地学前缘 ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 388-404.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.11.81
收稿日期:
2024-03-01
修回日期:
2024-12-03
出版日期:
2025-07-25
发布日期:
2025-08-04
通信作者:
*杨冬红(1979—),女,副教授,从事地球动力学研究工作。E-mail: 作者简介:
吴 渴(2001—),男,博士研究生,地质学专业,从事岩石学研究工作。E-mail: kewu23@mails.jlu.edu.cn
基金资助:
WU Ke1(), YAN Xiangyu1, YANG Donghong2,*(
)
Received:
2024-03-01
Revised:
2024-12-03
Online:
2025-07-25
Published:
2025-08-04
摘要:
辽东半岛早白垩世岩浆作用为揭示华北克拉通东北部晚中生代岩浆-构造演化提供了制约。文章选择丹东地区鸡冠山花岗斑岩为研究对象,在野外地质调查和岩石学、岩相学研究基础上,开展全岩岩石地球化学和锆石U-Pb年代学、锆石Hf同位素和磷灰石原位微量元素-Nd同位素分析等方面的研究,约束其岩石成因及形成的构造背景。结果表明: 花岗斑岩中锆石发育生长环带,结合较高的Th/U值(0.27~1.12),暗示其为岩浆成因;岩浆锆石U-Pb测年结果为(126±1.4) Ma,表明鸡冠山花岗斑岩形成于早白垩世。花岗斑岩具较高的SiO2(75.70%~76.07%)、全碱(Na2O+K2O,7.88%~8.30%)质量分数,以及较低的MgO(0.08%~0.15%)质量分数,为弱过铝质和高钾钙碱性系列岩石。花岗斑岩富集轻稀土元素(LREEs),亏损重稀土元素(HREEs),具明显的Eu负异常特征,富集Rb、Th和U等大离子亲石元素(LILEs)并亏损Nb和Ta等高场强元素(HFSEs),指示其弧岩浆的属性。花岗斑岩中磷灰石为岩浆成因,富集LREEs和LILEs,亏损HREEs和HFSEs,与全岩的稀土和微量元素特征相似。鸡冠山花岗斑岩为高分异I型花岗岩,结合样品具相对富集的锆石εHf(t)值(-15.5~-20.1)和磷灰石εNd(t)值(-15.0~-16.7)以及相对古老的Nd-Hf二阶段模式年龄(2 454~2 135 Ma),表明鸡冠山花岗斑岩起源于古元古代大陆下地壳的部分熔融,并主要以辽河群变火成岩为主,形成于早白垩世古太平洋板片向华北克拉通东部之下俯冲-后撤的伸展构造背景。
中图分类号:
吴渴, 闫相宇, 杨冬红. 辽东半岛早白垩世鸡冠山花岗斑岩的岩石成因:岩石地球化学及单矿物U-Pb-Hf-Nd同位素的制约[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 388-404.
WU Ke, YAN Xiangyu, YANG Donghong. Petrogenesis of the Early Cretaceous Jiguanshan granite porphyry in the Liaodong Peninsula: Constraints from geochemistry and single mineral U-Pb-Hf-Nd isotopes[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2025, 32(4): 388-404.
图1 研究区大地构造位置与地质简图 a—中国东北部主要构造单元简图; b—辽东半岛地质简图(据文献[4,9-11,20-21]); c—鸡冠山花岗斑岩地质简图及采样位置(据文献[14])。
Fig.1 Tectonic location and geological sketch of the study area. (a) Simplified geological map of the northeastern China, (b) simplified geological map of the Liaodong Peninsula(adapted from [4,9-11,20-21]) and (c) simplified geological map of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry and sample locations (adapted from [14]).
图2 鸡冠山花岗斑岩岩石组合特征 a—野外产状图;b—镜下显微照片。矿物缩写: Q—石英; Pl—斜长石; Or—正长石; Ap—磷灰石。
Fig.2 Petrochemical characteristics of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Field photos and (b) photomicrographs of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. Mineral abbreviations: Q, quartz; Pl, plagioclase; Or, orthoclase; Ap, apatite.
图3 鸡冠山花岗斑岩中锆石年代学结果 a—锆石代表性CL图像; b—锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图; c—加权平均年龄图。
Fig.3 Zircon geochronology results of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Representative cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from the Jiguanshan granite porphyry, (b) LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb concordia diagram and (c) weighted mean ages of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry.
测点号 | wB/10-6 | Th/ U | 同位素比值及误差 | 年龄及误差/Ma | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Th | U | 207Pb/ 206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/ 235U | 1σ | 206Pb/ 238U | 1σ | 207Pb/ 206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/ 235U | 1σ | 206Pb/ 238U | 1σ | ||||
21L03-1-1 | 420 | 903 | 0.47 | 0.048 97 | 0.002 55 | 0.130 95 | 0.006 72 | 0.019 27 | 0.000 20 | 146 | 98 | 125 | 6 | 123 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-2 | 584 | 1 097 | 0.53 | 0.049 49 | 0.002 03 | 0.138 36 | 0.005 67 | 0.020 16 | 0.000 22 | 171 | 76 | 132 | 5 | 129 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-3 | 682 | 946 | 0.72 | 0.048 89 | 0.001 75 | 0.135 04 | 0.004 73 | 0.019 99 | 0.000 25 | 143 | 58 | 129 | 4 | 128 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-4 | 472 | 522 | 0.90 | 0.049 73 | 0.002 87 | 0.128 63 | 0.007 27 | 0.018 76 | 0.000 28 | 182 | 102 | 123 | 7 | 120 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-5 | 907 | 808 | 1.12 | 0.053 08 | 0.003 31 | 0.146 59 | 0.008 70 | 0.020 07 | 0.000 42 | 332 | 97 | 139 | 8 | 128 | 3 | ||
21L03-1-6 | 261 | 253 | 1.03 | 0.058 25 | 0.004 75 | 0.155 15 | 0.012 13 | 0.019 63 | 0.000 36 | 539 | 140 | 146 | 11 | 125 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-8 | 313 | 671 | 0.47 | 0.048 99 | 0.003 01 | 0.134 32 | 0.008 35 | 0.019 76 | 0.000 26 | 147 | 116 | 128 | 7 | 126 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-10 | 457 | 1 134 | 0.40 | 0.049 62 | 0.001 77 | 0.136 20 | 0.004 87 | 0.019 83 | 0.000 18 | 177 | 66 | 130 | 4 | 127 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-11 | 247 | 494 | 0.50 | 0.050 51 | 0.002 07 | 0.135 59 | 0.005 38 | 0.019 58 | 0.000 20 | 219 | 73 | 129 | 5 | 125 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-12 | 385 | 737 | 0.52 | 0.050 87 | 0.003 55 | 0.138 77 | 0.010 22 | 0.019 66 | 0.000 27 | 235 | 142 | 132 | 9 | 125 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-13 | 745 | 1 136 | 0.66 | 0.049 29 | 0.002 42 | 0.135 40 | 0.006 53 | 0.019 91 | 0.000 22 | 162 | 90 | 129 | 6 | 127 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-14 | 88 | 322 | 0.27 | 0.052 02 | 0.004 05 | 0.139 97 | 0.010 57 | 0.01975 | 0.00037 | 286 | 138 | 133 | 9 | 126 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-15 | 235 | 233 | 1.01 | 0.058 72 | 0.003 58 | 0.158 00 | 0.008 76 | 0.019 83 | 0.000 32 | 557 | 93 | 149 | 8 | 127 | 2 |
表1 辽东半岛鸡冠山花岗斑岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb同位素分析结果
Table 1 LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb isotopic analytic data of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry in the Liaodong Peninsula
测点号 | wB/10-6 | Th/ U | 同位素比值及误差 | 年龄及误差/Ma | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Th | U | 207Pb/ 206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/ 235U | 1σ | 206Pb/ 238U | 1σ | 207Pb/ 206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/ 235U | 1σ | 206Pb/ 238U | 1σ | ||||
21L03-1-1 | 420 | 903 | 0.47 | 0.048 97 | 0.002 55 | 0.130 95 | 0.006 72 | 0.019 27 | 0.000 20 | 146 | 98 | 125 | 6 | 123 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-2 | 584 | 1 097 | 0.53 | 0.049 49 | 0.002 03 | 0.138 36 | 0.005 67 | 0.020 16 | 0.000 22 | 171 | 76 | 132 | 5 | 129 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-3 | 682 | 946 | 0.72 | 0.048 89 | 0.001 75 | 0.135 04 | 0.004 73 | 0.019 99 | 0.000 25 | 143 | 58 | 129 | 4 | 128 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-4 | 472 | 522 | 0.90 | 0.049 73 | 0.002 87 | 0.128 63 | 0.007 27 | 0.018 76 | 0.000 28 | 182 | 102 | 123 | 7 | 120 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-5 | 907 | 808 | 1.12 | 0.053 08 | 0.003 31 | 0.146 59 | 0.008 70 | 0.020 07 | 0.000 42 | 332 | 97 | 139 | 8 | 128 | 3 | ||
21L03-1-6 | 261 | 253 | 1.03 | 0.058 25 | 0.004 75 | 0.155 15 | 0.012 13 | 0.019 63 | 0.000 36 | 539 | 140 | 146 | 11 | 125 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-8 | 313 | 671 | 0.47 | 0.048 99 | 0.003 01 | 0.134 32 | 0.008 35 | 0.019 76 | 0.000 26 | 147 | 116 | 128 | 7 | 126 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-10 | 457 | 1 134 | 0.40 | 0.049 62 | 0.001 77 | 0.136 20 | 0.004 87 | 0.019 83 | 0.000 18 | 177 | 66 | 130 | 4 | 127 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-11 | 247 | 494 | 0.50 | 0.050 51 | 0.002 07 | 0.135 59 | 0.005 38 | 0.019 58 | 0.000 20 | 219 | 73 | 129 | 5 | 125 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-12 | 385 | 737 | 0.52 | 0.050 87 | 0.003 55 | 0.138 77 | 0.010 22 | 0.019 66 | 0.000 27 | 235 | 142 | 132 | 9 | 125 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-13 | 745 | 1 136 | 0.66 | 0.049 29 | 0.002 42 | 0.135 40 | 0.006 53 | 0.019 91 | 0.000 22 | 162 | 90 | 129 | 6 | 127 | 1 | ||
21L03-1-14 | 88 | 322 | 0.27 | 0.052 02 | 0.004 05 | 0.139 97 | 0.010 57 | 0.01975 | 0.00037 | 286 | 138 | 133 | 9 | 126 | 2 | ||
21L03-1-15 | 235 | 233 | 1.01 | 0.058 72 | 0.003 58 | 0.158 00 | 0.008 76 | 0.019 83 | 0.000 32 | 557 | 93 | 149 | 8 | 127 | 2 |
样品号 | 主量元素含量/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | TFe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI | Total | |
21L03-1 | 75.70 | 0.14 | 13.00 | 1.51 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 3.25 | 4.96 | 0.04 | 0.81 | 99.72 |
21L03-5 | 76.03 | 0.10 | 13.51 | 1.24 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 3.06 | 4.82 | 0.02 | 0.87 | 99.86 |
21L03-6 | 76.07 | 0.10 | 13.17 | 1.08 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 3.12 | 5.19 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 99.56 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||
Be | Sc | V | Cr | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | Ga | Rb | Sr | Y | |
21L03-1 | 1.96 | 1.59 | 8.26 | 16.77 | 1.20 | 6.60 | 1.38 | 23.74 | 17.17 | 226.70 | 53.50 | 13.04 |
21L03-5 | 5.11 | 1.76 | 2.21 | 10.10 | 0.43 | 2.51 | 3.09 | 153.50 | 17.53 | 246.60 | 73.45 | 7.87 |
21L03-6 | 1.90 | 1.79 | 1.97 | 9.26 | 0.29 | 3.55 | 7.44 | 52.50 | 13.85 | 194.15 | 62.75 | 9.20 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||
Zr | Nb | Cs | Ba | Hf | Ta | Pb | Th | U | Ge | Li | Sn | |
21L03-1 | 135.60 | 16.80 | 1.08 | 306.35 | 5.37 | 3.14 | 24.05 | 18.88 | 3.84 | 2.38 | 8.71 | 2.01 |
21L03-5 | 92.00 | 13.59 | 2.32 | 427.90 | 3.91 | 2.89 | 34.00 | 21.92 | 4.63 | 2.17 | 9.38 | 7.25 |
21L03-6 | 72.35 | 11.98 | 1.63 | 328.95 | 3.30 | 2.58 | 29.74 | 23.35 | 5.27 | 1.89 | 5.80 | 3.13 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||
Tl | Ti | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | |
21L03-1 | 1.14 | 865.28 | 6.36 | 38.17 | 1.72 | 5.95 | 1.44 | 0.18 | 1.70 | 0.33 | 2.27 | 0.52 |
21L03-5 | 1.35 | 607.62 | 17.39 | 43.97 | 3.61 | 11.67 | 2.07 | 0.27 | 1.73 | 0.25 | 1.49 | 0.31 |
21L03-6 | 1.00 | 582.22 | 22.39 | 45.30 | 4.79 | 15.74 | 2.92 | 0.48 | 2.74 | 0.35 | 1.86 | 0.37 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | (La/Yb)N | Eu/Eu* | Rb/Sr | Sr/Y | Nb/Ta | ||||||
Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | ∑REE | ∑LREE | ∑HREE | ||||||
21L03-1 | 1.67 | 0.29 | 2.07 | 0.32 | 62.97 | 53.81 | 9.16 | 2.07 | 0.36 | 4.24 | 4.10 | 5.36 |
21L03-5 | 0.94 | 0.15 | 1.02 | 0.15 | 85.00 | 78.97 | 6.03 | 11.54 | 0.42 | 3.36 | 9.34 | 4.70 |
21L03-6 | 1.07 | 0.17 | 1.08 | 0.17 | 99.43 | 91.61 | 7.82 | 14.02 | 0.51 | 3.09 | 6.82 | 4.64 |
表2 辽东半岛鸡冠山花岗斑岩主量元素和微量元素分析结果
Table 2 Whole-rock major and trace elements analytic data of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry in the Liaodong Peninsula
样品号 | 主量元素含量/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | TFe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI | Total | |
21L03-1 | 75.70 | 0.14 | 13.00 | 1.51 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 3.25 | 4.96 | 0.04 | 0.81 | 99.72 |
21L03-5 | 76.03 | 0.10 | 13.51 | 1.24 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 3.06 | 4.82 | 0.02 | 0.87 | 99.86 |
21L03-6 | 76.07 | 0.10 | 13.17 | 1.08 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 3.12 | 5.19 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 99.56 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||
Be | Sc | V | Cr | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | Ga | Rb | Sr | Y | |
21L03-1 | 1.96 | 1.59 | 8.26 | 16.77 | 1.20 | 6.60 | 1.38 | 23.74 | 17.17 | 226.70 | 53.50 | 13.04 |
21L03-5 | 5.11 | 1.76 | 2.21 | 10.10 | 0.43 | 2.51 | 3.09 | 153.50 | 17.53 | 246.60 | 73.45 | 7.87 |
21L03-6 | 1.90 | 1.79 | 1.97 | 9.26 | 0.29 | 3.55 | 7.44 | 52.50 | 13.85 | 194.15 | 62.75 | 9.20 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||
Zr | Nb | Cs | Ba | Hf | Ta | Pb | Th | U | Ge | Li | Sn | |
21L03-1 | 135.60 | 16.80 | 1.08 | 306.35 | 5.37 | 3.14 | 24.05 | 18.88 | 3.84 | 2.38 | 8.71 | 2.01 |
21L03-5 | 92.00 | 13.59 | 2.32 | 427.90 | 3.91 | 2.89 | 34.00 | 21.92 | 4.63 | 2.17 | 9.38 | 7.25 |
21L03-6 | 72.35 | 11.98 | 1.63 | 328.95 | 3.30 | 2.58 | 29.74 | 23.35 | 5.27 | 1.89 | 5.80 | 3.13 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||
Tl | Ti | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | |
21L03-1 | 1.14 | 865.28 | 6.36 | 38.17 | 1.72 | 5.95 | 1.44 | 0.18 | 1.70 | 0.33 | 2.27 | 0.52 |
21L03-5 | 1.35 | 607.62 | 17.39 | 43.97 | 3.61 | 11.67 | 2.07 | 0.27 | 1.73 | 0.25 | 1.49 | 0.31 |
21L03-6 | 1.00 | 582.22 | 22.39 | 45.30 | 4.79 | 15.74 | 2.92 | 0.48 | 2.74 | 0.35 | 1.86 | 0.37 |
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | (La/Yb)N | Eu/Eu* | Rb/Sr | Sr/Y | Nb/Ta | ||||||
Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | ∑REE | ∑LREE | ∑HREE | ||||||
21L03-1 | 1.67 | 0.29 | 2.07 | 0.32 | 62.97 | 53.81 | 9.16 | 2.07 | 0.36 | 4.24 | 4.10 | 5.36 |
21L03-5 | 0.94 | 0.15 | 1.02 | 0.15 | 85.00 | 78.97 | 6.03 | 11.54 | 0.42 | 3.36 | 9.34 | 4.70 |
21L03-6 | 1.07 | 0.17 | 1.08 | 0.17 | 99.43 | 91.61 | 7.82 | 14.02 | 0.51 | 3.09 | 6.82 | 4.64 |
图4 鸡冠山花岗斑岩主量元素判别图(丹东地区I型花岗岩数据据文献[9,20];千山A型花岗岩数据据文献[21]) a—(K2O+Na2O)-SiO2(TAS)图(据文献[31]); b—K2O-SiO2图(据文献[32])。
Fig.4 Major element discrimination diagram of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) (K2O+Na2O) vs. SiO2 diagram (adapted from [31]) and (b) K2O vs. SiO2 diagram (adapted from [32]) of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. Data of the Dandong I-type granite are from [9,20] and the Qianshan A-type granite from [21].
图5 鸡冠山花岗斑岩微量元素判别图(球粒陨石和原始地幔数据来源于文献[33], 其他文献数据来源同图4) a—球粒陨石标准化稀土元素配分型式图; b—原始地幔标准化微量元素蛛网图。
Fig.5 Trace element discrimination diagram of the Jiguanshan granitic porphyry. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (b) primitive mantle (PM)-normalized trace element diagrams. The chondrite and PM values are from [33]. Literature data are the same as Fig.4.
图6 鸡冠山花岗斑岩磷灰石的微量元素组成(球粒陨石和原始地幔数据来源于文献[33],I型花岗岩和S型花岗岩中磷灰石数据来源于文献[35]) a—磷灰石代表性CL图像; b—球粒陨石标准化稀土元素配分型式图; c—原始地幔标准化微量元素蛛网图。
Fig.6 Trace element composition of apatite from the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Representative CL images of apatites from the Jiguanshan granite porphyry, (b) chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (c) PM normalized trace element diagrams for the apatite grains and host granite. The chondrite and PM values are from [33]. The apatite’s data of I-type and S-type granites are from [35] and references therein.
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rb | Sr | Y | Zr | Nb | Cs | Ba | Hf | Pb | Th | U | La | Ce | Pr | |||||||||||||
21L3-1-01 | 0.24 | 338.06 | 1 163.58 | 1.88 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.38 | 0.02 | 3.89 | 36.64 | 9.33 | 1 502.72 | 4 052.83 | 468.91 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-02 | 0.54 | 325.22 | 793.61 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 4.65 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 11.87 | 2.70 | 817.38 | 2 255.64 | 282.54 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-03 | 0.00 | 341.69 | 826.02 | 2.29 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 1.53 | 0.01 | 3.49 | 23.24 | 5.73 | 1 265.17 | 3 269.44 | 366.28 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-04 | 0.21 | 245.16 | 888.35 | 3.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 0.05 | 3.19 | 13.39 | 3.74 | 850.36 | 2 402.37 | 292.85 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-05 | 0.00 | 372.97 | 796.39 | 2.07 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 1.86 | 0.01 | 3.56 | 22.76 | 5.05 | 1 151.19 | 2 996.50 | 342.71 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-06 | 0.15 | 210.01 | 927.36 | 4.08 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 3.12 | 15.78 | 4.17 | 867.63 | 2 475.38 | 302.00 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-07 | 0.44 | 238.52 | 1 277.60 | 2.30 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 3.96 | 34.72 | 8.08 | 1 067.82 | 3 179.90 | 394.85 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-08 | 0.00 | 391.93 | 526.11 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 5.62 | 2.55 | 658.90 | 1 597.25 | 201.88 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-09 | 1.72 | 408.13 | 900.73 | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 0.02 | 2.80 | 14.88 | 3.87 | 441.52 | 1 303.10 | 190.51 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-10 | 0.00 | 278.68 | 655.17 | 0.87 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 1.40 | 0.02 | 3.56 | 13.56 | 4.07 | 1 075.99 | 2 864.07 | 324.45 | ||||||||||||
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | Eu/Eu* | Nd/Nd* | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | ∑REE | |||||||||||||||
21L3-1-01 | 2 080.56 | 389.99 | 26.82 | 316.37 | 42.14 | 223.42 | 41.56 | 100.65 | 12.44 | 68.84 | 8.94 | 10 500.09 | 0.23 | 1.19 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-02 | 1 244.49 | 249.96 | 15.20 | 220.03 | 27.20 | 148.65 | 27.86 | 68.47 | 7.34 | 44.94 | 6.17 | 6 209.48 | 0.19 | 1.16 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-03 | 1 597.69 | 289.81 | 20.30 | 225.46 | 29.04 | 153.30 | 28.05 | 67.90 | 8.51 | 48.18 | 6.14 | 8 201.44 | 0.23 | 1.19 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-04 | 1 376.71 | 293.48 | 10.26 | 256.96 | 33.34 | 174.35 | 32.61 | 74.98 | 9.11 | 50.64 | 6.08 | 6 752.51 | 0.11 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-05 | 1 530.73 | 277.99 | 20.42 | 219.23 | 28.29 | 150.60 | 27.64 | 65.03 | 7.83 | 45.10 | 5.58 | 7 665.34 | 0.24 | 1.21 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-06 | 1 400.57 | 293.53 | 10.29 | 256.64 | 33.89 | 182.48 | 33.23 | 76.93 | 8.98 | 50.10 | 6.36 | 6 925.49 | 0.11 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-07 | 1 863.54 | 399.28 | 20.10 | 336.44 | 45.59 | 245.18 | 45.75 | 109.59 | 13.26 | 76.61 | 9.60 | 9 085.29 | 0.16 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-08 | 908.83 | 180.52 | 10.49 | 155.74 | 19.82 | 100.29 | 18.93 | 43.88 | 5.39 | 29.51 | 3.73 | 4 461.55 | 0.19 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-09 | 952.64 | 250.14 | 11.12 | 240.04 | 33.02 | 178.59 | 33.02 | 75.46 | 9.33 | 48.08 | 5.90 | 4 673.54 | 0.14 | 1.12 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-10 | 1 422.63 | 248.29 | 16.64 | 190.50 | 23.30 | 125.55 | 23.53 | 58.45 | 7.81 | 45.24 | 5.66 | 7 087.38 | 0.23 | 1.21 |
表3 辽东半岛鸡冠山花岗斑岩磷灰石微量元素分析结果
Table 3 Apatite trace elements analytic data of Jiguanshan granite porphyry in Liaodong Peninsula
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rb | Sr | Y | Zr | Nb | Cs | Ba | Hf | Pb | Th | U | La | Ce | Pr | |||||||||||||
21L3-1-01 | 0.24 | 338.06 | 1 163.58 | 1.88 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.38 | 0.02 | 3.89 | 36.64 | 9.33 | 1 502.72 | 4 052.83 | 468.91 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-02 | 0.54 | 325.22 | 793.61 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 4.65 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 11.87 | 2.70 | 817.38 | 2 255.64 | 282.54 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-03 | 0.00 | 341.69 | 826.02 | 2.29 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 1.53 | 0.01 | 3.49 | 23.24 | 5.73 | 1 265.17 | 3 269.44 | 366.28 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-04 | 0.21 | 245.16 | 888.35 | 3.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 0.05 | 3.19 | 13.39 | 3.74 | 850.36 | 2 402.37 | 292.85 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-05 | 0.00 | 372.97 | 796.39 | 2.07 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 1.86 | 0.01 | 3.56 | 22.76 | 5.05 | 1 151.19 | 2 996.50 | 342.71 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-06 | 0.15 | 210.01 | 927.36 | 4.08 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 3.12 | 15.78 | 4.17 | 867.63 | 2 475.38 | 302.00 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-07 | 0.44 | 238.52 | 1 277.60 | 2.30 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 3.96 | 34.72 | 8.08 | 1 067.82 | 3 179.90 | 394.85 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-08 | 0.00 | 391.93 | 526.11 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 5.62 | 2.55 | 658.90 | 1 597.25 | 201.88 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-09 | 1.72 | 408.13 | 900.73 | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 0.02 | 2.80 | 14.88 | 3.87 | 441.52 | 1 303.10 | 190.51 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-10 | 0.00 | 278.68 | 655.17 | 0.87 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 1.40 | 0.02 | 3.56 | 13.56 | 4.07 | 1 075.99 | 2 864.07 | 324.45 | ||||||||||||
样品号 | 微量元素含量/10-6 | Eu/Eu* | Nd/Nd* | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | ∑REE | |||||||||||||||
21L3-1-01 | 2 080.56 | 389.99 | 26.82 | 316.37 | 42.14 | 223.42 | 41.56 | 100.65 | 12.44 | 68.84 | 8.94 | 10 500.09 | 0.23 | 1.19 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-02 | 1 244.49 | 249.96 | 15.20 | 220.03 | 27.20 | 148.65 | 27.86 | 68.47 | 7.34 | 44.94 | 6.17 | 6 209.48 | 0.19 | 1.16 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-03 | 1 597.69 | 289.81 | 20.30 | 225.46 | 29.04 | 153.30 | 28.05 | 67.90 | 8.51 | 48.18 | 6.14 | 8 201.44 | 0.23 | 1.19 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-04 | 1 376.71 | 293.48 | 10.26 | 256.96 | 33.34 | 174.35 | 32.61 | 74.98 | 9.11 | 50.64 | 6.08 | 6 752.51 | 0.11 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-05 | 1 530.73 | 277.99 | 20.42 | 219.23 | 28.29 | 150.60 | 27.64 | 65.03 | 7.83 | 45.10 | 5.58 | 7 665.34 | 0.24 | 1.21 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-06 | 1 400.57 | 293.53 | 10.29 | 256.64 | 33.89 | 182.48 | 33.23 | 76.93 | 8.98 | 50.10 | 6.36 | 6 925.49 | 0.11 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-07 | 1 863.54 | 399.28 | 20.10 | 336.44 | 45.59 | 245.18 | 45.75 | 109.59 | 13.26 | 76.61 | 9.60 | 9 085.29 | 0.16 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-08 | 908.83 | 180.52 | 10.49 | 155.74 | 19.82 | 100.29 | 18.93 | 43.88 | 5.39 | 29.51 | 3.73 | 4 461.55 | 0.19 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-09 | 952.64 | 250.14 | 11.12 | 240.04 | 33.02 | 178.59 | 33.02 | 75.46 | 9.33 | 48.08 | 5.90 | 4 673.54 | 0.14 | 1.12 | ||||||||||||
21L3-1-10 | 1 422.63 | 248.29 | 16.64 | 190.50 | 23.30 | 125.55 | 23.53 | 58.45 | 7.81 | 45.24 | 5.66 | 7 087.38 | 0.23 | 1.21 |
样品号 | 147Sm/144Nd | 143Nd/144Nd | 2σ | εNd(0) | εNd(t) | fSm/Nd | TDM1/Ma | TDM2/Ma |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21L03-1-01 | 0.109 249 | 0.511 782 | 0.000 023 | -16.7 | -15.3 | -0.44 | 1 990 | 2 161 |
21L03-1-02 | 0.129 093 | 0.511 737 | 0.000 038 | -17.6 | -16.5 | -0.34 | 2 532 | 2 253 |
21L03-1-03 | 0.118 893 | 0.511 751 | 0.000 025 | -17.3 | -16.1 | -0.40 | 2 240 | 2 221 |
21L03-1-04 | 0.122 794 | 0.511 744 | 0.000 028 | -17.4 | -16.3 | -0.38 | 2 346 | 2 235 |
21L03-1-05 | 0.115 211 | 0.511 745 | 0.000 030 | -17.4 | -16.1 | -0.41 | 2 166 | 2 226 |
21L03-1-06 | 0.132 856 | 0.511 778 | 0.000 025 | -16.8 | -15.8 | -0.32 | 2 574 | 2 194 |
21L03-1-07 | 0.127 898 | 0.511 812 | 0.000 036 | -16.1 | -15.0 | -0.35 | 2 366 | 2 135 |
21L03-1-08 | 0.110 641 | 0.511 724 | 0.000 035 | -17.8 | -16.4 | -0.44 | 2 101 | 2 253 |
21L03-1-09 | 0.141 462 | 0.511 737 | 0.000 051 | -17.6 | -16.7 | -0.28 | 2 963 | 2 267 |
21L03-1-10 | 0.104 815 | 0.511 782 | 0.000 029 | -16.7 | -15.2 | -0.47 | 1 909 | 2 155 |
表4 辽东半岛鸡冠山花岗斑岩LA-MC-ICP-MS磷灰石Nd同位素分析结果
Table 4 LA-MC-ICP-MS apatite Nd isotope analytic data of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry in the Liaodong Peninsula
样品号 | 147Sm/144Nd | 143Nd/144Nd | 2σ | εNd(0) | εNd(t) | fSm/Nd | TDM1/Ma | TDM2/Ma |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21L03-1-01 | 0.109 249 | 0.511 782 | 0.000 023 | -16.7 | -15.3 | -0.44 | 1 990 | 2 161 |
21L03-1-02 | 0.129 093 | 0.511 737 | 0.000 038 | -17.6 | -16.5 | -0.34 | 2 532 | 2 253 |
21L03-1-03 | 0.118 893 | 0.511 751 | 0.000 025 | -17.3 | -16.1 | -0.40 | 2 240 | 2 221 |
21L03-1-04 | 0.122 794 | 0.511 744 | 0.000 028 | -17.4 | -16.3 | -0.38 | 2 346 | 2 235 |
21L03-1-05 | 0.115 211 | 0.511 745 | 0.000 030 | -17.4 | -16.1 | -0.41 | 2 166 | 2 226 |
21L03-1-06 | 0.132 856 | 0.511 778 | 0.000 025 | -16.8 | -15.8 | -0.32 | 2 574 | 2 194 |
21L03-1-07 | 0.127 898 | 0.511 812 | 0.000 036 | -16.1 | -15.0 | -0.35 | 2 366 | 2 135 |
21L03-1-08 | 0.110 641 | 0.511 724 | 0.000 035 | -17.8 | -16.4 | -0.44 | 2 101 | 2 253 |
21L03-1-09 | 0.141 462 | 0.511 737 | 0.000 051 | -17.6 | -16.7 | -0.28 | 2 963 | 2 267 |
21L03-1-10 | 0.104 815 | 0.511 782 | 0.000 029 | -16.7 | -15.2 | -0.47 | 1 909 | 2 155 |
测点号 | 176Yb/177Hf | 176Lu/177Hf | 176Hf/177Hf | 2σ | εHf(0) | εHf(t) | TDM1(Hf)/Ma | TDM2(Hf)/Ma | fLu/Hf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21L03-01 | 0.074 905 | 0.001 798 | 0.282 130 | 0.000 035 | -22.7 | -20.1 | 1 614 | 2 454 | -0.95 |
21L03-05 | 0.052 331 | 0.001 272 | 0.282 145 | 0.000 031 | -22.2 | -19.5 | 1 571 | 2 419 | -0.96 |
21L03-06 | 0.044 290 | 0.001 142 | 0.282 177 | 0.000 030 | -21.0 | -18.4 | 1 521 | 2 347 | -0.97 |
21L03-08 | 0.109 883 | 0.002 564 | 0.282 155 | 0.000 034 | -21.8 | -19.3 | 1 612 | 2 401 | -0.92 |
21L03-10 | 0.042 837 | 0.001 103 | 0.282 195 | 0.000 026 | -20.4 | -17.7 | 1 494 | 2 307 | -0.97 |
21L03-11 | 0.076 286 | 0.001 817 | 0.282 183 | 0.000 030 | -20.8 | -18.2 | 1 540 | 2 336 | -0.95 |
21L03-12 | 0.043 803 | 0.001 082 | 0.282 201 | 0.000 033 | -20.2 | -17.5 | 1 485 | 2 294 | -0.97 |
21L03-13 | 0.071 787 | 0.001 706 | 0.282 193 | 0.000 025 | -20.5 | -17.8 | 1 521 | 2 313 | -0.95 |
21L03-14 | 0.023 320 | 0.000 614 | 0.282 248 | 0.000 027 | -18.5 | -15.8 | 1 402 | 2 187 | -0.98 |
21L03-15 | 0.115 297 | 0.002 759 | 0.282 262 | 0.000 033 | -18.1 | -15.5 | 1 465 | 2 166 | -0.92 |
表5 辽东半岛鸡冠山花岗斑岩LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石Hf同位素分析结果
Table 5 LA-MC-ICP-MS zircon Hf isotope analytic data of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry in the Liaodong Peninsula
测点号 | 176Yb/177Hf | 176Lu/177Hf | 176Hf/177Hf | 2σ | εHf(0) | εHf(t) | TDM1(Hf)/Ma | TDM2(Hf)/Ma | fLu/Hf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21L03-01 | 0.074 905 | 0.001 798 | 0.282 130 | 0.000 035 | -22.7 | -20.1 | 1 614 | 2 454 | -0.95 |
21L03-05 | 0.052 331 | 0.001 272 | 0.282 145 | 0.000 031 | -22.2 | -19.5 | 1 571 | 2 419 | -0.96 |
21L03-06 | 0.044 290 | 0.001 142 | 0.282 177 | 0.000 030 | -21.0 | -18.4 | 1 521 | 2 347 | -0.97 |
21L03-08 | 0.109 883 | 0.002 564 | 0.282 155 | 0.000 034 | -21.8 | -19.3 | 1 612 | 2 401 | -0.92 |
21L03-10 | 0.042 837 | 0.001 103 | 0.282 195 | 0.000 026 | -20.4 | -17.7 | 1 494 | 2 307 | -0.97 |
21L03-11 | 0.076 286 | 0.001 817 | 0.282 183 | 0.000 030 | -20.8 | -18.2 | 1 540 | 2 336 | -0.95 |
21L03-12 | 0.043 803 | 0.001 082 | 0.282 201 | 0.000 033 | -20.2 | -17.5 | 1 485 | 2 294 | -0.97 |
21L03-13 | 0.071 787 | 0.001 706 | 0.282 193 | 0.000 025 | -20.5 | -17.8 | 1 521 | 2 313 | -0.95 |
21L03-14 | 0.023 320 | 0.000 614 | 0.282 248 | 0.000 027 | -18.5 | -15.8 | 1 402 | 2 187 | -0.98 |
21L03-15 | 0.115 297 | 0.002 759 | 0.282 262 | 0.000 033 | -18.1 | -15.5 | 1 465 | 2 166 | -0.92 |
图7 鸡冠山花岗斑岩成因类型判别图(据文献[40];文献数据来源同图4) a—TFeO/MgO-(Zr+Nb+Ce+Y)图; b—Nb-10000Ga/Al图; c—Ce-10000Ga/Al图; d—Zr-10000Ga/Al图。缩写:FG代表分异的花岗岩;OGT代表未分异的I、S和M花岗岩。
Fig.7 Discrimination diagram of genetic types of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) TFeO/MgO vs. (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y), (b) Nb vs. 10000Ga/Al, (c) Ce vs. 10000Ga/Al and (d) Zr vs. 10000Ga/Al discrimination diagrams (adapted from [40]). Literature data are the same as Fig.4. Abbreviations: FG, fractionated felsic granites; OGT, unfractionated I, S and M-type granites.
图8 鸡冠山花岗斑岩中磷灰石的成因判别图 a—Nd/Nd*-Sr图(据文献[45]; 数据来源文献[35]); b—Sr/Y-LREE 图(LREE: La-Nd; 据文献[35])。缩写:ALK代表富碱火成岩; HM代表浅色脉体/高级变质岩; IM代表I型花岗岩/基性火成岩; LM代表中低级变质岩/交代岩; S代表S型花岗岩; UM代表超基性岩。
Fig.8 Genetic discrimination diagram of apatite in the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Nd/Nd* vs. Sr diagram (adapted from [45]; data from [35]) and (b) Sr/Y vs. LREE diagram (LREE: defined here as La-Nd; after [35]) for apatite in the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. Abbreviations: ALK, alkali-rich igneous rocks; HM, leucosomes/high-grade metamorphic rocks; IM, mafic I-type granitoids and mafic igneous rocks; LM, low- and medium-grade metamorphic and metasomatic rocks; S, S-type granitoids; UM, ultramafic rocks.
图9 鸡冠山花岗斑岩源区特征判别图(据文献[49];文献数据来源同图4) a—Mg#[Mg#=Mg2+/(Mg2++Fe2+);摩尔分数比]-SiO2图; b—K2O/Na2O(质量分数比)-ASI[ASI=Al2O3/(CaO+K2O+Na2O);质量分数比]图。
Fig.9 Source characteristics discrimination diagram of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Mg#[Mg# = Mg2+/(Mg2+ + Fe2+); mole fraction] vs. SiO2 and (b) K2O/Na2O (mass fraction) vs. ASI[ASI = Al2O3/(CaO + K2O + Na2O); mass fraction] diagrams (adapted from [49]) of source characteristics for the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. Literature data are the same as Fig.4.
图10 鸡冠山花岗斑岩同位素组成图(太古宙片麻岩和古元古代南辽河群锆石Hf同位素数据据文献[48];辽东半岛早白垩世花岗质岩石: 锆石Hf同位素数据据文献[9],磷灰石Nd同位素数据据文献[50]) a—锆石εHf(t)-年龄图(据文献[21]); b—磷灰石εNd(t)-年龄图(据文献[50])。
Fig.10 Isotopic composition diagram of the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Zircon εHf(t) vs. zircon U-Pb age (adapted from [21]) and (b) apatite εNd(t) vs. zircon U-Pb age (adapted from [50]) diagrams for the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. Zircon Hf isotopic data for the Archean gneisses and Paleoproterozoic South Liaohe Group are from [48]. Zircon Hf isotopic data and apatite Nd isotopic data for the Early Cretaceous granitoids in Liaodong Peninsula are from [9] and [50], respectively.
图11 鸡冠山花岗斑岩磷灰石微量元素协变图 a—Nd/Tb-REEs图; b—Th-REEs图; c—U-REEs图; d—Th/U-REEs图。
Fig.11 Co-variation diagrams of trace elements in apatite from Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Nd/Tb, (b) Th, (c) U, and (d) Th/U vs. total REE contents diagrams showing variations in the chemistry of apatite in the Jiguanshan granite porphyry.
图12 鸡冠山花岗斑岩微量元素构造环境判别图(据文献[59];文献数据来源同图4) a—Rb-(Y + Nb)图; b—Nb-Y图
Fig.12 Tectonic settings discrimination diagram of trace elements for the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. (a) Rb vs.(Y+Nb) and (b) Nb vs. Y discrimination diagrams (adapted from [59]) of tectonic settings for the Jiguanshan granite porphyry. Literature data are the same as Fig.4.
[1] | WU F Y, YANG J H, XU Y G, et al. Destruction of the North China Craton in the Mesozoic[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2019, 47: 173-195. |
[2] | YANG J H, WU F Y, WILDE S A, et al. Mesozoic decratonization of the North China Block[J]. Geology, 2008, 36(6): 467. |
[3] | 吴福元, 杨进辉, 柳小明. 辽东半岛中生代花岗质岩浆作用的年代学格架[J]. 高校地质学报, 2005, 11(3): 305-317. |
[4] | WU F Y, LIN J Q, WILDE S, et al. Nature and significance of the Early Cretaceous giant igneous event in Eastern China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 233: 103-119. |
[5] | WU F Y, YANG J H, WILDE S A, et al. Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Jurassic granites in the Liaodong Peninsula, NE China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2005, 221(1/2): 127-156. |
[6] | 路孝平, 吴福元, 林景仟, 等. 辽东半岛南部早前寒武纪花岗质岩浆作用的年代学格架[J]. 地质科学, 2004, 39(1): 123-138. |
[7] | QUAN Y K, YANG D B, YANG H T, et al. Petrogenesis of Jurassic granitic plutons in Liaodong Peninsula, NE China: insights into the subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2022, 236:105310. |
[8] | QUAN Y K, YANG D B, MU M S, et al. Tectonic evolution of the northeastern North China Craton: constraints from geochronology and Sr-Nd-Hf-O isotopic data from Late Triassic intrusive rocks on Liaodong Peninsula, NE China[J]. Lithos, 2020, 362: 105489. |
[9] | QUAN Y K, YANG D B, YANG H T, et al. Reworking of continental crust on northeastern North China Craton: evidence from geochronology and geochemistry of Early Cretaceous granitic rocks[J]. Tectonophysics, 2022, 829: 229306. |
[10] | JI Z, GE W C, HE Y, et al. Mixing of cognate magmas as a process for producing high-silica granites: insights from Guanmenshan Complex in Liaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Lithos, 2021, 406: 106495. |
[11] | LIU Y, WEI J H, ZHANG D H, et al. Mesozoic crustal reworking at different depths in the North China Craton: insight from the coexisting Early Cretaceous high and low Sr/Y granitoids[J]. Lithos, 2023, 462/463:107402. |
[12] | 李三忠, 郝德峰, 赵国春, 等. 丹东花岗岩的地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 岩石学报, 2004, 20(6): 1417-23 |
[13] | 孟恩, 刘福来, 施建荣, 等. 丹东地区前震旦纪花岗岩年代学[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 29(2): 421-436. |
[14] | 辽宁省地质矿产局. 辽林省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001. |
[15] | ZHAO G C, CAWOOD P A, WILDE S A, et al. High-pressure granulites (retrograded eclogites) from the Hengshan complex, North China Craton: petrology and tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2001, 42(6): 1141-1170. |
[16] | ZHU R X, XU Y G. The subduction of the west Pacific plate and the destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2019, 62(9): 1340-1350. |
[17] | MU M S, YANG D B, YANG H T, et al. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of the Paleoproterozoic gaoliduntai plagiogranites in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton[J]. Precambrian Research, 2022, 368: 106465. |
[18] | MU M S, YANG D B, YANG H T, et al. Petrogenesis of late Paleoproterozoic post-collisional magmatism in southern North China Craton: insights from geochemistry and Nd-Hf isotopic compositions of A-type granites[J]. Precambrian Research, 2022, 383: 106887. |
[19] | QUAN Y K, MU M S, YANG D B, et al. Geochronology and in situ apatite geochemistry of late Paleoproterozoic A-type granites in the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic evolution[J]. Geochemistry, 2023, 83(4): 126009. |
[20] | 崔维龙, 刘正宏, 杜洋, 等. 辽东地区大兴岩体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2016, 38(5): 623-637. |
[21] | YANG J H, WU F Y, CHUNG S L, et al. A hybrid origin for the Qianshan A-type granite, Northeast China: geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence[J]. Lithos, 2006, 89(1/2): 89-106. |
[22] | 刘杰勋. 华北克拉通北缘东段辽东地区中生代构造演化[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019. |
[23] | ZONG K Q, KLEMD R, YUAN Y, et al. The assembly of Rodinia: the correlation of early Neoproterozoic (ca. 900 Ma) high-grade metamorphism and continental arc formation in the southern Beishan Orogen, southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB)[J]. Precambrian Research, 2017, 290: 32-48. |
[24] | WIEDENBECK M, ALLÉ P, CORFU F, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and ree analyses[J]. Geostandards Newsletter, 1995, 19(1): 1-23. |
[25] | MA Q, ZHENG J P, GRIFFIN W L, et al. Triassic “adakitic” rocks in an extensional setting (North China): melts from the cratonic lower crust[J]. Lithos, 2012, 149: 159-173. |
[26] | HU Z C, LIU Y S, GAO S, et al. Improved in situ Hf isotope ratio analysis of zircon using newly designed X skimmer cone and jet sample cone in combination with the addition of nitrogen by laser ablation multiple collector ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2012, 27(9): 1391-1399. |
[27] | GRIFFIN W L, PEARSON N J, BELOUSOVA E A, et al. Comment: Hf-isotope heterogeneity in zircon 91500[J]. Chemical Geology, 2006, 233(3/4): 358-363. |
[28] | QIAN S P, ZHANG L. Simultaneous in situ determination of rare earth element concentrations and Nd isotope ratio in apatite by laser ablation ICP-MS[J]. Geochemical Journal, 2019, 53(5): 319-328. |
[29] | YANG Y H, WU F Y, YANG J H, et al. Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of apatite reference materials used in U-Th-Pb geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2014, 385: 35-55. |
[30] | BELOUSOVA E, GRIFFIN W, O’REILLY S Y, et al. Igneous zircon: trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 143(5): 602-622. |
[31] | MIDDLEMOST E A K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 1994, 37(3/4): 215-224. |
[32] | PECCERILLO A, TAYLOR S. Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, Northern Turkey[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1976, 58(1): 63-81. |
[33] | SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1989, 42(1): 313-345. |
[34] | BELOUSOVA E A, GRIFFIN W L, O’REILLY S Y, et al. Apatite as an indicator mineral for mineral exploration: trace-element compositions and their relationship to host rock type[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2002, 76(1): 45-69. |
[35] | O’SULLIVAN G, CHEW D, KENNY G, et al. The trace element composition of apatite and its application to detrital provenance studies[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 201: 103044. |
[36] | 郭春丽, 吴福元, 杨进辉, 等. 中国东部早白垩世岩浆作用的伸展构造性质: 以辽东半岛南部饮马湾山岩体为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2004, 20(5): 204-215. |
[37] | WU F Y, LIU X C, JI W Q, et al. Highly fractionated granites: recognition and research[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2017, 60(7): 1201-1219. |
[38] | GREEN T H. Significance of Nb/Ta as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust-mantle system[J]. Chemical Geology, 1995, 120(3/4): 347-359. |
[39] | MichaelBau. Controls on the fractionation of isovalent trace elements in magmatic and aqueous systems: evidence from Y/Ho, Zr/Hf, and lanthanide tetrad effect[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1996, 123(3): 323-333. |
[40] | WHALEN J B, CURRIE K L, CHAPPELL B W. A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1987, 95(4): 407-419. |
[41] | CHAPPELL B W, WHITE A J R. Two contrasting granite types[J]. Pacific Geology, 1974, 8(2): 173-174. |
[42] | WATSON E B, HARRISON T M. Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1983, 64(2): 295-304. |
[43] | CHAPPELL B W, WHITE A J R. I- and S-type granites in the Lachlan fold belt[J]. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1992, 83(1/2): 1-26. |
[44] | HSIEH P S, CHEN C H, YANG H J, et al. Petrogenesis of the Nanling Mountains granites from South China: constraints from systematic apatite geochemistry and whole-rock geochemical and Sr-Nd isotope compositions[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2008, 33(5/6): 428-451. |
[45] | BELOUSOVA E A, WALTERS S, GRIFFIN W L, et al. Trace-element signatures of apatites in granitoids from the Mt Isa Inlier, northwestern Queensland[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2001, 48(4): 603-619. |
[46] | GAO S, LUO T C, ZHANG B R, et al. Chemical composition of the continental crust as revealed by studies in East China[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1998, 62(11): 1959-1975. |
[47] | GAO L E, ZENG L S, ASIMOW P D. Contrasting geochemical signatures of fluid-absent versus fluid-fluxed melting of muscovite in metasedimentary sources: the Himalayan leucogranites[J]. Geology, 2017, 45(1): 39-42. |
[48] | 孟恩, 王朝阳, 刘超辉, 等. 辽东半岛东南部南辽河群变质火山岩的时代、成因及其对区域构造演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1589-1619. |
[49] | ALTHERR R, SIEBEL W. I-type plutonism in a continental back-arc setting: miocene granitoids and monzonites from the central Aegean Sea, Greece[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 143(4): 397-415. |
[50] | QUAN Y K, YANG D B, YAN X Y, et al. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids in the northeastern North China Craton: constraints from apatite trace elements and in situ Nd isotopic data[J]. Lithos, 2023, 450: 107190. |
[51] | HOSKIN P W O, KINNY P D, WYBORN D, et al. Identifying accessory mineral saturation during differentiation in granitoid magmas: an integrated approach[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2000, 41(9): 1365-1396. |
[52] | PICCOLI P M, CANDELA P A. Apatite in igneous systems[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2002, 48(1): 255-292. |
[53] | PROWATKE S, KLEMME S. Trace element partitioning between apatite and silicate melts[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2006, 70(17): 4513-4527. |
[54] | MILES A J, GRAHAM C M, HAWKESWORTH C J, et al. Evidence for distinct stages of magma history recorded by the compositions of accessory apatite and zircon[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2013, 166(1): 1-19. |
[55] | YAN X Y, YANG D B, XU W L, et al. Apatite geochemistry from mafic rocks in the northeastern North China Craton: new insights into petrogenesis[J]. Lithos, 2023, 436: 106942. |
[56] | SUN J F, YANG J H, ZHANG J H, et al. Apatite geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic insights into granitoid petrogenesis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 566: 120104. |
[57] | STEPANOV A S, HERMANN J, RUBATTO D, et al. Experimental study of monazite/melt partitioning with implications for the REE, Th and U geochemistry of crustal rocks[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 300: 200-220. |
[58] | BARTH S, OBERLI F, MEIER M. Th-Pb versus U-Pb isotope systematics in allanite from co-genetic rhyolite and granodiorite: implications for geochronology[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1994, 124(1/2/3/4): 149-159. |
[59] | PEARCE J A, HARRIS N B W, TINDLE A G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25(4): 956-983. |
[60] | LIN W, WANG Q C, WANG J, et al. Late Mesozoic extensional tectonics of the Liaodong Peninsula massif: response of crust to continental lithosphere destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2011, 54(6): 843-857. |
[61] | MA Q, XU Y G. Magmatic perspective on subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate and initiation of big mantle wedge in East Asia[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 213: 103473. |
[62] | YAN X Y, YANG D B, XU W L, et al. Identification of metasomatic components in lithospheric mantle under multiple tectonic regimes: insights from Early Cretaceous mafic rocks in the northeastern North China Craton[J]. Lithos, 2023, 454: 107262. |
[1] | 王帅, 董涛, 李雅楠, 徐小涛, 高莲凤, 张振国. 东北地区早白垩世古野火事件及其对深时生态系统影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 497-509. |
[2] | 刘美玉, 苏尚国, 刘心然, 郭旭东, 李一鸣. 金川铜镍(铂)硫化物矿床岩浆通道成矿系统:来自矿物学的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(2): 390-411. |
[3] | 刘晓惠, 刘一珉, 丁林, 郭晓玉, 黄兴富, 李蕙琳, 高锐. 中拉萨地体当惹雍措锆石微量元素特征及其对地壳厚度演化的指示[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(1): 343-366. |
[4] | 黄宇, 钟世华, 李三忠, 赵鸿, 薛梓萌, 郭广慧, 刘嘉情, 牛警徽. 副矿物包裹体和信号采集时间对锆石U-Pb年龄和微量元素分析结果的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(1): 388-400. |
[5] | 焦守涛, 刘东娜, 张旗, 靳职斌, 张玉生, 原杰, 周李岗, 刘铁翊, 解团结, 范宗胜, 闫彤彤, 周新鹏, 张双奎, 卫倩倩, 闫涛, 张坤, 尹碧菡. 山西省早白垩世下地壳地质图:基于镜质组反射率证据的修正[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(1): 418-431. |
[6] | 刘金萍, 王改云, 简晓玲, 朱传庆, 胡小强, 袁晓蔷, 王超. 北黄海东部次盆地构造热机制与成烃效应[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 206-218. |
[7] | 尹青青, 唐菊兴, 项新葵, 赵晓彦, 汪方跃, 徐裕敏, 郭虎, 余振东, 谢金玲, 代晶晶, 彭勃. 赣北彭山还原性S型花岗岩成因及其对Sn富集的启示:来自锆石微量元素的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 133-149. |
[8] | 刘持恒, 李子颖, 贺锋, 张字龙, 李振成, 凌明星, 刘瑞萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地西北部下白垩统物源定量分析研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 80-99. |
[9] | 钏茂山, 胡乐, 蔺如喜, 毛崇祯, 李仕忠, 李锁明, 袁永盛. 扬子板块西缘早中生代“绿豆岩”成因及构造启示:锆石U-Pb年龄、微量元素及Hf同位素约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(2): 204-223. |
[10] | 周予茜, 时毓, 黄椿文, 刘希军, 蓝媛春, 唐源远, 翁伯寅. 桂东南莲垌和古龙岩体加里东期I型花岗岩类的岩石成因及构造意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(2): 224-248. |
[11] | 聂潇, 陈雷, 郭现轻, 于涛, 王宗起. 南秦岭中段宁陕地区绿柱石-铌铁矿型伟晶岩中磷灰石和铌铁矿族矿物的矿物地球化学研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(5): 115-133. |
[12] | 孙文博, 李欢. 伟晶岩中锆石研究进展及其对稀有金属成矿的启示[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(5): 171-184. |
[13] | 陈雷, 聂潇, 刘凯, 庞绪勇, 张英利. 东秦岭官坡地区火炎沟伟晶岩型锡铌钽矿床矿物学和年代学特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(5): 40-58. |
[14] | 徐大良, 邓新, 彭练红, 田洋, 金巍, 金鑫镖. 大别山碰撞造山带俯冲盘陆壳基底组成:白垩纪脉岩捕获/继承锆石的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 299-316. |
[15] | 赵晓燕, 杨竹森, 杨洋, 曹煜, 范建彪, 赵苗. 西藏雅拉香波早白垩世变质基性岩和斜长角闪岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 163-182. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||