苏北盆地金湖凹陷古近系戴南组孔隙演化及次生孔隙成因分析

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.5.18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

金湖凹陷戴南组储层总体为一套中低孔-中低渗碎屑储层,次生孔隙是本区最有效、最重要的孔隙类型,而搞清次生孔隙的分布规律及其成因成为下一步有利储层预测的关键。文中综合利用岩心、普通薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜及物性参数等资料,对戴南组储层的岩石类型、物性特征、孔隙类型及次生孔隙分布规律进行了综合分析,并从溶蚀作用的发育条件入手探讨了次生孔隙的成因,以期为下一步有利储层预测和勘探开发提供科学依据。研究认为,金湖凹陷戴南组碎屑岩储层主要发育于三角洲、扇三角洲和滨浅湖,受沉积相带控制,储层类型复杂,以不等粒砂岩、含砾不等粒砂岩、细砂岩及粉砂岩为主,不同地区岩性存在差异。根据岩性三角图,砂岩类型以长石岩屑质石英砂岩为主。砂岩成分成熟度中等偏低,结构成熟度中等。戴南组砂岩孔隙度峰值分布在12.0%~14.0%,渗透率峰值分布在1~10 mD。不同沉积环境和地区储层物性也存在一定差异。三角洲前缘亚相的储层物性最好,平均孔隙度约19.4%,平均渗透率约134.2 mD,岩性以细砂岩为主,主要分布于研究区西部和中部。扇三角洲物性次之,平均孔隙度约12.5%,平均渗透率约6.2 mD,岩性以含砾不等粒砂岩为主,位于桐城断裂带东南部便1井附近。滨浅湖亚相的储层物性最差,岩性以粉砂岩为主,平均孔隙度约8.3%,平均渗透率约2.3 mD。戴南组储层孔隙分为原生孔隙和次生孔隙两大类,以次生粒间溶蚀孔隙为主。溶蚀孔隙包括粒间溶孔、粒内溶孔和铸模孔。粒间溶孔多由粒间碳酸盐胶结物如方解石、白云石、铁方解石等溶蚀后形成,粒内溶孔主要是长石及碳酸盐岩屑被选择性溶解而形成,可见白云石晶粒溶解留下的铸模孔。戴南组储层中的原生孔隙相对较少,主要以石英次生加大后的残余粒间孔的形式存在,发育于埋藏较浅的井如新庄1井、关1-1井。戴南组储层孔隙经历了由原生到次生的演化过程。总体上,在浅于约1 100 m,储层主要处于早成岩A阶段,以原生孔隙为主。在1 100~1 500 m,储层处于早成岩B阶段,形成混合孔隙段。超过1 500 m,储层进入中成岩A阶段,原生孔隙消失殆尽,基本上以次生孔隙为主。戴南组储层存在3个次生孔隙发育带:第一次生孔隙发育带在1 200~1 600 m,分布于埋藏相对较浅-中等的井区;第二次生孔隙发育带分布在1 800~2 800 m;第三次生孔隙发育带在2 900~3 000 m左右。第一、二次生孔隙发育带次生孔隙的绝对值较大,说明溶蚀作用较强。戴南组储层次生孔隙发育与方解石、白云石胶结物的溶蚀及长石碎屑和碳酸盐岩岩屑的溶蚀有关。烃源岩成熟排烃是次生孔隙发育的主控因素;碳酸盐胶结物发育提供了次生孔隙发育的物质基础;长石的溶蚀对次生孔隙发育有一定的贡献;次生孔隙的形成与黏土矿物的相互转化有一定的关系;断裂活动进一步促使了次生孔隙的发育。

关键词: 孔隙类型, 次生孔隙, 孔隙演化, 控制因素, 戴南组, 金湖凹陷

Abstract:

The reservoir of the Dainan Formation, Jinhu Sag is a set of clastic reservoirs with medium-low porosity and permeability. The secondary pore is the most important and effective pore type in the study area, and the determination of its genesis and distribution is the key step for predicting favorable reservoirs. Based on core, thin section and cast thin section data, scanning electron microscope imaging, and physical property measurements, we analyzed the rock type, reservoir property, pore type and distribution of secondary pores, and discussed the genesis of secondary pores in association with the dissolution conditions in this area, which will provide scientific guidance for predicting favorable reservoir and for reservoir exploration. Our study showed that clastic reservoirs mainly deposited in delta, fan delta and show-shallow lakes. Controlled by sedimentary facies, the reservoir rocks are complex and include mainly unequal-grained sandstone and pebbly sandstone, fine sandstone and siltstone, showing varying lithologies in different areas. According to the triangular plot, the sandstone is mainly feldspathic debris quartz sandstone. The compositional maturity is medium to low and the textural maturity is medium. The porosity and permeability peak values were 12.0%-14.0% and 1-10 mD, respectively. There are some differences in reservoir properties associated with different sedimentary facies and regions. The reservoir properties of delta front are most favorable, with an average ~19.4% porosity and ~134.2 mD permeability, and the lithofacies is mainly fine sandstone distributing in the western and central areas. The fan delta near Well Bian-1 in the southeast of the Tongcheng fault zone cames in second. The fan sandstone is gravel bearing mix-grained sandstone with an average porosity of ~12.5% and permeability of ~6.2 mD. The reservoir property of shore-shallow lake is least favorable. It deposited mainly siltstone with an average porosity of ~8.3% and permeability of ~2.3 mD. There are two types of pores, primary and secondary pores, in the Dainan Formation. The dissolution pores included inter and intragranular dissolution pores and mold pores. The intergranular dissolution pores such as calcite, dolomite, iron calcite, etc., formed after dissolution of intergranular carbonate cements. The dissolution pores in grains mainly formed by selective dissolution of feldspar and carbonate debris. The mold pores left by the dissolution of dolomite grains could be seen. There are few primary pores in the Dainan Formation, mainly in the form of residual intergranular pores after quartz enlargement and developed in shallow buried wells, such as Wells Xinzhuang-1 and Guan-1-1. The pores evolved from primary to secondary pores in the Dainan Formation. On the whole, reservoir buried less than 1100 m is mainly in the early diagenetic stage A and mainly developed primary pores; reservoir buried between 1100-1500 m is in the early diagenetic stage B with mixed pore section; and reservoir buried below 1500 m entered the middle diagenetic stage A when secondary pores replaced primary pores. There are three secondary pore developing zones in the reservoir. The first one is between 1200-1600 m and distributed in the relatively shallow to moderately buried well area; the second one is between 1800-2800 m; and the third one is between 2900-3000 m. Among them, the absolute secondary porosity of the first and second secondary pore developing zones is relatively high, indicating strong dissolution. The secondary pore development in the Dainan Formation was related to the dissolutions of calcite and dolomite cements, feldspar and carbonate debris. Mature hydrocarbon from source rocks charging into the reservoir was the main controlling factor for the secondary pore development, as carbonate cements provided the material basis for the dissolution, and the dissolution of feldspar in turn contributed to the development of secondary pore. The formation of secondary pore was also related to the transformation of clay minerals, and fault activity further promoted the development of secondary pore.

Key words: pore type, secondary pore, pore evolution, controlling factor, Dainan Formation, Jinhu Sag

中图分类号:

P618.13

张琴, 朱筱敏, 毛凌, 孙祖宇, 周琛, 苏康, 杨立干. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷古近系戴南组孔隙演化及次生孔隙成因分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 190-201.

ZHANG Qin, ZHU Xiaomin, MAO Ling, SUN Zuyu, ZHOU Chen, SU Kang, YANG Ligan. Pore evolution and genesis of secondary pores in the Paleogene Dainan Formation, Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(1): 190-201.

图/表 15

图1 苏北盆地金湖凹陷构造单元划分[15]

Fig.1 Tectonic division of the Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin. Adapted from [15].

图2 金湖凹陷戴南组砂岩岩石类型三角图图中数值代表百分数。

Fig.2 Triangle map of sandstone types of the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图3 金湖凹陷戴南组孔隙度和渗透率频率分布图

Fig.3 Frequency distribution of porosity and permeability of sedimentary rocks in the Dainan Formation, Jinhu Sag

图4 戴南组不同沉积亚相平均孔隙度和平均渗透率分布特征

Fig.4 Histogram of average porosity and permeability of different sedimentary facies in the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

表1 金湖凹陷戴南组储层孔隙类型划分

Table 1 Classification of pore types of the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

孔隙类型			成因
原生孔隙		压缩原生粒间孔	原始粒间孔隙经压实收缩而成
		胶结剩余粒间孔	原始粒间孔隙经胶结后剩余的粒间孔隙
		杂基微孔隙	杂基晶间微孔隙
次生孔隙	溶蚀作用	粒间溶孔	粒间杂基或胶结物溶蚀形成
		粒内溶孔	颗粒内部部分溶蚀形成
		铸模孔	整个颗粒溶蚀形成
	收缩作用	贴粒孔	沿颗粒边缘溶解形成的线状孔缝
	构造作用	(微)裂缝	构造作用形成

图5 金湖凹陷戴南组储层孔隙类型

Fig.5 Pore types of the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图6 金湖凹陷戴南组原生孔隙发育特征 a—新庄1井,1 123.56 m,细砂岩,原生粒间孔发育,孔隙直径50~100 μm;b—关1-1井,1 321.56 m,粉砂岩,原生粒间孔和溶蚀孔发育,孔隙直径20~60 μm。

Fig.6 Characteristics of primary pores in the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图7 金湖凹陷戴南组储层粒间溶蚀孔隙和白云石溶蚀 a—早期方解石胶结物和粒内溶蚀为主(天X77井,细砂岩,1 375.56 m);b—早期白云石胶结物溶解为主(关1-1井,1 321.51 m)。

Fig.7 Intergranular dissolution pores and dolomite dissolution in the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图8 金湖凹陷戴南组长石粒内溶蚀孔隙 a—长石淋滤(关X4井,2 065.84 m,中砂岩);b—长石淋滤(新庄1井,1 123.56 m,细砂岩)。

Fig.8 Dissolution pores in the feldspar grains from the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图9 金湖凹陷戴南组碳酸盐岩颗粒粒内溶蚀孔隙便1井,2 348.12 m。

Fig.9 Dissolution pores in the carbonate grains from the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图10 金湖凹陷戴南组储层孔隙演化模式

Fig.10 Pore evolution model for the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图11 金湖凹陷戴南组溶蚀作用与有机质伴生现象关X2井,1 542.94 m,含油粉砂岩(a—粒间溶蚀孔隙发育,粒表发育粒状有机质球;b—粒表有机质球粒放大)。

Fig.11 Association of dissolution and organic matter in the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图12 金湖凹陷戴南组孔隙度与碳酸盐含量相关图

Fig.12 Correlation of porosity and carbonate content for the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图13 金湖凹陷戴南组早期方解石和白云石胶结物的溶蚀作用 a—粒间方解石胶结物溶蚀作用强,形成连通孔隙(关X2井,1 540.19 m);b—早期白云石胶结物弱溶蚀和后期方解石的二次胶结现象(关X5井,2 779.58 m)。

Fig.13 Dissolution of early calcite and dolomite cements in the Dainan Formation in the Jinhu Sag

图14 阜宁组油气沿着断层直接上排运移至戴南组促使溶蚀作用发育示意图

Fig.14 Schematic diagram showing hydrocarbon migration from the Funing Formation directly upward along the fault to the Dainan Formation in promoting dissolution

参考文献 47

[1]	邱旭明. 苏北盆地断块圈闭分类及油气成藏特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(4):371-374.
[2]	杨立干. 金湖凹陷古近系戴一段成藏条件和成藏模式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3):34-38.
[3]	刘世丽, 徐焕友, 李翔. 金湖凹陷戴南组成藏主控因素及成藏模式研究[J]. 小型油气藏, 2007, 12(3):1-5.
[4]	陈安定. 苏北下第三系源岩“浅”熟的构造背景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1996, 23(4):6-10.
[5]	汪本善, 范善发, 史继扬, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷下第三系生油岩的有机地化特征和生油门槛研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1985, 6(1):60-70.
[6]	巢越. 金湖凹陷三河次凹戴南组油气藏烃源条件分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2019, 12(2):28-35.
[7]	毛凤鸣, 陈安定, 严元锋, 等. 苏北盆地复杂小断块油气成藏特征及地震识别技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(6):60-70.
[8]	LI L Y, WEI J C, YIN H Y, et al. Influence of sedimentary facies on reservoir quality and distribution of diagenetic features in the Funing Formation, Wanglongzhuang Oilfield, Subei Basin, Eastern China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11(15):1-14. DOI URL
[9]	张琴, 朱筱敏, 董国栋, 等. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷戴南组成岩阶段划分及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(1):53-59.
[10]	邱旭明, 刘玉瑞, 傅强. 苏北盆地上白垩系—第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006.
[11]	张喜林, 朱筱敏, 杨俊生. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组地震相研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 20(3):44-47.
[12]	张喜林, 朱筱敏, 钟大康, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组沉积相及其对隐蔽油气藏的控制[J]. 古地理学报. 2005, 7(2):207-218.
[13]	ZHOU X, JIANG Z, QUAYE J A, et al. Ichnology and sedimentology of the trace fossil-bearing fluvial red beds from the lowermost member of the Paleocene Funing Formation in the Jinhu Depression, Subei Basin, East China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 99:393-415. DOI URL
[14]	张琴, 朱筱敏, 陈祥, 等. 南华北盆地谭庄凹陷下白垩统成岩相分布及优质储层预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(4):472-480.
[15]	LIU X P, LAI J, FAN X C, et al. Insights in the pore structure, fluid mobility and oiliness in oil shales of Paleogene Funing Formation in Subei Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 114:1-19.
[16]	汪孝敬, 李维锋, 袁晓光, 等. 金湖凹陷戴南组成岩相定量表征与孔隙演化模式[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(29):143-150.
[17]	LI X, ZHANG J L, LIU L L, et al. Three-dimensional reservoir architecture modeling by geostatistical techniques in BD block, Jinhu depression, northern Jiangsu Basin, China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9(15):654-671. DOI URL
[18]	QUAYE J A, JIANG Z, ZHOU X. Bioturbation influence on reservoir rock quality: a case study of Well Bian-5 from the second member Paleocene Funing Formation in the Jinhu sag, Subei Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 172:1165-1173. DOI URL
[19]	吴东胜. 金湖凹陷戴南组隐蔽油气藏研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2005, 27(4):16-19, 6.
[20]	龚永杰, 何胜, 鲁雪松. 金湖凹陷烃源岩“浅熟”原因探讨[J]. 特种油气藏, 2008, 15(1):36-39.
[21]	刘喜欢, 杨芝文, 杨立干. 金湖凹陷构造特征及圈闭类型[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2018, 11(3):6-11, 51.
[22]	陈安定. 苏北第三系成熟演化指标与深度关系的3种模式[J]. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(1):58-63.
[23]	鲁东升, 薛建华. 苏北金湖凹陷生油岩热演化研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 1999, 21(2):180-183.
[24]	姚合法, 侯建国, 林承焰, 等. 多旋回沉积盆地地温场与烃源岩演化-以苏北盆地为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 35(2):195-199.
[25]	陈丽华, 赵澄林. 碎屑岩天然气储集层次生孔隙三种成因机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(5):77-79.
[26]	CATHER M E, MORROW N R, KLICH I. Characterization of porosity and pore quality in sedimentary rocks[J]. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 1991, 62:727-736.
[27]	CHEN S Y, ZHANG S, WANG Y S, et al. Lithofacies types and reservoirs of Paleogene fine-grained sedimentary rock Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):218-229. DOI URL
[28]	ZHANG M M, ZHAO L. The lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of the fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the Permian Lucaogou Formation at the northern foot of Bogda Mountains, Junggar Basin (NW China)[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 170:21-39. DOI URL
[29]	WANG J, CAO Y C, LIU K Y, et al. Fractal characteristics of the pore structures of fine-grained, mixed sedimentary rocks from the Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin: implications for lacustrine tight oil accumulations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 182:1-11.
[30]	VERGÉS E, TOST D, AYALA D, et al. 3D pore analysis of sedimentary rocks[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2011, 234(1): 109-115. 30 DOI URL
[31]	KITTY L M, MARK E C. Imaging pores in sedimentary rocks: foundation of porosity prediction[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 73:590-608. DOI URL
[32]	CHEN J F, YAO J L, MAO Z G, et al. Sedimentary and diagenetic controls on reservoir quality of low-porosity and low-permeability sandstone reservoirs in Chang101, Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Shanbei area, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 105:204-221. DOI URL
[33]	LIU Z, SUN D, LI W L, et al. Research advances in the formation pore dynamics of sedimentary basins[J]. Petroleum Research, 2017, 2:107-130. DOI URL
[34]	OKAZAKI K, NODA H, UEHARA S, et al. Permeability, porosity and pore geometry evolution during compaction of Neogene sedimentary rocks[J]. Journal of Structural Geology. 2014, 62:1-12. DOI URL
[35]	SHAPIRO A M, EVANS C E, HAYES E C. Porosity and pore size distribution in a sedimentary rock: implications for the distribution of chlorinated solvents[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2017, 203:70-84. DOI URL
[36]	代金友, 张一伟, 熊琦华, 等. 成岩作用对储集层物性贡献比率研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(4):54-55.
[37]	刘鑫金, 冯阵东, 李聪, 等. 近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨: 以查干凹陷祥6井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2):393-404.
[38]	ZHANG Q, ZHU X M, RONALD J S, et al. Variation and mechanisms of clastic reservoir quality in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Science, 2014, 11(2):200-210. DOI URL
[39]	张琴, 朱筱敏, 刘畅, 等. 周口坳陷谭庄凹陷下白垩统低孔低渗碎屑岩储层特征及成因分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):66-49.
[40]	ZHANG C C, WU C D, ZHANG S, et al. Sedimentary and diagenetic control on the porosity and permeability in Lower-Middle Jurassic reservoirs, northern margin of Tianshan, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 165:873-889. DOI URL
[41]	马永平, 王国栋, 张献文, 等. 粗粒沉积次生孔隙发育模式: 以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系夏子街组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):1-10.
[42]	师晶, 黄文辉, 汪远征, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部盒8段-山1段砂岩次生孔隙特征与成因[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(12):3461-3470.
[43]	FUN C Y, TANG X L, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Characteristics and origin of the pore structure of the lacustrine tight oil reservoir in the northwestern Jiuquan Basin, China[J]. Interpretation, 2019, 7(3):T625-T636. DOI URL
[44]	YUAN G H, CAO Y C, QIU L W, et al. Genetic mechanism of high quality reservoirs in Permian tight fan delta conglomerates at the northwestern margin of the Junggar Basin, northwestern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2017, 101(12):1995-2019. DOI URL
[45]	MENG W, NIU Z C, HU Y, et al. Genesis of authigenic kaolinite and its indicative significance to secondary pores in petroliferous basins: a case study in the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186:1-16.
[46]	李佳思, 付磊, 张金龙, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区中上二叠统碎屑岩成岩作用及次生孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):1-13.
[47]	WU D, LIU X T, DU Y S, et al. Predictive distribution of high-quality tight reservoirs of coarse clastic rocks by linking diagenesis to sedimentary facies: evidence from the upper Sha 4 Member in the northern Bonan Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, eastern China[J]. Interpretation, 2019, 6(2):T413-T429. DOI URL