地学前缘 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 179-193.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2019.3.3

• 陆内与陆缘盆地演化 • 上一篇    下一篇

合肥盆地圆筒山组物源分析及其地质意义:来自碎屑锆石的证据

王勇生,田自强,胡召齐,白桥   

  1. 1. 合肥工业大学 资源与环境工程学院, 安徽 合肥 230009
    2. 安徽省地质调查院, 安徽 合肥 230001
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-20 修回日期:2019-03-10 出版日期:2019-03-30 发布日期:2019-03-30
  • 作者简介:王勇生(1977—),男,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事构造地质学研究。E-mail:yshw9007@hfut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(41572186)

Provenance analysis of the Yuantongshan Formation in the Hefei Basin and its geological signature: evidences from detrital zircon dating

WANG Yongsheng, TIAN Ziqiang, HU Zhaoqi, BAI Qiao   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    2. Geological Survey of Anhui Province, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2018-12-20 Revised:2019-03-10 Online:2019-03-30 Published:2019-03-30
  • Supported by:
     

摘要: 合肥盆地位于华北板块东南缘,形成于华南、华北板块碰撞过程中。合肥盆地形成时表现为大别造山带向北逆冲形成的前陆挠曲盆地,早白垩世在区域伸展背景下转变为断陷盆地。中侏罗统圆筒山组是合肥盆地前陆挠曲阶段的沉积地层之一,主要表现为湖泊相沉积,与下伏的防虎山组典型的河流相沉积明显不同。为了获得圆筒山组更详细的物源信息,对肥西地区出露的圆筒山组紫红色粉砂岩开展了碎屑锆石LA-ICP MS U-Pb定年。定年结果显示,两个粉砂岩样品均获得了约2.0 Ga和约770 Ma两个主要峰值以及约2.4 Ga次要峰值。该特征与扬子板块锆石年龄分布特征几乎完全一致,指示圆筒山组物源应来自扬子板块。考虑到盆地地层的物源不应来自其周边隆起区分水岭的另一侧,因而推测圆筒山组物源应来自张八岭隆起中侏罗世时地表出露岩石。在燕山运动A幕影响下,下扬子地区发生逆冲褶皱活动,张八岭隆起发生明显隆升,上部岩石被剥蚀殆尽,仅保留现今出露的新元古代张八岭群及肥东杂岩,被剥蚀的岩石搬运沉积于合肥盆地内,形成圆筒山组。

 

关键词: 合肥盆地, 碎屑锆石定年, 物源分析, 张八岭隆起

Abstract: The Hefei Basin in southeastern North China block was formed during the collision between the South and North China blocks. It transformed from a foreland basin, developed by northward thrusting of the Dabie Orogen, into a fault subsidence basin in an extensional tectonic setting in the Early Cretaceous. The Middle Jurassic Yuantongshan Formation in the Hefei foreland strata features lacustrine facies, which is very different from fluvial facies within the Lower Jurassic Fanghushan Formation. In order to obtain detailed provenance information, we performed detrital zircon LA-ICP MS U-Pb dating of purple siltstone from the Yuantongshan Formation, Feixi district. Zircon dating results of two collected samples revealed two major age peaks at ~2.0 Ga and ~770 Ma and one minor peak at ~2.4 Ga. Histograms of detrital zircon ages for the Yuantongshan Formation and Yangtze block are almost identical, suggesting that the later is provenance of the former. Considering that provenance of strata in a basin should not originate from other side of a watershed, provenance of the Yuantongshan Formation, therefore, is likely rocks cropping out in the Zhangbaling Uplift in the Middle Jurassic. In the early period of the Yanshanian movement, a fold-and-thrust belt occurred in the Lower Yangtze region. The Zhangbaling Uplift raised significantly at that time, causing surface rocks to erode while only the Zhangbaling Group and Feidong Complex preserved. Materials eroded from the Zhangbaling Uplift were transported to and deposited in the Hefei Basin to form the Yuantongshan Formation.

Key words: Hefei Basin, detrital zircon dating, provenance analysis, Zhangbaling Uplift

中图分类号: