羌塘盆地安多114道班地区上白垩统阿布山组沉积环境、物源分析及其构造意义

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.6.1

地学前缘 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 245-259.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.6.1

所属专题：印度-欧亚大陆碰撞及其远程效应

• “印度-欧亚大陆碰撞及其远程效应”专栏之八 • 上一篇下一篇

羌塘盆地安多114道班地区上白垩统阿布山组沉积环境、物源分析及其构造意义

杜林涛¹(), 毕文军²^,^*(), 李亚林³, 张佳伟⁴, 张少文¹, 尹须伟¹, 王成秀¹

1.北京市矿产地质研究所, 北京 101500
2.太原理工大学地球科学与工程系, 山西太原 030024
3.中国地质大学(北京) 生物地质与环境地质国家重点实验室, 北京 100083
4.中国地震局地质研究所地震动力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2023-05-22 修回日期:2023-06-07 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-07-07
通信作者: *毕文军(1991—),男,博士,讲师,构造地质学专业,主要从事青藏高原隆升和剥露历史研究。E-mail: biwenjun@tyut.edu.cn
作者简介:杜林涛(1988—),男,博士,工程师,矿产普查与勘探专业,主要从事含油气盆地与构造分析方的面研究。E-mail: lintaodu01@126.com
基金资助:
科学技术部第二次青藏高原科学考察项目(2019QZKK0803);山西省自然科学基金青年项目(202103021223120)

Sedimentary environment, provenance analysis and tectonic significance of the Upper-Cretaceous Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban, Anduo area, Qiangtang Basin

DU Lintao¹(), BI Wenjun²^,^*(), LI Yalin³, ZHANG Jiawei⁴, ZHANG Shaowen¹, YIN Xuwei¹, WANG Chengxiu¹

1. Beijing Institute of Mineral Resources and Geology, Beijing 101500, China
2. Department of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
4. State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2023-05-22 Revised:2023-06-07 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

羌塘盆地晚白垩世广泛发育阿布山组陆相粗碎屑岩沉积,然而当前对其沉积环境、物源特征、构造背景尚不清楚,这制约着我们对羌塘-拉萨地体碰撞后羌塘盆地的沉积演化和高原早期隆升的准确认识。为了解决上述问题,本文对安多114道班地区阿布山组的沉积时代、沉积环境、物源特征进行了详细研究。野外观察发现,阿布山组与下伏安山岩和上覆牛堡组均呈角度不整合接触,结合安山岩喷出时代和牛堡组的沉积年龄,限定其沉积时代为晚白垩世;阿布山组中砾石成分和形态结果显示,这些砾石主要为灰岩,且经历的搬运距离较短,为近源堆积。砂岩碎屑成分、重矿物特征、碎屑锆石年龄谱表明,阿布山组的物源主要来自南羌塘坳陷内部和中央隆升带的晚三叠世—侏罗纪地层。对比邻区阿布山组特征,本文认为羌塘盆地晚白垩世陆相红色碎屑岩的沉积与羌塘-拉萨地体持续汇聚作用形成的一系列逆冲推覆活动有关。

关键词: 羌塘盆地, 晚白垩世, 阿布山组, 羌塘-拉萨地体碰撞

Abstract:

Late-Cretaceous continental strata of the Abushan Formation consist mainly of coarse clastic rocks and outcrop widely in the Qiangtang Basin, however, its sedimentary environment, source characteristics and tectonic setting remain unclear. In order to better understand the sedimentary evolution of the Qiangtang Basin and the early Tibetan Plateau uplift history after the Qiangtang-Lhasa collision we conducted detailed investigation into the depositional age, sedimentary environment, and source characteristics of the Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban, Anduo area. Angular unconformities were observed between the Abushan Formation and the underlying andesite and overlying Niubao Formation. Based on this observation, along with the eruption age of andesite and the depositional age of the Niubao Formation, we conclude that the Abushan Formation was deposited during the Late Cretaceous. Gravels of the Abushan Formation indicated a near-source deposition scenario as they mainly consisted of limestone and were transported over a short distance. Combined with geochemical data on sandstone detritus and heavy minerals, along with detrital zircon age spectra, we consider that the Abushan Formation was mainly sourced from Triassic-Jurassic strata in the southern Qiangtang and the central uplift zone. By comparing the stratigraphic characteristics between the Abushan Formation and its surrounding area, we suggest that the deposition of continental red clastic rock during the Late Cretaceous was related to large-scale thrusting in the Qiangtang Basin caused by continued plate convergence in the Qiangtang-Lhasa terranes.

Key words: Qiangtang Basin, Late Cretaceous, Abushan Formation, collision of the Qiangtang-Lhasa Terrane

中图分类号:

杜林涛, 毕文军, 李亚林, 张佳伟, 张少文, 尹须伟, 王成秀. 羌塘盆地安多114道班地区上白垩统阿布山组沉积环境、物源分析及其构造意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 245-259.

DU Lintao, BI Wenjun, LI Yalin, ZHANG Jiawei, ZHANG Shaowen, YIN Xuwei, WANG Chengxiu. Sedimentary environment, provenance analysis and tectonic significance of the Upper-Cretaceous Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban, Anduo area, Qiangtang Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(4): 245-259.

图/表 11

图1 (a)羌塘盆地大地构造位置图,(b)羌塘盆地区域地质图,(c)研究区地质简图 SHS—龙木错—双湖缝合带;SGAT—狮泉河—改则—安多逆冲断层; GSCT—改则—色林错逆冲断层。

Fig.1 (a) Tectonic units and (b) regional geological map of the Qiangtang Basin, and (c) geologic sketch map of study area

图2 (a)地层接触关系(远景),(b)地层接触关系(近景),(c)阿布山组砾石

Fig.2 (a, b) Stratum contact relationships (distant and close views), and (c) gravel of the Abushan Formation

图3 安多114道班阿布山组4BA剖面综合柱状图

Fig.3 Comprehensive columnar profile of section 4BA of the Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban, Qiantang Basin

表1 114道班地区阿布山组砾石统计参数特征

Table 1 Physical properties of gravel from the Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban

砾石统计点	Mz/cm	σ	SK1	峰度	d/cm	F	ψ	H/km
点1	13.1	-1.5	-1.8	-0.38	4.6	1.8	0.73	34.9
点2	9.6	3.3	-4.4	-0.17	4.9	2.0	0.68	39.9
点3	17.0	8.2	-1.9	-0.57	4.0	1.8	0.72	39.9

图4 安多114道班地区阿布山组砂岩碎屑统计三角图解 (底图据文献 [40]) Qm—单晶石英;Qp—多晶石英(包括燧石);Lv—火山/变火山岩屑;Ls—沉积/变沉积岩屑;P—斜长石;K—碱性长石;Qt—石英总量(Qt=Qm+Qp);F—长石(F=P+K);L—不稳定岩屑(L=Lv+Ls);Lt—岩屑总量(Lt=L+Qp)。

Fig.4 Ternary plots for sandstone classification based on detritus analysis in the Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban. Modified after [40].

表2 重矿物相关指数描述

Table 2 Heavy mineral indices used in this study

指数	重矿物组合	重矿物指数
ATi	磷灰石-电气石	100×磷灰石/(磷灰石+电气石)
GZi	石榴石-锆石	100×石榴石/(石榴石+锆石)
MZi	独居石-锆石	100×独居石/(独居石+锆石)
RuZi	金红石-锆石	100×金红石/(金红石+锆石)
ZTR	锆石-电气石-金红石	锆石+电气石+金红石

表3 羌塘盆地114道班地区阿布山组重矿物百分含量与重矿物指数

Table 3 Relative percentage of heavy minerals in and heavy mineral index values for rock samples from the Abushan Formation in 114 daoban area

层位	w_B/%												ZTR	RuZi	GZi	ATi
层位	锆石	金红石	电气石	磷灰石	石榴子石	锐钛矿	白钛石	辉铜矿	黄铁矿	重晶石	辉石	绿帘石	ZTR	RuZi	GZi	ATi
4BA-04	63.3	10.7	4.1	1.9	11.1	2.4	3.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	3.3	75.7	14.4	15	31.1
4BA-06	25.5	6.9	8.3	0.2	30.3	0.5	27.4	0.0	0.0	0.7	0.0	0.0	62.6	21.4	54.3	2.1
4BA-08	50.0	5.0	15.4	2.3	14.0	1.3	1.7	0.0	4.6	0.0	4.2	1.4	64.0	9.2	21.9	13.1
4BA-11	41.1	3.3	8.4	0.6	32.3	0.0	0.4	0.0	0.2	13.6	0.0	0.0	39.5	7.5	44	6.9

图5 安多114道班地区阿布山组重矿物指数

Fig.5 Relationships between heavy mineral index values in the Abushan Formation in 114 daoban area

表4 羌塘盆地114道班地区阿布山组砂岩LA-ICP-MS碎屑锆石U-Pb结果

Table 4 Results of LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of detrital zircons from sandstone from the Abushan Formation in 114 daoban area

图6 安多114道班地区阿布山组锆石 U-Pb 年龄与潜在物源区对比 (碎屑锆石数据来源: 北羌塘坳陷数据来自文献[48⇓⇓-51]; 中央隆起带数据来自文献[52⇓⇓-55]; 南羌塘坳陷[18,48,56]; 中央隆起带岩浆岩、变质岩数据来自文献[52,56]; 班公湖—怒江缝合带多尼组数据来自文献[57]。)

Fig.6 Comparison of U-Pb zircon age spectra between the Abushan Formation and potential source areas. Data partly adapted from [18,48⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-57].

图7 羌塘盆地晚白垩世古地理重建示意图 (据文献[7]修编) SGAT—狮泉河—改则—安多逆冲断层; GSCT—改则—色林错逆冲断层;4BA—剖面位置。

Fig.7 Reconstruction of paleogeography of the Qiangtang Basin during the Late Cretaceous. Modified after [7].

参考文献 73

[1]	DECELLES P G, QUADE J, KAPP P, et al. High and dry in central Tibet during the Late Oligocene[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2007, 253(3/4): 389-401. DOI URL
[2]	LIU Z F, WANG C S. Facies analysis and depositional systems of Cenozoic sediments in the Hoh Xil Basin, northern Tibet[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2001, 140(3/4): 251-270. DOI URL
[3]	ALLEGRE C J, COURTILLOT V, TAPPONNIER P. Structure and evolution of the Himalaya-Tibet orogenic belt[J]. Nature, 1984, 307(5946): 17-22. DOI
[4]	MOLNAR P, ENGLAND P, MARTIOND J. Mantle dynamics, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian monsoon[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1993, 31(4): 357-396. DOI URL
[5]	YIN A, HARRISON T M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2000, 28(28): 211-280. DOI URL
[6]	KAPP P, DECELLES P, GEHRELS G E, et al. Geological records of the Lhasa-Qiangtang and Indo-Asian collisions in the Nima area of central Tibet[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2007, 19(7/8): 917-932.
[7]	KAPP P, YIN A, HAARRISON T M, et al. Cretaceous-Tertiary shortening, basin development, and volcanism in central Tibet[J]. Tectonics, 2005, 117: 865-878.
[8]	LI Y L, HE J, WANG C S, et al. Late Cretaceous K-rich magmatism in central Tibet: Evidence for early elevation of the Tibetan plateau?[J]. Lithos, 2013, 160/161: 1-13. DOI URL
[9]	LI Y L, HE J, WANG C S, et al. Cretaceous volcanic rocks in south Qiangtang Terrane: products of northward subduction of the Bangong-Nujiang Ocean?[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 104: 69-83. DOI URL
[37]	MCLANE M. Sedimentology[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995: 12-46.
[38]	万静萍, 马立祥, 周宗良. 恢复酒西地区白垩系变形盆地原始沉积边界的方法探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 1989, 11(3): 245-249.
[39]	王成善, 李祥辉. 沉积盆地分析原理与方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003: 6-35.
[40]	DICKINSON W R. Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes of sandstones[J]. Provenance of Arenites, 1985(29): 333-361.
[41]	INGERSOLL R V, BULLARD T F, FORD R L, et al. The effect of grain size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1984, 54(1): 103-116.
[42]	MORTON A C, HALLSWORTH C R. Identifying Provenance-Specific Features of Detrital Heavy Mineral Assemblages in Sandstones[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1994, 90(3/4): 241-256. DOI URL
[43]	MORTON A C, HALLSWORTH C R. Chapter 7 stability of detrital heavy minerals during burial diagenesis[J]. Developments in Sedimentology, 2007, 58: 215-245.
[44]	ZHANG C K, LI X H, MATTERN F, et al. Deposystem architectures and lithofacies of a sub Marine fan-dominated deep sea succession in an orogen: a case study from the Upper Triassic Langjiexue Group of southern Tibet[J]. Journal Asian Earth Science, 2015, 111(1): 222-243. DOI URL
[45]	曾庆高, 李祥辉, 夏斌, 等. 西藏仁布地区上三叠统重矿物组合与物源分析[J]. 地质通报, 2009, 28(1): 38-44.
[46]	ANDERSEN T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 192(1/2): 59-79. DOI URL
[10]	LI Y L, WANG C S, DAI J G, et al. Propagation of the deformation and growth of the Tibetan-Himalayan orogen: a review[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2015, 143: 36-61. DOI URL
[11]	HE H Y, LI Y L, WANG C S, et al. Late Cretaceous (ca.95? Ma) magnesian andesites in the Biluoco area, southern Qiangtang subterrane, central Tibet: petrogenetic and tectonic implications[J]. Lithos, 2018, 302/303: 389-404. DOI URL
[12]	LI Y L, HE J, WANG C S, et al. Early Cretaceous (ca.100 Ma) magmatism in the southern Qiangtang subterrane, central Tibet: product of slab break-off?[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2017, 106: 1289-1310. DOI URL
[13]	LI Y L, HE J, WANG C S, et al. Cretaceous volcanic rocks in south Qiangtang Terrane: products of northward subduction of the Bangong-Nujiang Ocean?[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 104: 69-83. DOI URL
[14]	杜林涛, 李亚林, 刘洋. 西藏羌塘地体中生代中—晚期不整合事件及其构造意义[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(4): 61-71.
[15]	CHEN S S, FAN W M, SHI R D, et al. Removal of deep lithosphere in ancient continental collisional orogens: a case study from central Tibet, China[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2017, 18(3): 1225-1243. DOI URL
[16]	LIU D L, SHI R D, DING L, et al. Late Cretaceous transition from subduction to collision along the Bangong-Nujiang Tethys: new volcanic constraints from central Tibet[J]. lithos, 2017, 296: 452-470.
[17]	杜林涛, 李亚林. 北羌塘托纳木地区上白垩统阿布山组沉积特征、物源分析及其构造意义[J]. 地球学报, 2022, 43(4): 555-568.
[18]	MA A L, HU X M, GARZANTI E, et al. Sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the southern Qiangtang basin: Implications for the Lhasa-Qiangtang collision timing[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2017, 122: 4790-4813.
[47]	LUDWIG K. Isoplot 4.1. A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[M]. San Francisco: Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 2009, 4: 76-77.
[48]	GEHRELS G, KAPP P, DECELLES P, et al. Detrital zircon geochronology of pre-Tertiary strata in the Tibetan-Himalayan orogen[J]. Tectonics, 2011, 30(5): TC5016.
[49]	WANG Z W, WANG J, FU X G, et al. Provenance and tectonic setting of the Quemoco sandstones in the North Qiangtang Basin, North Tibet: evidence from geochemistry and detrital zircon geochronology[J]. Geological Journal, 2018, 53(4): 1465-1481. DOI URL
[50]	Zhang J W, Li Y L, Zhang H, et al. Provenance of Middle Jurassic sequences in the Northern Qiangtang: implications for Mesozoic exhumation of the Central Tibetan Mountain Range[J]. International Geology Review, 2020(1): 1-21.
[51]	钱信禹. 北羌塘盆地与中央隆起带晚三叠世以来剥露历史的低温热年代学约束[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020: 51-56.
[52]	DONG C Y, LI C, WAN Y S, et al. Detrital zircon age model of Ordovician Wenquan quartzite south of Lungmuco-Shuanghu Suture in the Qiangtang area, Tibet: constraint on tectonic affinity and source regions[J]. Science China-Earth Sciences, 2011, 54(7): 1034-1042. DOI URL
[53]	PULLEN A, KAPP P, GEHRELS G E, et al. Metamorphic rocks in central Tibet: lateral variations and implications for crustal structure[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2011, 123(3/4): 585-600. DOI URL
[54]	ZHAO Z B, BONS P D, WANG G H, et al. Origin and pre-Cenozoic evolution of the south Qiangtang basement, Central Tibet[J]. Tectonophysics, 2014, 623: 52-66. DOI URL
[55]	FAN J J, LI C, WANG M, et al. Features, provenance, and tectonic significance of Carboniferous-Permian glacial marine diamictites in the Southern Qiangtang-Baoshan block, Tibetan Plateau[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 28(4): 1530-1542. DOI URL
[56]	MA A L, HU X M, PAUL K et al. The disappearance of a late Jurassic remnant sea in the southern Qiangtang block (shamuluo formation, najiangco area): implications for the tectonic uplift of central tibet[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 2018, 506: 30-47. DOI URL
[19]	金纬. 青藏高原腹地晚白垩—古近纪高原隆升的沉积响应与油气后期保存[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2007: 47-95.
[20]	王志龙, 胡西冲, 石晓龙, 等. 西藏窝若巴勒白龙地区阿布山组沉积岩石、地球化学特征及碎屑锆石对物源信息的指示意义[J]. 地质通报, 2017, 36(06): 1188-1203.
[21]	ZHANG J W, SINCLAIR H D, LI Y L, et al. Subsidence and exhumation of the Mesozoic Qiangtang Basin: implications for the growth of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Basin Research, 2019, 31: 754-781. DOI URL
[22]	黄继钧. 羌塘盆地基底构造特征[J]. 地质学报, 2001, 75(3): 333-337.
[23]	KAPP P, YIN A, MANNING C E, et al. Blueschist-bearing metamorphic core complexes in the Qiangtang block reveal deep crustal structure of northern Tibet[J]. Geology, 2000, 28(1): 19-22. DOI URL
[24]	李才, 翟庆国, 陈文, 等. 青藏高原龙木错—双湖板块缝合带闭合的年代学证据: 来自果干加年山蛇绿岩与流纹岩Ar-Ar和SHRIMP年龄制约[J]. 岩石学报, 2007, 23(5): 911-918.
[25]	王根厚, 李典, 梁晓. 南羌塘印支期增生造山带组成、结构及演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3): 242-261. DOI
[26]	ZHANG J W, SINCLAIR H D, LI Y L, et al. Subsidence and exhumation of the Mesozoic Qiangtang Basin: implications for the growth of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Basin Research, 2019, 31(4): 754-781. DOI URL
[27]	李亚林. 羌塘盆地托纳木地区石油地质特征与资源潜力[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011: 15-75.
[28]	曾胜强. 羌塘盆地白垩系海相油页岩的发现及其石油地质意义[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2013: 25-28.
[57]	LI S, GUILMETTE C, DING L, et al. Provenance of Mesozoic clastic rocks within the Bangong-Nujiang suture zone, central Tibet: implications for the age of the initial Lhasa-Qiangtang collision[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017, 147: 469-484. DOI URL
[58]	白志达, 徐德斌, 张绪教, 等. 西藏安多县幅1∶25万区域地质调查[R]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2005: 8-138.
[59]	陈杰, HEENNANCE R V, BRUBANK D W, 等. 中国西南天山西域砾岩的磁性地层年代与地质意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(4): 576-587.
[60]	ZHANG P Z, MOLNAR P, DOWNS W R. Increased sedimentation rates and grain sizes 2-4 Myr ago due to the influence of climate change on erosion rates[J]. Nature, 2001, 410: 891-897. DOI URL
[61]	孙立新. 班公湖—怒江缝合带中段晚侏罗世—白垩纪碰撞作用的沉积响应[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2005: 34-112.
[62]	WANG J G, HU X M, GARZANTI E, et al. Early Cretaceous topographic growth of the Lhasaplano, Tibetan Plateau: constraints from the Damxung Conglomerate[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017, 122: 5748-5765. DOI URL
[63]	MA A L, HU X M, GARZANTI E, et al. Mid-cretaceous exhumation of the central Qiangtang Mountain Range metamorphic rocks as evidenced by the Abushan continental redbeds[J]. Tectonics, 2023, 42(3): e2022TC007520.
[64]	吴珍汉, 刘志伟, 赵珍, 等. 羌塘盆地隆鄂尼-昂达尔错古油藏逆冲推覆构造隆升[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(4): 615-627.
[65]	KAPP P, MURPHY M A, YIN A, et al. Mesozoic and Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Shiquanhe area of western Tibet[J]. Tectonics, 2003, 22(4): 1-17.
[66]	BI W J, HAN Z P, LI Y L, et al. Deformation and cooling history of the central Qiangtang terrane, Tibetan Plateau and its tectonic implications[J]. International Geology Review, 2020, 63(15): 1821-1837. DOI URL
[29]	白志达, 徐德斌, 陈梦军, 等. 西藏安多地区粗面岩的特征及其锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年[J]. 地质通报, 2009, 28(9): 1229-1235.
[30]	陈文彬, 贺永忠, 占王忠, 等. 藏北南羌塘安多县鄂斯玛地区早白垩世孢粉化石Dicheiropollis的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(10): 1602-1607.
[31]	HE H Y, LI Y L, WANG C S, et al. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Late Cretaceous highly fractionated I-type granites from the Qiangtang block, central Tibet[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 176: 337-352. DOI URL
[32]	HE H Y, LI Y L, NING Z J, et al. Transition from oceanic subduction to continental collision in central Tibet: evidence from the Cretaceous magmatism in Qiangtang block[J]. 2020, 64(4): 545-563.
[33]	吴瑞忠, 胡承祖, 王成善, 等. 藏北羌塘地区地层系统[J]. 青藏高原地质文集, 1985(9): 1-32.
[34]	吴珍汉, 高锐, 卢占武, 等. 羌塘盆地结构构造与油气勘探方向[J]. 地质学报, 2014, 88(6): 1130-1144.
[35]	FORK R L, WARD W C. Brazos river bar: A study in the significance of grain size parameters[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1957, 27(1): 3-26. DOI URL
[36]	FORK R L. A review of grain-size parameters[J]. Sedimentology, 1966, 6(2): 73-93. DOI URL
[67]	ZHAO Z B, BONS P D, STUBNER K, et al. Early Cretaceous exhumation of the Qiangtang Terrane during collision with the Lhasa Terrane, Central Tibet[J]. Terra Nova, 2017, 29(6): 382-391. DOI URL
[68]	许明. 西藏羌塘盆地结构与构造变形特征[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017: 86-98.
[69]	XUE W W, NAJMAN Y, HU X M, et al. Late Cretaceous to Late Eocene exhumation in the Nima area, central Tibet: implications for development of low relief topography of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonics, 2022, 41: e2021TC006989.
[70]	BI W J, LI Y L, KAMP P J J, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic cooling history of the Qiangtang terrane and implications for Central Tibet formation[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2023, 135(516): 1587-1601.
[71]	毕文军, 张佳伟, 李亚林, 等. 西藏中部羌塘地体白垩纪以来隆升剥露过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 18-34. DOI
[72]	赵珍, 陆露, 吴珍汉. 羌塘盆地中央隆起带的抬升演化: 构造-热年代学约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(2): 249-263. DOI
[73]	刘少峰, 林成发, 刘晓波, 等. 冀北张家口地区同构造沉积过程及其与褶皱-逆冲作用耦合[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2019, 48(6): 705-731.

羌塘盆地安多114道班地区上白垩统阿布山组沉积环境、物源分析及其构造意义

Sedimentary environment, provenance analysis and tectonic significance of the Upper-Cretaceous Abushan Formation in 114 Daoban, Anduo area, Qiangtang Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 73

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴浩, 杨晨, 吴彦旺, 李才, 刘飞, 林兆旭. 藏北中仓地区晚白垩世岩浆岩成因及其对高原早期隆升的指示[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(6): 261-281.
[2]	肖洪, 李美俊, 程顶胜, 刘计国, 李晋, 邢向荣. 中非Muglad盆地晚白垩世海侵及其对油气勘探的意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 352-359.
[3]	毛凤军，刘若涵，刘邦. 尼日尔Termit盆地及其周缘晚白垩世古地理演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(3): 186-197.
[4]	王丽波，苏爱国，郑有业，李超，久凯. 羌塘盆地中生界海相黑色泥页岩特征及页岩气远景区预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(3): 264-279.
[5]	季燕南. 巨型山东龙的系统分类、生活习性与生态环境研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(1): 378-390.
[6]	刘建清, 杨平, 陈文彬, 陈文西, 付休根. 羌塘盆地中央隆起带南侧隆额尼—昂达尔错布曲组古油藏白云岩特征及成因机制[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(1): 311-321.
[7]	陈军明赵平王成善黄永建. 晚白垩世(80 Ma)东亚气候的数值模拟[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(6): 226-239.