

Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 43-54.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2026.2.81
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Mingming1,2,*(
), WANG Lexuan1, WANG Xiaoyuan1, CHEN Cong1, YUAN Feng1,2, LI Xiaohui1,2, DING Jing1
Received:2026-02-25
Revised:2026-03-02
Online:2026-07-25
Published:2026-04-20
CLC Number:
ZHANG Mingming, WANG Lexuan, WANG Xiaoyuan, CHEN Cong, YUAN Feng, LI Xiaohui, DING Jing. Research on 3D mineral prospectivity modeling based on GATv2[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 43-54.
Fig.2 Geotectonic position map of the Huoqiu area (a) and bedrock geological map of the LS iron ore district (b). a modified after [35]; b adapted from [37].
| 类型 | 数量 |
|---|---|
| 地质剖面图 | 20 |
| 综合纵剖面图 | 2 |
| 基岩地质图 | 1 |
| 柱状图 | 134 |
Table 1 Geological data of the LS deposit
| 类型 | 数量 |
|---|---|
| 地质剖面图 | 20 |
| 综合纵剖面图 | 2 |
| 基岩地质图 | 1 |
| 柱状图 | 134 |
| 模型 | 网络结构参数 | 训练参数 |
|---|---|---|
| GATv2 | 输入特征维度:32 隐藏层维度:64 注意力头数:4 网络层数:2 Dropout:0.30 | 学习率:0.001 权重衰减:0.000 5 训练轮数:200 Early stopping:20 |
| GAT | 输入特征维度:32 隐藏层维度:64 注意力头数:4 网络层数:2 Dropout:0.30 | 学习率:0.001 权重衰减:0.000 5 训练轮数:200 |
| 3DCNN | 卷积层数:3 卷积通道数:32→64→128 卷积核尺寸:3×3×3 池化方式:MaxPool3D 全连接层维度:128 | 学习率:0.000 5 批量大小:32 训练轮数:150 |
| RF | 决策树数量:300 最大深度:None 最小分裂样本数:2 最小叶节点样本数:1 最大特征数:sqrt | 无显式训练轮次 |
| SVM | 核函数:RBF 正则化参数C:10 Gamma:scale 概率输出:True | 无显式训练轮次 |
Table 2 Comparison of model network architecture and training parameter settings
| 模型 | 网络结构参数 | 训练参数 |
|---|---|---|
| GATv2 | 输入特征维度:32 隐藏层维度:64 注意力头数:4 网络层数:2 Dropout:0.30 | 学习率:0.001 权重衰减:0.000 5 训练轮数:200 Early stopping:20 |
| GAT | 输入特征维度:32 隐藏层维度:64 注意力头数:4 网络层数:2 Dropout:0.30 | 学习率:0.001 权重衰减:0.000 5 训练轮数:200 |
| 3DCNN | 卷积层数:3 卷积通道数:32→64→128 卷积核尺寸:3×3×3 池化方式:MaxPool3D 全连接层维度:128 | 学习率:0.000 5 批量大小:32 训练轮数:150 |
| RF | 决策树数量:300 最大深度:None 最小分裂样本数:2 最小叶节点样本数:1 最大特征数:sqrt | 无显式训练轮次 |
| SVM | 核函数:RBF 正则化参数C:10 Gamma:scale 概率输出:True | 无显式训练轮次 |
| [1] | 钟文. 金属矿山边坡勘察常见问题分析[J]. 中国金属通报, 2023(5): 103-106. |
| [2] | 李青元, 张洛宜, 曹代勇, 等. 三维地质建模的用途、现状、问题、趋势与建议[J]. 地质与勘探, 2016, 52(4): 759-767. |
| [3] | 翁正平. 复杂地质体三维模型快速构建及更新技术研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2013. |
| [4] |
JESSELL M. Three-dimensional geological modelling of potential-field data[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2001, 27(4): 455-465.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
WU Q, XU H. On three-dimensional geological modeling and visualization[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2004, 47(8): 739-748.
DOI |
| [6] |
CAO X, LIU Z, HU C, et al. Three-dimensional geological modelling in earth science research: an in-depth review and perspective analysis[J]. Minerals, 2024, 14(7): 686-725.
DOI URL |
| [7] | 袁峰, 张明明, 李晓晖, 等. 成矿预测:从二维到三维[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(12): 3863-3874. |
| [8] |
JANIESCH C, ZSCHECH P, HEINRICH K. Machine learning and deep learning[J]. Electronic Markets, 2021, 31(3): 685-695.
DOI |
| [9] |
FRANKEL F, REID R. Big data: distilling meaning from data[J]. Nature, 2008, 455(7209): 30.
DOI |
| [10] |
LECUN Y, BENGIO Y, HINTON G. Deep learning[J]. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436-444.
DOI |
| [11] |
GUO Y, LIU Y, OERLEMANS A, et al. Deep learning for visual understanding: a review[J]. Neurocomputing, 2016, 187: 27-48.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
成秋明. 面向人类智能与人工智能融合的矿产资源预测新范式[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 1-19.
DOI |
| [13] | 张旗, 周永章. 大数据正在引发地球科学领域一场深刻的革命: 《地质科学》2017年大数据专题代序[J]. 地质科学, 2017, 52(3): 637-648. |
| [14] |
罗建民, 王晓伟, 张琪, 等. 地质大数据方法在区域找矿靶区定量优选中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(4): 76-83.
DOI |
| [15] |
DONG X, GUO G, HUANG Y, et al. Extraction and interpretation of gold exploration indexes in Jinya-Mingshan area based on association rule algorithm and statistical analysis[J]. Minerals, 2025, 15(2): 165-184.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
ROSHANRAVAN B, AGHAJANI H, YOUSEFI M, et al. An improved prediction-area plot for prospectivity analysis of mineral deposits[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2019, 28(3): 1089-1105.
DOI |
| [17] |
LI S, CHEN J, LIU C. Overview on the development of intelligent methods for mineral resource prediction under the background of geological big data[J]. Minerals, 2022, 12(5): 616-635.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
CHEN L, GUAN Q, XIONG Y, et al. A spatially constrained multi-autoencoder approach for multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2019, 125: 43-54.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
LI Z, LIU F, YANG W, et al. A survey of convolutional neural networks: analysis, applications, and prospects[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021, 33(12): 6999-7019.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
DENG H, ZHENG Y, CHEN J, et al. Learning 3D mineral prospectivity from 3D geological models using convolutional neural networks: application to a structure-controlled hydrothermal gold deposit[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2022, 161: 105074.
DOI URL |
| [21] | 李忠潭, 薛林福, 冉祥金, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的智能找矿预测方法: 以甘肃龙首山地区铜矿为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 418-433. |
| [22] |
GHEZELBASH R, MAGHSOUDI A, SHAMEKHI M, et al. Genetic algorithm to optimize the SVM and K-means algorithms for mapping of mineral prospectivity[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(1): 719-733.
DOI |
| [23] |
简富源, 张子鸣, 董岳霖, 等. 基于多重分形与随机森林的新疆哈巴河金矿成矿预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 78-94.
DOI |
| [24] | 周永章, 王俊, 左仁广, 等. 地质领域机器学习、深度学习及实现语言[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(11): 3173-3178. |
| [25] |
周永章, 肖凡. 管窥人工智能与大数据地球科学研究新进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 1-6.
DOI |
| [26] |
KERAMATFAR A, RAFIEE M, AMIRKHANI H. Graph neural networks: a bibliometrics overview[J]. Machine Learning with Applications, 2022, 10: 100401.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
ZHAO S, CHEN Z, XIONG Z, et al. Beyond grid data: exploring graph neural networks for earth observation[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2024, 13(1): 175-208.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
SHENG S, WANG Y, TIAN J, et al. Knowledge-data collaboration-driven mineral prospectivity prediction with graph attention networks[J]. Minerals, 2025, 15(11): 1164-1185.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
XU Y, ZUO R, ZHANG G. The graph attention network and its post-hoc explanation for recognizing mineralization-related geochemical anomalies[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2023, 155: 105722.
DOI URL |
| [30] | BRODY S, ALON U, How attentive are graph attention networks?[PP/OL]. arXiv (2022-01-31)[2025-12-30]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14491. |
| [31] | 潘臻, 杨浩翔, 王向鹏, 等. 基于图神经网络聚类的露天矿区山洪风险等级区划研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2025, 45(12): 144-152. |
| [32] | 袁峰, 李晓晖, 张明明, 等. 三维成矿预测研究进展[J]. 甘肃地质, 2018, 27(1): 32-36. |
| [33] |
OBUCHOWSKI N A. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology[J]. Radiology, 2003, 229(1): 3-8.
DOI PMID |
| [34] | ZHOU K, HOU Q, WANG R, et al. Real-time KD-tree construction on graphics hardware[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2008, 27(5): 126. |
| [35] | 李双应, 程成, 王松, 等. 华北地台南缘霍邱安阳山地区八公山群地层时代归属(青白口纪):来自碎屑锆石年代学的制约[J]. 地质科学, 2014, 49(2): 608-617. |
| [36] | 王萍. 安徽省霍邱县地区地球物理特征与成矿[J]. 世界有色金属, 2019(17): 239-243. |
| [37] | 刘磊, 杨晓勇. 安徽霍邱BIF铁矿地球化学特征及其成矿意义:以班台子和周油坊矿床为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(7): 2551-2566. |
| [38] | 王波华, 郝越进, 彭海辉. 安徽省霍邱铁矿成矿条件分析及下一步找矿方向[C]// 2007年华东六省一市地学科技论坛论文集. 合肥: 安徽省地质学会, 上海市地质学会, 2007: 140-144. |
| [39] | 陆三明, 楼金伟, 李茂章, 等. 安徽省霍邱铁矿区及外围铁矿成矿规律及潜力研究[J]. 安徽地质, 2014, 24(2): 94-98. |
| [40] | 黄亮山, 王萍. 安徽省霍邱县刘寺铁矿物质组分及其赋存状态研究[J]. 四川地质学报, 2020, 40(4): 566-569. |
| [1] | ZHOU Yongzhang, ZHU Biaobiao, TONG Xiaochang, LI Dan, ZHANG Tong, NIU Lujia, YU Xinhui, ZHANG Yuqing, WANG Zhengzhe, GUO Yijia, LI Wenjia, ZHANG Can. GoldMiner-AI: Design and implementation of an intelligent prospecting system driven by big data and artificial intelligence [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 1-11. |
| [2] | XIAO Keyan, WANG Yao, LI Nan, TANG Rui, WANG Zhengyao, SONG Xianglong, SUN Li, ZOU Wei, CONG Yuan. Intelligent integrated prospecting model: Theoretical construction, method integration and prospecting practice [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 12-24. |
| [3] | LIU Gang, PAN Lu, CHEN Qiyu, CUI Zhesi, FANG Hongfeng, ZHANG Ce, ZHANG Zhiting. Seismic image super-resolution reconstruction method based on multi-scale dual-discriminator GAN [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 136-149. |
| [4] | JI Xingzhong, WANG Kun, CHEN Qishen, ZHANG Yanfei, LI Qiang, LI Zhenqing, ZHAO Yu. Intelligent evaluation of utilizability of vanadium ore resources: Process construction and empirical research based on convolutional neural network [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 175-186. |
| [5] | LIN Lujun, ZHANG Yanni, LIU Lei, FENG Min, WEN Wen, YIN Fang. Rock glacier classification based on deep learning and optical-sar remote sensing images [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 187-202. |
| [6] | ZHAO Zhifang, QIAN Diwei, WANG Zechuan, ZHANG Tao, YUAN Jiachen, MA Huasheng. Mineral prospectivity mapping for concealed weathering-crust ilmenite placers deposits in Funing, southeastern Yunnan: An application of AlphaEarth data fusion and machine learning [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 272-294. |
| [7] | CHEN Yichun, HE Jinxin, CHEN Yongliang, YU Yunliang, CHEN Jiajun. Intelligent mineral prospectivity mapping via KAN model based on remote sensing and geochemical data: A case study of the Zhaishang-Mawu exploration area, Gansu Province, China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 295-309. |
| [8] | ZHANG Qunjia, LIN Lujun, LIU Lei, LIU Yanqun, MEI Jiacheng. A high accuracy prediction framework integrating multi-source data and ensemble learning for mineral prospectivity mapping: A case study of the Chagai region, Pakistan [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 310-326. |
| [9] | WEN Hongtao, QIU Kunfeng, CAI Yiwei, ZHOU Tong, MA Jiadong, WU Mingqian, HOU Zhaoliang, YAO Jianlai, SUN Huafeng. Automated identification of zircon-quartz pseudomorphs in alkaline granites: Novel insights through Deep Learning [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 420-436. |
| [10] | YANG Na, ZHANG Zhenkai. Intelligent mineral prospectivity prediction method based on lightweight SqueezeNet optimized by channel attention mechanism [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 71-83. |
| [11] | WENG Zhengping, MAO Xinyuan, CHEN Qiyu, CUI Zhesi, FANG Hongfeng, ZHANG Ce, WU Chonglong, LIU Gang. A three-dimensional geological modeling method based on a multi-discriminator attention generative adversarial network [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 84-94. |
| [12] | ZHOU Yongzhang, GUO Yanjun. To readers from special editor in chief: A review of advances in big data and AI for geoscience [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(4): 0-Ⅷ. |
| [13] | WANG Bin, GAO Yongbao, REN Tao, KOU Shaolei, YANG Ke, WANG Zhanbin, LIU Ji, SONG Yiwei, MA Zhenyu, DU Wange. 3D primary halo and deep prospecting prediction of Xinjiazui gold deposit in the Longmenshan tectonic belt, China [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(2): 311-330. |
| [14] | QIAO Xiaojuan, LUO Chengke, CHAI Xinyu, YU Wenjin. Prediction of fracture distribution in karst area based on machine learning method: Taking Fangshan area in Beijing as a case study [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(1): 405-418. |
| [15] | KANG Jinzheng, MO Shaoxing, KANG Xueyuan, DANG Jingxuan, CHENG Chijitai, XU Peijie, SHI Xiaoqing. Frontier advances and challenges of machine learning in groundwater science [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(1): 483-499. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||