地学前缘 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 317-334.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.85
王洛锋1(), 王功文2,3,4,*(), 许文辉1, 徐森民1, 何亚清1, 王春毅1, 杨涛1, 周晓将1, 黄蕾蕾2, 左玲2, 牟妮妮2, 曹毅2, 刘志飞2, 常瑜琳2
收稿日期:
2022-06-13
修回日期:
2022-06-30
出版日期:
2023-07-25
发布日期:
2023-07-07
通讯作者:
*王功文(1972—),男,教授,博士生导师,从事三维地质建模与地学信息集成的资源-环境定量预测评价的科研与教学工作。E⁃mail: gwwang@cugb.edu.cn
作者简介:
王洛锋(1983-),男,高级工程师,主要从事矿山开采、工程爆破和智能矿山研究等。E-mail: wangluofeng1@126.com
基金资助:
WANG Luofeng1(), WANG Gongwen2,3,4,*(), XU Wenhui1, XU Senmin1, HE Yaqing1, WANG Chunyi1, YANG Tao1, ZHOU Xiaojiang1, HUANG Leilei2, ZUO Ling2, MOU Nini2, CAO Yi2, LIU Zhifei2, CHANG Yulin2
Received:
2022-06-13
Revised:
2022-06-30
Online:
2023-07-25
Published:
2023-07-07
摘要:
21世纪工业4.0促进了智能矿山诞生,智能矿山的地质、勘探、采矿、选矿、环境、测绘等多学科数据集构成了矿山大数据,从而促进了地球科学的数字化、信息化和智能化迅速发展。本文以河南上房沟钼(铁)矿床5G+智能矿山为例,开展矿山大数据的地学信息挖掘,以凸显新工科多学科融合研究,取得了创新性成果与一系列新的地学知识发现。具体内容概括如下:(1)根据“斑岩-夕卡岩”矿床理论和找矿矿物学方法,利用钻孔数据集和露采场大比例尺填图及镜下鉴定分析,查明并构建了矿区主矿种与潜在矿种的时空三维模型,新发现了NE向构造赋矿地段、贯入式赋矿地段;(2)利用无人机遥感与地面高光谱短波红外和长波红外技术,识别并建立了矿区20多种主要蚀变矿物并构建了三维多参数矿物模型;(3)运用地球化学XRF测量和微区原位测量技术,建立了高光谱匹配的样品数据集,研发了矿区岩矿石有用和有害元素双矩阵制图软件,实现了传统地质统计学(高斯模拟、克里格插值)与机器学习(深度学习)关联的数学建模,复原并查明了2021年3-4月选矿回收率偏低的配矿矿石矿物组合及其缘由;(4)运用矿区选矿工艺矿物学的生产与实验采选矿的多期次多类型数据集(季-月-日的岩粉、泥粉、精矿、尾矿等,>1 800),研发岩粉与矿粉测试技术与分析方法,查明了上房沟钼矿的难选矿石类型及其有害矿物种类。研究结果表明,矿山多元多类型的数据集具有大数据“5V”(volume, variety, velocity, veracity, value)特征,准确管控矿山大数据的动态关联测量、分析与快速、高效评价有利于矿山智能决策和经济效益提高(回收率)。其中,高精度的多参数三维建模不仅能够深层次挖掘岩矿石的地质、构造、蚀变、矿化等信息模型,核实储量/资源量,还能满足第四代工业5G+矿山的实时矿业(real-time-mining)发展的四维管控需求,例如三维空间可视化的地质矿产资源预测与评价及增储、虚拟仿真式的“年-季-月-日”动态配矿采矿、数字孪生的实时选矿等。本项研究成果为智能矿山的地质矿产深层次地学研究提供了借鉴和参考。
中图分类号:
王洛锋, 王功文, 许文辉, 徐森民, 何亚清, 王春毅, 杨涛, 周晓将, 黄蕾蕾, 左玲, 牟妮妮, 曹毅, 刘志飞, 常瑜琳. 智能矿山大数据的地学信息挖掘与知识发现:以河南上房沟钼(铁)5G+矿山为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 317-334.
WANG Luofeng, WANG Gongwen, XU Wenhui, XU Senmin, HE Yaqing, WANG Chunyi, YANG Tao, ZHOU Xiaojiang, HUANG Leilei, ZUO Ling, MOU Nini, CAO Yi, LIU Zhifei, CHANG Yulin. Intelligent geoscience information mining and knowledge discovery using big data analytics: A case study of the Shangfanggou Mo (Fe) mine in Henan Province[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(4): 317-334.
图1 上房沟钼铁矿床地质简图 (A,B引自文献[11];C据文献[11-12]修改) 1-第四系;2-煤窑沟组上段;3-煤窑沟组中段;4-煤窑沟组下段;5-花岗斑岩;6-花岗斑岩岩墙;7-辉长岩;8-辉绿岩;9-压扭性断层;10-张扭性断层;11-地质界线;12-蚀变带界线;13-磁铁-透闪透辉石化带;14-蛇纹石化带;15-金云母-阳起石化带;16-强硅化带。
Fig.1 Simplified geological maps showing the location of the study area (a, adapted from [11]), location of the Shangfanggou Mo (Fe) mine (b, adapted from [11]), and tectono-geological setting of the Shangfanggou deposit (c, modified after [11-12])
图2 上房沟矿区的无人机多期遥感(2020, 2021, 2022年)影像与雷达点云图
Fig.2 UAV multi-phase remote sensing images (years 2020, 2021, 2022) and radar point cloud maps of Shangfanggou mine
图3 研究区上房无人机倾斜测量三维影像(3D surface)与RTK(cm级)定点样品分布图 A-夕卡岩型铁矿采矿地段;B-辉钼矿采矿地段;C-富辉钼矿矿石样品;D-氧化钼难选矿石样品。
Fig.3 3D surface images of minding areas (upper panel) ), UAV captured image of the study area showing distribution of sampling points (RTK positioning with cm resolution), and ore specimen (lower panel)
图4 A-基于108个钻孔数据库的岩性标样三维矿物建模;B-研究区岩矿石标样及图层样品位置图;C-短波红外采场位置图
Fig.4 (A) 3D mineral content modeling of ore standard samples for lithofacies classification based on 108 borehole databases, (B) sampling locations of rock/ore standard samples and layer samples in the study area, and (C) short-wave infrared stope location map.
图5 (a)短波红外岩粉样品测试分析;(b)长波红外岩粉样品测试分析
Fig.5 Relative percentages of TSA minerals in rock powder samples by short-wave (a) and long-wave (b) infrared spectroscopy
图7 洛阳栾川钼矿业富川上房矿山中5G+控室三维地质体管控:钼的氧化矿(主矿体)(黄色)、2021年岩矿石采矿(爆堆)矿块(蓝色)、围岩地层(灰色)和样品采样点三维多元信息模型
Fig.7 3D control of geological bodies at the 5G+ control room, Shangfanggou mine, Luoyang Luanchuan Molybdenum Mining Co., Ltd., showing oxidized Mo ore (main ore body) (yellow), 2021 mined (blasted) ore block (blue), wall-rock (gray), and 3D multivariate information model of sampling points
编号 | 各主成分矿物TIR(热红外)光谱分析结果 | w(Fe)/% | w(Mo)/% | w(W)/10-6 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第一主成分 | 含量 | 第二主成分 | 含量 | 第三主成分 | 含量 | ||||
02-11-1 | 石英 | 0.631 | 白云石 | 0.369 | 4.019 8 | 0.075 2 | 75 | ||
02-11-2 | 石英 | 0.658 | 蛇纹石 | 0.342 | 3.737 5 | 0.101 6 | 67 | ||
02-11-3 | 石英 | 0.622 | 蛇纹石 | 0.378 | 4.412 4 | 0.120 4 | 106 | ||
02-12-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.397 | 石英 | 0.319 | 微斜长石 | 0.284 | 4.579 4 | 0.141 9 | 73 |
02-12-2 | 绿脱石 | 0.422 | 石英 | 0.300 | 微斜长石 | 0.278 | 4.171 5 | 0.124 2 | 91 |
02-12-3 | 绿脱石 | 0.462 | 石英 | 0.291 | 微斜长石 | 0.247 | 5.220 6 | 0.139 8 | 117 |
02-13-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.462 | 石英 | 0.275 | 微斜长石 | 0.262 | 5.013 5 | 0.119 3 | 89 |
02-13-2 | 绿脱石 | 0.409 | 石英 | 0.308 | 微斜长石 | 0.283 | 4.734 5 | 0.130 7 | 82 |
02-14-1 | 拉长石 | 0.361 | 石英 | 0.339 | 滑石 | 0.3 | 4.237 8 | 0.094 7 | 76 |
02-14-3 | 绿脱石 | 0.382 | 石英 | 0.339 | 微斜长石 | 0.279 | 4.039 0 | 0.112 3 | 88 |
02-14-2 | 绿脱石 | 0.406 | 石英 | 0.308 | 微斜长石 | 0.287 | 6.733 2 | 0.133 0 | 113 |
02-15-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.373 | 石英 | 0.332 | 微斜长石 | 0.294 | 6.733 2 | 0.133 0 | 113 |
02-15-2 | 石英 | 0.573 | 蛇纹石 | 0.427 | 6.733 2 | 0.133 0 | 113 | ||
03-31-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.569 | 蛇纹石 | 0.261 | 石英 | 0.17 | 9.198 9 | 0.129 6 | 99 |
03-31-2 | 滑石 | 0.459 | 角闪石 | 0.294 | 钠钙长石 | 0.248 | 10.623 5 | 0.124 4 | 140 |
03-31-3 | 滑石 | 0.355 | 角闪石 | 0.349 | 拉长石 | 0.297 | 10.623 5 | 0.124 4 | 140 |
04-01-1 | 滑石 | 0.484 | 角闪石 | 0.355 | 石英 | 0.161 | 10.724 8 | 0.127 6 | 137 |
04-01-2 | 滑石 | 0.424 | 角闪石 | 0.423 | 石英 | 0.153 | 10.557 7 | 0.125 8 | 117 |
04-01-3 | 滑石 | 0.519 | 角闪石 | 0.306 | 石英 | 0.175 | 10.129 6 | 0.134 0 | 124 |
04-02-1 | 滑石 | 0.463 | 角闪石 | 0.332 | 钠钙长石 | 0.204 | 11.473 4 | 0.130 1 | 121 |
表1 上房沟矿床岩矿石粉末样品的TIR光谱与XRF分析数据集(部分)
Table 1 Mineral composition (by TIR, XRF) dataset (part) of rock/ore powder samples from Shangfanggou deposit
编号 | 各主成分矿物TIR(热红外)光谱分析结果 | w(Fe)/% | w(Mo)/% | w(W)/10-6 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第一主成分 | 含量 | 第二主成分 | 含量 | 第三主成分 | 含量 | ||||
02-11-1 | 石英 | 0.631 | 白云石 | 0.369 | 4.019 8 | 0.075 2 | 75 | ||
02-11-2 | 石英 | 0.658 | 蛇纹石 | 0.342 | 3.737 5 | 0.101 6 | 67 | ||
02-11-3 | 石英 | 0.622 | 蛇纹石 | 0.378 | 4.412 4 | 0.120 4 | 106 | ||
02-12-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.397 | 石英 | 0.319 | 微斜长石 | 0.284 | 4.579 4 | 0.141 9 | 73 |
02-12-2 | 绿脱石 | 0.422 | 石英 | 0.300 | 微斜长石 | 0.278 | 4.171 5 | 0.124 2 | 91 |
02-12-3 | 绿脱石 | 0.462 | 石英 | 0.291 | 微斜长石 | 0.247 | 5.220 6 | 0.139 8 | 117 |
02-13-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.462 | 石英 | 0.275 | 微斜长石 | 0.262 | 5.013 5 | 0.119 3 | 89 |
02-13-2 | 绿脱石 | 0.409 | 石英 | 0.308 | 微斜长石 | 0.283 | 4.734 5 | 0.130 7 | 82 |
02-14-1 | 拉长石 | 0.361 | 石英 | 0.339 | 滑石 | 0.3 | 4.237 8 | 0.094 7 | 76 |
02-14-3 | 绿脱石 | 0.382 | 石英 | 0.339 | 微斜长石 | 0.279 | 4.039 0 | 0.112 3 | 88 |
02-14-2 | 绿脱石 | 0.406 | 石英 | 0.308 | 微斜长石 | 0.287 | 6.733 2 | 0.133 0 | 113 |
02-15-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.373 | 石英 | 0.332 | 微斜长石 | 0.294 | 6.733 2 | 0.133 0 | 113 |
02-15-2 | 石英 | 0.573 | 蛇纹石 | 0.427 | 6.733 2 | 0.133 0 | 113 | ||
03-31-1 | 绿脱石 | 0.569 | 蛇纹石 | 0.261 | 石英 | 0.17 | 9.198 9 | 0.129 6 | 99 |
03-31-2 | 滑石 | 0.459 | 角闪石 | 0.294 | 钠钙长石 | 0.248 | 10.623 5 | 0.124 4 | 140 |
03-31-3 | 滑石 | 0.355 | 角闪石 | 0.349 | 拉长石 | 0.297 | 10.623 5 | 0.124 4 | 140 |
04-01-1 | 滑石 | 0.484 | 角闪石 | 0.355 | 石英 | 0.161 | 10.724 8 | 0.127 6 | 137 |
04-01-2 | 滑石 | 0.424 | 角闪石 | 0.423 | 石英 | 0.153 | 10.557 7 | 0.125 8 | 117 |
04-01-3 | 滑石 | 0.519 | 角闪石 | 0.306 | 石英 | 0.175 | 10.129 6 | 0.134 0 | 124 |
04-02-1 | 滑石 | 0.463 | 角闪石 | 0.332 | 钠钙长石 | 0.204 | 11.473 4 | 0.130 1 | 121 |
图10 上房沟矿山2021年3、4月粉末难回收(回收率低)样品热图样分类
Fig.10 Heap map comparing elemental composition of low-recovery powder samples from Shangfanggou mine between March-April 2021
图11 上房沟矿床的高滑石中氧化高铁高钼矿石选矿厂试验分析的地学信息挖掘及地学认知过程分析
Fig.11 Geological information mining and decision making process based on ore processing result for high-talc, medium-oxidation, high-Fe, high-Mo ore from the Shangfanggou deposit
图12 基于斑岩-夕卡岩成矿理论与三维地质体建模的知识发现:矿区富铁地段与夕卡岩金云母关联的三维地质模型
Fig.12 Knowledge discovery-based 3D geological models of the Fe-rich section (left) and phlogopite-bearing skarn (right) in the mining area showing their associative relationship
图14 基于勘探蚀变信息、采矿配矿信息、选矿有害矿物信息综合构建的蚀变矿物不利程度分布模型
Fig.14 Hazard-level distribution model of altered minerals based on mineral alteration status and information on mining, mineral processing and harmful minerals
[1] |
YANG L. Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues[J]. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2017, 6: 1-10.
DOI URL |
[2] | 赵鹏大. 大数据时代数字找矿与定量评价[J]. 地质通报, 2015, 34(7): 1255-1259. |
[3] |
赵鹏大, 陈永清. 数字地质与数字矿产勘查[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 1-5.
DOI |
[4] |
赵鹏大. 地质大数据特点及其合理开发利用[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(4): 1-5.
DOI |
[5] | 郭华东. 地球大数据科学工程[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(8): 818-824. |
[6] | 周永章, 陈烁, 张旗, 等. 大数据与数学地球科学研究进展[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(2): 255-263. |
[7] |
王功文, 张寿庭, 燕长海, 等. 栾川矿集区矿产勘查大数据挖掘与三维/四维建模的资源-环境联合预测与定量评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 139-155.
DOI |
[8] | 王功文, 张智强, 李瑞喜, 等. 华北重点矿集区大数据三维/四维建模与深层次集成的资源预测评价[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(9): 1594-1610. |
[9] | CODE J. Australasian code for reporting of exploration result, mineral resources and ore reserves. The joint ore reserves committee of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia[S]. (2012-2-20) [2021-2-30]. http://www.jorc.org.2012. |
[10] | 周晓将, 毕惠珍. 上房沟钼铁矿区高滑石型难选矿石配矿管理方法采矿技术[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2021, 21(1): 170-172. |
[11] |
LIU Z, ZUO L, XU S, et al. 3D Multi-parameter geological modeling and knowledge findings for Mo oxide orebodies in the Shangfanggou porphyry-skarn Mo(-Fe) deposit, Henan Province, China[J]. Minerals, 2022, 12(6): 769.
DOI URL |
[12] | 简新玲, 张书彦, 庞运超, 等. 河南省栾川县上房沟矿区钼铁矿资源储量核实报告[R]. 郑州: 河南省地质矿产勘查开发局地球物理勘查队, 2012. |
[13] | 孙大勇, 肖舜元, 祁忠旭, 等. 洛钼上房沟高滑石型难选钼矿选矿试验研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2019, 39(3): 43-47. |
[14] | 王玲, 赵战锋. 工艺矿物学在地质冶金学中的应用及问题[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2020, 2: 37-43. |
[15] | 郝跃. 智能矿山大数据关键技术与发展研究[J]. 世界有色金属, 2022, 592(4): 15-17. |
[16] | 黄蕾蕾. 内蒙古乌努格吐山矿山高精度三维地质建模与评价[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020. |
[17] | 王功文, 张寿庭, 陈建平, 等. 大型-超大型矿床定量评价技术手册[S]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2019. |
[18] | 王功文, 张寿庭, 燕长海, 等. 基于地质与重磁数据集成的栾川钼多金属矿区三维地质建模[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2011, 36(2): 360-366. |
[19] | 杨艳, 张静, 杨永飞, 等. 栾川上房沟钼矿床流体包裹体特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(10): 2563-2574. |
[20] | 瓮纪昌, 高胜淮, 石聪, 等. 栾川上房沟特大型钼矿床蚀变分带规律研究[J]. 中国钼业, 2008, 139(3): 16-24. |
[21] | 韩江伟, 云辉, 胡红雷, 等. 河南栾川矿集区深部钨钼矿体特征及资源预测[J]. 金属矿山, 2020, 533(11): 141-151. |
[22] | 何亚清, 杜红波, 彭府华. 三道庄矿露天和地下岩体工程灾害监测预警应用[J]. 有色地质, 2017, 69(4): 81-85. |
[23] | BOOYSENREN E, LORENZ S, THIELE S T, et al. Accurate hyperspectral imaging of mineralised outcrops: an example from lithium-bearing pegmatites at Uis, Namibia[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2022(269): 112790. |
[24] |
ALI S H, GIURCO D, ARNDT N, et al. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance[J]. Nature, 2017, 543(7645): 367-372.
DOI |
[25] |
JAKOB S, ZIMMERMANN R, GLOAGUEN R. The need for accurate geometric and radiometric corrections of drone-borne hyperspectral data for mineral exploration: MEPHySTo: a toolbox for pre-processing drone-borne hyperspectral data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(1): 88.
DOI URL |
[26] |
JAMES M R, ROBSON S, D’OLEIRE-OLTMANNS S, et al. Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment[J]. Geomorphology, 2017, 280: 51-66.
DOI URL |
[27] |
KRUPNIK D, KHAN S. Close-range, ground-based hyperspectral imaging for mining applications at various scales: review and case studies[J]. Earth Science Review, 2019, 198: 102952.
DOI URL |
[28] |
GALLWEY J, ROBIATI C, COGGAN J, et al. A Sentinel-2 based multispectral convolutional neural network for detecting artisanal small-scale mining in Ghana: applying deep learning to shallow mining[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 248: 111970.
DOI URL |
[29] |
YANG Y, CHEN Y J, ZHANG J, et al. Ore geology, fluid inclusions and four-stage hydrothermal mineralization of the Shangfanggou giant Mo-Fe deposit in Eastern Qinling, Central China[J]. Ore Geology Review, 2013, 55: 146-161.
DOI URL |
[30] | 常瑜琳, 王功文, 黄蕾蕾, 等. 用于矿山岩粉矿物光谱测试分析的压片设备: CN218330841U[P]. 2023-2-17. |
[31] | HOULDING S W. 3D geoscience modeling-computer techniques for geological characterization[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994. |
[32] |
MALLET J L. Discrete modeling for natural objects[J]. Mathematical Geology, 1997, 29(2): 199-219.
DOI URL |
[33] | MARJORIBANKS R. Geological methods in mineral exploration and mining[M]. Second Edition. New York: Springer, 2010. |
[34] |
HUANG L, WANG G, CARRANZA E J M, et al. Multi-scalenumerical simulation and 3D modeling for deep mineral exploration in the Jiaojia gold district, China[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2020, 29: 415-438.
DOI |
[35] |
JORDAN M I, MITCHELL T M. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6245): 255-260.
DOI PMID |
[36] |
KERR R A. The coming copper peak[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6172): 722-724.
DOI PMID |
[37] | KREUZER O P, YOUSEFI M, NYKÁNEN V. Introduction to the special issue on spatial modelling and analysis of ore-forming processes in mineral exploration targeting[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2020, 103391. |
[38] |
MOGOLLON C U, MAHER K. White mica geochemistry: discriminating between barren and mineralized porphyry systems[J]. Economic Geology, 2020, 115(2): 325-354.
DOI URL |
[39] |
WANG G, ZHANG Z, LI R. et al. Resource prediction and assessment based on 3D/4D big data modeling and deep integration in key ore districts of North China[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2021, 64(9): 1590-1606.
DOI |
[49] | KOKALY R F, CLARK R N, SWAYZE G A, et al. USGS spectral library Version 7[R]. Denver: Geological Survey Data Series, 2017(1305): 61. |
[40] | KOKKALA A M. An engineering geological database for managing, planning and protecting intelligent cities: the case of Thessaloniki city in Northern Greece[J]. Engineering Geology, 2022(301): 106617. |
[41] | NEWMAN C, POULSON S R, MCCREA K W. Contaminant generation and transport from mine pit lake to perennial stream system: multidisciplinary investigations at the Big Ledge Mine, Nevada, USA[J]. Geochemistry, 2020(80): 125552. |
[42] |
BOX G E P. Science and statistics[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976, 71: 791-799. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949.
DOI URL |
[43] |
DUTTA S, BANDOPADHYAY S, GANGULI R. Machinelearning algorithms and their application to ore reserve estimation of sparse and imprecise data[J]. JILSA, 2010, 2: 86-96. DOI: 10.4236/jilsa.2010.22012.
DOI URL |
[44] | NEZAMOLHOSSEINI S A, MOJTAHEDZADEH S H, GHOLAMNEJAD J. Theapplication of artificial neural networks to ore reserve estimation at Choghart Iron Ore Deposit[J]. Analytical and Numerical Methods in Mining Engineering, Special Issue, 2017, 6: 73-83. |
[45] | THIELE S T, LORENZ S, KIRSCH M, et al. Multi-scale, multi-sensor data integration for automated 3-D geological mapping[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021(136): 104252. |
[46] | YIN B, ZUO R, XIONG Y, et al. Knowledge discovery of geochemical patterns from a data-driven perspective[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2021(231): 106872. |
[47] | CHOI Y, NGUYEN H, BUI X, et al. Optimization of haulage-truck system performance for ore production in open-pit mines using big data and machine learning-based methods[J]. Resources Policy, 2022(75): 102522. |
[48] |
BĖRUB C L, OLIVOB G R, CHOUTEAU M, et al. Predicting rock type and detecting hydrothermal alteration using machine learning and petrophysical properties of the Canadian Malartic ore and host rocks, Pontiac Subprovince, Québec, Canada[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2018, 96: 130-145.
DOI URL |
[1] | 邵雪维, 彭永明, 王功文, 赵显勇, 唐佳洋, 黄蕾蕾, 刘晓宁, 赵宪东. 短波红外光谱、X 射线荧光光谱、黄铁矿热电性分析在胶东新城金矿田深部找矿中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 236-251. |
[2] | 马坤元,李若琛,龚一鸣. 秦皇岛石门寨亮甲山奥陶系剖面化学地层和旋回地层研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(6): 268-286. |
[3] | 夏学齐 季峻峰 陈骏 廖启林 杨忠芳. 土壤理化参数的反射光谱分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(4): 354-362. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||