江南造山带西段桂北四堡地区830 Ma辉长岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学特征及其岩石成因研究

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.7.11

地学前缘 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 218-233.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.7.11

• 洋板块地质与造山带地质 • 上一篇下一篇

江南造山带西段桂北四堡地区830 Ma辉长岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学特征及其岩石成因研究

寇彩化¹(), 刘燕学¹^,^*(), 李江², 李廷栋¹, 丁孝忠¹, 刘勇¹, 靳胜凯³

1.中国地质科学院地质研究所, 北京 100037
2.广西壮族自治区地质调查院, 广西南宁 530023
3.中国地质大学(北京), 北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-04-30 修回日期:2021-06-02 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-03-31
通信作者: 刘燕学
作者简介:寇彩化(1985—),女,副研究员,主要从事岩石地球化学研究。E-mail: caihuakou@163.com
基金资助:
中国地质调查局项目(1212011120117);中国地质调查局项目(1212011120115);国家自然科学基金项目(41972069)

Geochronology and geochemistry of 830 Ma gabbro in the western segment of the Jiangnan Orogen and constraint on its petrogenesis

KOU Caihua¹(), LIU Yanxue¹^,^*(), LI Jiang², LI Tingdong¹, DING Xiaozhong¹, LIU Yong¹, JIN Shengkai³

1. Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
2. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Geological Survey Institute, Nanning 530023, China
3. China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-04-30 Revised:2021-06-02 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-31
Contact: LIU Yanxue

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本次研究对象为江南造山带西段桂北四堡地区新元古代辉长岩,主要由斜长石和单斜辉石组成,含有少量的橄榄石和钛铁氧化物,表明在岩浆演化过程中发生了斜长石和单斜辉石以及少量橄榄石的分离结晶作用。辉长岩锆石SIMS U-Pb谐和年龄为(830±7)Ma,指示其侵位年龄约为830 Ma。全岩具有低SiO₂含量(48.46%~53.99%)、高MgO含量(9.27%~25.22%)、Mg^#值较高(62~79)的特征。辉长岩为钙碱性系列岩石,其稀土元素球粒陨石标准化和微量元素原始地幔标准化与典型的弧岩浆相似,具有相对富集轻稀土元素((La/Yb)_N=2.2~3.7,(La/Sm)_N=2.5~2.9)和大离子亲石元素,明显的高场强元素(Nb、Ta和Ti)亏损的特征,还具有较高的Th/Nb比值(0.7~0.8)和低Nb/La比值(0.4~0.6)。辉长岩具有负的ε_Nd(t)值(-6.3~-3.0)和正的ε_Hf(t)值(8.0~12.1),指示其源区为亏损地幔,但有富集组分加入。结合区域地质特征,推测辉长岩形成于活动大陆边缘俯冲构造背景,起源于受沉积物流体交代了的楔地幔。

关键词: 江南造山带西段, 新元古代基性岩, 锆石SIMS U-Pb年龄, 岩石成因, 构造背景

Abstract:

We report gabbro discovered in the western segment of the Jiangnan Orogen Belt, Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province. The gabbro contains mostly plagioclase and clinopyroxene and a small amount of olivine and Fe-Ti oxide minerals, indicating likely fractionation of plagioclase, clinopyroxene and some olivine within the magma chamber. The gabbro specimen has a zircon SIMS U-Pb age of (830±7) Ma, suggesting gabbro emplacement at ~830 Ma. The bulk-rock is characterized by relatively low SiO₂ (48.46%-53.99%) and high MgO (9.27%-25.22%) contents with Mg^# of 62-79. It belongs to typical calc-alkalic arc rock, characterized by enrichments of light rare earth elements and large-ion lithophile elements relative to heavy rare earth elements ((La/Yb)_N=2.2-3.7, (La/Sm)_N=2.5-2.9), significantly negative Nb, Ta and Ti anomalies, and relatively high Th/Nb (0.7-0.8) and low Nb/La (0.4-0.6) ratios. The gabbro specimen has negative ε_Nd(t) (-6.3--3.0) and positive ε_Hf(t) (8.0-12.1), indicating it is sourced from depleted mantle with the addition of enriched components. In combination with the regional geology, we infer the gabbro is derived from depleted mantle wedge metasomatized by sediment-derived fluids and formed in the active continental margin in a subduction setting.

Key words: western Jiangnan Orogen, Neoproterozoic mafic intrusion, Zircon SIMS U-Pb dating, petrogenesis, tectonic setting

中图分类号:

寇彩化, 刘燕学, 李江, 李廷栋, 丁孝忠, 刘勇, 靳胜凯. 江南造山带西段桂北四堡地区830 Ma辉长岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学特征及其岩石成因研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 218-233.

KOU Caihua, LIU Yanxue, LI Jiang, LI Tingdong, DING Xiaozhong, LIU Yong, JIN Shengkai. Geochronology and geochemistry of 830 Ma gabbro in the western segment of the Jiangnan Orogen and constraint on its petrogenesis[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(2): 218-233.

图/表 15

图1 江南造山带及邻区构造框架图(a)和江南造山带西段地质概况图(b)(a据文献[2]修改,b中研究区引自文献[8-9,12,17,20,25,30-34])

Fig.1 (a) Tectonic framework of the Jiangnan Orogen (JO) and adjacent area (modified from [2]),and (b) geological sketch map of the western segment of JO (study area locations from [8-9,12,17,20,25,30-34])

图2 桂北四堡辉长岩地质图(据文献[35]修改)

Fig.2 Geological map of the Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province, showing the distribution of gabbro and the sampling location. Modified after [35].

图3 桂北四堡辉长岩显微镜特征 Pl—斜长石;Cpx—单斜辉石;Ol—橄榄石;正交偏光。

Fig.3 Thin section photomicrographs (in cross-polarized light) of gabbro from Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province (cross polarized)

表1 桂北四堡辉长岩SIMS锆石U-Pb年龄

Table 1 Results of SIMS U-Pb dating of zircon from gabbro of Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province

表2 桂北四堡辉长岩锆石 Lu-Hf同位素

Table 2 Results of Lu-Hf isotopic analysis of gabbro from Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province

图4 桂北四堡辉长岩锆石CL图像和U-Pb年龄图解

Fig.4 CL images and U-Pb ages of gabbro from Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province

表3 桂北四堡辉长岩全岩主量元素和微量元素

Table 3 Whole rock major and trace element composition of gabbro from Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province

样号	w_B/%																																						Mg^#
样号	SiO₂			Al₂O₃			FeO^T			MgO			CaO				Na₂O			K₂O				MnO			TiO₂			P₂O₅				LOI		Total			Mg^#
1211-6	51.45			12.56			12.31			11.54			7.31				2.10			1.76				0.22			0.69			0.07				5.15		94.85			67
1211-7	48.82			17.07			13.42			10.24			6.64				1.43			1.48				0.22			0.61			0.06				4.00		96.00			62
1211-8	52.28			12.49			11.97			11.36			7.38				2.22			1.31				0.24			0.67			0.07				4.91		95.09			67
1211-9	53.99			14.53			10.04			9.27			7.88				2.32			1.10				0.25			0.56			0.06				2.44		97.56			66
1211-10	48.82			9.15			12.93			21.23			6.82				0.26			0.07				0.19			0.48			0.06				5.33		94.67			78
1211-11	49.19			8.44			13.31			21.97			6.05				0.28			0.06				0.22			0.42			0.07				5.41		94.59			78
1211-12	48.59			9.64			13.15			21.50			6.23				0.29			0.06				0.18			0.48			0.05				5.36		94.64			78
1211-13	48.46			7.50			14.05			25.22			4.06				0.08			0.03				0.18			0.39			0.05				6.99		93.01			79
1211-14	48.50			8.56			13.65			23.09			5.31				0.20			0.05				0.18			0.42			0.04				5.93		94.07			78
样号	w_B/10^-6
样号	Rb		Ba			Th			U			Nb			Ta			La			Ce		Pr			Sr			Nd			Sm			Zr		Hf			Eu
1211-6	114		473			5.01			0.876			6.06			0.568			10.70			20.2		2.67			149			10.90			2.61			46.9		1.81			0.738
1211-7	103		90.2			3.38			0.507			4.01			0.427			6.67			12.9		1.70			162			7.03			1.74			24.6		1.00			0.453
1211-8	59.9		550			4.28			0.918			5.87			0.485			11.40			21.7		2.83			149			11.50			2.69			60.5		1.93			0.776
1211-9	74.2		128			3.15			0.574			4.32			0.404			8.99			17.7		2.34			138			9.56			2.29			32.3		1.20			0.600
1211-10	8.81		84.0			2.83			0.817			3.89			0.390			7.00			14.6		1.90			21.6			7.88			1.82			59.2		1.70			0.424
1211-11	2.96		3.94			2.52			0.659			3.37			0.338			7.84			15.2		1.93			12.7			7.95			1.79			47.0		1.38			0.505
1211-12	1.42		3.81			2.74			0.586			3.48			0.381			6.77			13.4		1.75			13.9			7.23			1.67			49.7		1.57			0.486
1211-13	1.09		4.00			2.36			0.441			3.04			0.321			5.55			11.1		1.42			18.3			5.93			1.37			27.9		0.889			0.219
1211-14	0.925		3.28			2.65			0.495			3.28			0.337			7.02			11.4		1.28			9.81			6.90			1.54			41.5		1.29			0.274
样号	w_B/10^-6																																(La/Sm)_N					(La/Yb)_N			δEu
样号	Ti	Gd			Tb			Dy			Ho			Y		Er			Tm			Yb			Lu			Cr			Ni		(La/Sm)_N					(La/Yb)_N			δEu
1211-6	4 109	2.55			0.562			3.47			0.756			18.3		2.15			0.405			2.46			0.359			846			499		2.65					3.12			0.86
1211-7	3 659	1.81			0.428			2.68			0.624			15.3		1.81			0.359			2.18			0.326			536			125		2.47					2.19			0.77
1211-8	4 036	2.69			0.573			3.48			0.795			18.7		2.13			0.401			2.48			0.353			881			604		2.74					3.30			0.87
1211-9	3 371	2.32			0.512			3.18			0.722			17.4		1.99			0.377			2.26			0.310			555			109		2.53					2.85			0.79
1211-10	2 876	1.87			0.400			2.48			0.533			13.1		1.50			0.281			1.78			0.258			2 434			498		2.48					2.82			0.70
1211-11	2 543	1.76			0.373			2.20			0.486			12.0		1.40			0.257			1.59			0.223			2 598			575		2.83					3.54			0.86
1211-12	2 891	1.70			0.374			2.22			0.512			12.0		1.41			0.269			1.58			0.232			2 765			587		2.62					3.07			0.87
1211-13	2 309	1.33			0.272			1.64			0.359			8.35		0.994			0.186			1.1			0.170			2 548			615		2.62					3.62			0.49
1211-14	2 524	1.53			0.324			1.97			0.447			10.5		1.23			0.232			1.37			0.201			2 957			618		2.94					3.68			0.54

表3 桂北四堡辉长岩全岩主量元素和微量元素

Table 3 Whole rock major and trace element composition of gabbro from Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province

样号	w_B/%																																						Mg^#
样号	SiO₂			Al₂O₃			FeO^T			MgO			CaO				Na₂O			K₂O				MnO			TiO₂			P₂O₅				LOI		Total			Mg^#
1211-6	51.45			12.56			12.31			11.54			7.31				2.10			1.76				0.22			0.69			0.07				5.15		94.85			67
1211-7	48.82			17.07			13.42			10.24			6.64				1.43			1.48				0.22			0.61			0.06				4.00		96.00			62
1211-8	52.28			12.49			11.97			11.36			7.38				2.22			1.31				0.24			0.67			0.07				4.91		95.09			67
1211-9	53.99			14.53			10.04			9.27			7.88				2.32			1.10				0.25			0.56			0.06				2.44		97.56			66
1211-10	48.82			9.15			12.93			21.23			6.82				0.26			0.07				0.19			0.48			0.06				5.33		94.67			78
1211-11	49.19			8.44			13.31			21.97			6.05				0.28			0.06				0.22			0.42			0.07				5.41		94.59			78
1211-12	48.59			9.64			13.15			21.50			6.23				0.29			0.06				0.18			0.48			0.05				5.36		94.64			78
1211-13	48.46			7.50			14.05			25.22			4.06				0.08			0.03				0.18			0.39			0.05				6.99		93.01			79
1211-14	48.50			8.56			13.65			23.09			5.31				0.20			0.05				0.18			0.42			0.04				5.93		94.07			78
样号	w_B/10^-6
样号	Rb		Ba			Th			U			Nb			Ta			La			Ce		Pr			Sr			Nd			Sm			Zr		Hf			Eu
1211-6	114		473			5.01			0.876			6.06			0.568			10.70			20.2		2.67			149			10.90			2.61			46.9		1.81			0.738
1211-7	103		90.2			3.38			0.507			4.01			0.427			6.67			12.9		1.70			162			7.03			1.74			24.6		1.00			0.453
1211-8	59.9		550			4.28			0.918			5.87			0.485			11.40			21.7		2.83			149			11.50			2.69			60.5		1.93			0.776
1211-9	74.2		128			3.15			0.574			4.32			0.404			8.99			17.7		2.34			138			9.56			2.29			32.3		1.20			0.600
1211-10	8.81		84.0			2.83			0.817			3.89			0.390			7.00			14.6		1.90			21.6			7.88			1.82			59.2		1.70			0.424
1211-11	2.96		3.94			2.52			0.659			3.37			0.338			7.84			15.2		1.93			12.7			7.95			1.79			47.0		1.38			0.505
1211-12	1.42		3.81			2.74			0.586			3.48			0.381			6.77			13.4		1.75			13.9			7.23			1.67			49.7		1.57			0.486
1211-13	1.09		4.00			2.36			0.441			3.04			0.321			5.55			11.1		1.42			18.3			5.93			1.37			27.9		0.889			0.219
1211-14	0.925		3.28			2.65			0.495			3.28			0.337			7.02			11.4		1.28			9.81			6.90			1.54			41.5		1.29			0.274
样号	w_B/10^-6																																(La/Sm)_N					(La/Yb)_N			δEu
样号	Ti	Gd			Tb			Dy			Ho			Y		Er			Tm			Yb			Lu			Cr			Ni		(La/Sm)_N					(La/Yb)_N			δEu
1211-6	4 109	2.55			0.562			3.47			0.756			18.3		2.15			0.405			2.46			0.359			846			499		2.65					3.12			0.86
1211-7	3 659	1.81			0.428			2.68			0.624			15.3		1.81			0.359			2.18			0.326			536			125		2.47					2.19			0.77
1211-8	4 036	2.69			0.573			3.48			0.795			18.7		2.13			0.401			2.48			0.353			881			604		2.74					3.30			0.87
1211-9	3 371	2.32			0.512			3.18			0.722			17.4		1.99			0.377			2.26			0.310			555			109		2.53					2.85			0.79
1211-10	2 876	1.87			0.400			2.48			0.533			13.1		1.50			0.281			1.78			0.258			2 434			498		2.48					2.82			0.70
1211-11	2 543	1.76			0.373			2.20			0.486			12.0		1.40			0.257			1.59			0.223			2 598			575		2.83					3.54			0.86
1211-12	2 891	1.70			0.374			2.22			0.512			12.0		1.41			0.269			1.58			0.232			2 765			587		2.62					3.07			0.87
1211-13	2 309	1.33			0.272			1.64			0.359			8.35		0.994			0.186			1.1			0.170			2 548			615		2.62					3.62			0.49
1211-14	2 524	1.53			0.324			1.97			0.447			10.5		1.23			0.232			1.37			0.201			2 957			618		2.94					3.68			0.54

图5 桂北四堡辉长岩微量元素标准化图解 (标准化数据、OIB和E/N-MORB数据引自文献[40];Mariana Arc数据引自[41];江南造山带西段860~830 Ma基性-超基性岩数据引自文献[12,17,20,23,25,27-30])

Fig.5 Normalized trace element patterns of gabbro from Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province. Normalized values and OIB and E/N-MORB data from [40]. Mariana Arc data from [41]. Data for 860-830 Ma mafic-ultramafic rocks from the western segment of the Jiangnan Orogen adapted from [12, 17, 20, 23, 25, 27-30].

表4 桂北四堡辉长岩全岩Sm-Nd同位素

Table 4 Bulk rock composition of Sm-Nd isotope for the gabbro from Sibao area in northern Guangxi Province

样号	w_B/10^-6		¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd	¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd	Nd标准误差	(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_i	εNd(t)
样号	Sm	Nd	¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd	¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd	Nd标准误差	(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_i	εNd(t)
1211-6	2.42	10.10	0.144 2	0.512 085	0.000 004	0.511 291	-5.2
1211-7	1.56	6.21	0.151 8	0.512 184	0.000 006	0.511 348	-4
1211-8	2.44	10.30	0.143 6	0.512 086	0.000 006	0.511 295	-5.1
1211-9	2.09	8.50	0.148 5	0.512 219	0.000 006	0.511 401	-3
1211-10	1.70	7.19	0.143 0	0.512 056	0.000 007	0.511 268	-5.6
1211-11	1.69	7.40	0.138 3	0.512 009	0.000 018	0.511 247	-6
1211-12	1.58	6.76	0.141 3	0.512 055	0.000 008	0.511 277	-5.4
1211-13	1.19	4.98	0.144 7	0.512 041	0.000 006	0.511 244	-6.1
1211-14	1.34	5.50	0.146 9	0.512 042	0.000 009	0.511 330	-6.3

图6 桂北四堡辉长岩岩石系列判别图解(a底图引自文献[24], b底图引自文献[43]) a—TAS图解;b—SiO2-FeOT/MgO图解。江南造山带西段860~830 Ma基性-超基性岩数据来源同图5。

Fig.6 Discrimination diagrams for gabbroic rocks in the Sibao area, northern Guangxi Province. Adapted from [24, 43].

图7 桂北四堡辉长岩(Th/Ta)PM-(La/Nb)PM图解(底图据文献[45])

Fig.7 Diagram of(Th/Ta)PM-(La/Nb)PM for the gabbro from Sibao area in northern Guangxi Province. Adapted from 45.

图8 桂北四堡辉长岩MgO与主要氧化物和部分微量元素哈克图解

Fig.8 Variations of MgO versus major and certain trace elements for the gabbro from Sibao area in northern Guangxi Province

图9 桂北四堡辉长岩Hf同位素图解 DM—亏损地幔储库;CHUR—球粒陨石储库。

Fig.9 Hf isotope for the gabbro from Sibao area in northern Guangxi Province

图10 桂北四堡辉长岩构造判别图解(a-d底图分别据文献[49,50,51,52]) a—Zr-Ti图解;b—Ti/1 000-V图解;c—Ti/Y-Zr/Y图解;d—Ta/Yb-Th/Yb图解。VAB—火山弧玄武岩;WPB—板内玄武岩;VAT—火山弧型拉斑玄武岩;CFB—大陆溢流玄武岩;MORB—洋中脊玄武岩;OIB—洋岛玄武岩;PMB—板块边缘玄武岩;OA—大洋弧玄武岩;ACM—活动大陆边缘弧玄武岩。

Fig.10 Diagrams of tectonic setting for the gabbro from Sibao area in northern Guangxi Province. Adapted from [49-52].

图11 桂北四堡辉长岩微量元素比值图解

Fig.11 Diagrams of trace elements ratios for the gabbro from Sibao area in northern Guangxi Province

参考文献 52

[1]	夏斌. 广西龙胜元古代二种不同成因蛇绿岩岩石地球化学及侵位方式研究[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 1984, 20(3):554-566.
[2]	郭令智, 施央申, 马瑞士. 华南大地构造格架和地壳演化[C]//第26界国际地质大会国际交流学术论文集(1). 北京: 地质出版社, 1980: 109-116.
[3]	胡受奚, 叶瑛. 对“华夏古陆”、“华夏地块”及“扬子—华夏古陆统一体”等观点的质疑[J]. 高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4):432-439.
[4]	薛怀民, 马芳, 宋永勤, 等. 江南造山带东段新元古代花岗岩组合的年代学和地球化学: 对扬子与华夏地块拼合时间与过程的约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(11):3215-3244.
[5]	舒良树. 华南构造演化的基本特征[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(7):1035-1053.
[6]	WU R X, ZHENG Y F, WU Y B, et al. Reworking of juvenile crust: element and isotope evidence from Neoproterozoic granodiorite in South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2006, 146(3/4):179-212. DOI URL
[7]	DRUSCHKE P, HANSON A D, YAN Q R, et al. Stratigraphic and U-Pb SHRIMP detrital zircon evidence for a neoproterozoic continental arc, central China: Rodinia implications[J]. The Journal of Geology, 2006, 114(5):627-636. DOI URL
[8]	ZHOU J B, LI X H, GE W C, et al. Age and origin of Middle Neoproterozoic mafic magmatism in southern Yangtze Block and relevance to the break-up of Rodinia[J]. Gondwana Research, 2007, 12(1/2):184-197. DOI URL
[9]	WANG X L, ZHAO G C, ZHOU J C, et al. Geochronology and Hf isotopes of zircon from volcanic rocks of the Shuangqiaoshan Group, South China: implications for the Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the eastern Jiangnan orogen[J]. Gondwana Research, 2008, 14(3):355-367. DOI URL
[10]	ZHENG Y F, WU R X, WU Y B, et al. Rift melting of juvenile arc-derived crust: geochemical evidence from Neoproterozoic volcanic and granitic rocks in the Jiangnan Orogen, South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2008, 163(3/4):351-383. DOI URL
[11]	ZHANG S B, ZHENG Y F, ZHAO Z F, et al. Neoproterozoic anatexis of Archean lithosphere: geochemical evidence from felsic to mafic intrusions at Xiaofeng in the Yangtze Gorge, South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2008, 163(3/4):210-238. DOI URL
[12]	ZHOU J C, WANG X L, QIU J S. Geochronology of Neoproterozoic mafic rocks and sandstones from northeastern Guizhou, South China: coeval arc magmatism and sedimentation[J]. Precambrian Research, 2009, 170(1/2):27-42. DOI URL
[13]	FAURE M, SHU L S, WANG B, et al. Intracontinental subduction: a possible mechanism for the Early Palaeozoic orogen of SE China[J]. Terra Nova, 2009, 21(5):360-368. DOI URL
[14]	LI X H, ZHU W G, ZHONG H, et al. The Tongde picritic dikes in the western Yangtze Block: evidence for ca. 800-Ma mantle plume magmatism in South China during the breakup of Rodinia[J]. The Journal of Geology, 2010, 118(5):509-522. DOI URL
[15]	ZHOU J C, WANG X L, QIU J S, et al. Geochemistry of Meso- and Neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi, China: arc or plume magmatism?[J]. Geochemical Journal, 2004, 38(2):139-152. DOI URL
[16]	YAN Q R, HANSON A D, WANG Z Q, et al. Neoproterozoic subduction and rifting on the northern margin of the Yangtze plate, China: implications for Rodinia reconstruction[J]. International Geology Review, 2004, 46(9):817-832. DOI URL
[17]	YAO J L, SHU L S, SANTOSH M, et al. Neoproterozoic arc-related mafic-ultramafic rocks and syn-collision granite from the western segment of the Jiangnan Orogen, South China: constraints on the Neoproterozoic assembly of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks[J]. Precambrian Research, 2014, 243:39-62. DOI URL
[18]	CAMPBELL I H, GRIFFITHS R W. Implications of mantle plume structure for the evolution of flood basalts[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1990, 99(1/2):79-93. DOI URL
[19]	LI X H. U-Pb zircon ages of granites from the southern margin of the Yangtze Block: timing of Neoproterozoic Jinning: orogeny in SE China and implications for Rodinia Assembly[J]. Precambrian Research, 1999, 97(1/2):43-57. DOI URL
[20]	LI Z X, LI X H, KINNY P D, et al. The breakup of Rodinia: did it start with a mantle plume beneath South China?[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1999, 173(3):171-181. DOI URL
[21]	LI X H, LI Z X, ZHOU H W, et al. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age, geochemistry and Nd isotope of the Guandaoshan pluton in SW Sichuan: petrogenesis and tectonic significance[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2003, 46(1):73-83.
[22]	WANG X L, ZHOU J C, QIU J S, et al. Geochemistry of the Meso- to Neoproterozoic basic-acid rocks from Hunan Province, South China: implications for the evolution of the western Jiangnan Orogen[J]. Precambrian Research, 2004, 135(1/2):79-103. DOI URL
[23]	WANG X L, ZHOU J C, QIU J S, et al. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon geochronology of the Neoproterozoic igneous rocks from northern Guangxi, South China: implications for tectonic evolution[J]. Precambrian Research, 2006, 145(1/2):111-130. DOI URL
[24]	WILSON M. Igneous petrogenesis[M]. London: Unwin and Hyman, 1989.
[25]	葛文春, 李献华, 李正祥, 等. 龙胜地区镁铁质侵入体: 年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 2001, 36(1):112-118.
[26]	CHEN X, WANG X L, WANG D, et al. Contrasting mantle-crust melting processes within orogenic belts: implications from two episodes of mafic magmatism in the western segment of the Neoproterozoic Jiangnan Orogen in South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2018, 309:123-137. DOI URL
[27]	LIN M S, PENG S B, JIANG X F, et al. Geochemistry, petrogenesis and tectonic setting of Neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from the western Jiangnan Orogen, South China[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 35:338-356. DOI URL
[28]	WANG X C, LI X H, LI W X, et al. Ca. 825 Ma komatiitic basalts in South China: first evidence for >1500 ℃ mantle melts by a Rodinian mantle plume[J]. Geology, 2007, 35(12):1103-1106. DOI URL
[29]	ZHAO J H, ZHOU M F. Neoproterozoic high-Mg basalts formed by melting of ambient mantle in South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2013, 233:193-205. DOI URL
[30]	KOU C H, LIU Y X, HUANG H, et al. The Neoproterozoic arc-type and OIB-type mafic-ultramafic rocks in the western Jiangnan Orogen: implications for tectonic settings[J]. Lithos, 2018, 312/313:38-56.
[31]	LI Z X, ZHANG L H, POWELL C M. South China in Rodinia: part of the missing link between Australia-East Antarctica and Laurentia?[J]. Geology, 1995, 23(5):407-410. DOI URL
[32]	ZHONG J, CHEN Y J, PIRAJNO F. Geology, geochemistry and tectonic settings of the molybdenum deposits in South China: a review[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2017, 81:829-855. DOI URL
[33]	ZHAO G C. Jiangnan Orogen in South China: developing from divergent double subduction[J]. Gondwana Research, 2015, 27(3):1173-1180. DOI URL
[34]	杨菲, 汪正江, 王剑, 等. 华南西部新元古代中期沉积盆地性质及其动力学分析: 来自桂北丹洲群的沉积学制约[J]. 地质论评, 2012, 58(5):854-864.
[35]	广西地质局. 1: 200 000罗城幅[CM]. 南宁: 广西地质局, 1968.
[36]	李献华, 李武显, 王选策, 等. 幔源岩浆在南岭燕山早期花岗岩形成中的作用: 锆石原位Hf-O同位素制约[J]. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2009, 39(7):872-887.
[37]	侯可军, 李延河, 邹天人, 等. LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石Hf同位素的分析方法及地质应用[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(10):2595-2604.
[38]	LIANG Q, GRÉGOIRE D C. Determination of trace elements in twenty six Chinese geochemistry reference materials by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Geostandards Newsletter, 2000, 24(1):51-63. DOI URL
[39]	HOSKIN P W O. Trace-element composition of hydrothermal zircon and the alteration of Hadean zircon from the Jack Hills, Australia[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2005, 69(3):637-648. DOI URL
[40]	SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1989, 42(1):313-345. DOI URL
[41]	TAMURA Y, ISHIZUKA O, STERN R J, et al. Mission immiscible: distinct subduction components generate two primary magmas at Pagan volcano, Mariana arc[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2014, 55(1):63-101. DOI URL
[42]	ZHANG Z C, MAO J W, CAI J H, et al. Geochemistry of picrites and associated lavas of a Devonian island arc in the northern Junggar terrane, Xinjiang (NW China): implications for petrogenesis, arc mantle sources and tectonic setting[J]. Lithos, 2008, 105(3/4):379-395. DOI URL
[43]	MIYASHIRO A. Volcanic rock series in island arcs and active continental margins[J]. American Journal of Science, 1974, 274(4):321-355. DOI URL
[44]	TAYLOR S R, MCLENNAN S M. The continental crust: its composition and evolution[M]. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1985.
[45]	NEAL C R, MAHONEY J J, CHAZEY W J. Mantle sources and the highly variable role of continental lithosphere in basalt petrogenesis of the Kerguelen plateau and broken ridge LIP: results from ODP leg 183[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2002, 43(7):1177-1205. DOI URL
[46]	FREY F A, GREEN D H, ROY S D. Integrated models of basalt petrogenesis: a study of quartz tholeiites to olivine melilitites from south eastern Australia utilizing geochemical and experimental petrological data[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1978, 19(3):463-513. DOI URL
[47]	吴福元, 李献华, 郑永飞, 等. Lu-Hf同位素体系及其岩石学应用[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(2):185-220.
[48]	KIMURA J I, YOSHIDA T. Contributions of slab fluid, mantle wedge and crust to the origin of quaternary lavas in the NE Japan arc[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2006, 47(11):2185-2232. DOI URL
[49]	Pearce J A, Norry M J. Petrogenetic implications of Ti, Zr, Y, and Nb variations in volcanic rocks[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1979, 69(1):33-47. DOI URL
[50]	SHERVAIS J W. Ti-V plots and the petrogenesis of modern and ophiolitic lavas[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1982, 59(1):101-118. DOI URL
[51]	PEARCE J A, GALE G H. Identification of ore-deposition environment from trace-element geochemistry of associated igneous host rocks[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1977, 7(1):14-24. DOI URL
[52]	CONDIE K C. Geochemical changes in baslts and andesites across the Archean-Proterozoic boundary: identification and significance[J]. Lithos, 1989, 23(1/2):1-18. DOI URL

江南造山带西段桂北四堡地区830 Ma辉长岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学特征及其岩石成因研究

Geochronology and geochemistry of 830 Ma gabbro in the western segment of the Jiangnan Orogen and constraint on its petrogenesis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 52

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴浩, 杨晨, 吴彦旺, 李才, 刘飞, 林兆旭. 藏北中仓地区晚白垩世岩浆岩成因及其对高原早期隆升的指示[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(6): 261-281.
[2]	刘伟, 张洪瑞, 罗迪柯, 贾鹏飞, 靳立杰, 周永刚, 梁云汉, 王子圣, 李春稼. 安哥拉地块北部Dondo地区古元古代花岗岩岩石成因:Columbia超大陆聚合的响应[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 237-257.
[3]	张焕宝, 贺海洋, 杨仕教, 李亚林, 毕文军, 韩世礼, 郭钦鹏, 杜青. 基于机器学习的埃达克质岩构造背景判别研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 417-428.
[4]	陈国超, 张晓飞, 裴先治, 裴磊, 李佐臣, 刘成军, 李瑞保. 雅鲁藏布江中段日喀则地区却顶布—路曲地幔橄榄岩岩石地球化学特征、成因及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 1-19.
[5]	李光洁, 陈永清, 尚志, 刘世博. 扬子地块西缘峨山新元古代高分异I型花岗岩地球化学特征及岩石成因[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 20-39.
[6]	黄春梅, 李光明, 付建刚, 梁维, 张志, 王艺云. 藏南错那洞中新世早期淡色花岗岩岩石成因:全岩地球化学、矿物学特征约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(5): 74-92.
[7]	焦小芹, 张关龙, 牛花朋, 王圣柱, 于洪洲, 熊峥嵘, 周健, 谷文龙. 准噶尔盆地东北缘石炭系火山岩形成机制:对准噶尔洋盆闭合时限的新启示[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 385-402.
[8]	张继彪, 丁孝忠, 刘燕学. 扬子西缘洋岛型与岛弧型火山岩岩石成因与构造意义:从板内裂谷到洋-陆俯冲[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 250-266.
[9]	瞿雪姣, 高有峰, 林志成, 王璞珺, 吴康军. 松辽盆地及周缘地区侏罗系/白垩系界线区域对比特征探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 299-315.
[10]	王旭影, 姜在兴. 苏北盆地古近系阜三段物源特征及其形成的构造背景分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(2): 376-390.
[11]	裴圣良, 丁汝福, 单立华, 杨武生. 新疆富蕴科克别克提基性杂岩体锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 184-198.
[12]	张达玉, 付翔, 位鸥祥, 叶龙翔, 蒋华, 张永, 辛后田. 内蒙古北山小狐狸山钼多金属矿区志留纪安山玢岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(3): 222-238.
[13]	贾儒雅，王涛，李康宁，程志中，薛建玲，林成贵，陈辉，刘铮. 西秦岭德乌鲁含矿岩体及其包体的岩石学成因和构造意义 [J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(5): 290-303.
[14]	李刚, 蒋职权, 邵学峰, 高万里, 刘正宏. 医巫闾山中—晚侏罗世构造变形与同构造花岗岩的耦合关系[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(2): 72-91.
[15]	曹代勇，宋时雨，马志凯，彭扬文，乔军伟. 晚三叠世昌都盆地构造背景及对成煤作用的控制[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(2): 169-178.