东昆仑夏日哈木矿区热液型铅锌矿体成因及地质意义

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.76

地学前缘 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 347-369.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.76

• 成藏-成矿作用与评价 • 上一篇下一篇

东昆仑夏日哈木矿区热液型铅锌矿体成因及地质意义

陈欣¹(), 王辉¹^,^*(), 毛景文¹^,², 于淼³, 乔建峰⁴, 王治安⁴

1.长安大学地球科学与资源学院, 陕西西安 710061
2.中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所自然资源部成矿作用与资源评价重点实验室, 北京100037
3.中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院, 湖南长沙 410083
4.青海省第五地质矿产勘查院, 青海西宁 810003

收稿日期:2022-03-02 修回日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-01-05
通讯作者: 王辉
作者简介:陈欣(2000—),男,硕士研究生,从事矿床学研究工作。E-mail: chenxin21s@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41902074);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(300102271202)

Genesis and geological significance of hydrothermal Pb-Zn orebodies in the Xiarihamu mining area, East Kunlun Mountains, China

CHEN Xin¹(), WANG Hui¹^,^*(), MAO Jingwen¹^,², YU Miao³, QIAO Jianfeng⁴, WANG Zhian⁴

1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
2. Ministry of Natural Resources Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
3. School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
4. Qinghai No.5 Geological Mineral Exploration Institute, Xining 810003, China

Received:2022-03-02 Revised:2022-04-28 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-01-05
Contact: WANG Hui

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

夏日哈木是近年来在东昆仑成矿带探明的一个超大型岩浆型Ni-Co硫化物矿床,然而,随着矿区深部和外围找矿工作的不断深入,矿区内相继发现与岩浆硫化物型矿体特征明显不同的热液型Pb-Zn±Cu±Ag矿体,已探明的金属量达10万吨。为进一步揭示热液型矿体的成因及其产出背景,本文系统地开展了矿化蚀变特征和成矿年代学研究工作。新发现的热液型矿体主要呈似层状产于古元古代金水口群白沙河岩组的大理岩与片麻岩的层间构造带内,矿石矿物主要为方铅矿、闪锌矿和黄铜矿,脉石矿物为辉石、石榴子石、绿帘石、绿泥石、榍石、磷灰石、石英及方解石等。电子探针分析结果显示,辉石属于透辉石-钙铁辉石系列,矿物端员组分为Di_65.44~79.01Hd_18.55~30.78Jo_1.63~0.51;石榴子石属于钙铝榴石-锰铝榴石系列,矿物端员组分为Gro_24.93~92.17And_3.29~9.95(Spe+Alm)_1.68~67.29;绿帘石和绿泥石均有高Mn特征。综合以上矿物学研究工作,认为其属于夕卡岩型矿体。LA-ICP-MS微量元素分析显示,榍石稀土元素总量较低,稀土配分模式为右倾的轻稀土富集型,Th/U为0.23~1.97,平均值为0.94,与典型的热液榍石稀土元素组成相近。LA-ICP-MS微区原位U-Pb定年获得的热液榍石²⁰⁷Pb校正后的²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U加权平均年龄为(413.3±3.6) Ma(n=23, MSWD=0.96);热液磷灰石²⁰⁷Pb校正后的²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U加权平均年龄为(414±13) Ma(n=17, MSWD=1.03),代表夕卡岩型矿体成矿作用发生于早泥盆世,与岩浆型镍钴硫化物矿体的成矿时代在误差范围内基本一致。结合成矿地质条件,本文认为夏日哈木矿区发育具有时空联系的岩浆型与热液型两套成矿系统,区域伸展背景下幔源岩浆上涌导致地壳岩石发生部分熔融,形成浅部酸性岩浆房,熔体沿着伸展作用形成的构造薄弱带上升,分异产生岩浆流体,与古元古代金水口群大理岩发生接触交代作用,形成夕卡岩型Pb-Zn±Cu±Ag矿体。此外,本文为东昆仑成矿带泥盆纪夕卡岩型铅锌成矿作用的存在提供了直接的成矿年代学佐证,关注岩浆型与热液型两套成矿系统的共存,对开展综合找矿评价具有重要的理论和实际意义。

关键词: 铅锌矿, 夕卡岩, 矿床成因, 夏日哈木, 东昆仑

Abstract:

The Xiarihamu deposit is a giant magmatic Ni-Co sulfide deposit discovered recently in the East Kunlun metallogenic belt. With the advancement of deep, peripheral ore prospecting, however, some distinct hydrothermal Pb-Zn-(Cu, Ag) orebodies—which are obviously different from the magmatic sulfide deposit—have been found at the Xiarihamu mining area, with nearly 100,000 tons of proven reserves. In order to further reveal their genesis and production background, a systematic study of the mineral alteration characteristics and metallogenic chronology of the newly discovered hydrothermal orebodies is carried out. The hydrothermal orebodies are mainly stratified in the marble/gneiss interlayer structural belt of the Paleoproterozoic Baishahe Formation of the Jinshuikou Group. The main metallic minerals are galena and sphalerite, followed by chalcopyrite, and the gangue minerals are pyroxene, garnet, epidote, chlorite, titanite, apatite, quartz, calcite, etc. According to EPMA analysis, the pyroxene is mainly composed of the diopside-hedenbergite series, with the end component mainly Di_65.44-79.01Hd_18.55-30.78Jo_1.63-0.51; the garnet belongs to the andradite-spessartine series, with the end component mainly Gro_24.93-92.17And_3.29-9.95(Spe + Alm)_1.68-67.29; and the epidote and chlorite in the skarn are both characterized by high Mn contents. Based on the above results it is considered that the hydrothermal orebodies are of skarn type. The trace element composition of the hydrothermal titanite from the skarn is similar to that of typical hydrothermal titanite according to LA-ICP-MS analysis. It has relatively low ΣREE, is enriched in LREE, with small LREE/HREE fractionation, and has a Th/U ratio of 0.23-1.97 (averaging 0.94). By LA-ICP-MS in-situ U-Pb dating the ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U weighted mean age (after ²⁰⁷Pb correction) of the hydrothermal titanite is (413.3 ± 3.6) Ma (n = 23, MSWD = 0.96), and for the hydrothermal apatite it is (414 ± 13) Ma (n = 17, MSWD = 1.03). These results indicate that mineralization of the skarn orebodies occurred in the Early Devonian, which is consistent with the metallogenic age (within the error range) of the magmatic Ni-Co sulfide ore body. Combined with the regional metallogenic geological conditions, this paper considers that there are two temporospatially related metallogenic systems-magmatic and hydrothermal systems-developed in the Xiarihamu mining area. Briefly, under the extensional background the upwelling of the mantle-derived magma results in the partial melting of rocks in the middle-upper crust to form a felsic magmatism chamber; the melts then rise along the extensional structure zone and differentiate to produce the ore-forming fluids which then react with Paleoproterozoic marble or calcareous siltstone to form the Pb-Zn-(Cu, Ag) orebodies. This paper provides direct metallogenic and chronological evidences for the existence of Devonian Pb-Zn skarn deposits in the East Kunlun metallogenic belt. It is of theoretical and practical significance, therefore, to consider the coexistence of magmatic and hydrothermal ore-forming systems in the region and carry out a comprehensive prospecting evaluation accordingly.

Key words: Pb-Zn deposit, skarn, ore genesis, Xiarihamu, East Kunlun

中图分类号:

陈欣, 王辉, 毛景文, 于淼, 乔建峰, 王治安. 东昆仑夏日哈木矿区热液型铅锌矿体成因及地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 347-369.

CHEN Xin, WANG Hui, MAO Jingwen, YU Miao, QIAO Jianfeng, WANG Zhian. Genesis and geological significance of hydrothermal Pb-Zn orebodies in the Xiarihamu mining area, East Kunlun Mountains, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(2): 347-369.

图/表 18

参考文献 105

[1]	姜春发, 杨经绥, 冯秉贵, 等. 昆仑开合构造[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1992.
[2]	姜春发, 王宗起, 李锦轶. 中央造山带开合构造[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2000.
[3]	DONG Y P, HE D F, SUN S S, et al. Subduction and accretionary tectonics of the East Kunlun orogen, western segment of the Central China Orogenic System[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 186: 231-261. DOI URL
[4]	DONG Y P, SUN S S, SANTOSH M, et al. Central China orogenic belt and amalgamation of east Asian continents[J]. Gondwana Research, 2021, 100: 131-194. DOI URL
[5]	SONG S G, BI H Z, QI S S, et al. HP-UHP metamorphic belt in the East Kunlun Orogen: final closure of the proto-Tethys ocean and formation of the pan-north-China continent[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2018, 59(11): 2043-2060. DOI URL
[6]	裴先治, 李瑞保, 李佐臣, 等. 东昆仑南缘布青山复合增生型构造混杂岩带组成特征及其形成演化过程[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(12): 4498-4520.
[7]	吴福元, 万博, 赵亮, 等. 特提斯地球动力学[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(6): 1627-1674.
[8]	莫宣学, 罗照华, 邓晋福, 等. 东昆仑造山带花岗岩及地壳生长[J]. 高校地质学报, 2007, 13(3): 403-414.
[9]	马昌前, 熊富浩, 尹烁, 等. 造山带岩浆作用的强度和旋回性: 以东昆仑古特提斯花岗岩类岩基为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2015, 31(12): 3555-3568.
[10]	YU M, DICK J M, FENG C Y, et al. The tectonic evolution of the East Kunlun Orogen, northern Tibetan Plateau: a critical review with an integrated geodynamic model[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2020, 191: 104168. DOI URL
[11]	丰成友, 李东生, 吴正寿, 等. 东昆仑祁漫塔格成矿带矿床类型、时空分布及多金属成矿作用[J]. 西北地质, 2010, 43(4): 10-17.
[12]	丰成友, 王松, 李国臣, 等. 青海祁漫塔格中晚三叠世花岗岩: 年代学、地球化学及成矿意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(2): 665-678.
[13]	潘彤. 青海矿床成矿系列探讨[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(3): 297-315.
[14]	李文渊, 张照伟, 高永宝, 等. 昆仑古特提斯构造转换与镍钴锰锂关键矿产成矿作用研究[J]. 中国地质, 2022, 49(05): 1385-1407.
[15]	张德全, 党兴彦, 佘宏全, 等. 柴北缘—东昆仑地区造山型金矿床的Ar-Ar测年及其地质意义[J]. 矿床地质, 2005, 24(2): 87-98.
[16]	WANG H, FENG C Y, LI R X, et al. Geological characteristics, metallogenesis, and tectonic setting of porphyry-skarn Cu deposits in East Kunlun Orogen[J]. Geological Journal, 2018, 53: 58-76.
[17]	WU J J, ZENG Q D, SANTOSH M, et al. Intrusion-related orogenic gold deposit in the East Kunlun belt, NW China: a multiproxy investigation[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 139: 104550. DOI URL
[18]	LI C S, ZHANG Z W, LI W Y, et al. Geochronology, petrology and Hf-S isotope geochemistry of the newly-discovered Xiarihamu magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide deposit in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, western China[J]. Lithos, 2015, 216/217: 224-240. DOI URL
[19]	张照伟, 李文渊, 钱兵, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木岩浆铜镍硫化物矿床成矿时代的厘定及其找矿意义[J]. 中国地质, 2015, 42(3): 438-451.
[20]	SONG X Y, YI J N, CHEN L M, et al. The giant xiarihamu Ni-co sulfide deposit in the East Kunlun orogenic belt, northern Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Economic Geology, 2016, 111(1): 29-55. DOI URL
[21]	丰成友, 于淼, 李大新, 等. 新疆祁漫塔格巴什尔希钨锡矿床流体包裹体地球化学研究[J]. 矿床地质, 2013, 32(1): 20-36.
[22]	李加多, 王新雨, 祝新友, 等. 青海祁漫塔格海西期成矿初探: 以牛苦头M1铅锌矿床为例[J]. 矿产勘查, 2019, 10(8): 1775-1783.
[23]	王新雨, 祝新友, 李加多, 等. 青海牛苦头矿区两期岩浆岩及其矽卡岩型成矿作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(5): 1567-1586.
[24]	姚磊, 吕志成, 赵财胜, 等. 青海祁漫塔格地区牛苦头矿床和卡而却卡矿床B区花岗质岩石LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄: 对泥盆纪成岩成矿作用的指示[J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(7): 1158-1169.
[25]	高永宝, 李文渊, 钱兵, 等. 东昆仑野马泉铁矿相关花岗质岩体年代学、地球化学及Hf同位素特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(6): 1647-1665.
[26]	ZHONG S H, LI S Z, FENG C Y, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of mineralized and barren intrusive rocks in the Yemaquan polymetallic skarn deposit, northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: a zircon perspective[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 139: 104560. DOI URL
[27]	SONG X Y, WANG K Y, BARNES S J, et al. Petrogenetic insights from chromite in ultramafic cumulates of the Xiarihamu intrusion, northern Tibet Plateau, China[J]. American Mineralogist, 2020, 105(4): 479-497. DOI URL
[28]	张照伟, 钱兵, 王亚磊, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木镍成矿赋矿机理认识与找矿方向指示[J]. 西北地质, 2020, 53(3): 153-168.
[29]	青海省第五地质勘查院. 青海省格尔木市拉陵灶火地区铜多金属矿整装勘查项目报告[R]. 青海: 青海省第五地质勘查院, 2021.
[30]	CLARK M K, FARLEY K A, ZHENG D W, et al. Early Cenozoic faulting of the northern Tibetan Plateau margin from apatite (U-Th)/He ages[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2010, 296(1/2): 78-88. DOI URL
[31]	COWGILL E, YIN A, HARRISON T M, et al. Reconstruction of the Altyn Tagh Fault based on U-Pb geochronology: role of back thrusts, mantle sutures, and heterogeneous crustal strength in forming the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B7: 1-28.).
[32]	YIN A, DANG Y Q, WANG L C, et al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Qaidam Basin and its surrounding regions (Part 1): the southern Qilian Shan-Nan Shan thrust belt and northern Qaidam Basin[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2008, 120(7/8): 813-846. DOI URL
[33]	YIN A, DANG Y Q, ZHANG M, et al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Qaidam Basin and its surrounding regions (part 2): wedge tectonics in southern Qaidam Basin and the eastern Kunlun Range[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2007, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2433(18). DOI
[34]	姜春发, 冯秉贵, 杨经绥, 等. 昆仑地质构造轮廓[J]. 中国地质科学院地质研究所文集, 1986(2): 70-80.
[35]	古凤宝. 东昆仑地质特征及晚古生代: 中生代构造演化[J]. 青海地质, 1994(1): 4-14.
[36]	许志琴, 李海兵, 杨经绥, 等. 东昆仑山南缘大型转换挤压构造带和斜向俯冲作用[J]. 地质学报, 2001, 75(2): 156-164.
[37]	YU M, FENG C Y, SANTOSH M, et al. The Qiman Tagh Orogen as a window to the crustal evolution in northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2017, 167: 103-123. DOI URL
[38]	HE D F, DONG Y P, LIU X M, et al. Tectono-thermal events in East Kunlun, northern Tibetan Plateau: evidence from zircon U-Pb geochronology[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 30: 179-190. DOI URL
[39]	孟繁聪, 崔美慧, 吴祥珂, 等. 东昆仑祁漫塔格花岗片麻岩记录的岩浆和变质事件[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(6): 2107-2122.
[40]	HE D F, DONG Y P, ZHANG F F, et al. The 1.0 Ga S-type granite in the East Kunlun Orogen, Northern Tibetan Plateau: implications for the Meso- to Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2016, 130: 46-59. DOI URL
[41]	张勤山, 马楠, 郝亚青, 等. 综合化探方法在青海夏日哈木超大型铜镍矿床中的找矿应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(3): 429-437.
[42]	王冠. 东昆仑造山带镍矿成矿作用研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014.
[43]	姜常义, 凌锦兰, 周伟, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木镁铁质-超镁铁质岩体岩石成因与拉张型岛弧背景[J]. 岩石学报, 2015, 31(4): 1117-1136.
[44]	王冠, 孙丰月, 李碧乐, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木矿区早泥盆世正长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学及其动力学意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2013, 37(4): 685-697.
[45]	奥琮, 孙丰月, 李碧乐, 等. 青海夏日哈木矿区中泥盆世闪长玢岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学及其地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2014, 47(1): 96-106.
[46]	王冠, 孙丰月, 李碧乐, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木铜镍矿镁铁质-超镁铁质岩体岩相学、锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学及其构造意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(6): 381-401. DOI
[47]	王冠, 孙丰月, 李碧乐, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木矿区新元古代早期二长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学及其构造意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2016, 40(6): 1247-1260.
[48]	郭峰, 王盘喜, 卞孝东, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木地区二长花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 中国地质调查, 2020, 7(6): 51-60.
[49]	路远发. GeoKit: 一个用VBA构建的地球化学工具软件包[J]. 地球化学, 2004, 33(5): 459-464.
[50]	BRANDELIK A. CALCMIN - an EXCEL^TM Visual Basic application for calculating mineral structural formulae from electron microprobe analyses[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2009, 35(7): 1540-1551. DOI URL
[51]	GÜNTHER D, HEINRICH C A. Enhanced sensitivity in laser ablation-ICP mass spectrometry using helium-argon mixtures as aerosol carrier[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 1999, 14(9): 1363-1368. DOI URL
[52]	LUO T, HU Z C, ZHANG W, et al. Reassessment of the influence of carrier gases He and Ar on signal intensities in193 nm excimer LA-ICP-MS analysis[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(10): 1655-1663. DOI URL
[53]	HU Z C, ZHANG W, LIU Y S, et al. “Wave” signal-smoothing and mercury-removing device for laser ablation quadrupole and multiple collector ICPMS analysis: application to lead isotope analysis[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 87(2): 1152-1157. DOI URL
[54]	LUO T, HU Z C, ZHANG W, et al. Watervapor-assisted “universal” nonmatrix-matched analytical method for the in situ U-Pb dating of zircon, monazite, titanite, and xenotime by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 90(15): 9016-9024. DOI URL
[55]	WIEDENBECK M, ALLÉ P, CORFU F, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and ree analyses[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 1995, 19(1): 1-23.
[56]	SPANDLER C, HAMMERLI J, SHA P, et al. MKED1: a new titanite standard for in situ analysis of Sm-Nd isotopes and U-Pb geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2016, 425: 110-126. DOI URL
[57]	LIU Y S, GAO S, HU Z C, et al. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the trans-north China orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2009, 51(1/2): 537-571. DOI URL
[58]	LIU Y S, HU Z C, ZONG K Q, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15): 1535-1546. DOI URL
[59]	LUDWIG K R. Isoplot 3.00: a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[J]. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 2003, 4: 70.
[60]	SCHOENE B, BOWRING S A. U-Pb systematics of the McClure Mountain syenite: thermochronological constraints on the age of the⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar standard MMhb[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2006, 151(5): 615-630. DOI URL
[61]	BARFOD G H, KROGSTAD E J, FREI R, et al. Lu-Hf and PbSL geochronology of apatites from Proterozoic terranes: a first look at Lu-Hf isotopic closure in metamorphic apatite[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2005, 69(7): 1847-1859. DOI URL
[62]	CHEW D M, SYLVESTER P J, TUBRETT M N. U-Pb and Th-Pb dating of apatite by LA-ICPMS[J]. Chemical Geology, 2011, 280(1/2): 200-216. DOI URL
[63]	MCDOWELL F W, MCINTOSH W C, FARLEY K A. A precise ⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar reference age for the Durango apatite (U-Th)/He and fission-track dating standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 2005, 214(3/4): 249-263. DOI URL
[64]	THOMSON S N, GEHRELS G E, RUIZ J, et al. Routine low-damage apatite U-Pb dating using laser ablation-multicollector-ICPMS[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2012, 13(2): doi:10.1029/2011GC003928.
[65]	COCHRANE R, SPIKINGS R A, CHEW D, et al. High temperature (>350 ℃) thermochronology and mechanisms of Pb loss in apatite[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2014, 127: 39-56. DOI URL
[66]	MEFFRE S, LARGE R R, SCOTT R, et al. Age and pyrite Pb-isotopic composition of the giant Sukhoi Log sediment-hosted gold deposit, Russia[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2008, 72(9): 2377-2391. DOI URL
[67]	MEINERT L D, DIPPLE G M, NICOLESCU S. World skarn deposits[J]. Economic. Geology, 100th Anniversary Volume, 2005: 299-336.
[68]	ARMBRUSTER T, BONAZZI P, AKASAKA M, et al. Recommended nomenclature of epidote-group minerals[J]. European Journal of Mineralogy, 2006, 18(5): 551-567. DOI URL
[69]	Higgins J B, Ribbe P H. The structure of malayaite, CaSnOSiO₄, a tin analog of titanite[J]. American Mineralogist, 1977, 62(7/8): 801-806.
[70]	朱乔乔, 谢桂青, 蒋宗胜, 等. 湖北金山店大型矽卡岩型铁矿热液榍石特征和原位微区LA-ICPMS U-Pb定年[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(5): 1322-1338.
[71]	吕沅峻, 彭建堂, 蔡亚飞. 湖南杏枫山钨矿床热液榍石的地球化学特征、U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(3): 830-846.
[72]	FU Y, SUN X M, ZHOU H Y, et al. In-situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and trace elements analysis of polygenetic titanite from the giant Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province, Southwest China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2016, 77: 43-56. DOI URL
[73]	DENG X D, LI J W, ZHOU M F, et al. In-situ LA-ICPMS trace elements and U-Pb analysis of titanite from the Mesozoic Ruanjiawan W-Cu-Mo skarn deposit, Daye district, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 65: 990-1004. DOI URL
[74]	LI J W, DENG X D, ZHOU M F, et al. Laser ablation ICP-MS titanite U-Th-Pb dating of hydrothermal ore deposits: a case study of the Tonglushan Cu-Fe-Au skarn deposit, SE Hubei Province, China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2010, 270(1/2/3/4): 56-67. DOI URL
[75]	ALEINIKOFF J N, WINTSCH R P, FANNING C M, et al. U-Pb geochronology of zircon and polygenetic titanite from the Glastonbury Complex, Connecticut, USA: an integrated SEM, EMPA, TIMS, and SHRIMP study[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 188(1/2): 125-147. DOI URL
[76]	FU Y, SUN X M, HOLLINGS P, et al. Geochronology and trace element geochemistry of titanite in the Machangqing Cu-Mo-dominated polymetallic deposit, Yunnan Province, southwest China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018, 158: 398-414. DOI URL
[77]	HAYDEN L A, WATSON E B, WARK D A. A thermobarometer for sphene (titanite)[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2008, 155(4): 529-540. DOI URL
[78]	CHE X D, LINNEN R L, WANG R C, et al. Distribution of trace and rare earth elements in titanite from tungsten and molybdenum deposits in Yukon and British Columbia, Canada[J]. The Canadian Mineralogist, 2013, 51(3): 415-438. DOI URL
[79]	SUN S S, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1989, 42(1): 313-345. DOI URL
[80]	TERA F, WASSERBURG G J. U-Th-Pb systematics in three Apollo 14 basalts and the problem of initial Pb in lunar rocks[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1972, 14(3): 281-304. DOI URL
[81]	PACEY A, WILKINSON J J, COOKE D R. Chlorite and epidote mineral chemistry in porphyry ore systems: a case study of the north parkes district, new South Wales, Australia[J]. Economic Geology, 2020, 115(4): 701-727. DOI URL
[82]	赵一鸣. 夕卡岩矿床研究的某些重要新进展[J]. 矿床地质, 2002, 21(2): 113-120, 136.
[83]	VEZZONI S, DINI A, ROCCHI S. Reverse telescoping in a distal skarn system (Campiglia Marittima, Italy)[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2016, 77: 176-193. DOI URL
[84]	CHANG Z S, SHU Q H, MEINERT L. Skarn deposits of China[J]. 2019, 189-234.
[85]	COOK N J, CIOBANU C L. Paragenesis of Cu-Fe ores from Ocna de Fier-Dognecea (Romania), typifying fluid plume mineralization in a proximal skarn setting[J]. Mineralogical Magazine, 2001, 65(3): 351-372. DOI URL
[86]	LI J, XU L L, BI X W, et al. New titanite U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os ages for a hydrothermal vein-type Cu deposit in the Lanping Basin, Yunnan, SW China: constraints on regional metallogeny and implications for exploration[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2021, 56(3): 441-456. DOI URL
[87]	LI Q L, LI X H, WU F Y, et al. In-situ SIMS U-Pb dating of Phanerozoic apatite with low U and high common Pb[J]. Gondwana Research, 2012, 21(4): 745-756. DOI URL
[88]	ZHANG W, JIANG S Y, OUYANG Y P, et al. Geochronology and textural and compositional complexity of apatite from the mineralization-related granites in the world-class Zhuxi W-Cu skarn deposit: a record of magma evolution and W enrichment in the magmatic system[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 128: 103885. DOI URL
[89]	周红英, 耿建珍, 崔玉荣, 等. 磷灰石微区原位LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb同位素定年[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(6): 857-864.
[90]	刘敏, 宋世伟, 崔玉荣, 等. 赣东北朱溪矿床深部似层状钨(铜)矿体白钨矿、磷灰石原位U-Pb年代学及微量元素研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(3): 717-732.
[91]	LI H R, QIAN Y, SUN F Y, et al. Zircon U-Pb dating and sulfide Re-Os isotopes of the Xiarihamu Cu-Ni sulfide deposit in Qinghai Province, northwestern China[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2020, 57(8): 885-902. DOI URL
[92]	凌锦兰. 柴周缘镁铁质—超镁铁质岩体与镍矿床成因研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2014.
[93]	杜玮, 姜常义, 凌锦兰, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木铜镍矿床Ⅱ号岩体年代学、地球化学及其意义[J]. 矿床地质, 2017, 36(5): 1185-1196.
[94]	王冠, 孙丰月, 李碧乐, 等. 夏日哈木矿区早泥盆世镁铁质岩墙群的年代学特征及地质意义[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报, 2019, 29(1): 35-40.
[95]	SONG X Y, DANYUSHEVSKY L V, KEAYS R R, et al. Structural, lithological, and geochemical constraints on the dynamic magma plumbing system of the Jinchuan Ni-Cu sulfide deposit, NW China[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2012, 47(3): 277-297. DOI URL
[96]	靳树芳. 甘肃金川铜镍硫化物矿床磁黄铁矿与磁铁矿地球化学特征及成因研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2018.
[97]	MARFIN A E, IVANOV A V, ABRAMOVA V D, et al. A trace element classification tree for chalcopyrite from oktyabrsk deposit, norilsk-talnakh ore district, Russia: LA-ICPMS study[J]. Minerals, 2020, 10(8): 716. DOI URL
[98]	ORTEGA L, LUNAR R, GARCIA-PALOMERO F, et al. The aguablanca Ni Cu PGE deposit, southwestern Iberia: magmatic ore-forming processes and retrograde evolution[J]. The Canadian Mineralogist, 2004, 42(2): 325-350. DOI URL
[99]	MENG F C, ZHANG J X, CUI M H. Discovery of Early Paleozoic eclogite from the East Kunlun, western China and its tectonic significance[J]. Gondwana Research, 2013, 23(2): 825-836. DOI URL
[100]	贾丽辉, 孟繁聪, 冯惠彬. 榴辉岩相峰期流体活动: 来自东昆仑榴辉岩石英脉的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(8): 2339-2350.
[101]	祁生胜, 宋述光, 史连昌, 等. 东昆仑西段夏日哈木-苏海图早古生代榴辉岩的发现及意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(11): 3345-3356.
[102]	张照伟, 钱兵, 李文渊, 等. 东昆仑夏日哈木铜镍矿区发现早古生代榴辉岩: 锆石U-Pb定年证据[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(4): 816-817.
[103]	李文渊, 王亚磊, 钱兵, 等. 塔里木陆块周缘岩浆Cu-Ni-Co硫化物矿床形成的探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 276-293. DOI
[104]	WANG H, FENG C Y, LI D X, et al. Geology, geochronology and geochemistry of the Saishitang Cu deposit, East Kunlun Mountains, NW China: constraints on ore genesis and tectonic setting[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2016, 72: 43-59. DOI URL
[105]	毛景文, 周振华, 丰成友, 等. 初论中国三叠纪大规模成矿作用及其动力学背景[J]. 中国地质, 2012, 39(6): 1437-1471.

编号	岩性	w_B/%													矿物定名
编号	岩性	SiO₂	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	FeO^T	MnO	MgO	CaO	Na₂O	K₂O	P₂O₅	Cr₂O₃	SrO	Total	矿物定名
1	夕卡岩	38.4	0.04	25.46	8.2	1.68	0	22.42	—	—	—	—	0.43	96.63	绿帘石
2	夕卡岩	37.78	0.05	24.11	9.95	1.5	0.02	22.15	0.01	—	0.01	0	0.54	96.12	绿帘石
3	夕卡岩	37.56	—	23.36	10.52	1.33	0.01	21.91	—	—	—	0.04	0.48	95.21	绿帘石
4	夕卡岩	38.17	0.02	24.45	9.36	1.22	0.01	22.4	0.08	—	0.03	—	0.47	96.22	绿帘石
5	夕卡岩	36.9	0.04	20.79	12.96	1.01	0.01	21.99	0.01	—	—	0.04	0.54	94.28	绿帘石
6	夕卡岩	38.66	0.06	27.24	5.43	2.55	0.08	22	—	—	0.04	0.03	0.45	96.53	绿帘石
7	夕卡岩	37.95	0.08	23.04	11.4	3.42	—	20.13	—	—	0.15	—	0.61	96.76	绿帘石
8	夕卡岩	38.76	0.09	26.9	6	2.19	0.04	22.35	—	0.01	0.04	—	0.52	96.89	绿帘石
9	夕卡岩	37.48	—	23.57	10.55	1.5	0.08	21.84	—	0	—	—	0.47	95.48	绿帘石
10	夕卡岩	38.72	0.14	26.98	5.7	1.09	0.03	23.21	—	—	—	0.05	0.51	96.42	绿帘石
11	夕卡岩	39.36	0.03	27.54	5.5	1.08	0.01	23.31	—	—	0.07	—	0.48	97.39	绿帘石
12	夕卡岩	38.09	0.17	21.08	13.66	1.18	0.02	22.14	0.01	—	0.02	0.03	0.44	96.82	绿帘石
13	夕卡岩	38.47	0.14	24.23	8.82	1.66	0.13	22.76	0.06	—	—	—	0.51	96.78	绿帘石
14	夕卡岩	37.73	0.1	21.08	14.02	1.17	—	22.19	—	0.01	—	0.01	0.53	96.84	绿帘石
15	夕卡岩	27.6	—	18.37	15.37	5.61	18.16	0.02	0.03	—	—	0.08	0.63	85.86	密绿泥石
16	夕卡岩	27.23	—	19.16	14.73	7.13	16.76	0.12	0.06	—	—	0.53	0.55	86.27	密绿泥石
17	夕卡岩	27.55	0.03	18.81	15.39	6.14	17.95	0.01	—	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.68	86.59	密绿泥石
18	夕卡岩	27.83	0.08	19.24	16.46	5.73	17.5	0.03	—	0.02	0.02	0.03	0.8	87.73	密绿泥石
19	夕卡岩	28.16	0.05	18.73	17.58	4.52	17.99	0.02	0.02	0.04	—	0	0.68	87.78	密绿泥石
20	夕卡岩	28.61	0.01	17.47	17.81	4.44	18.15	0.06	0	—	—	0.06	0.71	87.32	密绿泥石
21	夕卡岩	28.45	0.03	17.98	16.48	4.43	18.72	0.08	—	0	0.01	0.24	0.74	87.15	密绿泥石
22	夕卡岩	27.67	0.01	19.28	19.04	5.49	16	0.08	0.04	—	0.05	0.18	0.63	88.46	密绿泥石
23	夕卡岩	27.65	0.02	19.28	18.6	5.82	16.4	0.03	0.01	—	—	0.07	0.66	88.53	密绿泥石
24	夕卡岩	27.93	0.03	18.21	18.6	4.96	17.33	0.03	—	0.02	—	0.05	0.71	87.85	密绿泥石
25	夕卡岩	27.95	0.01	18.3	17.48	4.86	18.3	0.05	0.02	0	—	0.05	0.74	87.76	密绿泥石
26	夕卡岩	27.73	0.04	17.84	18.16	5.01	16.79	0.05	—	0	—	0.09	0.55	86.25	密绿泥石
27	夕卡岩	27.58	—	18.73	15.7	7.15	16.15	0	0.06	—	—	0.01	0.29	85.67	密绿泥石
28	夕卡岩	29.68	0.07	17.28	14.55	4.46	20.36	0.03	—	0.01	0.02	0.07	0.31	86.85	密绿泥石
29	夕卡岩	28.26	0.06	16.13	17.3	4.23	17.81	0.2	—	—	—	0.1	0.29	84.36	密绿泥石

编号	岩性	w_B/%													矿物定名
编号	岩性	SiO₂	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	FeO^T	MnO	MgO	CaO	Na₂O	K₂O	P₂O₅	Cr₂O₃	SrO	Total	矿物定名
1	夕卡岩	38.4	0.04	25.46	8.2	1.68	0	22.42	—	—	—	—	0.43	96.63	绿帘石
2	夕卡岩	37.78	0.05	24.11	9.95	1.5	0.02	22.15	0.01	—	0.01	0	0.54	96.12	绿帘石
3	夕卡岩	37.56	—	23.36	10.52	1.33	0.01	21.91	—	—	—	0.04	0.48	95.21	绿帘石
4	夕卡岩	38.17	0.02	24.45	9.36	1.22	0.01	22.4	0.08	—	0.03	—	0.47	96.22	绿帘石
5	夕卡岩	36.9	0.04	20.79	12.96	1.01	0.01	21.99	0.01	—	—	0.04	0.54	94.28	绿帘石
6	夕卡岩	38.66	0.06	27.24	5.43	2.55	0.08	22	—	—	0.04	0.03	0.45	96.53	绿帘石
7	夕卡岩	37.95	0.08	23.04	11.4	3.42	—	20.13	—	—	0.15	—	0.61	96.76	绿帘石
8	夕卡岩	38.76	0.09	26.9	6	2.19	0.04	22.35	—	0.01	0.04	—	0.52	96.89	绿帘石
9	夕卡岩	37.48	—	23.57	10.55	1.5	0.08	21.84	—	0	—	—	0.47	95.48	绿帘石
10	夕卡岩	38.72	0.14	26.98	5.7	1.09	0.03	23.21	—	—	—	0.05	0.51	96.42	绿帘石
11	夕卡岩	39.36	0.03	27.54	5.5	1.08	0.01	23.31	—	—	0.07	—	0.48	97.39	绿帘石
12	夕卡岩	38.09	0.17	21.08	13.66	1.18	0.02	22.14	0.01	—	0.02	0.03	0.44	96.82	绿帘石
13	夕卡岩	38.47	0.14	24.23	8.82	1.66	0.13	22.76	0.06	—	—	—	0.51	96.78	绿帘石
14	夕卡岩	37.73	0.1	21.08	14.02	1.17	—	22.19	—	0.01	—	0.01	0.53	96.84	绿帘石
15	夕卡岩	27.6	—	18.37	15.37	5.61	18.16	0.02	0.03	—	—	0.08	0.63	85.86	密绿泥石
16	夕卡岩	27.23	—	19.16	14.73	7.13	16.76	0.12	0.06	—	—	0.53	0.55	86.27	密绿泥石
17	夕卡岩	27.55	0.03	18.81	15.39	6.14	17.95	0.01	—	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.68	86.59	密绿泥石
18	夕卡岩	27.83	0.08	19.24	16.46	5.73	17.5	0.03	—	0.02	0.02	0.03	0.8	87.73	密绿泥石
19	夕卡岩	28.16	0.05	18.73	17.58	4.52	17.99	0.02	0.02	0.04	—	0	0.68	87.78	密绿泥石
20	夕卡岩	28.61	0.01	17.47	17.81	4.44	18.15	0.06	0	—	—	0.06	0.71	87.32	密绿泥石
21	夕卡岩	28.45	0.03	17.98	16.48	4.43	18.72	0.08	—	0	0.01	0.24	0.74	87.15	密绿泥石
22	夕卡岩	27.67	0.01	19.28	19.04	5.49	16	0.08	0.04	—	0.05	0.18	0.63	88.46	密绿泥石
23	夕卡岩	27.65	0.02	19.28	18.6	5.82	16.4	0.03	0.01	—	—	0.07	0.66	88.53	密绿泥石
24	夕卡岩	27.93	0.03	18.21	18.6	4.96	17.33	0.03	—	0.02	—	0.05	0.71	87.85	密绿泥石
25	夕卡岩	27.95	0.01	18.3	17.48	4.86	18.3	0.05	0.02	0	—	0.05	0.74	87.76	密绿泥石
26	夕卡岩	27.73	0.04	17.84	18.16	5.01	16.79	0.05	—	0	—	0.09	0.55	86.25	密绿泥石
27	夕卡岩	27.58	—	18.73	15.7	7.15	16.15	0	0.06	—	—	0.01	0.29	85.67	密绿泥石
28	夕卡岩	29.68	0.07	17.28	14.55	4.46	20.36	0.03	—	0.01	0.02	0.07	0.31	86.85	密绿泥石
29	夕卡岩	28.26	0.06	16.13	17.3	4.23	17.81	0.2	—	—	—	0.1	0.29	84.36	密绿泥石

编号	岩性	位置	w_B/%														矿物定名
编号	岩性	位置	SiO₂	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	FeO^T	MnO	MgO	CaO	Na₂O	K₂O	P₂O₅	Cr₂O₃	SrO	F	Total	矿物定名
1	夕卡岩		30.4	34.26	3.56	0.2	0.02	0.02	28.15	0.09	—	0.06	—	0.29	—	97.04	榍石
2	夕卡岩		30.41	33.85	3.6	0.19	—	0.03	28.22	—	—	—	0.04	0.34	—	96.68	榍石
3	夕卡岩		30.59	34.94	2.89	0.22	0.01	0.04	27.84	0.04	—	0.03	0.06	0.35	—	96.99	榍石
4	夕卡岩		30.96	33.22	4.47	0.32	0.04	0.06	28.28	0.02	0.02	0.02	—	0.31	—	97.71	榍石
5	夕卡岩		30.5	36.78	2.07	0.2	—	0.06	28.03	0.01	—	0.04	0.09	0.34	—	98.11	榍石
6	夕卡岩	核	30.93	31.6	3.8	0.35	0.03	—	29.1	0.01	0	0.05	0.03	—	1.1	96.99	榍石
7	夕卡岩	↓	30.9	34.08	1.65	0.33	0.08	0.01	28.68	—	—	0.03	0	—	0.46	96.21	榍石
8	夕卡岩	↓	30.3	31.95	3.81	0.32	0.15	0.03	29.04	—	—	0.01	0.01	—	1.18	96.78	榍石
9	夕卡岩	边	28.99	31.98	3.55	0.27	0.05	0.02	28.98	0.02	—	0.04	0.01	—	0.96	94.86	榍石
10	夕卡岩	核	30.81	35.43	1.62	0.27	0.02	—	28.88	0.02	—	—	0.01	—	0.13	97.19	榍石
11	夕卡岩	↓	31.34	31	3.74	0.24	0.06	0.03	28.91	—	—	0.04	0.02	—	0.86	96.23	榍石
12	夕卡岩	边	31.19	31.97	3.78	0.47	0.01	0.02	28.95	—	—	0.03	0.04	—	1.1	97.57	榍石
13	夕卡岩		—	0.04	0.01	0.09	0.03	—	56.81	0	—	40.64	—	—	3.38	101	磷灰石
14	夕卡岩		—	0.06	0.02	0.01	0.04	0.01	55.1	0	0.01	40.13	0.01	—	6.93	102.33	磷灰石
15	夕卡岩		—	0.04	0	0.07	0.01	—	55.68	0	—	38.59	—	—	3.63	98.03	磷灰石
16	夕卡岩		—	—	—	—	0.04	—	55.14	—	0.01	39.54	—	—	5.75	100.48	磷灰石
17	夕卡岩	核	0.01	0.05	0.02	0.04	0.06	0.06	55.45	—	0.02	40.28	—	—	4.92	100.89	磷灰石
18	夕卡岩	边	0.05	0.05	0.01	—	0.07	0.02	55.07	0.01	0.01	39.16	0.02	—	6.27	100.75	磷灰石
19	夕卡岩		—	0.07	0.03	0.13	0.03	0.02	56.46	0.02	0.03	40.77	—	—	3.98	101.52	磷灰石
20	夕卡岩		—	0.03	0.01	0.01	—	0.01	55.38	—	—	40.18	0.08	—	3.69	99.4	磷灰石

编号	岩性	位置	w_B/%														矿物定名
编号	岩性	位置	SiO₂	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	FeO^T	MnO	MgO	CaO	Na₂O	K₂O	P₂O₅	Cr₂O₃	SrO	F	Total	矿物定名
1	夕卡岩		30.4	34.26	3.56	0.2	0.02	0.02	28.15	0.09	—	0.06	—	0.29	—	97.04	榍石
2	夕卡岩		30.41	33.85	3.6	0.19	—	0.03	28.22	—	—	—	0.04	0.34	—	96.68	榍石
3	夕卡岩		30.59	34.94	2.89	0.22	0.01	0.04	27.84	0.04	—	0.03	0.06	0.35	—	96.99	榍石
4	夕卡岩		30.96	33.22	4.47	0.32	0.04	0.06	28.28	0.02	0.02	0.02	—	0.31	—	97.71	榍石
5	夕卡岩		30.5	36.78	2.07	0.2	—	0.06	28.03	0.01	—	0.04	0.09	0.34	—	98.11	榍石
6	夕卡岩	核	30.93	31.6	3.8	0.35	0.03	—	29.1	0.01	0	0.05	0.03	—	1.1	96.99	榍石
7	夕卡岩	↓	30.9	34.08	1.65	0.33	0.08	0.01	28.68	—	—	0.03	0	—	0.46	96.21	榍石
8	夕卡岩	↓	30.3	31.95	3.81	0.32	0.15	0.03	29.04	—	—	0.01	0.01	—	1.18	96.78	榍石
9	夕卡岩	边	28.99	31.98	3.55	0.27	0.05	0.02	28.98	0.02	—	0.04	0.01	—	0.96	94.86	榍石
10	夕卡岩	核	30.81	35.43	1.62	0.27	0.02	—	28.88	0.02	—	—	0.01	—	0.13	97.19	榍石
11	夕卡岩	↓	31.34	31	3.74	0.24	0.06	0.03	28.91	—	—	0.04	0.02	—	0.86	96.23	榍石
12	夕卡岩	边	31.19	31.97	3.78	0.47	0.01	0.02	28.95	—	—	0.03	0.04	—	1.1	97.57	榍石
13	夕卡岩		—	0.04	0.01	0.09	0.03	—	56.81	0	—	40.64	—	—	3.38	101	磷灰石
14	夕卡岩		—	0.06	0.02	0.01	0.04	0.01	55.1	0	0.01	40.13	0.01	—	6.93	102.33	磷灰石
15	夕卡岩		—	0.04	0	0.07	0.01	—	55.68	0	—	38.59	—	—	3.63	98.03	磷灰石
16	夕卡岩		—	—	—	—	0.04	—	55.14	—	0.01	39.54	—	—	5.75	100.48	磷灰石
17	夕卡岩	核	0.01	0.05	0.02	0.04	0.06	0.06	55.45	—	0.02	40.28	—	—	4.92	100.89	磷灰石
18	夕卡岩	边	0.05	0.05	0.01	—	0.07	0.02	55.07	0.01	0.01	39.16	0.02	—	6.27	100.75	磷灰石
19	夕卡岩		—	0.07	0.03	0.13	0.03	0.02	56.46	0.02	0.03	40.77	—	—	3.98	101.52	磷灰石
20	夕卡岩		—	0.03	0.01	0.01	—	0.01	55.38	—	—	40.18	0.08	—	3.69	99.4	磷灰石

东昆仑夏日哈木矿区热液型铅锌矿体成因及地质意义

Genesis and geological significance of hydrothermal Pb-Zn orebodies in the Xiarihamu mining area, East Kunlun Mountains, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 18

参考文献 105

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

矿物	早期夕卡岩阶段	退化蚀变阶段	石英-硫化物阶段	碳酸盐阶段
辉石
石榴子石
磷灰石
榍石
透闪石
绿帘石
绿泥石
磁铁矿
黄铜矿
黄铁矿
方铅矿
闪锌矿
辉银矿
石英
方解石

[1]	范朝熙, 许成, 崔莹, 韦春婉, 匡光喜, 石爱国, 李卓骐. 碳酸岩岩浆与地壳反应综述[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 330-344.
[2]	孔志岗, 张斌臣, 吴越, 张长青, 刘益, 张锋, 李杨林. 四川大梁子富锗铅锌矿床的控矿构造样式及成矿机制研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 143-159.
[3]	徐林刚, 付雪瑞, 叶会寿, 郑伟, 陈勃, 方正龙. 南秦岭地区下寒武统黑色页岩赋存的千家坪大型钒矿地球化学特征及成矿环境[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 160-175.
[4]	王武名, 盛涛, 王丽娟, 董少波. 刚果(金)加丹加鲁苏西铜钴矿床S、C、O、Sr同位素特征及矿床成因[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(6): 318-330.
[5]	洪双, 左仁广, 胡浩, 熊义辉, 王子烨. 磁铁矿元素地球化学大数据构建及其在矿床成因分类中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 87-96.
[6]	谢桂青, 毛景文, 张长青, 李伟, 宋世伟, 章荣清. 华南地区三叠纪矿床地质特征、成矿规律和矿床模型[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 252-270.
[7]	王秉璋, 潘彤, 任海东, 王涛, 赵志逸, 封建平, 张金明. 东昆仑祁漫塔格寒武纪岛弧:来自拉陵高里河地区玻安岩型高镁安山岩/闪长岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Hf同位素证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 318-333.
[8]	陈国超, 裴先治, 李瑞保, 李佐臣, 裴磊, 刘成军, 陈有炘, 王盟, 高峰, 魏均启. 东昆仑造山带东段晚古生代—早中生代构造岩浆演化与成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 33-48.
[9]	欧阳永棚, 周显荣, 尧在雨, 饶建锋, 宋世伟, 魏锦, 卢弋. 赣东北朱溪钨(铜)矿床两期石榴石研究及其对成矿作用的指示[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 219-231.
[10]	刘家军, 翟德高, 王大钊, 高燊, 尹超, 柳振江, 王建平, 王银宏, 张方方. Au-(Ag)-Te-Se成矿系统与成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 79-98.
[11]	邓军, 王庆飞, 陈福川, 李龚健, 杨立强, 王长明, 张静, 孙祥, 舒启海, 和文言, 高雪, 高亮, 刘学飞, 郑远川, 邱昆峰, 薛胜超, 徐佳豪. 再论三江特提斯复合成矿系统[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 106-136.
[12]	杜杨松, 曹毅, 秦新龙, 庞振山, 杜轶伦, 王功文. 皖赣沿江地区中生代壳幔相互作用与多成因夕卡岩成矿过程研究综述[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 165-181.
[13]	赵新福, 曾丽平, 廖旺, 李婉婷, 胡浩, 李建威. 长江中下游成矿带玢岩铁矿研究新进展及对矿床成因的启示[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 197-217.
[14]	高作宇，刘云华，韩一筱，雷万杉，邓楠. 西秦岭天水范家山夕卡岩型铜金矿床地质特征及成因探讨 [J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(5): 96-105.
[15]	陈国超，裴先治，李瑞保，李佐臣，裴磊，刘成军，陈有炘，王盟，高峰，李小兵. 东昆仑古特提斯后碰撞阶段伸展作用：来自晚三叠世岩浆岩的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(4): 191-208.