Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 42-53.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.12.32

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Soil moisture retrieval on both active and passive microwave data scales

LIU Qixin1,2(), GU Xingfa1,2,3, WANG Chunmei1, YANG Jian1, ZHAN Yulin1,*()   

  1. 1. Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    3. School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Langfang 065000, China
  • Received:2023-12-13 Revised:2024-01-02 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-18

Abstract:

Soil moisture is a critical parameter in the field of hydrology, agriculture and meteorology, and microwave remote sensing is one of the most effective methods for soil moisture detection. This study uses active and passive microwave data and other multi-source remote sensing data and applies Random forest algorithm to perform soil moisture retrieval on both active and passive microwave data scales. First, on passive microwave data scale, the parameters for land cover and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) are spatially optimized. Second, ReliefF method is used for evaluating the importance of input parameters and parameter selection. Last, results by using active and passive microwave data jointly or separately are compared to assess the retrial accuracy and effectiveness of the former method. It was found that on the scale of active microwave data, the joint retrieval method yielded results with higher accuracy (r=0.691, RMSE=0.0796) compared to using only active microwave data (r=0.744, RMSE=0.0848); however, on the scale of passive microwave data, the opposite was true (r=0.939, RMSE=0.0451 using joint data; r=0.944, RMSE=0.0435 using only passive microwave data). The joint retrieval method proved to be applicable on the scale of active microwave data.

Key words: soil moisture, microwave remote sensing, joint retrieval, random forest, spatial optimization, importance evaluation

CLC Number: