南海北部渗漏型水合物成藏系统的发育特征及其形成演化规律

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.6.55

地学前缘 ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 77-93.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.6.55

• 南海北部天然气水合物钻探发现与富集成藏 • 上一篇下一篇

南海北部渗漏型水合物成藏系统的发育特征及其形成演化规律

陈雨核¹^,²(), 任金锋²^,^*(), 李廷微², 徐梦婕², 王笑雪², 廖远涛¹

1.中国地质大学(武汉)海洋学院, 湖北武汉 430074
2.广州海洋地质调查局天然气水合物勘查开发国家工程研究中心, 广东广州 511458

收稿日期:2024-05-20 修回日期:2024-11-28 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-03-25
通信作者: *任金锋(1987—),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事海域天然气水合物储层特征与成藏研究。E-mail:jf_ren@163.com
作者简介:陈雨核(2000—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事渗漏型水合物与沉积研究。E-mail:865935403@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC2800901);国家自然科学基金项目(42376221);国家自然科学基金项目(42276083);广州海洋地质调查局局长科研基金项目(2023GMGSJZJJ00030);广东省基础与应用基础研究重大项目(2020B0301030003);中国地质调查局二级项目(DD20230064)

Developmental characteristics and evolution of seepage gas hydrate accumulation system in the northern South China Sea

CHEN Yuhe¹^,²(), REN Jinfeng²^,^*(), LI Tingwei², XU Mengjie², WANG Xiaoxue², LIAO Yuantao¹

1. College of Marine Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
2. National Engineering Research Center of Gas Hydrate Exploration and Development, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 511458, China

Received:2024-05-20 Revised:2024-11-28 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

渗漏型水合物成藏系统往往发育中-高饱和度的水合物及其下伏伴生气,是海域广泛分布的一类水合物资源,也是海底灾害、冷泉系统和气候变化的重要研究对象。因此,认识其分布规律和形成机制具有重要意义。本文通过南海北部海底观测、岩心、测井、地震及测试分析资料,系统总结了渗漏型水合物成藏系统发育的地貌、地质、地球物理与地球化学方面的识别标志,发现渗漏型水合物主要分布在渗漏通道内。按照渗漏通道形成的机械失稳方式不同将其分为两类:构造圈闭控制的水力破裂型渗漏通道,呈集群状分布;高角度断层控制的剪切破裂型渗漏通道,呈线状分布。在渗漏型水合物成藏系统中,深部气体沿气烟囱、断层等运移并聚集在甲烷水合物稳定带底部附近。当流体压力大于上覆细粒沉积地层的破裂力时,游离气向上突破形成渗漏通道,在渗漏通道内的高角度裂隙网中形成中-高饱和度裂隙充填型水合物,在穿越的薄砂层中形成高饱和度孔隙充填型水合物。游离气在渗漏通道内的长距离运移过程可能受到3种机制的影响,即排盐效应维持的热力学三相平衡、水合物壳的形成使得甲烷扩散受限和高甲烷通量导致的水合物动力学生长速率受限。与活动冷泉相关的渗漏型水合物的形成过程可划分为3个阶段:(1)盖层破裂阶段。在超压作用下可能受水合物动力学生长速率的影响;(2)向上突破阶段。局部升高的盐度和温度维持了热力学三相平衡;(3)当流体到达海底后,地温趋近背景值,进入稳定渗漏阶段。排盐效应和水合物壳导致的甲烷扩散受限控制了水合物的生成。当冷泉停止活动后,盐度随着游离气的不断扩散而降低,渗漏通道的底部逐渐有新的水合物再次形成。

关键词: 渗漏型水合物, 渗漏通道, 机械失稳, 长距离运移, 南海北部

Abstract:

Seepage gas hydrate accumulation systems tend to develop medium-to-high saturation gas hydrates and their associated underlying gases, which are widely distributed gas hydrate resources in the ocean. These systems are also important research subjects for submarine disasters, cold seep systems, and climate change. Therefore, understanding their distribution patterns and formation mechanisms is of great significance. Based on seafloor observations, core samples, well logging, seismic data, and test analysis from the northern South China Sea, this study systematically summarizes the geomorphological, geological, geophysical, and geochemical indicators for identifying seepage gas hydrate accumulation systems. The findings reveal that seepage gas hydrates are primarily distributed within escape pipes. Escape pipes can be categorized into two types based on their mechanical failure mechanisms: (1) hydraulic fracturing escape pipes controlled by structural traps, which exhibit clustered distributions, and (2) shear failure escape pipes controlled by high-angle faults, which show aligned distributions. In seepage gas hydrate accumulation systems, deep gas migrates and accumulates near the bottom of the methane gas hydrate stability zone along gas chimneys and faults. When fluid pressure exceeds the fracturing strength of the overlying fine-grained sedimentary layer, free gas breaks through upward to form escape pipes. This process results in medium-to-high saturation fracture-filling gas hydrates within high-angle fracture networks in the escape pipes and high-saturation pore-filling gas hydrates in thin sand layers intersected by the pipes. The long-range migration of free gas within escape pipes is influenced by three mechanisms: (1) thermodynamic three-phase equilibrium maintained by salt exclusion, (2) methane diffusion limited by the formation of gas hydrate shells, and (3) gas hydrate kinetic formation rates constrained by high fluid fluxes. The formation process of seepage gas hydrates associated with active cold seeps can be divided into three stages. First, during the cap fracture stage, gas hydrate formation is influenced by kinetic rates under over pressure. Second, in the upward breakthrough stage, locally elevated salinity and temperature maintain thermodynamic three-phase equilibrium. Finally, when the fluid reaches the seafloor, the ground temperature approaches the background value, entering a stable leakage stage. Salt exclusion and methane diffusion limitations caused by gas hydrate shells control the generation of gas hydrates. After cold seep activity ceases, salinity decreases due to continuous diffusion, and new gas hydrates gradually form again at the bottom of the escape pipe.

Key words: seepage gas hydrates, escape pipe, mechanical failure, long-range free gas flow, northern South China Sea

中图分类号:

P618.13

陈雨核, 任金锋, 李廷微, 徐梦婕, 王笑雪, 廖远涛. 南海北部渗漏型水合物成藏系统的发育特征及其形成演化规律[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(2): 77-93.

CHEN Yuhe, REN Jinfeng, LI Tingwei, XU Mengjie, WANG Xiaoxue, LIAO Yuantao. Developmental characteristics and evolution of seepage gas hydrate accumulation system in the northern South China Sea[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2025, 32(2): 77-93.

图/表 13

表1 国内外典型渗漏型水合物分布情况

Table 1 Distribution of representative seepage gas hydrates at home and abroad

典型地区		深部构造背景	水深/ m	稳定带底界	渗漏标志	储层沉积特征	水合物赋存特征	优势运移通道	参考文献
卡斯卡迪亚大陆边缘		主动大陆边缘俯冲增生楔	950~ 2 200	126~ 240 mbsf	碳酸盐岩、生物群落	黏土、细砂	薄层状、结核状、分散状	断层	[10]
印度K-G盆地		被动大陆边缘盆内局部背斜	1 519~ 2 815	2 200~ 2 500 m	碳酸盐结核、贝壳碎片	泥质碎屑流沉积	块状、脉状、透镜状	断层	[11]
韩国郁陵盆地		边缘海弧后盆地局部背斜	1 800~ 2 100	141 mbsf	海底丘状体、水合物帽	黏土	脉状、结核状、块状	气烟囱	[12]
南部水合物脊		主动大陆边缘挤压背斜	780~ 1 200	124~ 134 mbsf	碳酸盐岩、羽状流	黏土、粉砂质黏土	薄层状、结核状、脉状	高渗透层	[20]
墨西哥湾 Terrebonne盆地		被动大陆边缘盐构造	1 700~ 2 250	420~ 670 mbsf	海底丘状体	黏土	裂隙充填	高渗透层	[21-22]
鄂霍次克海		边缘海弧后盆地坳陷	300~ 1 200	665~ 960 m	碳酸盐岩、羽状流、生物群落	粉砂质黏土	薄层状、脉状、块状	泥底辟	[13]
台西南盆地		边缘海盆地挤压背斜	600~ 1 600	98~ 219 mbsf	海底丘状体、碳酸盐岩	粉砂质黏土	薄层状、块状、结核状、分散状	断层	[14]
神狐海域		边缘海盆地坳陷	667~ 1 747	194~ 225 mbsf	碳酸盐岩、双壳类生物	含有孔虫的黏土质粉砂	分散状	断层与气烟囱	[15-16]
琼东南盆地	海马冷泉	边缘海盆地低凸起	1 250~ 1 500	130 mbsf	海底羽状流、麻坑、丘状体	黏土	块状		[17]
	A区		1 500~ 1 700	160~ 170 mbsf	羽状流、冷泉生物、碳酸盐岩	黏土质粉砂夹薄层粉砂	脉状、块状结核状、厚层状		[18]
	B区		1 250~ 1 780	140 mbsf	海底麻坑、丘状体、生物群落	黏土质粉砂	脉状、片状、块状、结核状		[19]

表1 国内外典型渗漏型水合物分布情况

Table 1 Distribution of representative seepage gas hydrates at home and abroad

典型地区		深部构造背景	水深/ m	稳定带底界	渗漏标志	储层沉积特征	水合物赋存特征	优势运移通道	参考文献
卡斯卡迪亚大陆边缘		主动大陆边缘俯冲增生楔	950~ 2 200	126~ 240 mbsf	碳酸盐岩、生物群落	黏土、细砂	薄层状、结核状、分散状	断层	[10]
印度K-G盆地		被动大陆边缘盆内局部背斜	1 519~ 2 815	2 200~ 2 500 m	碳酸盐结核、贝壳碎片	泥质碎屑流沉积	块状、脉状、透镜状	断层	[11]
韩国郁陵盆地		边缘海弧后盆地局部背斜	1 800~ 2 100	141 mbsf	海底丘状体、水合物帽	黏土	脉状、结核状、块状	气烟囱	[12]
南部水合物脊		主动大陆边缘挤压背斜	780~ 1 200	124~ 134 mbsf	碳酸盐岩、羽状流	黏土、粉砂质黏土	薄层状、结核状、脉状	高渗透层	[20]
墨西哥湾 Terrebonne盆地		被动大陆边缘盐构造	1 700~ 2 250	420~ 670 mbsf	海底丘状体	黏土	裂隙充填	高渗透层	[21-22]
鄂霍次克海		边缘海弧后盆地坳陷	300~ 1 200	665~ 960 m	碳酸盐岩、羽状流、生物群落	粉砂质黏土	薄层状、脉状、块状	泥底辟	[13]
台西南盆地		边缘海盆地挤压背斜	600~ 1 600	98~ 219 mbsf	海底丘状体、碳酸盐岩	粉砂质黏土	薄层状、块状、结核状、分散状	断层	[14]
神狐海域		边缘海盆地坳陷	667~ 1 747	194~ 225 mbsf	碳酸盐岩、双壳类生物	含有孔虫的黏土质粉砂	分散状	断层与气烟囱	[15-16]
琼东南盆地	海马冷泉	边缘海盆地低凸起	1 250~ 1 500	130 mbsf	海底羽状流、麻坑、丘状体	黏土	块状		[17]
	A区		1 500~ 1 700	160~ 170 mbsf	羽状流、冷泉生物、碳酸盐岩	黏土质粉砂夹薄层粉砂	脉状、块状结核状、厚层状		[18]
	B区		1 250~ 1 780	140 mbsf	海底麻坑、丘状体、生物群落	黏土质粉砂	脉状、片状、块状、结核状		[19]

图1 ROV观测到的冷泉特征(a据文献[18]修改;d据文献[18]修改) a—羽状流;b—冷泉生物;c—块状水合物;d—碳酸盐岩。

Fig.1 Cold seep characteristics observed by ROV:(a) Plume (modified after [18]); (b) Cold seep organisms; (c) Massive gas hydrates; (d) Carbonate rocks (modified after [18]).

图2 松南低凸起区W08站位的海底地震振幅属性图(a)及海底地形图(b)

Fig.2 Seafloor seismic amplitude attribute map (a) and water depth map (b) of site W08 in the Songnan Low Uplift

图3 琼东南盆地与珠江口盆地钻获的岩心样品照片(b据文献[18]修改;c据文献[18]修改) a—碳酸盐岩样品,钻取自琼东南盆地W01井0.7 mbsf; b—块状水合物,钻取自琼东南盆地W01井12 mbsf;c—片状水合物,钻取自琼东南盆地W01井17 mbsf;d—结核状水合物,钻取自琼东南盆地W01井15 mbsf;e—分散状水合物,钻取自琼东南盆地W01井59.5 mbsf;f—脉状水合物,钻取自珠江口盆地W08井68.5 mbsf。

Fig.3 Pictures of core samples in the Qiongdongnan Basin and Zhujiangkou Basin. (b modified after [18]; c modified after [18]).

图4 琼东南盆地W01 井岩心X射线成像及其对应测井曲线(岩心来自图5)

Fig.4 X-ray images and their corresponding logging curves of the core of Well W01 in the Qiongdongnan Basin (core from Fig.5)

图5 琼东南盆地W01井综合测井曲线图

Fig.5 Comprehensive logging curves of Well W01 in the Qiongdongnan Basin

图6 过W01井的地震剖面解释

Fig.6 Interpreted seismic sections crossing Well W01

图7 W01井的典型地球化学指标变化图

Fig.7 Variation in typical geochemical indicators of Well W01

图8 (a)沿2 480 ms 时窗提取方差属性;(b)W09站位附近的时间域等深线图;(c)过W09井的地震剖面解释。

Fig.8 (a) Variance attribute along the 2480 ms time window; (b) Time-domain contour map near site W09;(c) Interpreted seismic sections crossing Well W09.

图9 (a)沿2 480 ms时窗提取方差属性;(b)W08站位附近的时间域等深线图;(c)过W08井的地震剖面解释。

Fig.9 (a) Variance attribute along the 2480 ms time window; (b) Time-domain contour map near site W08;(c) Interpreted seismic sections crossing Well W08.

图10 (a)过W09和W08井的地震剖面解释;(b)过W09和W08井的地震剖面位置;(c)W09井中盖层水力破裂形成渗漏通道的应力模型;(d)W08井中断层剪切破裂形成渗漏通道的应力模型。

Fig.10 (a) Interpreted seismic sections crossing Well W09 and W08; (b) The geographic location of the interpreted seismic profile crossing Well W09 and W08;(c) A stress model for the formation of escape pipes by hydraulic fracturing of the cap layer in Well W09;(d) A stress model for the formation of escape pipes by shear failure of the fault in Well W08.

图11 (a)热力学三相平衡模型;(b)甲烷扩散受限模型;(c)水合物动力学生长速率受限模型。(据文献[2,25]修改)

Fig.11 (a) Thermodynamic three-phase equilibrium model; (b) Methane diffusion limited model;(c) Gas hydrate kinetic formation rate limited model (Modified after [2,25]).

图12 形成渗漏型水合物成藏系统的三个阶段:(a)盖层破裂阶段;(b)突破阶段;(c)稳定渗漏阶段。(据文献[42]修改)

Fig.12 Three stages of forming a seepage gas hydrate accumulation system (a) Cap fracture stage; (b) Upward breakthrough stage; (c) Stable leakage stage (Modified after [42]).

参考文献 42

[1]	TRÉHU A, RUPPEL C, HOLLAND M, et al. Gas hydrates in marine sediments: lessons from scientific ocean drilling[J]. Oceanography, 2006, 19(4): 124-142.
[2]	YOU K, FLEMINGS P B, MALINVERNO A, et al. Mechanisms of methane hydrate formation in geological systems[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2019, 57(4): 1146-1196.
[3]	PAGANONI M, CARTWRIGHT J A, FOSCHI M, et al. Relationship between fluid-escape pipes and hydrate distribution in offshore Sabah (NW Borneo)[J]. Marine Geology, 2018, 395: 82-103.
[4]	RUGE S M, SCARSELLI N, BILAL A. 3D seismic classification of fluid escape pipes in the western Exmouth Plateau, North West Shelf of Australia[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2021, 178(3): jgs2020-096.
[5]	YE J L, WEI J G, LIANG J Q, et al. Complex gas hydrate system in a gas chimney, South China Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 104: 29-39. DOI
[6]	CHEN D F, SU Z, CATHLES L M. Types of gas hydrates in marine environments and their thermodynamic characteristics[J]. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 2006, 17(4): 723-737.
[7]	DENG W, LIANG J Q, ZHANG W, et al. Typical characteristics of fracture-filling hydrate-charged reservoirs caused by heterogeneous fluid flow in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 124: 104810.
[8]	KETZER M, PRAEG D, RODRIGUES L F, et al. Gas hydrate dissociation linked to contemporary ocean warming in the southern Hemisphere[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 3788. DOI PMID
[9]	RUPPEL C D, KESSLER J D. The interaction of climate change and methane hydrates[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2017, 55(1): 126-168.
[10]	RIEDEL M, NOVOSEL I, SPENCE G D, et al. Geophysical and geochemical signatures associated with gas hydrate-related venting in the northern Cascadia margin[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2006, 118(1/2): 23-38.
[11]	GULLAPALLI S, DEWANGAN P, KUMAR A, et al. Seismic evidence of free gas migration through the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ) and active methane seep in Krishna-Godavari offshore basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 110: 695-705.
[12]	CHUN J H, RYU B J, SON B K, et al. Sediment mounds and other sedimentary features related to hydrate occurrences in a columnar seismic blanking zone of the Ulleung Basin, East Sea, Korea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2011, 28(10): 1787-1800.
[13]	LÜDMANN T, WONG H K. Characteristics of gas hydrate occurrences associated with mud diapirism and gas escape structures in the northwestern Sea of Okhotsk[J]. Marine Geology, 2003, 201(4): 269-286.
[14]	匡增桂, 方允鑫, 梁金强, 等. 珠江口盆地东部海域高通量流体运移的地貌-地质-地球物理标志及其对水合物成藏的控制[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2018, 48(8): 1033-1044.
[15]	REN J F, CHENG C, JIANG T, et al. Faults and gas chimneys jointly dominate the gas hydrate accumulation in the Shenhu Area, northern South China Sea[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2023, 10: 1254410.
[16]	SU M, SHA Z B, ZHANG C M, et al. Types, characteristics and significances of migrating pathways of gas-bearing fluids in the Shenhu Area, northern continental slope of the South China Sea[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 2017, 91(1): 219-231.
[17]	杨力, 刘斌, 徐梦婕, 等. 南海北部琼东南海域活动冷泉特征及形成模式[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(7): 2905-2914. DOI
[18]	何玉林, 梁金强, 石万忠, 等. 琼东南盆地南部低凸起及其周缘区天然气水合物富集影响因素和成藏模式[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1711-1727.
[19]	张伟, 梁金强, 陆敬安, 等. 琼东南盆地典型渗漏型天然气水合物成藏系统的特征与控藏机制[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(8): 90-99.
[20]	LIU X L, FLEMINGS P B. Passing gas through the hydrate stability zone at southern Hydrate Ridge, offshore Oregon[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 241(1/2): 211-226.
[21]	MEAZELL P K, FLEMINGS P B. The evolution of seafloor venting from Hydrate-sealed gas reservoirs[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2022, 579: 117336.
[22]	BOSWELL R, COLLETT T S, FRYE M, et al. Subsurface gas hydrates in the northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 34(1): 4-30.
[23]	雷裕红, 宋颖睿, 张立宽, 等. 海洋天然气水合物成藏系统研究进展及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 801-820. DOI
[24]	张金华, 方念乔, 魏伟, 等. 天然气水合物成藏条件与富集控制因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(3): 35-46. DOI
[25]	蔡峰, 吴能友, 闫桂京, 等. 海洋浅表层天然气水合物成藏特征[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2020, 36(9): 73-78.
[26]	张金华, 苏明, 魏伟, 等. 含气流体运移与天然气水合物成藏[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(2): 176-185.
[27]	胡高伟, 卜庆涛, 吕万军, 等. 主动、被动大陆边缘天然气水合物成藏模式对比[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(8): 45-58.
[28]	RIEDEL M, COLLETT T S, KUMAR P, et al. Seismic imaging of a fractured gas hydrate system in the Krishna-Godavari Basin offshore India[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2010, 27(7): 1476-1493.
[29]	RYU B-J, COLLETT T S, RIEDEL M, et al. Scientific results of the second gas hydrate drilling expedition in the Ulleung Basin (UBGH2)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 47: 1-20.
[30]	梁金强, 付少英, 陈芳, 等. 南海东北部陆坡海底甲烷渗漏及水合物成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 761-770. DOI
[31]	LIANG J Q, ZHANG W, LU J A, et al. Geological occurrence and accumulation mechanism of natural gas hydrates in the eastern Qiongdongnan Basin of the South China Sea: insights from site GMGS5-W9-2018[J]. Marine Geology, 2019, 418: 106042.
[32]	SHA Z B, LIANG J Q, ZHANG G X, et al. A seepage gas hydrate system in northern South China Sea: seismic and well log interpretations[J]. Marine Geology, 2015, 366(8): 69-78.
[33]	LIANG Q Y, HU Y, FENG D, et al. Authigenic carbonates from newly discovered active cold seeps on the northwestern slope of the South China Sea: constraints on fluid sources, formation environments, and seepage dynamics[J]. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2017, 124: 31-41.
[34]	REN J F, QIU H J, KUANG Z G, et al. Deep-large faults controlling on the distribution of the venting gas hydrate system in the middle of the Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea[J]. China Geology, 2024, 7(1): 36-50.
[35]	KUANG Z G, COOK A, REN J F, et al. A flat-lying transitional free gas to gas hydrate system in a Sand Layer in the Qiongdongnan Basin of the South China Sea[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50(24): e2023GL105744.
[36]	王秀娟, 靳佳澎, 郭依群, 等. 南海北部天然气水合物富集特征及定量评价[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(3): 1038-1057.
[37]	CARTWRIGHT J, SANTAMARINA C. Seismic characteristics of fluid escape pipes in sedimentary basins: implications for pipe genesis[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 65: 126-140.
[38]	FLEMINGS P B. A concise guide to geopressure:origin, prediction, and applications[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[39]	TRÉHU A M, FLEMINGS P B, BANGS N L, et al. Feeding methane vents and gas hydrate deposits at South Hydrate Ridge[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(23): 2004GL021286.
[40]	FINKBEINER T, ZOBACK M, FLEMINGS P, et al. Stress, pore pressure, and dynamically constrained hydrocarbon columns in the South Eugene Island 330 field, northern Gulf of Mexico[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(6): 1007-1031.
[41]	LIU J L, HAECKEL M, RUTQVIST J, et al. The mechanism of methane gas migration through the gas hydrate stability zone: insights from numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2019, 124(5): 4399-4427.
[42]	SMITH A J, FLEMINGS P B, LIU X, et al. The evolution of methane vents that pierce the hydrate stability zone in the world’s Oceans[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2014, 119(8): 6337-6356.

南海北部渗漏型水合物成藏系统的发育特征及其形成演化规律

Developmental characteristics and evolution of seepage gas hydrate accumulation system in the northern South China Sea

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	靳佳澎, 王秀娟, 邓炜, 李清平, 李丽霞, 余晗, 周吉林, 吴能友. 南海北部多类型天然气水合物成藏特征与赋存差异[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(2): 61-76.
[2]	匡增桂, 任金锋, 邓炜, 赖洪飞, 谢莹峰. 南海北部陆坡天然气水合物钻探发现及成藏特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(2): 1-19.
[3]	刘晓磊, 李伟甲, 陆杨, 李星宇, 张淑玉, 余和雨. 南海北部大陆边缘沉积物波分布特征及形成机制研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 81-95.
[4]	季春生, 贾永刚, 朱俊江, 胡乃利, 范智涵, 胡聪, 冯学志, 余和雨, 刘博. 深海海底边界层原位观测系统研发与应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(5): 265-274.
[5]	董宏坤, 万世明, 刘畅, 赵德博, 曾志刚, 李安春. 南海北部晚中新世红绿韵律层成因的矿物学和地球化学约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 42-54.
[6]	贾永刚, 阮文凤, 胡乃利, 乔玥, 李正辉, 胡聪. 现代暖期气候变暖对南海北部陆坡天然气水合物分解潜在影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 191-201.
[7]	王明健, 潘军, 高红芳, 黄龙, 李霞. 南海北部—东海南部中生代盆地演化与油气资源潜力[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 294-302.
[8]	孙启良, 解习农, 吴时国. 南海北部海底滑坡的特征、灾害评估和研究展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(2): 258-270.
[9]	茅晟懿，朱小畏，贾国东，吴能友. 长链烷基二醇及其指标在南海北部粤东沿海上升流地区的环境指示[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(4): 285-298.
[10]	马云，孔亮，梁前勇，林进清，李三忠. 南海北部东沙陆坡主要灾害地质因素特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(4): 102-111.
[11]	张光学，陈芳，沙志彬，梁金强，苏新，陆红锋. 南海东北部天然气水合物成藏演化地质过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(4): 15-23.
[12]	梁静之, 黄宝琦, 董轶婷, 贾文博, 周彦希. 南海北部MD12-3432站MIS 11期以来底栖有孔虫反映的古环境变化[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(4): 292-300.
[13]	张劼, 雷怀彦, 汪卫国, 郝赛赛, 龚楚君. 南海北部陆坡沉积物中硫酸盐浓度变化模型与硫酸盐甲烷界面(SMI)的计算[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(4): 290-298.
[14]	陈建军,马艳萍,陈建中,孙贵宾. 南海北部陆缘盆地形成的构造动力学背景[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(3): 38-47.
[15]	张莉, 曾维军, 韦振权, 林珍, 雷振宇, 帅庆伟. 南海北部古构造格局对中、新生界发育的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(6): 254-263.