岩溶碳汇效应对植被的响应研究进展

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.9.4

地学前缘 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 418-428.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.9.4

岩溶碳汇效应对植被的响应研究进展

于奭¹^,²(), 蒲俊兵³^,^*(), 刘凡¹^,², 杨慧¹^,²

1.中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所岩溶动力学重点实验室, 广西桂林 541004
2.联合国教科文组织国际岩溶研究中心 / 岩溶动力系统与全球变化国际联合研究中心, 广西桂林 541004
3.重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院长江上游湿地科学研究重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331

收稿日期:2022-05-24 修回日期:2022-07-31 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-07-07
通讯作者: *蒲俊兵(1982—),男,研究员,博士生导师,长期从事岩溶地质作用与环境变化方面的研究工作。E⁃mail: junbingpu@163.com
作者简介:于奭(1983-),男,研究员,博士生导师,长期从事化学风化研究工作,近年来重点研究流域化学风化问题。E-mail: yushihydrogeo@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42177075);国家自然科学基金项目(41977166);广西重点研发专项(桂科AB21196050);重庆师范大学基金项目(21XRC002);中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20221808);中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20230547)

Effect of vegetation on carbon sequestration in karst systems-a critical review

YU Shi¹^,²(), PU Junbing³^,^*(), LIU Fan¹^,², YANG Hui¹^,²

1. Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
2. International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO / National Center for International Research on Karst Dynamic System and Global Change, Guilin 541004, China
3. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Wetland Research in the Upper Yangtze River, School of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China

Received:2022-05-24 Revised:2022-07-31 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植被是连接大气、水体、土壤及岩石的纽带,也是影响岩石风化碳汇效应的关键驱动因子之一。研究植被与岩石风化碳汇效应(特别是岩溶碳汇效应)的相互关系能进一步准确估算岩溶作用所产生的碳汇量并为大气CO₂减排研究做出重要贡献。本文阐述了植被演替对岩溶碳汇效应影响的研究进展,分析了植被对岩溶碳汇效应的控制机制,并从生物作用、土壤理化性质、气候、径流变化及岩溶地区水文地质结构等方面详细分析了植被对岩溶碳汇控制因子的影响,重点探讨岩溶作用过程中水循环响应受植被影响的情况,最后从岩溶关键带的垂向结构研究、不同降水过程中植被对流域岩溶碳库影响、结构性的小尺度与宏观尺度的水文效应耦合研究、流域尺度植被演替对岩溶碳汇的影响及对人工调控的启示4方面提出未来研究的总体趋势和方向。

关键词: 碳中和, 岩溶碳汇, 植被, 水循环, 岩溶关键带

Abstract:

Vegetation-the link between atmosphere, water, soil and rock-is a key influencing factor of carbon sequestration via rock weathering. Understanding their relationship can help to better estimate the carbon flux in karst systems and assess the effect of karsification on the reduction of atmospheric CO₂ emissions. This review summarizes and evaluates the latest research findings on the impact of vegetation succession on karst carbon sink, the control of vegetation on the karstification process in terms of biological effects, soil properties, climate, runoff changes and hydrogeological structure of karst systems, and the impact of vegetation on water cycle during the karstification process. Finally, future research directions are proposed, which include the vertical structure of karst critical zone, the effect of vegetation on carbon sequestration in karst watershed during different precipitation processes, the relationship between microstructure and hydrological effects, and the impact of vegetation succession on carbon sequestration in karst systems at watershed scale plus insights from human interventions.

Key words: carbon neutrality, karst carbon sequestration, vegetation, water cycle, karst critical zone

中图分类号:

于奭, 蒲俊兵, 刘凡, 杨慧. 岩溶碳汇效应对植被的响应研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 418-428.

YU Shi, PU Junbing, LIU Fan, YANG Hui. Effect of vegetation on carbon sequestration in karst systems-a critical review[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(4): 418-428.

图/表 4

图1 灰岩土壤界面溶蚀速率影响因素的强弱及路径图 (引自文献[10]) 灰色箭头粗细与风化速率受影响的强弱成正比。

Fig.1 Main influencing factors of the karstification process at the limestone-soil interface. Adapted from [10].

图2 水-岩-气-生界面碳循环模式 (引自文献[12]) 红色方框为植被能够直接或者间接影响水体DIC浓度及径流等的相关驱动因子。

Fig.2 The terrestrial carbon cycle. Adapted from [12].

图3 气候变化及植被恢复对岩石风化过程的复合影响机制 (引自文献[44])

Fig.3 Combined effects of climate change and vegetation restoration on rock weathering process. Adapted from [44].

图4 岩溶关键带结构模型 (引自文献[69])

Fig.4 Structural model of key karst zones. Adapted from [69].

参考文献 76

[1]	TANG X L, ZHAO X, BAI Y F, et al. Carbon pools in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: new estimates based on an intensive field survey[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(16): 4021-4026.
[2]	HARRIS N L, GIBBS D A, BACCINI A, et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2021, 11(3): 234-240. DOI
[3]	PAN Y D, BIRDSEY R A, FANG J Y, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045): 988-993. DOI URL
[4]	PIAO S L, FANG J Y, CIAIS P, et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Nature, 2009, 458(7241): 1009-1013. DOI
[5]	FANG J Y, CHEN A P, PENG C H, et al. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 2001, 292(5525): 2320-2322. DOI PMID
[6]	GURNEY K R, ECKELS W J. Regional trends in terrestrial carbon exchange and their seasonal signatures[J]. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2011, 63(3): 328-339. DOI URL
[7]	曾思博, 蒋勇军. 土地利用对岩溶作用碳汇的影响研究综述[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(2): 153-163.
[8]	章程. 岩溶作用时间尺度与碳汇稳定性[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(4): 368-371.
[9]	LIU Z H, DREYBRODT W H J. Significance of the carbon sink produced by H₂O-carbonate-CO₂-aquatic phototroph interaction on land[J]. Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(2): 182-191. DOI URL
[10]	DONG X L, COHEN M J, MARTIN J B, et al. Ecohydrologic processes and soil thickness feedbacks control limestone-weathering rates in a karst landscape[J]. Chemical Geology, 2019, 527: 118774. DOI URL
[11]	ZHAOR Y, LIU Z Q, HUANG H, et al. Difference in the relationship between soil CO₂ concentration and the karst-related carbon cycle under different land use types in Southwest China[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2019, 34(4): 1569-1581. DOI
[12]	LIU Z H, MACPHERSON G L, GROVES C, et al. Large and active CO₂ uptake by coupled carbonate weathering[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 182: 42-49. DOI URL
[13]	刘方, 王世杰, 罗海波, 等. 喀斯特石漠化过程中植被演替及其对径流水化学的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(1): 26-32.
[14]	章程. 不同土地利用下的岩溶作用强度及其碳汇效应[J]. 科学通报, 2011, 56(26): 2174-2180.
[15]	章程, 李玉辉, 汪进良, 等. 云南石林地质公园土岩、土根界面过程和土下溶蚀速率[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(4): 1019-1030.
[16]	周孟霞, 莫碧琴, 杨慧. 岩溶石漠化区李树林土壤岩溶作用强度及碳汇效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13): 116-123.
[17]	LIU Z H, ZHAO J B. Contribution of carbonate rock weathering to the atmospheric CO₂ sink[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000, 39(9): 1053-1058. DOI URL
[18]	姜光辉, 张强. 峰丛洼地自然封育过程岩溶水溶解无机碳的变化: 以桂林丫吉试验场为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(4): 397-402.
[19]	何师意, 徐胜友, 张美良. 岩溶土壤中CO₂浓度、水化学观测及其与岩溶作用关系[J]. 中国岩溶, 1997, 16(4): 319-324.
[20]	刘九缠, 孙玉川, 沈立成, 等. 石漠化治理对土壤中CO₂、CH₄变化特征及碳汇效应的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(5): 733-741.
[21]	刘长礼, 林良俊, 宋超, 等. 土地利用变化对典型碳酸盐岩流域风化碳汇的影响: 以云南小江岩溶流域研究为例[J]. 中国地质, 2011, 38(2): 479-488.
[22]	SIGLER W V, BACHOFEN R, ZEYER J. Molecular characterization of endolithic cyanobacteria inhabiting exposed dolomite in central Switzerland[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 5(7): 618-627. PMID
[23]	TANG Y, LIAN B, DONG H L, et al. Endolithic bacterial communities in dolomite and limestone rocks from the Nanjiang canyon in Guizhou karst area (China)[J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2012, 29(3): 213-225. DOI URL
[24]	LIU Z H, DREYBRODT W, WANG H J. A new direction in effective accounting for the atmospheric CO₂ budget: considering the combined action of carbonate dissolution, the global water cycle and photosynthetic uptake of DIC by aquatic organisms[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2010, 99(3/4): 162-172. DOI URL
[25]	LIU Z H, DREYBROD W. Dissolution kinetics of calcium carbonate minerals in H₂O-CO₂ solutions in turbulent flow: the role of the diffusion boundary layer and the slow reaction H₂O + CO₂ → H⁺ + HCO₃^-[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 61(14): 2879-2889. DOI URL
[26]	李为, 余龙江, 袁道先, 等. 不同岩溶生态系统土壤及其细菌碳酸酐酶的活性分析及生态意义[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(3): 438-443.
[27]	WANG C W, LI W, SHEN T M, et al. Influence of soil bacteria and carbonic anhydrase on karstification intensity and regulatory factors in a typical karst area[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 313: 17-24. DOI URL
[28]	范周周, 卢舒瑜, 李志茹, 等. 岩溶与非岩溶地区不同林分根际土壤微生物对碳酸盐岩的溶蚀作用[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(4): 751-757.
[29]	SHEN T M, LI W, PAN W Z, et al. Role of bacterial carbonic anhydrase during CO₂ capture in the CO₂-H₂O-carbonate system[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 123: 66-74. DOI URL
[30]	李强, 何媛媛, 曹建华, 等. 植物碳酸酐酶对岩溶作用的影响及其生态效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(12): 1867-1871.
[31]	HU H H, BOISSON-DERNIER A, ISRAELSSON-NORDSTRÖM M, et al. Carbonic anhydrases are upstream regulators of CO₂-controlled stomatal movements in guard cells[J]. Nature Cell Biology, 2010, 12(1): 87-93. DOI PMID
[32]	吴沿友, 梁铮, 邢德科. 模拟干旱胁迫下构树和桑树的生理特征比较[J]. 广西植物, 2011, 31(1): 92-96.
[33]	NZUNG’A S O, PAN W Z, SHEN T M, et al. Comparative study of carbonic anhydrase activity in waters among different geological eco-environments of Yangtze River Basin and its ecological significance[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 66: 173-181. DOI PMID
[34]	姜鑫, 黄先飞, 秦樊鑫, 等. 不同土地利用方式下喀斯特地区岩石溶蚀速率及其驱动因素[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(5): 899-905.
[35]	陶于祥, 潘根兴, 孙玉华, 等. 土壤有机碳地球化学及其与岩溶作用的关系: 以桂林丫吉村岩溶试验场为例[J]. 火山地质与矿产, 1998, 19(1): 40-46.
[36]	黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 等. 半干旱岩溶区土壤次生碳酸盐比例及对岩溶碳汇计算的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(2): 164-172.
[37]	邵明玉, 张连凯, 刘朋雨, 等. 黄土区典型小流域矿物化学风化及碳汇效应[J]. 地球与环境, 2019, 47(5): 575-585.
[38]	NYACHOTI S, JIN L X, TWEEDIE C E, et al. Insight into factors controlling formation rates of pedogenic carbonates:a combined geochemical and isotopic approach in dryland soils of the US Southwest[J]. Chemical Geology, 2019, 527: 118503. DOI URL
[39]	陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 等. 水分对土壤呼吸的影响及机理[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(5): 972-978.
[40]	GISLASON S R, OELKERS E H, EIRIKSDOTTIR E S, et al. Direct evidence of the feedback between climate and weathering[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 277(1/2): 213-222. DOI URL
[41]	HAGEDORN B, CARTWRIGHT I. Climatic and lithologic controls on the temporal and spatial variability of CO₂ consumption via chemical weathering: an example from the Australian Victorian Alps[J]. Chemical Geology, 2009, 260(3/4): 234-253. DOI URL
[42]	TIPPER E T, BICKLE M J, GALY A, et al. The short term climatic sensitivity of carbonate and silicate weathering fluxes:insight from seasonal variations in river chemistry[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2006, 70(11): 2737-2754. DOI URL
[43]	ZENG C, LIU Z H, YANG J W, et al. A groundwater conceptual model and karst-related carbon sink for a glacierized alpine karst aquifer, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 529: 120-133. DOI URL
[44]	李汇文, 王世杰, 白晓永, 等. 气候变化及生态恢复对喀斯特槽谷碳酸盐岩风化碳汇的影响评估[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(16): 6158-6172.
[45]	康志强, 何师意. 表层岩溶系统碳迁移路径及其土被效应探讨[J]. 中国岩溶, 2011, 30(4): 456-460.
[46]	ZENG S B, LIU Z H, KAUFMANN G. Sensitivity of the global carbonate weathering carbon-sink flux to climate and land-use changes[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 5749. DOI PMID
[47]	ZENG S B, LIU Z H, GOLDSCHEIDER N, et al. Comparisons on the effects of temperature,runoff, and land-cover on carbonate weathering in different karst catchments: insights into the future global carbon cycle[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2021, 29(1): 331-345. DOI
[48]	ZENG C, LIU Z H, ZHAO M, et al. Hydrologically-driven variations in the karst-related carbon sink fluxes: insights from high-resolution monitoring of three karst catchments in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 533: 74-90. DOI URL
[49]	曾成, 赵敏, 杨睿, 等. 贵州典型岩溶流域水循环驱动的岩溶碳汇通量及其主控因素分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2017, 45(1): 74-83.
[50]	何师意, 康志强, 李清艳, 等. 高分辨率实时监测技术在岩溶碳汇估算中的应用: 以板寨地下河监测站为例[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2011, 7(3): 157-161.
[51]	肖时珍. 亚热带典型白云岩流域化学剥蚀速率及碳汇潜力: 以贵州施秉杉木河流域为例[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
[52]	KANG Z Q, CHEN J, YUAN D X, et al. Promotion function of forest vegetation on the waterand carbon coupling cycle in karst critical zone: insights from karst groundwater systems in south China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125246. DOI URL
[53]	石培礼, 李文华. 森林植被变化对水文过程和径流的影响效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(5): 481-487.
[54]	陈军锋, 李秀彬. 森林植被变化对流域水文影响的争论[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(5): 474-480.
[55]	魏晓华, 李文华, 周国逸, 等. 森林与径流关系: 一致性和复杂性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(5): 761-770.
[56]	王世杰, 刘再华, 倪健, 等. 中国南方喀斯特地区碳循环研究进展[J]. 地球与环境, 2017, 45(1): 2-9.
[57]	姜光辉, 郭芳. 岩溶水柜集流坡面的径流模式和调控建议[J]. 水科学进展, 2021, 32(2): 271-278.
[58]	蒋忠诚, 袁道先. 表层岩溶带的岩溶动力学特征及其环境和资源意义[J]. 地球学报, 1999, 20(3): 302-308.
[59]	蒋忠诚, 王瑞江, 裴建国, 等. 我国南方表层岩溶带及其对岩溶水的调蓄功能[J]. 中国岩溶, 2001, 20(2): 106-110.
[60]	LYU Y N, LUO W J, WANG Y W, et al. Geochemical responses of cave drip water to vegetation restoration[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125543. DOI URL
[61]	DENG Y, WU S, KE J, et al. Effects of meteorological factors and groundwater depths on plant sap flow velocities in karst critical zone[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 781: 146764. DOI URL
[62]	曾成, 刘再华. 建设岩溶水-碳通量大型模拟试验场的构想[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2013, 27(2): 196-200, 221. DOI
[63]	朱辉, 曾成, 刘再华, 等. 岩溶作用碳汇强度变化的土地利用调控规律: 贵州普定岩溶水-碳通量大型模拟试验场研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2015, 42(6): 120-125.
[64]	JACKSON R B, JOBBA'GY E G, AVISSAR R, et al. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration[J]. Science, 2005, 310(5756): 1944-1947. DOI PMID
[65]	SCANLON B R, REEDY R C, STONESTROM D A, et al. Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US[J]. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11(10): 1577-1593. DOI URL
[66]	ZHANG Y K, SCHILLING K E. Effects of land cover on water table, soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and groundwater recharge: a field observation and analysis[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 319(1/2/3/4): 328-338. DOI URL
[67]	ROMERO-MUJALLI G, HARTMANN J, BÖRKER J, et al. Ecosystem controlled soil-rock pCO₂ and carbonate weathering: constraints by temperature and soil water content[J]. Chemical Geology, 2019, 527: 118634. DOI URL
[68]	ZENG Q R, LIU Z H, CHEN B, et al. Carbonate weathering-related carbon sink fluxes under different land uses: a case study from the Shawan Simulation Test Site, Puding, Southwest China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2017, 474: 58-71. DOI URL
[69]	吴泽燕, 章程, 蒋忠诚, 等. 岩溶关键带及其碳循环研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(5): 488-498. DOI
[70]	吕玉香, 蒋勇军, 王正雄, 等. 西南岩溶槽谷区隧道建设的水文生态环境效应研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6): 1851-1864.
[71]	苏樑, 宋同清, 杜虎, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复阶段细根生物量、形态特征及其影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 783-789. DOI
[72]	蒙吉军, 王钧. 20世纪80年代以来西南喀斯特地区植被变化对气候变化的响应[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(5): 857-865, 1069.
[73]	NI J, LUO D H, XIA J, et al. Vegetation in karst terrain of southwestern China allocates more biomass to roots[J]. Solid Earth, 2015, 6(3): 799-810. DOI URL
[74]	TONG X W, BRANDT M, YUE Y M, et al. Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1(1): 44-50. DOI
[75]	XU X J, LIU H Y, LIN Z S, et al. Relationship of abrupt vegetation change to climate change and ecological engineering with multi-timescale analysis in the karst region, Southwest China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(13): 1564. DOI URL
[76]	刘立斌, 周运超, 程安云, 等. 利用皆伐法估算黔中喀斯特森林地上生物量[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(13): 4455-4461.

岩溶碳汇效应对植被的响应研究进展

Effect of vegetation on carbon sequestration in karst systems-a critical review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 76

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓一荣, 汪永红, 赵岩杰, 谷培科, 肖瑾, 周健, 李朝晖, 于志强, 彭平安. 碳中和背景下二氧化碳封存研究进展与展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 429-439.
[2]	徐蓉桢, 魏世博, 李成业, 程旭学, 周翔宇. 基于水化学与环境同位素的额济纳平原区域地下水循环规律解析[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 440-450.
[3]	刘永岗, 张铭, 林琪凡, 刘鹏, 胡永云. 古气候中的沙尘变化及其气候影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(5): 285-299.
[4]	曾成, 何春, 肖时珍, 刘再华, 陈旺光, 何江湖. 湿润亚热带典型白云岩流域的岩溶无机碳汇强度[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 179-188.
[5]	朱亮, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 刘丹丹, 角世哲. 基于水循环分析的水资源乘数效应评价:以黄河上游北川河流域为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 263-270.
[6]	周长松, 邹胜章, 冯启言, 朱丹尼, 李军, 王佳, 谢浩, 邓日欣. 岩溶关键带水文地球化学研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 37-50.
[7]	王军, 张骁, 高岩. 青藏高原植被动态与环境因子相互关系的研究现状与展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 70-82.
[8]	袁涛, 倪璇, 周伟. 煤炭开发区植被扰动时空效应及影响范围界定:以宁东矿区为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 110-117.
[9]	张俊杰, 白中科, 杨博宇. 新疆荒漠露天矿区生态受损及砾幕层重构方法研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 142-152.
[10]	赵冰清, 白中科, 郭东罡, 曹银贵. 黄土区露天煤矿排土场人工林下植被发育动态[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 153-164.
[11]	刘艳慧, 杨晓宇, 包妮沙, 顾晓薇. 基于Worldview-3与Sentinel-1 SAR数据的草原矿区复垦植被生物量反演方法研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 219-228.
[12]	马蓉蓉, 杨国柱, 胡月明, 周伟. 数据挖掘算法在高寒草地退化驱动因素相关性分析中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 229-237.
[13]	李庆旭，张彪，王爽，谢高地. 京津风沙源区2000—2015年植被覆盖状况的区域差异研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(5): 298-304.
[14]	齐蕊，王旭升，万力，黄金廷，冯雨晴，蒋小伟，韩鹏飞. 地下水和干旱指数对植被指数空间分布的联合影响：以鄂尔多斯高原为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(2): 265-273.
[15]	金晓媚，刘金韬，夏薇. 柴达木盆地乌图美仁区植被覆盖率变化及其与地下水的关系[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(4): 100-106.