DONG Chunyan, XIE Hangqiang, LI Pengchuan, LIU Shoujie, LI Yuan, WANG Yuqing, WANG Kunli, LIU Dunyi. Neoarchean magmatism in the North China Craton: Implication for tectonic regimes and cratonization [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(1): 77-94. |
[3] | XU Zhihao, YAN Guoying, YANG Zongfeng, WANG Zhaojing, SHEN Junfeng, ZHANG Mengmeng, LI Peipei, XU Kexin. Typomorphic characteristics of magnetite and prediction of deep iron-rich orebody in the Bayan Obo ore deposit [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(2): 426-439. |
[4] | ZHAO Xiaoyan, YANG Zhusen, YANG Yang, CAO Yu, FAN Jianbiao, ZHAO Miao. Discovery of Early Cretaceous metamorphic basic rock and plagioclase amphibolite in Yalaxiangbo, Tibet and its geological significance [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(2): 163-182. |
[5] | WANG Tao, ZHANG Jianjun, LI Shan, TONG Ying, GUO Lei, ZHANG Xiaowei, HUANG He, ZHANG Lei, XUE Huaimin. Distinctive spatial-temporal evolution of Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic magmatic systems in Northeast Asia: Evidences for identification of the extent and superposition of multiple plate tectonic regimes [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(2): 28-44. |
[6] | LIU Baoshan, CHENG Zhaoxun, KOU Linlin, DENG Changzhou, YANG Xiaoping, ZHANG Chunpeng, LI Chenglu, HAN Renping. Late Triassic magmatic activity in Duobaoshan area, Heilongjiang Province: Response to the southward subduction of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(2): 132-145. |
[7] | DENG Miao, WEI Chunwan, XU Cheng, SHI Aiguo, LI Zuoqi, FAN Chaoxi, KUANG Guangxi. Rare earth mineralization in Bayan Obo super-large deposit: A review [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(1): 14-28. |
[8] | WEN Ligang,ZENG Pusheng,ZHAN Xiuchun,FAN Chenzi,SUN Dongyang,WANG Guang,YUAN Jihai,FEI Xiaojie. The Yinachang deposit in central Yunnan Province, Southwest China: A “Bayan Obo-type” Fe-Cu-REE deposit. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(6): 308-329. |
[9] | ZHANG Zeming,DING Huixia,DONG Xin,TIAN Zuolin. The Gangdese arc magmatism: from Neo-Tethyan subduction to Indo-Asian collision. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(6): 78-91. |
[10] | MO Tian-Feng. Discussion on some important problems in structural geology and tectonics. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2014, 21(1): 132-149. |
[11] | . A discussion on the collision time. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(3): 48-56. |
[12] | . Geochemistry, zircon geochronology and Hf isotopes of Lujiazhai granites from the Dabie Orogen: Evidence for the Neoproterozoic magmatism along the northeastern margin of Yangtze Block. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(2): 85-99. |
[13] | FAN Wei-Ming, BANG Tou-Beng, WANG Yue-Jun. Triassic magmatism in the southern Lancangjiang zone, southwestern China and its constraints on the tectonic evolution of PaleoTethys. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(6): 291-302. |
[14] | ZHANG Qi JIN Wei-Dun LI Cheng-Dong WANG Yuan-Long. Yanshanian largescale magmatism and lithosphere thinning in Eastern China: Relation to large igneous province. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(2): 21-51. |
[15] | SHU Di-Cheng MO Xuan-Hua DIAO Zhi-Dan NIU Yao-Ling BO Gui-Tang WANG Li-Quan LIAO Zhong-Li. Permian and Early Cretaceous tectonomagmatism in southern Tibet and Tethyan evolution: New perspective. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(2): 1-20. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||