早白垩世华北克拉通东部岩石圈减薄过程和机制:来自辽宁本溪北大山岩体的证据

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.9.2

地学前缘 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 340-365.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.9.2

早白垩世华北克拉通东部岩石圈减薄过程和机制:来自辽宁本溪北大山岩体的证据

骆念岗¹^,²(), 高莲凤¹^,^*(), 张振国¹, 尹志刚¹, 崔建宇², 吴君飞³, 邢杰¹, 丁恺¹, 高晨阳¹, 王月¹

1.辽宁工程技术大学矿业学院, 辽宁阜新 123000
2.辽宁省地质矿产调查院有限责任公司, 辽宁沈阳 110031
3.内蒙古平庄煤业(集团)有限责任公司, 内蒙古赤峰 204000

收稿日期:2022-04-12 修回日期:2022-07-13 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-04-27
通讯作者: *高莲凤(1970—),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事古生物学与地层学、岩石地球化学研究工作。E-mail: ytgaolf@163.com
作者简介:骆念岗(1990—),男,博士研究生,矿山地质工程专业。E-mail: 956094747@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41972004);辽宁工程技术大学学科创新团队资助项目(LNTU20TD-14)

Processes and mechanism of lithospheric thinning in the eastern North China Craton during the Early Cretaceous: Evidence from the Beidashan pluton, Liaoning Province

LUO Niangang¹^,²(), GAO Lianfeng¹^,^*(), ZHANG Zhenguo¹, YIN Zhigang¹, CUI Jianyu², WU Junfei³, XING Jie¹, DING Kai¹, GAO Chenyang¹, WANG Yue¹

1. College of Mining Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
2. Liaoning Provincial Geological and Mineral Survey Institute Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110031, China
3. Inner Mongolia Pingzhuang Coal Industry (Group) Co., Ltd., Chifeng 204000, China

Received:2022-04-12 Revised:2022-07-13 Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-04-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

早白垩世华北克拉通岩石圈经历了巨厚减薄事件,但减薄过程及机制仍存在较大争论。本文对位于华北克拉通东部辽宁本溪地区的北大山岩体进行了野外地质调查、岩相学、地球化学、锆石U-Pb 定年和Lu-Hf同位素研究,探讨其形成时代、源区和成因,以期得到关于华北克拉通东部早白垩世岩石圈减薄研究的启示。北大山岩体岩性为似斑状黑云二长花岗岩,锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb同位素测年结果显示,花岗岩的²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U加权平均年龄为(117.1±1.4) Ma,表明为早白垩世岩浆活动的产物。北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩具有富硅(w(SiO₂)=69.15%~69.87%)、富碱(w(Na₂O+K₂O)=8.46%~8.66%)、贫镁(w(MgO)=0.80%~0.90%)、贫钙(w(CaO)=2.03%~2.04%),准铝质(A/CNK=0.98~0.99)的特征;富集Rb、Th、K、Ba等大离子亲石元素,相对亏损Nb、Ta、Ti、P等高场强元素,稀土元素配分曲线为右倾型,轻稀土较陡,重稀土较平缓,花岗岩熔体的锆石饱和温度(763.14~768.87 ℃)明显低于A型花岗岩(>800 ℃),以上特征总体表现出高钾钙碱性I型花岗岩特征。锆石Lu-Hf同位素分析表明,锆石ε_Hf(t)值为-21.49~-19.04,均为负值,二阶段亏损地幔Hf模式年龄(t_DM2)=2 536~2 383 Ma,表明其源岩主要为古元古代古老下地壳基性岩的部分熔融。根据年代学和岩石地球化学研究认为,北大山岩体形成于早白垩世时期古太平洋板块俯冲回撤而导致的区域伸展背景环境下,同时,上涌的软流圈引起华北克拉通深部岩石圈发生大规模的拆沉作用,从而致使华北克拉通岩石圈减薄。

关键词: 似斑状黑云二长花岗岩, 地球化学, 年代学, Lu-Hf同位素, 岩石圈减薄, 北大山岩体

Abstract:

The North China Craton (NCC) experienced pervasive lithospheric thinning in the Early Cretaceous, but the thinning process and thinning mechanism are still controversial. To shine a new light on the thinning events this paper focuses on the Beidashan Pluton of Liaoning Province, eastern NCC to conduct detailed field geological survey, combined with laboratory research including petrographical, geochemical, U-Pb zircon chronological and Lu-Hf isotopic analyses, so as to explore the formation age, source area and petrogenesis of the Beidashan pluton. The lithology of the Beidashan pluton is porphyritic biotite monzogranite which has a weighted mean age of 117.1±1.4 Ma by zircon U-Pb dating. The quasi peraluminous porphyritic biotite monzogranite is rich in silicon (69.15%-69.87%) and alkali (8.46%-8.66%) and poor in magnesium (0.80%-0.90%) and calcium (2.03%-2.04%), and is enriched in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs) (Rb, Th, K, Ba) and depleted in high field strength elements (HFSEs) (Nb, Ta, Ti). The rare earth element (REE) pattern is right-leaning, showing a steep linear slope for light REE (LREE) and flattening of heavy REE (HREE). The zircon saturation temperature of granite melt (763.14-768.87℃) is clearly lower than that of A-type granite (> 800 ℃). The above characteristics generally represent high-k, calc-alkaline I-type granitoids. Zircon ε_Hf(t) values range from -21.49 to -19.04, and the two-stage Hf model ages (t_DM2) range between 2536-2383 Ma, indicating the monzogranite is mainly derived from partial melting of Paleproterozoic ancient basaltic crust. According to the chronological and petrogeochemical analyses, the Beidashan pluton was formed under regional extensional environment caused by slab roll-back of the paleo-Pacific plate during the Early Cretaceous, and the upwelling asthenosphere caused large-scale delamination of the deep lithosphere of the North China Craton resulting in lithospheric thinning.

Key words: porphyaceous biotite monzonitic granite, geochemistry, geochronology, Lu-Hf isotope, lithospheric thinning, Beidashan pluton

中图分类号:

骆念岗, 高莲凤, 张振国, 尹志刚, 崔建宇, 吴君飞, 邢杰, 丁恺, 高晨阳, 王月. 早白垩世华北克拉通东部岩石圈减薄过程和机制:来自辽宁本溪北大山岩体的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3): 340-365.

LUO Niangang, GAO Lianfeng, ZHANG Zhenguo, YIN Zhigang, CUI Jianyu, WU Junfei, XING Jie, DING Kai, GAO Chenyang, WANG Yue. Processes and mechanism of lithospheric thinning in the eastern North China Craton during the Early Cretaceous: Evidence from the Beidashan pluton, Liaoning Province[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(3): 340-365.

图/表 19

图1 华北克拉通早白垩世伸展构造简图(a)和辽东半岛中生代侵入体分布地质图(b)(底图a据文献[57])

Fig.1 Tectonic sketch map of the North China Craton showing Early Cretaceous extensional structures (a) and distribution map of Mesozoic intrusions in the Liaodong Peninsula (b). a modified after [57].

图2 辽东本溪地区北大山岩体地质简图

Fig.2 Geological sketch map of the Beidashan pluton in Benxi area, eastern Liaoning Province

图3 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩手标本特征(a)及显微镜下特征(b) Pl—斜长石;Qtz—石英;Bt—黑云母;Mc—微斜长石。

Fig.3 Representative granite specimen from the Beidashan pluton (a) and minerals in the specimen under microscopy (b)

表1 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb分析结果

Table 1 LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data of granite samples

图4 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩锆石CL图像(a)和锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图(b)

Fig.4 Representative CL images of zircons (a) and zircon U-Pb Concordia diagram (b) for granite samples

表2 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩主量元素、微量元素测试分析结果

Table 2 Major and trace element compositions of granite samples

样品号	w_B/10^-2
样品号	SiO₂	TiO₂				Al₂O₃			Fe₂O₃			FeO				CaO			MgO			MnO				K₂O		Na₂O				P₂O₅			LOI				Total
BDS-1	69.15	0.39				15.39			1.09			1.35				2.04			0.9			0.04				4.19		4.48				0.149 9			0.43				99.75
BDS-2	69.19	0.39				15.38			1.08			1.35				2.04			0.89			0.04				4.2		4.46				0.148 2			0.44				99.76
BDS-3	69.43	0.39				15.38			0.96			1.35				2.03			0.85			0.04				4.14		4.45				0.146 1			0.44				99.75
BDS-4	69.5	0.38				15.35			0.94			1.35				2.03			0.84			0.04				4.13		4.45				0.145 7			0.44				99.75
BDS-5	69.87	0.38				15.17			0.91			1.35				2.04			0.8			0.04				4.02		4.44				0.147 5			0.44				99.76
样品号	w_B/10^-2							Mg^#					AR				σ				A/NK				A/CNK				DI				SI				T_Zr/℃
样品号	TFeO			K₂O+Na₂O				Mg^#					AR				σ				A/NK				A/CNK				DI				SI				T_Zr/℃
BDS-1	2.33			8.66				22.88					2.98				2.86				1.294				0.986				84.63				7.48				767.19
BDS-2	2.32			8.65				22.73					2.97				2.85				1.296				0.987				84.65				7.42				768.87
BDS-3	2.22			8.59				22.71					2.95				2.78				1.303				0.992				84.77				7.2				763.14
BDS-4	2.2			8.58				22.65					2.95				2.77				1.302				0.991				84.85				7.14				767.19
BDS-5	2.17			8.46				22.16					2.93				2.65				1.301				0.988				85.08				6.97				765.47
样品号	w_B/10^-6
样品号	La	Ce				Pr			Nd			Sm				Eu			Gd			Tb				Dy		Ho				Er			Tm				Yb
BDS-1	32.9	58.8				6.37			22.5			3.33				0.98			2.67			0.36				1.5		0.26				0.75			0.13				0.74
BDS-2	36.4	63.5				7.13			24.3			3.57				1.04			2.86			0.37				1.52		0.27				0.77			0.13				0.75
BDS-3	27.1	49.2				5.57			19.6			3.03				0.88			2.3			0.32				1.31		0.23				0.64			0.11				0.64
BDS-4	31.2	53.8				6.25			21.8			3.29				0.96			2.58			0.35				1.45		0.25				0.7			0.12				0.68
BDS-5	32.7	56.8				6.52			22.8			3.41				1.01			2.71			0.37				1.52		0.26				0.73			0.12				0.69
样品号	w_B/10^-6																							LREE/HREE						(La/Yb)_N						δEu
样品号	Lu				Y					ΣREE				LREE						HREE				LREE/HREE						(La/Yb)_N						δEu
BDS-1	0.11				8.51					131.32				124.78						6.53				19.1						31.9						1
BDS-2	0.11				8.79					142.71				135.93						6.78				20.06						34.99						1
BDS-3	0.1				6.98					110.93				105.29						5.64				18.68						30.48						1.03
BDS-4	0.1				7.94					123.61				117.37						6.24				18.82						32.81						1.01
BDS-5	0.1				8.28					129.74				123.22						6.52				18.91						33.9						1.01
样品号	w_B/10^-6
样品号	Cu	Pb				Zn			Cr			Ni				Co			Rb			Cs				Sr		Ba				V			Sc				Nb
BDS-1	3.63	1.68				42			6.84			4.65				4.77			108			1.25				569		950				44			2.93				11.5
BDS-2	3.47	1.3				44.1			6.96			5.02				5.06			113			1.26				622		1 031				47.3			3.55				12.8
BDS-3	2.38	0.42				33			9.14			3.86				4.18			92.9			1				523		907				39			4.4				10.4
BDS-4	3.16	0.35				38.1			5.99			3.97				4.44			97.1			1.05				578		989				41			3.77				12
BDS-5	3.25	0.75				37			6.07			4.13				4.33			92.5			1.03				557		918				41.6			3.46				12.2
样品号	w_B/10^-6																						10⁴ Ga/Al				Nb/Ta				Zr/Hf			La/Nb				Th/Nb
样品号	Ta		Zr				Hf				Ga				U			Th					10⁴ Ga/Al				Nb/Ta				Zr/Hf			La/Nb				Th/Nb
BDS-1	1.31		137				4.3				19.1				1.4			10.3					2.43				8.78				31.9			2.86				0.9
BDS-2	1.59		125				3.77				20.7				1.25			10.3					2.64				8.03				33.14			2.85				0.8
BDS-3	1.34		120				3.88				17.4				1.13			8.67					2.22				7.75				31			2.61				0.84
BDS-4	1.25		124				3.85				18.9				1.3			10.3					2.41				9.63				32.32			2.59				0.86
BDS-5	1.43		122				3.82				18.8				1.24			9.85					2.43				8.52				32.07			2.69				0.81

表2 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩主量元素、微量元素测试分析结果

Table 2 Major and trace element compositions of granite samples

样品号	w_B/10^-2
样品号	SiO₂	TiO₂				Al₂O₃			Fe₂O₃			FeO				CaO			MgO			MnO				K₂O		Na₂O				P₂O₅			LOI				Total
BDS-1	69.15	0.39				15.39			1.09			1.35				2.04			0.9			0.04				4.19		4.48				0.149 9			0.43				99.75
BDS-2	69.19	0.39				15.38			1.08			1.35				2.04			0.89			0.04				4.2		4.46				0.148 2			0.44				99.76
BDS-3	69.43	0.39				15.38			0.96			1.35				2.03			0.85			0.04				4.14		4.45				0.146 1			0.44				99.75
BDS-4	69.5	0.38				15.35			0.94			1.35				2.03			0.84			0.04				4.13		4.45				0.145 7			0.44				99.75
BDS-5	69.87	0.38				15.17			0.91			1.35				2.04			0.8			0.04				4.02		4.44				0.147 5			0.44				99.76
样品号	w_B/10^-2							Mg^#					AR				σ				A/NK				A/CNK				DI				SI				T_Zr/℃
样品号	TFeO			K₂O+Na₂O				Mg^#					AR				σ				A/NK				A/CNK				DI				SI				T_Zr/℃
BDS-1	2.33			8.66				22.88					2.98				2.86				1.294				0.986				84.63				7.48				767.19
BDS-2	2.32			8.65				22.73					2.97				2.85				1.296				0.987				84.65				7.42				768.87
BDS-3	2.22			8.59				22.71					2.95				2.78				1.303				0.992				84.77				7.2				763.14
BDS-4	2.2			8.58				22.65					2.95				2.77				1.302				0.991				84.85				7.14				767.19
BDS-5	2.17			8.46				22.16					2.93				2.65				1.301				0.988				85.08				6.97				765.47
样品号	w_B/10^-6
样品号	La	Ce				Pr			Nd			Sm				Eu			Gd			Tb				Dy		Ho				Er			Tm				Yb
BDS-1	32.9	58.8				6.37			22.5			3.33				0.98			2.67			0.36				1.5		0.26				0.75			0.13				0.74
BDS-2	36.4	63.5				7.13			24.3			3.57				1.04			2.86			0.37				1.52		0.27				0.77			0.13				0.75
BDS-3	27.1	49.2				5.57			19.6			3.03				0.88			2.3			0.32				1.31		0.23				0.64			0.11				0.64
BDS-4	31.2	53.8				6.25			21.8			3.29				0.96			2.58			0.35				1.45		0.25				0.7			0.12				0.68
BDS-5	32.7	56.8				6.52			22.8			3.41				1.01			2.71			0.37				1.52		0.26				0.73			0.12				0.69
样品号	w_B/10^-6																							LREE/HREE						(La/Yb)_N						δEu
样品号	Lu				Y					ΣREE				LREE						HREE				LREE/HREE						(La/Yb)_N						δEu
BDS-1	0.11				8.51					131.32				124.78						6.53				19.1						31.9						1
BDS-2	0.11				8.79					142.71				135.93						6.78				20.06						34.99						1
BDS-3	0.1				6.98					110.93				105.29						5.64				18.68						30.48						1.03
BDS-4	0.1				7.94					123.61				117.37						6.24				18.82						32.81						1.01
BDS-5	0.1				8.28					129.74				123.22						6.52				18.91						33.9						1.01
样品号	w_B/10^-6
样品号	Cu	Pb				Zn			Cr			Ni				Co			Rb			Cs				Sr		Ba				V			Sc				Nb
BDS-1	3.63	1.68				42			6.84			4.65				4.77			108			1.25				569		950				44			2.93				11.5
BDS-2	3.47	1.3				44.1			6.96			5.02				5.06			113			1.26				622		1 031				47.3			3.55				12.8
BDS-3	2.38	0.42				33			9.14			3.86				4.18			92.9			1				523		907				39			4.4				10.4
BDS-4	3.16	0.35				38.1			5.99			3.97				4.44			97.1			1.05				578		989				41			3.77				12
BDS-5	3.25	0.75				37			6.07			4.13				4.33			92.5			1.03				557		918				41.6			3.46				12.2
样品号	w_B/10^-6																						10⁴ Ga/Al				Nb/Ta				Zr/Hf			La/Nb				Th/Nb
样品号	Ta		Zr				Hf				Ga				U			Th					10⁴ Ga/Al				Nb/Ta				Zr/Hf			La/Nb				Th/Nb
BDS-1	1.31		137				4.3				19.1				1.4			10.3					2.43				8.78				31.9			2.86				0.9
BDS-2	1.59		125				3.77				20.7				1.25			10.3					2.64				8.03				33.14			2.85				0.8
BDS-3	1.34		120				3.88				17.4				1.13			8.67					2.22				7.75				31			2.61				0.84
BDS-4	1.25		124				3.85				18.9				1.3			10.3					2.41				9.63				32.32			2.59				0.86
BDS-5	1.43		122				3.82				18.8				1.24			9.85					2.43				8.52				32.07			2.69				0.81

图5 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩主量元素判别图解(底图a据文献[78],b据文献[79],c据文献[80],d据文献[81];前人研究资料据文献[52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86])

Fig.5 Major element discrimination diagrams for granite samples. Basemaps from [78⇓⇓-81]; published data from [52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86].

图6 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩稀土元素球粒陨石标准化配分图(a)及微量元素原始地幔标准化蛛网图(b) (球粒陨石和原始地幔数值据文献[87];前人研究资料据文献[52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86])

Fig.6 Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (a) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams (b) for granite samples. Normalization values after [87]; published data from [52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86].

表3 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩的Hf同位素分析结果

Table 3 Results of Hf isotopic analysis of granite samples

测点	年龄/ Ma	¹⁷⁶Yb/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Lu/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	ε_Hf(0)	ε_Hf(t)	T_DM	$T D M C$	f_Lu/Hf
BDSTW1.02	119	0.019 636	0.000 109	0.000 818	0.000 003	0.282 108	0.000 014	-23.49	-20.95	1 603	2 503	-0.98
BDSTW1.03	118	0.022 720	0.000 731	0.000 924	0.000 031	0.282 125	0.000 015	-22.88	-20.36	1 584	2 466	-0.97
BDSTW1.05	117	0.015 277	0.000 067	0.000 688	0.000 002	0.282 147	0.000 014	-22.1	-19.59	1 544	2 417	-0.98
BDSTW1.06	119	0.024 648	0.000 207	0.001 017	0.000 004	0.282 144	0.000 015	-22.22	-19.67	1 562	2 424	-0.97
BDSTW1.07	119	0.020 766	0.000 081	0.000 924	0.000 004	0.282 097	0.000 014	-23.88	-21.35	1 623	2 528	-0.97
BDSTW1.08	116	0.021 552	0.000 136	0.000 874	0.000 005	0.282 139	0.000 016	-22.39	-19.92	1 563	2 437	-0.97
BDSTW1.09	119	0.015 243	0.000 302	0.000 642	0.000 011	0.282 162	0.000 015	-21.58	-19.04	1 522	2 383	-0.98
BDSTW1.11	115	0.012 191	0.000 173	0.000 518	0.000 006	0.282 116	0.000 013	-23.2	-20.72	1 580	2 487	-0.98
BDSTW1.12	118	0.018 153	0.000 171	0.000 752	0.000 010	0.282 105	0.000 015	-23.6	-21.07	1 605	2 510	-0.98
BDSTW1.16	117	0.021 592	0.000 231	0.000 959	0.000 012	0.282 107	0.000 014	-23.5	-21.02	1 610	2 506	-0.97
BDSTW1.20	117	0.034 206	0.000 476	0.001 271	0.000 018	0.282 144	0.000 017	-22.21	-19.74	1 572	2 425	-0.96
BDSTW1.22	118	0.019 158	0.000 155	0.000 829	0.000 012	0.282 093	0.000 013	-24	-21.49	1 624	2 536	-0.98
BDSTW1.24	118	0.022 206	0.000 236	0.000 984	0.000 005	0.282 104	0.000 014	-23.62	-21.12	1 616	2 513	-0.97

表3 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩的Hf同位素分析结果

Table 3 Results of Hf isotopic analysis of granite samples

测点	年龄/ Ma	¹⁷⁶Yb/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Lu/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	ε_Hf(0)	ε_Hf(t)	T_DM	$T D M C$	f_Lu/Hf
BDSTW1.02	119	0.019 636	0.000 109	0.000 818	0.000 003	0.282 108	0.000 014	-23.49	-20.95	1 603	2 503	-0.98
BDSTW1.03	118	0.022 720	0.000 731	0.000 924	0.000 031	0.282 125	0.000 015	-22.88	-20.36	1 584	2 466	-0.97
BDSTW1.05	117	0.015 277	0.000 067	0.000 688	0.000 002	0.282 147	0.000 014	-22.1	-19.59	1 544	2 417	-0.98
BDSTW1.06	119	0.024 648	0.000 207	0.001 017	0.000 004	0.282 144	0.000 015	-22.22	-19.67	1 562	2 424	-0.97
BDSTW1.07	119	0.020 766	0.000 081	0.000 924	0.000 004	0.282 097	0.000 014	-23.88	-21.35	1 623	2 528	-0.97
BDSTW1.08	116	0.021 552	0.000 136	0.000 874	0.000 005	0.282 139	0.000 016	-22.39	-19.92	1 563	2 437	-0.97
BDSTW1.09	119	0.015 243	0.000 302	0.000 642	0.000 011	0.282 162	0.000 015	-21.58	-19.04	1 522	2 383	-0.98
BDSTW1.11	115	0.012 191	0.000 173	0.000 518	0.000 006	0.282 116	0.000 013	-23.2	-20.72	1 580	2 487	-0.98
BDSTW1.12	118	0.018 153	0.000 171	0.000 752	0.000 010	0.282 105	0.000 015	-23.6	-21.07	1 605	2 510	-0.98
BDSTW1.16	117	0.021 592	0.000 231	0.000 959	0.000 012	0.282 107	0.000 014	-23.5	-21.02	1 610	2 506	-0.97
BDSTW1.20	117	0.034 206	0.000 476	0.001 271	0.000 018	0.282 144	0.000 017	-22.21	-19.74	1 572	2 425	-0.96
BDSTW1.22	118	0.019 158	0.000 155	0.000 829	0.000 012	0.282 093	0.000 013	-24	-21.49	1 624	2 536	-0.98
BDSTW1.24	118	0.022 206	0.000 236	0.000 984	0.000 005	0.282 104	0.000 014	-23.62	-21.12	1 616	2 513	-0.97

表4 辽东地区早白垩世花岗质岩石部分成岩年龄汇总

Table 4 LA-ICPMS/SHRIMP dating results for selected Early-Cretaceous granitoids in Liaodong

序号	岩体	岩性	采样位置		测试方法	年龄/Ma	资料来源
1	北大山	似斑状黑云二长花岗岩	41°03'35″N	123°52'12″E	LA-ICPMS	117.1±1.4	本文
2	千山	正长花岗岩	41°01'14″N	123°04'08″E	LA-ICPMS	127±2	[57]
3	赵屯	细粒二长花岗岩	39°11'45″N	121°50'19″E	LA-ICPMS	130±5	[57]
4	饮马湾山	二长花岗岩	39°03'21″N	122°17'58″E	LA-ICPMS	124±4	[57]
5	饮马湾山	二长花岗岩	39°37'57″N	122°22'10″E	LA-ICPMS	122±6	[57]
6	古道岭	似斑状花岗岩	40°02'46″N	122°12'31″E	LA-ICPMS	118±3	[57]
7	古道岭	二长花岗岩	40°14'46″N	122°24'53″E	LA-ICPMS	121±2	[57]
8	双塔	似斑状二长花岗岩	39°48'47″N	122°23'48″E	LA-ICPMS	129±2	[57]
9	洼子店	细粒二长花岗岩	39°21'15″N	122°09'57″E	LA-ICPMS	120±4	[57]
10	鞍子山	似斑状花岗岩	39°50'48″N	122°20'50″E	LA-ICPMS	124±2	[57]
11	韭菜顶子	二长花岗岩	41°10'49″N	124°47'45″E	LA-ICPMS	121±2	[57]
12	帽盔山	二长花岗岩	40°30'20″N	120°40'53″E	LA-ICPMS	137±1	[57]
13	荒地	花岗闪长岩	40°30'50″N	123°40'00″E	LA-ICPMS	139±1	[57]
14	朝阳	二长岩	40°28'54″N	123°21'44″E	LA-ICPMS	139±1	[57]
15	三股流	似斑状花岗岩	40°06'15″N	124°15'29″E	LA-ICPMS	120±2	[57]
16	三股流	二长花岗岩	40°08'11″N	124°16'56″E	SHRIMP	123±2	[84]
17	三股流	花岗闪长岩	40°06'39″N	124°15'43″E	SHRIMP	123±1	[84]
18	凤凰山	碱长花岗岩	40°25'01″N	124°03'40″E	LA-ICPMS	130±2	[57]
19	石柱子	二长花岗岩	40°46'13″N	125°24'17″E	LA-ICPMS	124±1	[51]
20	太平哨	碱长花岗岩	40°47'11″N	125°02'24″E	LA-ICPMS	129±1	[86]
21	灌水	花岗闪长岩	40°52'09″N	124°35'51″E	LA-ICPMS	131±1	[57]
22	四平街	碱性花岗岩	41°06'54″N	124°43'56″E	TIMS	130±1	[57]
23	大金山	二长花岗岩	40°13'20″N	124°18'11″E	SHRIMP	124±2	[85]
24	丁岐山	碱长花岗岩	40°17'29″N	124°21'49″E	LA-ICPMS	124±2	[85]
25	黄岭	二长闪长岩	39°22'15″N	123°21'53″E	LA-ICPMS	127.4±1.9	[92]
26	关门山	花岗斑岩	41°02'45″N	124°20'04″E	LA-ICPMS	126±2	[86]
27	关门山	碱长花岗岩	41°03'22″N	124°20'47″E	LA-ICPMS	126±2	[86]
28	三股流	二长花岗岩	40°06'08″N	124°15'30″E	SHRIMP	125.1±1.2	[55]
29	三股流	二长花岗岩	40°06'30″N	124°11'41″E	SHRIMP	128.7±2.2	[55]
30	三股流	黑云母花岗岩			LA-ICPMS	123.8±1.2	[93]
31	帽盔山	二长花岗岩			LA-ICPMS	127.2±0.6	[53]
32	清凉山	二长花岗岩			LA-ICPMS	129.0±0.8	[53]
33	石庙沟	花岗斑岩	40°27'54″N	123°25'20″E	LA-ICPMS	123.0±1.6	[82]
34	袁家堡	石英二长斑岩	40°28'37″N	123°54'53″E	LA-ICPMS	129±1	[94]

表4 辽东地区早白垩世花岗质岩石部分成岩年龄汇总

Table 4 LA-ICPMS/SHRIMP dating results for selected Early-Cretaceous granitoids in Liaodong

序号	岩体	岩性	采样位置		测试方法	年龄/Ma	资料来源
1	北大山	似斑状黑云二长花岗岩	41°03'35″N	123°52'12″E	LA-ICPMS	117.1±1.4	本文
2	千山	正长花岗岩	41°01'14″N	123°04'08″E	LA-ICPMS	127±2	[57]
3	赵屯	细粒二长花岗岩	39°11'45″N	121°50'19″E	LA-ICPMS	130±5	[57]
4	饮马湾山	二长花岗岩	39°03'21″N	122°17'58″E	LA-ICPMS	124±4	[57]
5	饮马湾山	二长花岗岩	39°37'57″N	122°22'10″E	LA-ICPMS	122±6	[57]
6	古道岭	似斑状花岗岩	40°02'46″N	122°12'31″E	LA-ICPMS	118±3	[57]
7	古道岭	二长花岗岩	40°14'46″N	122°24'53″E	LA-ICPMS	121±2	[57]
8	双塔	似斑状二长花岗岩	39°48'47″N	122°23'48″E	LA-ICPMS	129±2	[57]
9	洼子店	细粒二长花岗岩	39°21'15″N	122°09'57″E	LA-ICPMS	120±4	[57]
10	鞍子山	似斑状花岗岩	39°50'48″N	122°20'50″E	LA-ICPMS	124±2	[57]
11	韭菜顶子	二长花岗岩	41°10'49″N	124°47'45″E	LA-ICPMS	121±2	[57]
12	帽盔山	二长花岗岩	40°30'20″N	120°40'53″E	LA-ICPMS	137±1	[57]
13	荒地	花岗闪长岩	40°30'50″N	123°40'00″E	LA-ICPMS	139±1	[57]
14	朝阳	二长岩	40°28'54″N	123°21'44″E	LA-ICPMS	139±1	[57]
15	三股流	似斑状花岗岩	40°06'15″N	124°15'29″E	LA-ICPMS	120±2	[57]
16	三股流	二长花岗岩	40°08'11″N	124°16'56″E	SHRIMP	123±2	[84]
17	三股流	花岗闪长岩	40°06'39″N	124°15'43″E	SHRIMP	123±1	[84]
18	凤凰山	碱长花岗岩	40°25'01″N	124°03'40″E	LA-ICPMS	130±2	[57]
19	石柱子	二长花岗岩	40°46'13″N	125°24'17″E	LA-ICPMS	124±1	[51]
20	太平哨	碱长花岗岩	40°47'11″N	125°02'24″E	LA-ICPMS	129±1	[86]
21	灌水	花岗闪长岩	40°52'09″N	124°35'51″E	LA-ICPMS	131±1	[57]
22	四平街	碱性花岗岩	41°06'54″N	124°43'56″E	TIMS	130±1	[57]
23	大金山	二长花岗岩	40°13'20″N	124°18'11″E	SHRIMP	124±2	[85]
24	丁岐山	碱长花岗岩	40°17'29″N	124°21'49″E	LA-ICPMS	124±2	[85]
25	黄岭	二长闪长岩	39°22'15″N	123°21'53″E	LA-ICPMS	127.4±1.9	[92]
26	关门山	花岗斑岩	41°02'45″N	124°20'04″E	LA-ICPMS	126±2	[86]
27	关门山	碱长花岗岩	41°03'22″N	124°20'47″E	LA-ICPMS	126±2	[86]
28	三股流	二长花岗岩	40°06'08″N	124°15'30″E	SHRIMP	125.1±1.2	[55]
29	三股流	二长花岗岩	40°06'30″N	124°11'41″E	SHRIMP	128.7±2.2	[55]
30	三股流	黑云母花岗岩			LA-ICPMS	123.8±1.2	[93]
31	帽盔山	二长花岗岩			LA-ICPMS	127.2±0.6	[53]
32	清凉山	二长花岗岩			LA-ICPMS	129.0±0.8	[53]
33	石庙沟	花岗斑岩	40°27'54″N	123°25'20″E	LA-ICPMS	123.0±1.6	[82]
34	袁家堡	石英二长斑岩	40°28'37″N	123°54'53″E	LA-ICPMS	129±1	[94]

图7 辽东地区早白垩世花岗质岩石时空分布图(a)和岩体年龄统计直方图(b)

Fig.7 Distribution map (a) and histogram for ages (b) of Early-Cretaceous granitoids in eastern Liaodong

图8 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩成因类型判别图解(底图据文献[108];前人研究资料据文献[52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86])

Fig.8 Genetic-types discrimination of granite from the Beidashan pluton. Basemaps from [108]; published data from [52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86].

图9 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩的P2O5-SiO2图解(a)、Y-Rb图解(b)和P2O5-A/CNK图解(c)

Fig.9 P2O5-SiO2 (a), Y-Rb (b) and P2O5-A/CNK (c) diagrams for granite samples

图10 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩的源区判别图解(底图据文献[130])

Fig.10 Source discriminant diagrams for granite samples. Basemap from [130].

图11 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩锆石Hf同位素组成图解(底图图a据文献[133],b据文献[105];前人数据据文献[52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86])

Fig.11 Hf isotopic composition of zircon from granite samples. Basemaps from [105,133]; published data from [52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86].

图12 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩的主量元素和微量元素协变图解(底图a据文献[133],b据文献[105])

Fig.12 Scatter plots showing covariances between major elements/trace elements in granite samples. Basemap in (a) adapted from [133]; basemap in (b) adapted from [105].

图13 华北克拉通东部所在的东亚陆缘中生代岩浆作用时空迁移规律(底图据文献[42,140])

Fig.13 Temporal and spatial migration patterns of Mesozoic magmatism in the East Asian continental margin of the eastern North China Craton (basemap after [42,140])

图14 北大山岩体似斑状黑云二长花岗岩R1-R2图解(a)、Rb-Y+Nb 图解(b)和Nb-Y图解(c)(底图图a据文献[161],图b,c据文献[162];前人研究资料据文献[52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86])

Fig.14 R1-R2 (a, basemap after [161]), Rb-Y+Nb (b, basemap from [162]) and Nb-Y (c, basemap after [162]) diagrams for granite samples. Published data from [52⇓-54,82⇓⇓⇓-86]

图15 华北克拉通东部中侏罗世—早白垩世构造演化模式图(底图据文献[86])

Fig.15 Simplified tectonic evolution and petrogenetic model of the eastern North China Craton between the Middle Jurassic and Early Cretaceous (basemap after [86])

参考文献 169

[1]	PESLIER A H, WOODLAND A B, BELL D R, et al. Olivine water contents in the continental lithosphere and the longevity of cratons[J]. Nature, 2010, 467(7311): 78-81. DOI
[2]	LEE C T A, LUFFI P, CHIN E J. Building and destroying continental mantle[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2011, 39: 59-90. DOI URL
[3]	ZHAO Y, XU G, ZHANG S H, et al. Yanshanian Movement and conversion of tectonic regimes in East Asia[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2004, 11(3): 319-328.
[4]	ZHAI M G, GUO J H, LIU W J. Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic continental evolution and tectonic history of the North China Craton: a review[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2005, 24(5): 547-561. DOI URL
[5]	吴福元, 杨进辉, 柳小明. 辽东半岛中生代花岗质岩浆作用的年代学格架[J]. 高校地质学报, 2005, 11(3): 305-317.
[6]	ZHENG J P, GRIFFIN W L, O’REILLY S Y, et al. Mechanism and timing of lithospheric modification and replacement beneath the eastern North China Craton: peridotitic xenoliths from the 100 Ma Fuxin basalts and a regional synthesis[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2007, 71(21): 5203-5225. DOI URL
[7]	XU Y G. Thermo-tectonic destruction of the archaean lithospheric keel beneath the Sino-Korean craton in China: evidence, timing and mechanism[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy, 2001, 26(9/10): 747-757. DOI URL
[8]	ZHAO T, ZHU G, LIN S Z, et al. Indentation-induced tearing of a subducting continent: evidence from the Tan-Lu fault zone, East China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 152: 14-36. DOI URL
[9]	DAI L Q, ZHENG Y F, ZHAO Z F. Termination time of peak decratonization in North China: geochemical evidence from mafic igneous rocks[J]. Lithos, 2016, 240/241/242/243: 327-336.
[10]	LI Y J, ZHU G, SU N, et al. The Xiaoqinling metamorphic core complex: a record of Early Cretaceous backarc extension along the southern part of the North China Craton[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2020, 132(3/4): 617-637. DOI URL
[11]	LIU J L, DAVIS G A, LIN Z Y, et al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, southeastern Liaoning Province, North China: a likely contributor to Cretaceous rotation of eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2005, 407(1/2): 65-80. DOI URL
[12]	ZHANG B L, ZHU G, JIANG D Z, et al. Evolution of the Yiwulushan metamorphic core complex from distributed to localized deformation and its tectonic implications[J]. Tectonics, 2012, 31(4): TC4018.1-TC4018.22.
[13]	ZHU G, JIANG D Z, ZHANG B L, et al. Destruction of the eastern North China Craton in a backarc setting: evidence from crustal deformation kinematics[J]. Gondwana Research, 2012, 22(1): 86-103. DOI URL
[14]	林伟, 王军, 刘飞, 等. 华北克拉通及邻区晚中生代伸展构造及其动力学背景的讨论[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(5): 1791-1810.
[15]	DAVIS G A, DARBY B J. Early Cretaceous overprinting of the Mesozoic Daqing Shan fold-and-thrust belt by the Hohhot metamorphic core complex, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2010, 1(1): 1-20. DOI URL
[16]	MENG Q R. What drove late Mesozoic extension of the northern China-Mongolia tract?[J]. Tectonophysics, 2003, 369(3/4): 155-174. DOI URL
[17]	YANG J H, WU F Y, CHUNG S L, et al. Petrogenesis of Early Cretaceous intrusions in the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure orogenic belt, East China and their relationship to lithospheric thinning[J]. Chemical Geology, 2005, 222(3/4): 200-231. DOI URL
[18]	吴福元, 杨进辉, 张艳斌, 等. 辽西东南部中生代花岗岩时代[J]. 岩石学报, 2006, 22(2): 315-325.
[19]	ZHANG H F, SUN M, ZHOU X H, et al. Geochemical constraints on the origin of Mesozoic alkaline intrusive complexes from the North China Craton and tectonic implications[J]. Lithos, 2005, 81(1/2/3/4): 297-317. DOI URL
[20]	杨进辉, 吴福元. 华北东部三叠纪岩浆作用与克拉通破坏[J]. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2009, 39(7): 910-921.
[21]	XU Y G, MA J L, HUANG X L, et al. Early Cretaceous gabbroic complex from Yinan, Shandong Province: petrogenesis and mantle domains beneath the North China Craton[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2004, 93(6): 1025-1041. DOI URL
[22]	ZHANG H F, SUN M, ZHOU M F, et al. Highly heterogeneous Late Mesozoic lithospheric mantle beneath the North China Craton: evidence from Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic systematics of mafic igneous rocks[J]. Geological Magazine, 2004, 141(1): 55-62. DOI URL
[23]	GAO S, LING W L, QIU Y M, et al. Contrasting geochemical and Sm-Nd isotopic compositions of Archean metasediments from the Kongling high-grade terrain of the Yangtze craton: evidence for cratonic evolution and redistribution of REE during crustal anatexis[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63(13/14): 2071-2088. DOI URL
[24]	GAO S, RUDNICK R L, CARLSON R W, et al. Re-Os evidence for replacement of ancient mantle lithosphere beneath the North China Craton[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 198(3/4): 307-322. DOI URL
[25]	GAO S, RUDNICK R L, YUAN H L, et al. Recycling lower continental crust in the North China Craton[J]. Nature, 2004, 432(7019): 892-897. DOI
[26]	邓晋福, 赵国春, 赵海玲, 等. 中国东部燕山期火成岩构造组合与造山-深部过程[J]. 地质论评, 2000, 46(1): 41-48.
[27]	邓晋福, 苏尚国, 赵海玲, 等. 华北地区燕山期岩石圈减薄的深部过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2003, 10(3): 41-50.
[28]	邓晋福, 苏尚国, 刘翠, 等. 关于华北克拉通燕山期岩石圈减薄的机制与过程的讨论: 是拆沉, 还是热侵蚀和化学交代?[J]. 地学前缘, 2006, 13(2): 105-119.
[29]	邓晋福, 冯艳芳, 刘翠, 等. 太行—燕辽地区燕山期造山过程、岩浆源区与成矿作用[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(3): 623-633.
[30]	高山, 金振民. 拆沉作用(delamination)及其壳-幔演化动力学意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 1997, 16(1): 1-9.
[31]	吴福元, 孙德有. 中国东部中生代岩浆作用与岩石圈减薄[J]. 长春科技大学学报, 1999, 29(4): 313-318.
[32]	吴福元, 葛文春, 孙德有, 等. 中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J]. 地学前缘, 2003, 10(3): 51-60.
[33]	许文良, 王清海, 王冬艳, 等. 华北克拉通东部中生代岩石圈减薄的过程与机制: 中生代火成岩和深源捕虏体证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(3): 309-317.
[34]	许文良, 杨承海, 杨德彬, 等. 华北克拉通东部中生代高Mg闪长岩: 对岩石圈减薄机制的制约[J]. 地学前缘, 2006, 13(2): 120-129.
[35]	许文良, 杨德彬, 裴福萍, 等. 华北克拉通中生代拆沉陆壳物质对岩石圈地幔的改造: 来自橄榄岩捕虏体中角闪石的成分制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(4): 606-617.
[36]	FAN W, MENZIES M. Destruction of aged lower lithosphere and accretion of asthenosphere mantle beneath eastern China[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 1992, 16(2): 171-180.
[37]	徐义刚, 李洪颜, 庞崇进, 等. 论华北克拉通破坏的时限[J]. 科学通报, 2009, 54(14): 1974-1989.
[38]	XU Y G, HUANG X L, MA J L, et al. Crust-mantle interaction during the tectono-thermal reactivation of the North China Craton: constraints from SHRIMP zircon U-Pb chronology and geochemistry of Mesozoic plutons from western Shandong[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2004, 147(6): 750-767. DOI URL
[39]	XU Y G, BLUSZTAJN J, MA J L, et al. Late Archean to Early Proterozoic lithospheric mantle beneath the western North China Craton: Sr-Nd-Os isotopes of peridotite xenoliths from Yangyuan and Fansi[J]. Lithos, 2008, 102(1/2): 25-42. DOI URL
[40]	LI C, VAN DER HILST R D. Structure of the upper mantle and transition zone beneath Southeast Asia from traveltime tomography[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115(B7): B07308.
[41]	ZHU R X, XU Y G, ZHU G, et al. Destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Science China (Earth Sciences), 2012, 55(10): 1565-1587. DOI URL
[42]	NIU Y L. Geological understanding of plate tectonics: basic concepts, illustrations, examples and new perspectives[J]. Global Tectonics and Metallogeny, 2018, 10(1): 23-46. DOI URL
[43]	吴福元, 徐义刚, 朱日祥, 等. 克拉通岩石圈减薄与破坏[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2014, 44(11): 2358-2372.
[44]	DONG S W, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG F Q, et al. Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous continental convergence and intracontinental orogenesis in East Asia: asynthesis of the Yanshan revolution[J]. Journal of Asia Earth Sciences, 2015, 114: 750-770.
[45]	朱日祥, 范宏瑞, 李建威, 等. 克拉通破坏型金矿床[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2015, 45(8): 1153-1168, 1.
[46]	郑永飞, 徐峥, 赵子福, 等. 华北中生代镁铁质岩浆作用与克拉通减薄和破坏[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2018, 48(4): 379-414.
[47]	WU F Y, YANG J H, XU Y G, et al. Destruction of the North China craton in the Mesozoic[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2019, 47: 173-195. DOI URL
[48]	ZHU R X, YANG J H, WU F Y. Timing of destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Lithos, 2012, 149: 51-60. DOI URL
[49]	吴福元, 杨进辉, 柳小明, 等. 冀东3.8Ga锆石Hf同位素特征与华北克拉通早期地壳时代[J]. 科学通报, 2005, 50(18): 1996-2003.
[50]	张朋, 陈冬, 寇林林, 等. 辽东卧龙泉岩体锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学、Sr-Nd-Pb同位素特征及其构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(10): 1762-1772.
[51]	张朋, 陈冬, 寇林林, 等. 辽东宽甸东北沟钼矿二长花岗岩年代学、地球化学及Hf同位素特征[J]. 中国地质, 2016, 43(6): 2092-2103.
[52]	张朋, 赵岩, 寇林林, 等. 辽东半岛丹东地区中生代花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素特征及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(10): 3297-3313.
[53]	刘永俊, 韩晓涛, 刘正宏, 等. 辽东凤城地区早白垩世花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(1): 145-155.
[54]	刘杰勋, 郭巍, 朱凯. 辽东岫岩地区早白垩世侵入岩的年代学、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(9): 2889-2900.
[55]	王志强, 胡滑志帆, 陈斌, 等. 辽东半岛早白垩世三股流岩体岩石成因: 微量元素模拟和Sr-Nd同位素的制约[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(12): 3683-3704.
[56]	郭伟静, 陈树良, 于海峰, 等. 辽东半岛印支期侵入岩侵入机制与岩浆大陆动力学演化[J]. 地质与资源, 2005, 14(2): 92-96.
[57]	WU F Y, YANG J H, WILDE S A, et al. Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Jurassic granites in the Liaodong Peninsula, NE China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2005, 221(1/2): 127-156. DOI URL
[58]	LIU D Y, NUTMAN A P, COMPSTON W, et al. Remnants of ≥3800 Ma crust in the Chinese part of the Sino-Korean Craton[J]. Geology, 1992, 20(4): 339-342. DOI URL
[59]	SONG B, NUTMAN A P, LIU D Y, et al. 3800 to 2500 Ma crustal evolution in the Anshan area of Liaoning Province, northeastern China[J]. Precambrian Research, 1996, 78(1-3): 79-94. DOI URL
[60]	吴福元, 葛文春, 孙德有, 等. 吉林南部太古代花岗岩Sm-Nd, Rb-Sr同位素年龄测定[J]. 岩石学报, 1997, 13(4): 499-506.
[61]	路孝平, 吴福元, 林景仟, 等. 辽东半岛南部早前寒武纪花岗质岩浆作用的年代学格架[J]. 地质科学, 2004, 39(1): 123-138.
[62]	周皓, 裴福萍, 焦骥, 等. 吉林通化赤柏松地区早白垩世花岗质岩脉(株)的成因: 锆石U-Pb年代学、Hf同位素和地球化学证据[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(2): 519-533.
[63]	LUO Y, SUN M, ZHAO G C, et al. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon ages of the Liaohe Group in the eastern block of the North China Craton: constraints on the evolution of the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt[J]. Precambrian Research, 2004, 134(3/4): 349-371. DOI URL
[64]	LUO Y, SUN M, ZHAO G C, et al. A comparison of U-Pb and Hf isotopic compositions of detrital zircons from the North and South Liaohe Groups: constraints on the evolution of the Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt, North China Craton[J]. Precambrian Research, 2008, 163(3/4): 279-306. DOI URL
[65]	LU X P, WU F Y, GUO J H, et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronological constraints on the Paleoproterozoic crustal evolution of the eastern block in the North China Craton[J]. Precambrian Research, 2006, 146(3/4): 138-164. DOI URL
[66]	李壮, 陈斌, 刘经纬, 等. 辽东半岛南辽河群锆石U-Pb年代学及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2015, 31(6): 1589-1605.
[67]	THOMPSON J M, MEFFRE S, DANYUSHEVSKY L. Impact of air, laser pulse width and fluence on U-Pb dating of zircons by LA-ICPMS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(2): 221-230. DOI URL
[68]	PATON C, WOODHEAD J D, HELLSTROM J C, et al. Improved laser ablation U-Pb zircon geochronology through robust downhole fractionation correction[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2010, 11(3): Q0AA06.
[69]	SLAMA J, KOSLER J, CONDON D J, et al. Plesovice zircon: a new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 249: 1-35. DOI URL
[70]	YUAN H L, GAO S, LIU X M, et al. Accurate U-Pb age and trace element determinations of zircon by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2004, 28(3): 353-370. DOI URL
[71]	LIU Y S, HU Z C, ZONG K Q, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15): 1535-1546. DOI URL
[72]	ANDERSEN T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report ²⁰⁴Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 192(1/2): 59-79. DOI URL
[73]	SÖDERLUND U, PATCHETT P J, VERVOORT J D, et al. The ¹⁷⁶Lu decay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2004, 219(3/4): 311-324. DOI URL
[74]	GRIFFIN W L, PEARSON N J, BELOUSOVA E, et al. The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2000, 64(1): 133-147. DOI URL
[75]	GRIFFIN W L, WANG X, JACKSON S E, et al. Zircon chemistry and magma mixing, SE China: in-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes[J]. Lithos, 2002, 61(3/4): 237-269. DOI URL
[76]	KOSCHEK G. Origin and significance of the SEM cathodoluminescence from zircon[J]. Journal of Microscopy, 1993, 171(3): 223-232. DOI URL
[77]	BELOUSOVA E, GRIFFIN W, O'REILLY S Y, et al. Igneous zircon: trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 143(5): 602-622. DOI URL
[78]	IRVINE TN, BARAGAR W R A. A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1971, 8(5): 523-548. DOI URL
[79]	MANIAR P D, PICCOLI P M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1989, 101(5): 635-643. DOI URL
[80]	RICKWOOD P C. Boundary lines within petrologic diagrams which use oxides of major and minor elements[J]. Lithos, 1989, 22(4): 247-263. DOI URL
[81]	FROST B R, BARNES C G, COLLINS W J, et al. A geochemical classification for granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2001, 42(11): 2033-2048. DOI URL
[82]	王世成, 杨仲杰, 杨菊, 等. 辽东石庙沟岩体岩石地球化学特征、锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 429-441.
[83]	崔维龙, 刘正宏, 杜洋, 等. 辽东地区大兴岩体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2016, 38(5): 623-637.
[84]	杨凤超, 宋运红, 杨佳林, 等. 辽东五龙—四道沟金矿集区花岗杂岩SHRIMP U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2018, 42(5): 940-954.
[85]	杨佳林, 顾玉超, 杨凤超, 等. 辽东半岛大金山花岗岩体SHRIMP U-Pb年龄、元素地球化学和Hf同位素特征及地质意义[J]. 地质论评, 2018, 64(6): 1541-1556.
[86]	刘杰勋. 华北克拉通北缘东段辽东地区中生代构造演化[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019: 1-131.
[87]	SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society London Special Publications, 1989, 42(1): 313-345. DOI URL
[88]	WILSON M. Igneous petrogenesis[M]. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989: 327-373.
[89]	PATCHETT P J, KOUVO O, HEDGE C E, et al. Evolution of continental crust and mantle heterogeneity: evidence from Hf isotopes[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1982, 78(3): 279-297. DOI URL
[90]	KNUDSEN T L, GRIFFIN W, HARTZ E, et al. In-situ hafnium and lead isotope analyses of detrital zircons from the Devonian sedimentary basin of NE Greenland: a record of repeated crustal reworking[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2001, 141(1): 83-94. DOI URL
[91]	吴福元, 李献华, 郑永飞, 等. Lu-Hf同位素体系及其岩石学应用[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(2): 185-220.
[92]	寇林林, 张朋, 赵岩, 等. 辽东半岛早白垩世黑云母二长闪长岩锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素特征及地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(11): 3950-3961.
[93]	胡国辉, 张琪琪, 李建锋, 等. 辽东地区中生代花岗岩的侵位时代: 锆石和独居石U-Pb年代学[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(11): 3962-3981.
[94]	李海洋, 王玉平, 吴文彬, 等. 辽东袁家堡石英二长斑岩的锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2019, 39(3): 551-557.
[95]	刘杰勋, 李世超, 朱凯, 等. 辽东本溪关门山岩体的年代学、地球化学及构造背景[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(3): 869-879.
[96]	刘俊来, 纪沫, 申亮, 等. 辽东半岛早白垩世伸展构造组合、形成时代及区域构造内涵[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2011, 41(5): 618-637.
[97]	WU F Y, LIN J Q, WILDE S A, et al. Nature and significance of the Early Cretaceous giant igneous event in eastern China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 233(1/2): 103-119. DOI URL
[98]	BONIN B. A-type granites and related rocks: evolution of a concept, problems and prospects[J]. Lithos, 2007, 97(1/2): 1-29. DOI URL
[99]	DONG Y, GE W C, YANG H, et al. Geochemical and SIMS U-Pb rutile and LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon geochronological evidence of the tectonic evolution of the Mudanjiang Ocean from amphibotites of the Heilongjiang Complex, NE China[J]. Gondwana Research, 2019, 69: 25-44. DOI URL
[100]	张旗, 周国庆. 中国蛇绿岩[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 1-182.
[101]	CHAPPELL B W. Aluminium saturation in I- and S-type granites and the characterization of fractionated haplogranites[J]. Lithos, 1999, 46(3): 535-551. DOI URL
[102]	WU F Y, SUN D Y, JAHN B M, et al. A Jurassic garnet-bearing granitic pluton from NE China showing tetrad REE patterns[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2004, 23(5): 731-744. DOI URL
[103]	LI X H, LI Z X, LI W X, et al. U-Pb zircon, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on age and origin of Jurassic I- and A-type granites from central Guangdong, SE China: a major igneous event in response to foundering of a subducted flat-slab[J]. Lithos, 2007, 96(1/2): 186-204. DOI URL
[104]	WU F Y, LI X H, ZHENG Y F, et al. Lu-Hf isotopicsystematic and their applications in petrology[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2007, 23(2): 185-220.
[105]	吴福元, 李献华, 杨进辉, 等. 花岗岩成因研究的若干问题[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(6): 1217-1238.
[106]	李碧乐, 孙永刚, 陈广俊, 等. 小兴安岭东安金矿区细粒正长花岗岩U-Pb年龄、岩石地球化学、Hf同位素组成及地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(1): 1-16.
[107]	SYLVESTER P J. Post-collisional strongly peraluminous granites[J]. Lithos, 1998, 45(1/2/3/4): 29-44. DOI URL
[108]	WHALEN J B, CURRIE K L, CHAPPELL B W. A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1987, 95(4): 407-419. DOI URL
[109]	张旗, 冉皞, 李承东. A型花岗岩的实质是什么?[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2012, 31(4): 621-626.
[110]	WATSON E B, HARRISON T M. Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1983, 64(2): 295-304. DOI URL
[111]	WATSON E B, HARRISON T M. Zircon thermometer reveals minimum melting conditions on earliest earth[J]. Science, 2005, 308(5723): 841-844. PMID
[112]	KING P L, WHITE A J R, CHAPPELL B W, et al. Characterization and origin of aluminous A-type granites from the Lachlan fold belt, southeastern Australia[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1997, 38(3): 371-391. DOI URL
[113]	李献华, 李武显, 李正祥. 再论南岭燕山早期花岗岩的成因类型与构造意义[J]. 科学通报, 2007, 52(9): 981-991.
[114]	李世超, 李永飞, 王兴安, 等. 大兴安岭中段晚三叠世四分组效应花岗岩的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(9): 2793-2806.
[115]	CHAPPELL B W, WHITE A J R. Two contrasting granite types[J]. Pacific Geology, 1974, 8(2): 173-174.
[116]	CHAPPELL B W, WHITE A J R, WYBORN D. The importance of residual source material (restite) in granite petrogenesis[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1987, 28(6): 1111-1138. DOI URL
[117]	CHAMPION D C, CHAPPELL B W. Petrogenesis of felsic I-type granites: an example from northern Queensland[J]. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 1992, 83(1/2): 115-126.
[118]	JAHN B, WU F Y, CHEN B. Massive granitoid generation in Central Asia: Nd isotope evidence and implication for continental growth in the Phanerozoic[J]. Episodes, 2000, 23(2): 82-92. DOI URL
[119]	RICHARDS J P. Magmatic to hydrothermal metal fluxes in convergent and collided margins[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2011, 40(1): 1-26. DOI URL
[120]	YANG H, GE W C, ZHAO G C, et al. Early Permian-Late Triassic granitic magmatism in the Jiamusi-Khanka Massif, eastern segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and its implications[J]. Gondwana Research, 2015, 27(4): 1509-1533. DOI URL
[121]	HAN B F, WANG S G, JAHN B M, et al. Depleted-mantle source for the Ulungur River A-type granites from North Xinjiang, China: geochemistry and Nd-Sr isotopic evidence, and implications for Phanerozoic crustal growth[J]. Chemical Geology, 1997, 138(3/4): 135-159. DOI URL
[122]	VALLEY J W, LACKEY J S, CAVOSIE A J, et al. 4.4 billion years of crustal maturation: oxygen isotope ratios of magmatic zircon[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2005, 150(6): 561-580. DOI URL
[123]	TAYLOR S R, MCLENNAN S M. The Continental Crust: its composition and evolution[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1985: 1-312.
[124]	HOFMANN ALBRECHT W. Chemical differentiation of the Earth: the relationship between mantle, continental crust, and oceanic crust[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1988, 90(3): 297-314. DOI URL
[125]	张旗, 王焰, 潘国强, 等. 花岗岩源岩问题: 关于花岗岩研究的思考之四[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(6): 1193-1204.
[126]	罗红玲, 吴泰然, 赵磊. 乌拉特中旗二叠纪Ⅰ型花岗岩类地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46(5): 805-820.
[127]	RUDNICK R L. Making continental crust[J]. Nature, 1995, 378(6557): 571-578. DOI
[128]	SAUNDERS A D, NORRY M J, TARNEY J. Origin of MORB and chemically-depleted mantle reservoirs: trace element constraints[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1988, Special Volume(1): 415-445.
[129]	WEAVER B L. The origin of ocean island basalt end-member compositions: trace element and isotopic constraints[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1991, 104(2/3/4): 381-397. DOI URL
[130]	ALTHERR R, SIEBEL W. I-type plutonism in a continental back-arc setting: Miocene granitoids and monzonites from the central Aegean Sea, Greece[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2002, 143(4): 397-415. DOI URL
[131]	AMELIN Y, LEE D C, HALLIDAY A N. Early-Middle Archaean crustal evolution deduced from Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotopic studies of single zircon grains[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2000, 64(24): 4205-4225. DOI URL
[132]	VERVOORT J D, PATCHETT P J, GEHRELS G E, et al. Constraints on early earth differentiation from hafnium and neodymium isotopes[J]. Nature, 1996, 379(6566): 624-627. DOI
[133]	YANG J H, WU F Y, CHUNG S L, et al. A hybrid origin for the Qianshan A-type granite, Northeast China: geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence[J]. Lithos, 2006, 89(1/2): 89-106. DOI URL
[134]	ALLÈGRE C J, MINSTER J F. Quantitative models of trace element behavior in magmatic processes[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1978, 38(1): 1-25. DOI URL
[135]	徐楠, 吴才来, 雷敏, 等. 茫崖二长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学、Lu-Hf同位素特征及岩石成因[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(增刊2): 60-80.
[136]	WU F Y, JAHN B M, WILDE S A, et al. Highly fractionated I-type granites in NE China (I): geochronology and petrogenesis[J]. Lithos, 2003, 66(3/4): 241-273. DOI URL
[137]	王智慧, 杨浩, 葛文春, 等. 东北三江盆地始新世花岗闪长岩的发现及其地质意义: 锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Sr-Nd-Hf同位素证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(6): 1823-1838.
[138]	许文良, 王枫, 裴福萍, 等. 中国东北中生代构造体制与区域成矿背景: 来自中生代火山岩组合时空变化的制约[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(2): 339-353.
[139]	CHEN C H, LEE C Y, SHINJO R. Was there Jurassic paleo-Pacific subduction in South China? : constraints from ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar dating, elemental and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry of the Mesozoic basalts[J]. Lithos, 2008, 106(1/2): 83-92. DOI URL
[140]	朱日祥, 徐义刚. 西太平洋板块俯冲与华北克拉通破坏[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2019, 49(9): 1346-1356.
[141]	杨进辉, 吴福元, 张艳斌, 等. 辽东半岛南部三叠纪辉绿岩中发现新元古代年龄锆石[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(18): 1878-1882.
[142]	裴福萍, 许文良, 杨德彬, 等. 华北克拉通东北缘岩石圈深部物质组成的不均一性: 来自吉林南部中生代火山岩元素及Sr-Nd同位素地球化学的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(8): 1962-1974.
[143]	唐杰, 许文良, 王枫, 等. 张广才岭帽儿山组双峰式火山岩成因: 年代学与地球化学证据[J]. 世界地质, 2011, 30(4): 508-520.
[144]	徐美君, 许文良, 王枫, 等. 小兴安岭中部早侏罗世花岗质岩石的年代学与地球化学及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(2): 354-368.
[145]	赵玉妹. 辽西南部中生代构造变形叠加及其意义[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012: 1-112.
[146]	LIANG C Y, LIU Y J, NEUBAUER F, et al. Structural characteristics and LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon geochronology of the deformed granitic rocks from the Mesozoic Xingcheng-Taili ductile shear zone in the North China Craton[J]. Tectonophysics, 2015, 650: 80-103. DOI URL
[147]	KARIG D E, SHARMAN G F. Subduction and accretion in trenches[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1975, 86(3): 377. DOI URL
[148]	李锦轶. 中国东北及邻区若干地质构造问题的新认识[J]. 地质论评, 1998, 44(4): 339-347.
[149]	ZHOU J B, CAO J L, WILDE S A, et al. Paleo-Pacific subduction-accretion: evidence from geochemical and U-Pb zircon dating of the Nadanhada accretionary complex, NE China[J]. Tectonics, 2014, 33(12): 2444-2466. DOI URL
[150]	ZHOU J B, LI L. The Mesozoic accretionary complex in Northeast China: evidence for the accretion history of Paleo-Pacific subduction[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017, 145: 91-100. DOI URL
[151]	崔芳华, 徐学纯, 郑常青, 等. 华北克拉通东部古太平洋板块俯冲与回撤作用: 来自辽西兴城地区晚中生代花岗质岩石的记录与启示[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(8): 2463-2492.
[152]	翟明国, 孟庆任, 刘建明, 等. 华北东部中生代构造体制转折峰期的主要地质效应和形成动力学探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(3): 285-297.
[153]	姜耀辉, 蒋少涌, 赵葵东, 等. 辽东半岛煌斑岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄及其对中国东部岩石圈减薄开始时间的制约[J]. 科学通报, 2005, 50(19): 2161-2168.
[154]	邵济安, 张履桥, 牟保磊. 大兴安岭中生代伸展造山过程中的岩浆作用[J]. 地学前缘, 1999, 6(4): 339-346.
[155]	刘俊来, 纪沫, 夏浩然, 等. 华北克拉通晚中生代壳-幔拆离作用: 岩石流变学约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(8): 1819-1829.
[156]	仲米山, 张国仁, 杨中柱, 等. 辽东半岛南部早白垩世变质核杂岩时空分布及动力学特征[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(5): 411-418.
[157]	路凤香, 韩柱国, 郑建平, 等. 辽宁复县地区古生代岩石圈地幔特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 1991, 10(增刊1): 2-20, 141.
[158]	FAN Q C, HOOPER P R. The mineral chemistry of ultramafic xenoliths of eastern China: implications for upper mantle composition and the paleogeotherms[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1989, 30(5): 1117-1158. DOI URL
[159]	SALTERS VINCENT J M, HART STANLEY R. The mantle sources of ocean ridges, islands and arcs: the Hf-isotope connection[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1991, 104(2/3/4): 364-380. DOI URL
[160]	MULLER D, GROVES D I. Potassic igneous rocks and associated gold-copper mineralization[J]. Berlin: Spring-Verlag, 1995, 1-144.
[161]	BATCHELOR RICHARD A, PETER B. Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters[J]. Chemical Geology, 1985, 48(1/2/3/4): 43-55. DOI URL
[162]	APEARCE J, WHARRIS N B, GTINDLE A. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25(4): 956-983. DOI URL
[163]	吴福元, 孙德有, 张广良, 等. 论燕山运动的深部地球动力学本质[J]. 高校地质学报, 2000, 6(3): 379-388.
[164]	吴福元, 徐义刚, 高山, 等. 华北岩石圈减薄与克拉通破坏研究的主要学术争论[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(6): 1145-1174.
[165]	朱日祥, 徐义刚, 朱光, 等. 华北克拉通破坏[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2012, 42(8): 1135-1159.
[166]	KING S D. Archean cratons and mantle dynamics[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 234: 1-14. DOI URL
[167]	HIERONYMUS C F, SHOMALI Z H, PEDERSEN L B. A dynamical model for generating sharp seismic velocity contrasts underneath continents: application to the Sorgenfrei-Tornquist Zone[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2007, 262(1/2): 77-91. DOI URL
[168]	HIRSCHMANN M M, TENNER T, AUBAUD C, et al. Dehydration melting of nominally anhydrous mantle: the primacy of partitioning[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2009, 176(1/2): 54-68. DOI URL
[169]	GREEN D H, HIBBERSON W O, KOVÁCS I, et al. Water and its influence on the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary[J]. Nature, 2010, 467(7314): 448-451. DOI

早白垩世华北克拉通东部岩石圈减薄过程和机制:来自辽宁本溪北大山岩体的证据

Processes and mechanism of lithospheric thinning in the eastern North China Craton during the Early Cretaceous: Evidence from the Beidashan pluton, Liaoning Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 19

参考文献 169

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王学求, 张必敏, 姚文生, 刘雪敏. 地球化学探测：从纳米到全球[J]. 地学前缘, 20140101, 21(1): 65-74.
[2]	. 尼泊尔喜马拉雅山脉中央丘里亚冲断层的电子自旋共振测年[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 260-269.
[3]	王涛, 李积清, 韩杰, 王泰山, 李玉龙, 袁博武. 东昆仑大水沟东地区稀土矿化石英正长岩地球化学、年代学及Hf同位素特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 283-298.
[4]	王洛锋, 王功文, 许文辉, 徐森民, 何亚清, 王春毅, 杨涛, 周晓将, 黄蕾蕾, 左玲, 牟妮妮, 曹毅, 刘志飞, 常瑜琳. 智能矿山大数据的地学信息挖掘与知识发现:以河南上房沟钼(铁)5G⁺矿山为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 317-334.
[5]	孟康, 邵德勇, 张六六, 李立武, 张瑜, 罗欢, 宋辉, 张同伟. 鄂西宜昌地区寒武系水井沱组页岩破碎气地球化学特征及其对页岩含气性的指示意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3): 14-27.
[6]	赵晓燕, 杨竹森, 杨洋, 曹煜, 范建彪, 赵苗. 西藏雅拉香波早白垩世变质基性岩和斜长角闪岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 163-182.
[7]	董小宇, 孔若颜, 颜丹平, 邱亮, 邱骏挺. 辽东半岛青城子地区晚三叠世构造岩脉成因及其金成矿意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 215-238.
[8]	王璐琳, 刘晓鸿, 张志光. 香港世界地质公园东平洲平洲组新发现火山岩的锆石U-Pb测年、地球化学及地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 239-258.
[9]	朱平平, 刘岳, 成秋明. 定量确定胶东毕郭地区勘查地球化学异常的分布方向及地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 440-446.
[10]	邢世平, 吴萍, 胡学达, 郭华明, 赵振, 袁有靖. 化隆-循化盆地含水层沉积物地球化学特征及其对地下水氟富集的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 526-538.
[11]	吴家望, 姚胜男, Amalia FILIPPIDI, 刘志飞, Gert J. DE LANGE. 全新世东地中海的陆源碎屑输入及其水文气候变化:海盆尺度地球化学分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 156-167.
[12]	雷子炎, 葛倩, 陈东, 张泳聪, 韩喜彬, 叶黎明, 边叶萍, 许冬. 中全新世以来西南极阿蒙森海沉积物来源和古气候意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 179-190.
[13]	董宏坤, 万世明, 刘畅, 赵德博, 曾志刚, 李安春. 南海北部晚中新世红绿韵律层成因的矿物学和地球化学约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 42-54.
[14]	刘海燕, 刘茂涵, 张卫民, 孙占学, 王振, 吴通航, 郭华明. 华北平原高氟地下水中稀土元素分布和分异特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 129-144.
[15]	王广才, 王焰新, 刘菲, 郭华明. 基于文献计量学分析水文地球化学研究进展及趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 25-36.