Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 179-190.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.yx.2017-6-4

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir: a case study from the Upper Triassic reservoir of the southwest Sichuan Basin, China.

SHI Zhensheng,LI Xizhe,DONG Dazhong,QIU Zhen,LU Bin,LIANG Pingping   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, CNPC, Langfang 065007, China
    2. National Energy Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China
  • Received:2017-09-01 Revised:2017-10-12 Online:2018-03-15 Published:2018-03-15

Abstract: Diagenesis of tight sandstone reservoir dominates pore evolution, and further controls the distribution of relatively highquality reservoirs. The Upper Triassic sandstone reservoir in the southwest Sichuan Basin, with overall porosity less than 6% and permeability less than 0.1×10-3 μm2, is a typical tight sandstone reservoir. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of cores, cast slices and fluid inclusion shows that the tight sandstone reservoirdominated by intragranular dissolved pore, intergranular dissolved pore and moldic poreexperienced compaction, cementation, dissolution and metasomatism. Paragenetic relationship and fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures reveal the succession of the Upper Triassic sandstone: compaction→first phase (sequentially) fracture, illite cementation, quartz overgrowth and calcite cementation→second phase quartz overgrowth and siliceous infill→dissolution of feldspar and debris→chlorite cementation or illite cementation→second phase calcite cementation→dissolution of feldspar and debris→second phase fracture→third phase quartz overgrowth and siliceous infill followed by carbonate cementation→carbonate replacement of feldspar and quartz→third phase fracture→late stage calcite and quartz cementation. The measured vitrinite reflectivity (Ro) value and homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions indicate the sandstone is currently in the A2 to B diagenetic stage, when compaction, the main factor of reservoir densification, causes roughly 27.5% porosity loss; while siliceous and carbonate cementation are responsible for only 5.3% porosity loss.

Key words: tight sandstone reservoir, diagenesis evolution, pore evolution, southwest Sichuan Basin, Upper Triassic

CLC Number: