Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 234-240.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.10.40
Previous Articles Next Articles
CUI Xianyue1(), CHEN Bolin1, SI Xiaobo2, DENG Jinfu2, FENG Yanfang3,*(
), XIAO Qinghui2
Received:
2021-08-12
Revised:
2021-10-27
Online:
2022-03-25
Published:
2022-03-31
Contact:
FENG Yanfang
CLC Number:
CUI Xianyue, CHEN Bolin, SI Xiaobo, DENG Jinfu, FENG Yanfang, XIAO Qinghui. Magmatic epidote in Quanganglintou gneissic dacodiorite from the Changle-Nan’ao structural zone: Discovery and geological significance[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(2): 234-240.
样品 编号 | wB/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | FeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | Total | ||||||||||||
F11-3 | 69.31 | 0.48 | 14.92 | 1.97 | 2.04 | 0.09 | 1.39 | 4.26 | 4.09 | 1.27 | 0.17 | 100 | |||||||||||
F11-4 | 56.81 | 0.91 | 17.07 | 3.16 | 5.38 | 0.15 | 4.15 | 7.32 | 3 | 1.78 | 0.29 | 100 | |||||||||||
F11-5 | 59.96 | 0.84 | 16.47 | 2.66 | 4.72 | 0.17 | 3.75 | 5.66 | 3.39 | 2.11 | 0.29 | 100 | |||||||||||
样品 编号 | C.I.P.W.Norm矿物组分含量/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
石英 | 钙长石 | 钠长石 | 正长石 | 刚玉 | 透辉石 | 紫苏辉石 | 钛铁矿 | 磁铁矿 | 磷灰石 | 合计 | |||||||||||||
F11-3 | 29.55 | 18.6 | 34.59 | 7.53 | 0 | 1.17 | 4.41 | 0.91 | 2.86 | 0.39 | 100 | ||||||||||||
F11-4 | 10.16 | 27.85 | 25.35 | 10.55 | 0 | 5.38 | 13.75 | 1.73 | 4.58 | 0.66 | 100.01 | ||||||||||||
F11-5 | 13.43 | 23.52 | 28.65 | 12.44 | 0 | 2.18 | 13.65 | 1.6 | 3.86 | 0.66 | 99.98 |
Table 1 Major element compositions (100% without water) and CIPW norms in magmatic epidote-bearing gneissic tonalite
样品 编号 | wB/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | FeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | Total | ||||||||||||
F11-3 | 69.31 | 0.48 | 14.92 | 1.97 | 2.04 | 0.09 | 1.39 | 4.26 | 4.09 | 1.27 | 0.17 | 100 | |||||||||||
F11-4 | 56.81 | 0.91 | 17.07 | 3.16 | 5.38 | 0.15 | 4.15 | 7.32 | 3 | 1.78 | 0.29 | 100 | |||||||||||
F11-5 | 59.96 | 0.84 | 16.47 | 2.66 | 4.72 | 0.17 | 3.75 | 5.66 | 3.39 | 2.11 | 0.29 | 100 | |||||||||||
样品 编号 | C.I.P.W.Norm矿物组分含量/% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
石英 | 钙长石 | 钠长石 | 正长石 | 刚玉 | 透辉石 | 紫苏辉石 | 钛铁矿 | 磁铁矿 | 磷灰石 | 合计 | |||||||||||||
F11-3 | 29.55 | 18.6 | 34.59 | 7.53 | 0 | 1.17 | 4.41 | 0.91 | 2.86 | 0.39 | 100 | ||||||||||||
F11-4 | 10.16 | 27.85 | 25.35 | 10.55 | 0 | 5.38 | 13.75 | 1.73 | 4.58 | 0.66 | 100.01 | ||||||||||||
F11-5 | 13.43 | 23.52 | 28.65 | 12.44 | 0 | 2.18 | 13.65 | 1.6 | 3.86 | 0.66 | 99.98 |
样品号 | wB/% | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | FeO | MnO | CaO | Na2O | TOTAL | |||||||||||||||
F11-3-3107 | 38.31 | 0.04 | 22.93 | 12.66 | 0.39 | 23.09 | 0.14 | 97.56 | ||||||||||||||
F11-4-1112 | 38.04 | 0 | 23.14 | 11.46 | 0.14 | 23.86 | 0 | 96.64 | ||||||||||||||
F11-5-1114 | 38.61 | 0 | 23.46 | 10.76 | 0.42 | 23.16 | 0 | 96.41 | ||||||||||||||
F11-5-3116 | 37.5 | 0.06 | 22.41 | 11.84 | 0.37 | 22.05 | 0 | 94.23 | ||||||||||||||
样品号 | 以12.5个O为基础计算的阳离子数 | Ps | ||||||||||||||||||||
Si | ZAl | ΣZ | Ti | Al | CR | Fe3+ | Fe2+ | Mg2+ | Mn2+ | ΣM | Ca2+ | Na+ | ΣA | |||||||||
F11-3-3107 | 3.026 | 0 | 3.026 | 0.002 | 2.134 | 0 | 0.831 | 0.005 | 0 | 0.026 | 2.999 | 1.954 | 0.021 | 1.975 | 27.8 | |||||||
F11-4-1112 | 3.026 | 0 | 3.026 | 0 | 2.169 | 0 | 0.779 | 0 | 0 | 0.009 | 2.958 | 2.033 | 0 | 2.033 | 26.4 | |||||||
F11-5-1114 | 3.076 | 0 | 3.076 | 0 | 2.203 | 0 | 0.646 | 0.071 | 0 | 0.028 | 2.948 | 1.977 | 0 | 1.977 | 22.5 | |||||||
F11-5-3116 | 3.068 | 0 | 3.068 | 0.004 | 2.161 | 0 | 0.697 | 0.113 | 0 | 0.026 | 3 | 1.933 | 0 | 1.933 | 24.2 |
Table 2 Results of electron probe analysis of epidote in Quanganglintou gneissic tonalite
样品号 | wB/% | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | FeO | MnO | CaO | Na2O | TOTAL | |||||||||||||||
F11-3-3107 | 38.31 | 0.04 | 22.93 | 12.66 | 0.39 | 23.09 | 0.14 | 97.56 | ||||||||||||||
F11-4-1112 | 38.04 | 0 | 23.14 | 11.46 | 0.14 | 23.86 | 0 | 96.64 | ||||||||||||||
F11-5-1114 | 38.61 | 0 | 23.46 | 10.76 | 0.42 | 23.16 | 0 | 96.41 | ||||||||||||||
F11-5-3116 | 37.5 | 0.06 | 22.41 | 11.84 | 0.37 | 22.05 | 0 | 94.23 | ||||||||||||||
样品号 | 以12.5个O为基础计算的阳离子数 | Ps | ||||||||||||||||||||
Si | ZAl | ΣZ | Ti | Al | CR | Fe3+ | Fe2+ | Mg2+ | Mn2+ | ΣM | Ca2+ | Na+ | ΣA | |||||||||
F11-3-3107 | 3.026 | 0 | 3.026 | 0.002 | 2.134 | 0 | 0.831 | 0.005 | 0 | 0.026 | 2.999 | 1.954 | 0.021 | 1.975 | 27.8 | |||||||
F11-4-1112 | 3.026 | 0 | 3.026 | 0 | 2.169 | 0 | 0.779 | 0 | 0 | 0.009 | 2.958 | 2.033 | 0 | 2.033 | 26.4 | |||||||
F11-5-1114 | 3.076 | 0 | 3.076 | 0 | 2.203 | 0 | 0.646 | 0.071 | 0 | 0.028 | 2.948 | 1.977 | 0 | 1.977 | 22.5 | |||||||
F11-5-3116 | 3.068 | 0 | 3.068 | 0.004 | 2.161 | 0 | 0.697 | 0.113 | 0 | 0.026 | 3 | 1.933 | 0 | 1.933 | 24.2 |
Pluton | 样品号 | wB/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2 | MgO | MnO | CaO | Na2O | F | SUM | -F≡O | SUM | ||
Round Valley,Idaho | Riggins #3 | 37.29 | 0.16 | 23.62 | 13.95 | 0 | 0.22 | 24.26 | 0.01 | 0 | 99.51 | 0 | 99.51 |
Ecstall,B.C. | JS-E2 | 37.51 | 0.05 | 25.99 | 12.4 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 23.01 | 0 | 0.03 | 99.47 | 0.01 | 99.46 |
Moth Bay,Alaska | AK-1 | 36.64 | 0.08 | 23.62 | 13.69 | 0 | 0.49 | 23.34 | 0 | 0.03 | 97.89 | 0.01 | 97.88 |
Table 3 Representative microprobe data. Adapted from [2].
Pluton | 样品号 | wB/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2 | MgO | MnO | CaO | Na2O | F | SUM | -F≡O | SUM | ||
Round Valley,Idaho | Riggins #3 | 37.29 | 0.16 | 23.62 | 13.95 | 0 | 0.22 | 24.26 | 0.01 | 0 | 99.51 | 0 | 99.51 |
Ecstall,B.C. | JS-E2 | 37.51 | 0.05 | 25.99 | 12.4 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 23.01 | 0 | 0.03 | 99.47 | 0.01 | 99.46 |
Moth Bay,Alaska | AK-1 | 36.64 | 0.08 | 23.62 | 13.69 | 0 | 0.49 | 23.34 | 0 | 0.03 | 97.89 | 0.01 | 97.88 |
[1] |
KEYES C R. Epidote as a primary component op eruptive rocks[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1892, 4(1):305-312.
DOI URL |
[2] |
ZEN E A, Hammarstrom J M. Magmatic epidote and its petrologic significance[J]. Geology, 1984, 12(9):515-518.
DOI URL |
[3] |
NANEY M T. Phase equilibria of rock-forming ferromagnesian silicates in granitic systems[J]. American Journal of Science, 1983, 283(10):993-1033.
DOI URL |
[4] |
ZEN E A. Implications of magmatic epidote-bearing plutons on crystal evolution in the accreted terranes of northwestern North America[J]. Geology, 1985, 13(4):266-269.
DOI URL |
[5] |
ZEN E, HAMMARSTROM J M. Comments and reply on“Implications of magmatic epidote-bearing plutons on crustal evolution in the accreted terranes of northwestern North America” and “Magmatic epidote and its petrologic significance”[J]. Geology, 1986, 14(2):188-189.
DOI URL |
[6] | ZEN E, HAMMARSTROM J M. Plumbing the depth of plutons by magmatic epidote±hornblende association: a cautionary review and an example from Round Valley Pluton, Western Idaho[C]// Geological Society of America, Rocky Mountain Section Annual Meeting Abstracts. 1988, 20:475-476. |
[7] | 张华锋, 叶青培, 翟明国. 岩浆绿帘石特征及其地质意义研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4):442-448. |
[8] | 陈光远, 孙岱生, 邵岳. 胶东昆嵛山二长花岗岩副矿物成因矿物学研究[J]. 现代地质, 1996, 10(2):175-186. |
[9] | 李武显, 徐夕生, 周新民, 等. 庐山“星子杂岩”中绿帘石花岗岩的定年和成因[J]. 地质论评, 1998, 44(2):143-148. |
[10] | 廖世勇, 姜耀辉, 杨万志. 西昆仑大同岩体岩浆成因绿帘石矿物学研究及其对岩体形成构造环境的制约[J]. 矿物学报, 2009, 29(1):49-55. |
[11] | 邹慧娟, 马昌前, 王连训. 湘东北幕阜山含绿帘石花岗闪长岩岩浆的上升速率: 岩相学和矿物化学证据[J]. 地质学报, 2011, 85(3):366-378. |
[12] | 冯艳芳, 邓晋福, 肖庆辉, 等. 长乐—南澳构造带花岗岩类年代学、岩石组合与构造演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013: 1-162. |
[13] | 邢光福, 卢清地, 姜杨, 等. 闽东南长乐—南澳断裂带“片麻状”浆混杂岩的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2010, 29(1):31-43. |
[14] | 李武显, 周新民, 李献华. 长乐—南澳断裂带变形火成岩的U-Pb和40Ar/39Ar年龄[J]. 地质科学, 2003, 38(1):22-30. |
[15] | 卢华复, 贾东, 郭令智, 等. 闽台微大陆的组成与碰撞史[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1983. |
[16] | 谢窦克, 郭坤一. 中国东南岩石圈板块边界变质带[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1989: 58-59. |
[17] | 谢窦克, 马荣生, 张禹慎, 等. 华南大陆地壳生长过程与地幔柱构造[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996: 1-257. |
[18] | 李继亮. 东南大陆岩石圈结构与地质演化[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1993: 1-264. |
[19] | 许志琴, 张建新. 中国东部中生代以来的陆内造山作用及山链造型[C]//海峡两岸地质学术研讨会报告摘要(2) 1995: 136-138. |
[20] | 李根坤, 章金海, 陈觉民, 等. 闽台两省变质带的初步认识[J]. 福建地质, 1983, 2(1):41-50. |
[21] | 陶奎元, 薛怀民. 中国东南沿海与西南日本内带中生代火山活动时代、 旋回与迁移问题的讨论[J]. 中国地质科学院南京地质矿产研究所所刊, 1988, 9(1):1-13. |
[22] | 郭令智, 施央申, 马瑞士. 华南大地构造格架和地壳演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1980: 109-116. |
[23] | 王德滋, 周新民. 中国东南部晚中生代花岗质火山-侵入杂岩成因与地壳演化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 1-295. |
[24] | 周新民, 徐夕生, 董传万, 等. 中国东南活动大陆边缘的矿物标志: 钙长石质斜长石[J]. 科学通报, 1994, 39(11):1011-1014. |
[25] | 舒良树, 于津海, 王德滋, 等. 长乐—南澳断裂带晚中生代岩浆活动与变质-变形关系[J]. 高校地质学报, 2000, 6(3):368-378. |
[26] | 福建省地质调查研究院. 中华人民共和国莆田市幅、 泉州市幅1: 250 000区域地质调查报告[R]. 福州: 福建省地质调查研究院, 2007. |
[27] | SCHMIDT M W, STEFANO P. Magmatic epidote[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, 2004, 56(1):399-430. |
[28] |
SCHMIDT M W, THOMPSON A B. Epidote in calc-alkaline magmas: an experimental study of stability, phase relationships, and the role of epidote in magmatic evolution[J]. American Mineralogist, 1996, 81(3/4):462-474.
DOI URL |
[1] | ZHU Biaobiao, CAO Wei, YU Pengpeng, ZHANG Qianlong, GUO Lanxuan, YUAN Guiqiang, HAN Feng, WANG Hanyu, ZHOU Yongzhang. Research hotspots and cutting-edge analysis of geological big data and artificial intelligence based on CiteSpace [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(4): 73-86. |
[2] | YUAN Feng, LI Xiaohui, TIAN Weidong, ZHOU Guanqun, WANG Jinju, GE Can, GUO Xianzheng, ZHENG Chaojie. Key issues in three-dimensional predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(4): 119-128. |
[3] | WANG Luofeng, WANG Gongwen, XU Wenhui, XU Senmin, HE Yaqing, WANG Chunyi, YANG Tao, ZHOU Xiaojiang, HUANG Leilei, ZUO Ling, MOU Nini, CAO Yi, LIU Zhifei, CHANG Yulin. Intelligent geoscience information mining and knowledge discovery using big data analytics: A case study of the Shangfanggou Mo (Fe) mine in Henan Province [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(4): 317-334. |
[4] | LI Yongsheng, ZHEN Shimin, YU Xiaofei, GONG Fanying, DU Zezhong. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions of igneous rocks from the Shuikoushan Pb-Zn deposit, Hunan Province, and their geological significance [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(2): 332-352. |
[5] | SHI Zhensheng,LI Xizhe,DONG Dazhong,QIU Zhen,LU Bin,LIANG Pingping. New evidences for dating of the Middle Jurassic Wanbao Formation in the Longjiang Basin, western margin of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(1): 182-196. |
[6] | GUO Pei, LIU Che-Xiang, WANG Jian-Jiang, DENG Yu, DIAO Xiao-Chen, WANG Lei, ZHANG Xiao-Long, WANG Wen-Jing. Sedimentary boundary evolution of the Carboniferous in Northern NorthSouth Tectonic Belt, China and its geological significance. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(3): 215-226. |
[7] | SONG Jin-Min, LUO Peng, LIU Shu-Gen, YANG Di, WANG Xin, LI Peng-Wei. Lower Cambrian tempestites and their geological significances in Sugaitblak area, Tarim Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2014, 21(6): 346-355. |
[8] | XUE Chun-Ji, DUAN Shi-Gang, CHAI Feng-Mei, MU Ge-Da-Er-·Mai-Mai-Chi, А.Х.Туресебеков3 , JUE Wen-Dun. Metallogenetic epoch of the Almalyk porphyry copper ore field, Uzbekistan, and its geological significance. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2): 197-204. |
[9] | WANG Hua, DIAO Chu-E, LIN Zheng-Liang, JIANG Hua, HUANG Chuan-Tan, LIAO Yuan-Chao, LIAO Ji-Hua. The key control factors and its petroleum and geological significance of extrathick deposition in Dongying Formation, Nanpu Sag. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(1): 108-120. |
[10] | LIU Zhi-Hong LIU Hang-Jun WANG Peng TUN Xiang-Mei SHU De-Feng MO Chuan-Biao. Discovery of compressional structure in WuerxunBeier Sag in Hailar Basin and its geological significance. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(4): 138-146. |
[11] | JIANG Jun TANG Yao-Geng. [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(6): 338-341. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||