地学前缘 ›› 2012, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 121-135.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

断陷湖盆洼陷带重力流沉积特征与模式:以南堡凹陷东部东营组为例

鲜本忠, 万锦峰, 姜在兴, 张建国, 李振鹏, 佘源琦   

  1. 1. 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249
    2. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249
    3. 中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-01 修回日期:2011-12-15 出版日期:2012-01-10 发布日期:2012-01-10
  • 作者简介:鲜本忠(1973—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事沉积学、层序地层学研究。E-mail: xianbzh@163.com

Sedimentary characteristics and model of gravity flow deposition in the depressed belt of rift lacustrine basin: A case study from Dongying Formation in Nanpu Depression.

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    3. School of Energy, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2011-11-01 Revised:2011-12-15 Online:2012-01-10 Published:2012-01-10
  • Supported by:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41172104);国家油气重大专项(2011ZX05009002);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20090007120001)

摘要:

利用岩心、粒度、测井信息和重力流沉积理论,系统研究了南堡凹陷东部洼陷带东营组重力流沉积特征和沉积模式。该区重力流沉积砂岩常夹于灰色、灰黑色泥岩中,砂岩相发育,其中正递变层理(含砾)中细砂岩相(S3)、粉砂岩相(S4)和块状层理中细砂岩相(S2)发育层数最多,块状层理含砾砂岩相(S1)次之;S2沉积厚度最大,S1和S3次之。 按支撑和沉积机制,将本区重力流分为浊流、砂质碎屑流、颗粒流和液化流,其中砂质碎屑流以基质支撑、冻结块状沉积为特征。不同重力流发育程度有明显差异。从砂岩层数看,浊流最多,砂质碎屑流次之,颗粒流和液化流最少;从单期沉积厚度看,砂质碎屑流最大,平均为1.17 m,浊流沉积最小,仅平均为0.25 m。为了回避取心的局限性、弱化重力流成因,突出具有油气储集意义的砂层概念,开展了测井岩性解释,结果表明该区重力流沉积为细砂岩或粉砂岩,单层平均厚度2.94 m,最大厚度可达9.5 m,其中单井中厚度在3 m以上的砂体可达22层、累积达107.5 m。本区重力流沉积为滑塌成因,除了(扇)三角洲前缘斜坡的自然滑塌外,断层(地震)活动或间歇式火山喷发是其关键的触发机制;断层活动除了提供滑塌的动力外,还影响着其堆积场所和沉积的结构。

关键词: 重力流, 砂质碎屑流, 浊流, 沉积机制, 南堡凹陷

Abstract:

Sedimentary characteristics and depositional model of Dongying Formation in depressed belt of eastern Nanpu Depression were studied based on core, grain size and logging data. The gravity flow sediments, characterized by richness of sandstone lithofacies and lack of conglomerate ones, always interbedded with gray or deepgray mudstone. According to beds number, normal graded bedding sandstone (S3), siltstone (S4) and massive bedding sandstone (S2) were the most developed ones, and the massive bedding pebbled sandstone (S1) took the second place. However, S2 takes the first place in thickness, S1 and S3 took the second one. Considering supporting and depositional mechanism, sediment gravity flows in studied area may be divided into four types, i.e., turbidity flow, sandy debris current, grain current and liquefied current, and specially, sandy debris current was supported by matrix and deposited by frozen massive mode. Every gravity flow developed differently on large scale. According to sandstone beds number, turbidity flow took the first place and sandy debris flow the second one. Considering deposition thickness of single gravity flow, sandy debris flow took the first one with an average of 1.17 m, and the turbidity flow deposit took the last one with an average of 0.25 m which showing turbidity flow usually was very thin. In order to reduce the limit of cores and ignore the effect of different flow types on sandstone size, which decided their importance for hydrocarbon exploration, logging data were used in lithointerpretation. Interpretation results showed that the gravity flows sediments included fine sandstone and siltstone with an average thickness of 2.94 m and a maximum thickness of 9.5 m for a single bed. Among them, there were 22 single sandstone beds with over 3 m thickness, which had a total thickness of 107.5 m. Basically, the sediment gravity flows were sprung by sedimentsslump on the delta front slope in studied area. During the processes, earthquake movements and intermittent volcano eruptions, besides natural sediments slump when the angle of delta front slope overrun the critical slope angel, brought the key dynamical mechanisms. Besides, faulting played an important role not only in providing accumulation space but also in deciding the depositional architecture.

Key words: gravity flow, sandy debris current, turbidity flow, sedimentary mechanism, Nanpu Depression

中图分类号: