国内外基础地质数据更新现状与思考

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.10.41

地学前缘 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 370-377.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.10.41

• 月球地质与基础地质数据更新 • 上一篇下一篇

国内外基础地质数据更新现状与思考

冯艳芳¹(), 刘江涛¹, 刘勇², 崔显岳³^,⁴^,^*(), 司晓博⁵

1.中国地质调查局发展研究中心, 北京 100037
2.中国地质科学院地质研究所, 北京 100037
3.中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 北京 100081
4.自然资源部古地磁与古构造重建重点实验室, 北京 100081
5.中国地质大学(北京), 北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-08-10 修回日期:2021-11-02 出版日期:2022-03-25 发布日期:2022-03-31
通讯作者: 崔显岳
作者简介:冯艳芳(1973—),女,研究员,博士,主要从事成矿地质背景及其数据产品开发研究。E-mail: 949701299@qq.com
基金资助:
中国地质调查局“地质矿产调查数据集成与处理应用”项目(DD20190429);中国地质调查局“地质调查标准化与标准制修订(2022—2025)”项目(DD20221826)

Updating basic geological data: Current status at home and abroad and suggestions for future improvements

FENG Yanfang¹(), LIU Jiangtao¹, LIU Yong², CUI Xianyue³^,⁴^,^*(), SI Xiaobo⁵

1. Center for Research Development, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China
2. Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
3. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4. Ministry of Natural Resources Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism and Tectonic Reconstruction, Beijing 100081, China
5. China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-08-10 Revised:2021-11-02 Online:2022-03-25 Published:2022-03-31
Contact: CUI Xianyue

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在大数据、云计算、移动互联网等信息技术的推动下,地质科研范式正由过去的经验范式、理论范式向数据密集型范式转变。基础地质数据是国家基础性、战略性、公益性地质调查工作成果,反映了地质调查的精度和质量,是地质调查工作创新、服务和可持续发展的基点与源泉,决定了地质调查事业发展的战略制高点和竞争力。在以密集数据为基础的科学研究第四范式即将来临之际,基础地质数据的数量、质量和更新时效已成为衡量一个国家地质调查工作水准的基础标准之一。大部分国家按照严格的技术标准实现了基础地质数据库的实时更新和基础地质数据与图件的一体化表达,并面向社会需求研发出类别丰富的地质数据衍生产品。我国虽然建成了地质云平台,实现了一批数据库的汇聚和共享,但基础地质数据更新机制尚不健全,影响了宏观尺度的地质认知水平;基础地质数据更新标准与技术刚刚提上日程,制约了地质调查工作的支撑服务能力;基础地质数据研发服务能力不足,限制了数据更新的外在需求。基于此,本文提出了依托地质云平台构建基础地质数据更新体系的建议:一是建立“地质云节点一盘棋”的数据更新工作机制;二是构建全国统一的基础地质数据更新标准体系;三是构建“大数据、智能化和在线化”三位一体的数据更新技术体系;四是打造多方稳定协同的数据更新队伍体系。

关键词: 数据更新, 现状, 思考, 国内外, 基础地质

Abstract:

Geological research, driven by Big Data, cloud computing, mobile internet and other information technologies, has seen a paradigm shift from empirically and theoretically oriented to data intensive research. Basic geological data acquired through basic, strategic and public national geological survey reflect the accuracy and quality of the survey. They are the basis and source of innovation, service and sustainable development of geological survey and determine the strategic planning and competitiveness of future geological survey. With the coming of the fourth paradigm in scientific research, the quantity, quality and renewal time of basic geological data have become one of the basic standards to measure the overall quality of national geological survey. Most countries, according to strict technical standards, have achieved real-time updating of basic geological database and integration of basic geological data and maps, and have developed a variety of geological data-based products to meet societal needs. In China, although the Geological Cloud 3.0 platform has been built to achieve the integration and sharing of a number of databases, factors such as imperfect data updating mechanism, lack of data updating standards/technology and insufficient research and service development for basic geological data have, respectively, affected the macro-scale geological cognition capability, restricted the support and service role of geological survey and limited the external demand for data renewal. Thus, we put forth in this paper some suggestions on building a basic geological data updating system based on the Geological Cloud 3.0 platform: 1. Establish an integrated “cloud-nodes” data updating working mechanism. 2. Establish unified national data updating standards. 3. Build a “Big Data, AI and online-based” technological system. 4. Build a stable and collaborative multi-party working team. This paper is dedicated to Academician Li Tingdong, the Chief Scientist in the “National Basic Geological Data Update and Integration Project”, in celebrating his 90th Birthday and thanking him for his guidance, advice and kindness for the past 10+ years.

Key words: data updating, current status, thinking, at home and abroad, basic geology

中图分类号:

冯艳芳, 刘江涛, 刘勇, 崔显岳, 司晓博. 国内外基础地质数据更新现状与思考[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 370-377.

FENG Yanfang, LIU Jiangtao, LIU Yong, CUI Xianyue, SI Xiaobo. Updating basic geological data: Current status at home and abroad and suggestions for future improvements[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2022, 29(2): 370-377.

图/表 4

图1 美国地质调查工作程度一张图(数据来源:https://www.usgs.gov)

Fig.1 An United States geological survey working map (source: https://www.usgs.gov)

图2 美国地质调查局基础地质数据与图件一体化表达形式(数据来源:https://www.usgs.gov)

Fig.2 Layout of USGS interactive map with integrated basic geological data (source: https://www.usgs.gov)

图3 英国地质调查局发布的数据更新区域及成果出版范围分布样式图(数据来源:http://www.bgs.ac.uk)

Fig.3 BGS survey revisions with updated polygons and new published map data (source: http://www.bgs.ac.uk)

图4 中国网络版地质图不同比例尺图件表达样式(数据来源:http://www.ngac.cn)

Fig.4 China online geological map at different scales (source: http://www.ngac.cn)

参考文献 10

[1]	中国地质调查局发展研究中心. 现代地质调查: 研究、创新与综合: 美国地质调查局的视角[J]. 地质调查动态, 2020, 5.
[2]	BADARD T. Towards a generic updating tool for geographic data-bases[C]// Proceedings of GIS/LIS’98 Annual exposition and conference. Texas, USA: Fort Worth, 1998: 352-363.
[3]	KILPELINEN T, SARJAKOSKI T. Incremental generalization for multiple representations of geographical objects[M]LA-GRANGE J, WEIBEL R. GIS and generalization. London: Taylor & Francis. Press, 1995: 209-218.
[4]	UITERMARK H T, OOSTEROM P, MARS N, et al. Propagating updates: finding corresponding objects in a multi-source environment[C]// POIKER T, CHRISMAN N. Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on spatial data handling. Canada: Vancouver, 1998: 580-591.
[5]	杜子图, 翟刚毅, 程光华. 中国基础地质调查发展战略研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014: 155-239.
[6]	李廷栋. 国际地质编图现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国地质, 2007, 34(2):206-211.
[7]	蒋捷, 陈军. 基础地理信息数据库更新的若干思考[J]. 测绘通报, 2000, (5):1-3.
[8]	陈军, 李志林, 蒋捷, 等. 基础地理数据库的持续更新问题[J]. 地理信息世界, 2004, 2(5):1-5.
[9]	艾廷华, 郭宝辰, 黄亚峰. 1: 5万地图数据库的计算机综合缩编[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2005, 30(4):297-300.
[10]	张翠光, 冯艳芳, 侯荣玖. 关于制定国家基础地质数据采集、更新与发布管理办法的初步研究[J]. 国土资源情报, 2009, (2):14-17.

国内外基础地质数据更新现状与思考

Updating basic geological data: Current status at home and abroad and suggestions for future improvements

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 10

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱筱敏, 董艳蕾, 刘成林, 叶蕾, 张美洲. 中国含油气盆地沉积研究主要科学问题与发展分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 1-11.
[2]	程光华，王睿，赵牧华，苏晶文，杨洋，张晓波. 国内城市地下空间开发利用现状与发展趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(3): 39-47.
[3]	张彬，徐能雄，戴春森. 国际城市地下空间开发利用现状、趋势与启示 [J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(3): 48-56.
[4]	刘刚，梁树能，燕云鹏，闫柏琨，王喆. 精细地质初议[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2): 267-279.
[5]	康玉柱, 周磊. 中国非常规油气的战略思考[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 1-7.
[6]	郭彤楼. 涪陵气田发现的启示与思考[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 29-43.
[7]	吴胜和, 翟瑞, 李宇鹏. 地下储层构型表征：现状与展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2): 15-23.
[8]	莫彬彬, 连宾. 长石风化作用及影响因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(3): 281-289.
[9]	武雄韩兵管清花张顺峰高明显韩永岐陈鸿汉. 北京市固体矿山生态环境现状及修复对策[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(5): 324-329.