

地学前缘 ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 338-353.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2025.4.99
• “印度欧亚大陆碰撞及其远程效应”专栏之十二 • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:2025-03-18
修回日期:2025-04-28
出版日期:2026-05-25
发布日期:2026-03-26
通信作者:
*黄兴富(1989—),男,副教授,主要从事构造地质学与地球深部结构研究。E-mail: huangxingfu@glut.edu.cn
作者简介:于文豪(2000—),男,硕士研究生,地质资源与地质工程专业。E-mail: 2200575527@qq.com
基金资助:
YU Wenhao1(
), HUANG Xingfu1,2,*(
), GUO Xiaoyu2, GAO Rui2
Received:2025-03-18
Revised:2025-04-28
Online:2026-05-25
Published:2026-03-26
摘要:
青藏高原东北缘隆升历史的研究是检验新生代青藏高原各种形成模型机制的关键,大量研究工作主要集中于东北缘新生代以来的隆升历史。但是,新生代的隆升过程是高原在晚中生代奠定的基础格架之上进一步隆升的结果。因此,对晚中生代青藏高原东北缘的演化进行深入研究,对于理解整个高原乃至周边地区的构造演化具有重要意义。为了破译青藏高原东北缘晚中生代的构造演化过程,本研究在总结青藏高原东北缘区域已发表资料的基础之上,对陇中盆地内部和六盘山地区采集并进行了磷灰石与锆石的裂变径迹分析与热史模拟,拟在揭示东北缘地区晚中生代隆升历史,进而探讨晚中生代构造演化过程,为青藏高原东北缘新生代前的地质地貌演化提供新的证据。本研究共采集了11个磷灰石样品与9个锆石样品进行测试,测试结果表明研究区样品的磷灰石裂变径迹年龄范围分布于140~85 Ma,裂变径迹的长度范围在12.3~13.4 μm;锆石裂变径迹年龄结果为166~117 Ma。热史模拟的结果揭示了研究区中生代晚期经历了三个快速隆升与冷却降温阶段:(1)170~150 Ma(中—晚侏罗世)隆升冷却事件,该事件可能与班公湖—怒江缝合带西段早期碰撞的远程构造响应相关;(2)150~130 Ma(晚侏罗世—早白垩世)隆升冷却事件,可能为东亚大陆内造山运动中拉萨地块的北向拼贴碰撞的远场效应;(3)100~85 Ma(晚白垩世)隆升冷却事件,可能与新特提斯洋(雅鲁藏布江缝合带前身)向北俯冲的远场构造效应相关。结合本文和前人隆升年代学数据,我们认为晚中生代的这些隆升事件基本奠定了青藏高原东北缘的构造格局,青藏高原东北缘的大部分区域在晚中生代建立的构造和地貌基础之上经过了新生代的缓慢隆升。
中图分类号:
于文豪, 黄兴富, 郭晓玉, 高锐. 青藏高原东北缘晚中生代构造演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(3): 338-353.
YU Wenhao, HUANG Xingfu, GUO Xiaoyu, GAO Rui. Late Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(3): 338-353.
图1 (a)基于DEM(数字高程模型)青藏高原东北缘地形地貌、构造简图及中生代至新生代隆升年龄汇总;(b)研究区及邻区地质构造图(a据文献[14-15,24-48]) TS:托莱山;TNS:托莱南山;SNS:疏勒南山;DNS:党河南山。
Fig.1 (a) Topography and geomorphology based on DEM, tectonic sketch map and summary of Mesozoic to Cenozoic uplift ages in the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau; (b) Geological tectonic map of the study area and adjacent regions. a adapted from [14-15,24-48].
| 样品号 | 样品位置 | 高程/m | 时代 | 岩石类型 | 分析方法 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS62 | E104.12°, N36.59° | 1 817 | E2 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS64 | E104.08°, N36.60° | 1 865 | S | 板岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS66 | E104.10°, N36.79° | 1 787 | N1 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS67 | E104.13°, N36.86° | 1 791 | O | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS72 | E104.11°, N36.91° | 1 874 | O | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS77 | E104.04°, N36.49° | 1 837 | S1 | 黑云片岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS79 | E103.97°, N36.21° | 1 607 | K1 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS80 | E103.98°, N36.18° | 1 517 | S1 | 闪长岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS 83 | E104.03°, N36.15° | 1 502 | Pt1 | 变粒岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS 88 | E103.92°, N35.82° | 2 447 | K1 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS 90 | E104.02°, N35.78° | 2 472 | S | 板岩 | AFT, ZFT |
表1 裂变径迹分析样品统计表
Table 1 Summary of samples for the apatite and zircon fission track analysis
| 样品号 | 样品位置 | 高程/m | 时代 | 岩石类型 | 分析方法 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS62 | E104.12°, N36.59° | 1 817 | E2 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS64 | E104.08°, N36.60° | 1 865 | S | 板岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS66 | E104.10°, N36.79° | 1 787 | N1 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS67 | E104.13°, N36.86° | 1 791 | O | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS72 | E104.11°, N36.91° | 1 874 | O | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS77 | E104.04°, N36.49° | 1 837 | S1 | 黑云片岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS79 | E103.97°, N36.21° | 1 607 | K1 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS80 | E103.98°, N36.18° | 1 517 | S1 | 闪长岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS 83 | E104.03°, N36.15° | 1 502 | Pt1 | 变粒岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS 88 | E103.92°, N35.82° | 2 447 | K1 | 砂岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| LPS 90 | E104.02°, N35.78° | 2 472 | S | 板岩 | AFT, ZFT |
| 样品号 | 颗粒数n | ρs/(105cm-2) (Ns) | ρi/(105cm-2) (Ni) | ρd/(105cm-2) (Nd) | P(χ2)/ % | 中值年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma | 池年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma | 长度及误差/ μm(N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS62 | 35 | 5.995 (1 277) | 20.027 (4 266) | 14.797 (7 124) | 90.3 | 90±5 | 90±5 | 12.9±1.7 (130) |
| LPS64 | 35 | 4.087 (552) | 13.853 (1 871) | 14.168 (7 124) | 12.6 | 84±6 | 85±6 | 13.2±1.4 (97) |
| LPS66 | 35 | 6.917 (1 370) | 18.559 (3 676) | 13.75 (7 124) | 12.4 | 104±6 | 104±6 | 13.3±1.5 (106) |
| LPS67 | 34 | 4.475 (578) | 10.134 (1 309) | 13.331 (7 124) | 72.3 | 120±8 | 120±8 | 12.3±1.9 (102) |
| LPS72 | 33 | 6.754 (1 280) | 12.421 (2 354) | 12.703 (7 124) | 90.1 | 140±8 | 140±8 | 12.4±2.0 (114) |
| LPS77 | 35 | 3.744 (343) | 11.068 (1 014) | 16.472 (7 124) | 100 | 113±9 | 113±9 | 12.8±1.8 (83) |
| LPS79 | 34 | 9.519 (1 164) | 25.988 (3 178) | 15.634 (7 124) | 56.3 | 117±7 | 116±7 | 13.1±2.0 (113) |
| LPS80 | 30 | 9.883 (3 509) | 34.445 (12 230) | 14.797 (7 124) | 5.3 | 87±4 | 87±4 | 13.0±1.5 (140) |
| LPS83-1 | 34 | 6.631 (745) | 17.525 (1 969) | 13.959 (7 124) | 100 | 107±7 | 107±7 | 13.0±1.8 (103) |
| LPS83-2 | 35 | 7.589 (1 072) | 20.629 (2 914) | 13.122 (7 124) | 98.7 | 98±6 | 98±6 | 12.6±2.1 (123) |
| LPS88 | 35 | 5.429 (1 520) | 13.338 (3 734) | 12.285 (7 124) | 90.9 | 102±6 | 102±6 | 13.4±1.5 (111) |
| LPS90 | 35 | 4.569 (614) | 12.376 (1 663) | 16.472 (7 124) | 70.5 | 124±8 | 124±8 | 12.3±1.5 (99) |
表2 研究区磷灰石裂变径迹分析数据表
Table 2 Apatite fission track data of the study area
| 样品号 | 颗粒数n | ρs/(105cm-2) (Ns) | ρi/(105cm-2) (Ni) | ρd/(105cm-2) (Nd) | P(χ2)/ % | 中值年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma | 池年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma | 长度及误差/ μm(N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS62 | 35 | 5.995 (1 277) | 20.027 (4 266) | 14.797 (7 124) | 90.3 | 90±5 | 90±5 | 12.9±1.7 (130) |
| LPS64 | 35 | 4.087 (552) | 13.853 (1 871) | 14.168 (7 124) | 12.6 | 84±6 | 85±6 | 13.2±1.4 (97) |
| LPS66 | 35 | 6.917 (1 370) | 18.559 (3 676) | 13.75 (7 124) | 12.4 | 104±6 | 104±6 | 13.3±1.5 (106) |
| LPS67 | 34 | 4.475 (578) | 10.134 (1 309) | 13.331 (7 124) | 72.3 | 120±8 | 120±8 | 12.3±1.9 (102) |
| LPS72 | 33 | 6.754 (1 280) | 12.421 (2 354) | 12.703 (7 124) | 90.1 | 140±8 | 140±8 | 12.4±2.0 (114) |
| LPS77 | 35 | 3.744 (343) | 11.068 (1 014) | 16.472 (7 124) | 100 | 113±9 | 113±9 | 12.8±1.8 (83) |
| LPS79 | 34 | 9.519 (1 164) | 25.988 (3 178) | 15.634 (7 124) | 56.3 | 117±7 | 116±7 | 13.1±2.0 (113) |
| LPS80 | 30 | 9.883 (3 509) | 34.445 (12 230) | 14.797 (7 124) | 5.3 | 87±4 | 87±4 | 13.0±1.5 (140) |
| LPS83-1 | 34 | 6.631 (745) | 17.525 (1 969) | 13.959 (7 124) | 100 | 107±7 | 107±7 | 13.0±1.8 (103) |
| LPS83-2 | 35 | 7.589 (1 072) | 20.629 (2 914) | 13.122 (7 124) | 98.7 | 98±6 | 98±6 | 12.6±2.1 (123) |
| LPS88 | 35 | 5.429 (1 520) | 13.338 (3 734) | 12.285 (7 124) | 90.9 | 102±6 | 102±6 | 13.4±1.5 (111) |
| LPS90 | 35 | 4.569 (614) | 12.376 (1 663) | 16.472 (7 124) | 70.5 | 124±8 | 124±8 | 12.3±1.5 (99) |
图3 (a)磷灰石裂变径迹年龄与样品高程关系图;(b)磷灰石裂变径迹年龄与样品平均径迹长度关系图;(c)从N-S样品海拔、主要断层与磷灰石裂变径迹年龄关系图
Fig.3 (a) Correlation plot of apatite fission track (AFT) ages versus sample elevation; (b) Relationship between AFT ages and mean track lengths; (c) Spatial correlation of AFT ages with sample elevation and major faults along a N-S transect.
| 样品号 | 颗粒数n | ρs/(105cm-2) (Ns) | ρi/(105cm-2) (Ni) | ρd/(105cm-2) (Nd) | P(χ2)/% | 中值年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma | 池年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS62 | 36 | 105.985 (6 699) | 29.997 (1 896) | 7.474 (5 958) | 0.2 | 118±6 | 119±5 |
| LPS64-3 | 35 | 95.181 (5 988) | 20.696 (1 302) | 7.865 (5 958) | 16.5 | 162±8 | 162±7 |
| LPS66 | 36 | 95.883 (5 806) | 30.436 (1 843) | 8.257 (5 958) | 0.1 | 115±6 | 117±5 |
| LPS67-2 | 21 | 94.012 (2 412) | 22.879 (587) | 8.648 (5 958) | 55.6 | 160±9 | 160±9 |
| LPS72-1 | 31 | 103.275 (4 944) | 25.276 (1 210) | 9.04 (5 958) | 49.0 | 166±8 | 166±8 |
| LPS79 | 36 | 102.297 (5 229) | 35.997 (1 840) | 9.432 (5 958) | 0 | 119±7 | 121±5 |
| LPS86-2 | 18 | 124.568 (2 449) | 32.096 (631) | 7.082 (5 958) | 61.1 | 124±7 | 124±7 |
| LPS88 | 36 | 101.517 (5 738) | 24.344 (1 376) | 7.474 (5 958) | 31.2 | 139±7 | 140±6 |
| LPS90-1 | 30 | 103.008 (3 868) | 23.861 (896) | 7.865 (5 958) | 52.8 | 153±8 | 153±8 |
表3 研究区锆石裂变径迹分析数据表
Table 3 Zircon fission track data of the study area
| 样品号 | 颗粒数n | ρs/(105cm-2) (Ns) | ρi/(105cm-2) (Ni) | ρd/(105cm-2) (Nd) | P(χ2)/% | 中值年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma | 池年龄及 误差(±σ)/Ma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPS62 | 36 | 105.985 (6 699) | 29.997 (1 896) | 7.474 (5 958) | 0.2 | 118±6 | 119±5 |
| LPS64-3 | 35 | 95.181 (5 988) | 20.696 (1 302) | 7.865 (5 958) | 16.5 | 162±8 | 162±7 |
| LPS66 | 36 | 95.883 (5 806) | 30.436 (1 843) | 8.257 (5 958) | 0.1 | 115±6 | 117±5 |
| LPS67-2 | 21 | 94.012 (2 412) | 22.879 (587) | 8.648 (5 958) | 55.6 | 160±9 | 160±9 |
| LPS72-1 | 31 | 103.275 (4 944) | 25.276 (1 210) | 9.04 (5 958) | 49.0 | 166±8 | 166±8 |
| LPS79 | 36 | 102.297 (5 229) | 35.997 (1 840) | 9.432 (5 958) | 0 | 119±7 | 121±5 |
| LPS86-2 | 18 | 124.568 (2 449) | 32.096 (631) | 7.082 (5 958) | 61.1 | 124±7 | 124±7 |
| LPS88 | 36 | 101.517 (5 738) | 24.344 (1 376) | 7.474 (5 958) | 31.2 | 139±7 | 140±6 |
| LPS90-1 | 30 | 103.008 (3 868) | 23.861 (896) | 7.865 (5 958) | 52.8 | 153±8 | 153±8 |
图5 研究区磷灰石样品裂变径迹热史模拟结果及径迹长度分布
Fig.5 Thermal history modeling results and track length distributions of apatite fission track (AFT) samples from the study area
图7 (a)青藏高原东北缘祁连山及其周边区域样品隆升年龄汇总图;(b)裂变径迹年龄(AFT)与样品海拔关系图;(c)样品隆升年龄与样品海拔关系图(据文献[6,23,26,36-37,42,44,78-85])
Fig.7 (a) Compilation of sample uplift ages in the Qilian Mountains and adjacent areas along the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; (b) Relationship between Apatite Fission Track (AFT) ages and sample elevation; (c) Correlation between sample uplift ages and elevation. Modified after [6,23,26,36-37,42,44,78-85].
| [1] |
AN Z, KUTZBACH J E, PRELL W L, et al. Evolution of Asian monsoons and phased uplift of the Himalaya-Tibetan Plateau since late Miocene times[J]. Nature, 2001, 411(6833): 62-66.
DOI |
| [2] |
PRELL W L, KUTZBACH J E. Sensitivity of the Indian monsoon to forcing parameters and implications for its evolution[J]. Nature, 1992, 360(6405): 647-652.
DOI |
| [3] |
RAYMO M E, RUDDIMAN W F. Tectonic forcing of late Cenozoic climate[J]. Nature, 1992, 359(6391): 117-122.
DOI |
| [4] |
DING L, SPICER R A, YANG J, et al. Quantifying the rise of the Himalaya orogen and implications for the South Asian monsoon[J]. Geology, 2017, 45(3): 215-218.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
KAPP P, YIN A, HARRISON T M, et al. Cretaceous-Tertiary shortening, basin development, and volcanism in central Tibet[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2005, 117(7): 865.
DOI URL |
| [6] | 戚帮申, 胡道功, 杨肖肖, 等. 祁连山中段白垩纪以来阶段性构造抬升过程的磷灰石裂变径迹证据[J]. 地球学报, 2016, 37(1): 46-58. |
| [7] |
MURPHY M A, YIN A, HARRISON T M. Did the Indo-Asian collision alone create the Tibetan Plateau?[J]. Geology, 1997, 25(8): 719.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
GUYNN J H, KAPP P, PULLEN A, et al. Tibetan basement rocks near Amdo reveal “missing” Mesozoic tectonism along the Bangong suture, central Tibet[J]. Geology, 2006, 34(6): 505-508.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
LI Y, HE J, WANG C, et al. Late Cretaceous K-rich magmatism in central Tibet: evidence for early elevation of the Tibetan Plateau?[J]. Lithos, 2012, 160/161: 1-13.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
WANG C, ZHAO X, LIU Z, et al. Constraints on the early uplift history of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(13): 4987-4992.
DOI PMID |
| [11] |
SPICER R A, HARRIS N B W, WIDDOWSON M, et al. Constant elevation of southern Tibet over the past 15 million years[J]. Nature, 2003, 421(6923): 622-624.
DOI |
| [12] |
YIN A, RUMELHART P E, BUTLER R, et al. Tectonic history of the Altyn Tagh Fault System in northern Tibet inferred from Cenozoic sedimentation[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2002, 114(10): 1257-1295.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
ZHENG D, ZHANG P, WAN J, et al. Rapid exhumation at -8 Ma on the Liupan Shan thrust fault from apatite fission-track thermochronology: implications for growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau margin[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 248(1/2): 198-208.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
PANG J, YU J, ZHENG D, et al. Neogene expansion of the Qilian Shan, North Tibet: implications for the dynamic evolution of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonics, 2019, 38(3): 1018-1032.
DOI URL |
| [15] | 陈国明, 覃焕图, 黄兴富, 等. 六盘山地区新生代构造演化:来自锆石和磷灰石裂变径迹的证据[J]. 地球物理学报, 2024, 67(3): 1147-1168. |
| [16] | 李吉均, 方小敏. 青藏高原隆起与环境变化研究[J]. 科学通报, 1998, 43(15): 1569-1574. |
| [17] |
TAPPONNIER P, XU Z Q, ROGER F, et al. Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet Plateau[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5547): 1671-1677.
PMID |
| [18] |
AN K, LIN X, WU L, et al. An immediate response to the Indian-Eurasian collision along the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: evidence from apatite fission track analysis in the Kuantan Shan-Hei Shan[J]. Tectonophysics, 2020, 774: 228278.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
WANG C, DAI J, ZHAO X, et al. Outward-growth of the Tibetan Plateau during the Cenozoic: a review[J]. Tectonophysics, 2014, 621: 1-43.
DOI URL |
| [20] | DING L, KAPP P, CAI F, et al. Timing and mechanisms of Tibetan Plateau uplift[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2022, 3(10): 652-667. |
| [21] |
ZUZA A, WU C, REITH R C, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Qilian Shan: an early Paleozoic orogen reactivated in the Cenozoic[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2018, 130(5/6): 881-925.
DOI URL |
| [22] | ZHANG Y, ZHENG W, WANG W, et al. Rapid Eocene exhumation of the West Qinling Belt: implications for the growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Lithosphere, 2020(1): 8294751. |
| [23] |
LIN X, JOLIVET M, LIU-ZENG J, et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic cooling history of the eastern Qinghai Nan Shan (NW China): apatite low-temperature thermochronology constraints[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2021, 572: 110416.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
QI B, HU D, YANG X, et al. Apatite fission track evidence for the Cretaceous-Cenozoic cooling history of the Qilian Shan (NW China) and for stepwise northeastward growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau since early Eocene[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2016, 124: 28-41.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
JOLIVET M, BRUNEL M, SEWARD D, et al. Mesozoic and Cenozoic tectonics of the northern edge of the Tibetan Plateau: fission-track constraints[J]. Tectonophysics, 2001, 343(1/2): 111-134.
DOI URL |
| [26] | WANG X, SONG C, ZATTIN M, et al. Cenozoic pulsed deformation history of northeastern Tibetan Plateau reconstructed from fission-track thermochronology[J]. Tectonophysics, 2016, 672: 212-227. |
| [27] |
LIN X, ZHENG D, SUN J, et al. Detrital apatite fission track evidence for provenance change in the Subei Basin and implications for the tectonic uplift of the Danghe Nan Shan (NW China) since the mid-Miocene[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 111: 302-311.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
GEORGE A D, MARSHALLSEA S J, WYRWOLL K H, et al. Miocene cooling in the northern Qilian Shan, northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, revealed by apatite fission-track and vitrinite-reflectance analysis[J]. Geology, 2001, 29(10): 939.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
WANG Y, ZHENG J, ZHENG Y. Mesozoic-Cenozoic exhumation history of the Qimen Tagh Range, northeastern margins of the Tibetan Plateau: evidence from apatite fission track analysis[J]. Gondwana Research, 2018, 58: 16-26.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
HE P, SONG C, WANG Y, et al. Cenozoic deformation history of the Qilian Shan (northeastern Tibetan Plateau) constrained by detrital apatite fission-track thermochronology in the northeastern Qaidam Basin[J]. Tectonophysics, 2018, 749: 1-11.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
JIAN X, GUAN P, ZHANG W, et al. Late Cretaceous to early Eocene deformation in the northern Tibetan Plateau: detrital apatite fission track evidence from northern Qaidam Basin[J]. Gondwana Research, 2018, 60: 94-104.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
YUAN W, ZHANG A, TIAN C, et al. The tectonic events inHalongxiuma district, East Kunlun Mountains, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: evidence from fission track thermochronology[J]. Radiation Measurements, 2019, 123: 63-68.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
ZATTIN M, WANG X. Exhumation of the western Qinling mountain range and the building of the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 177: 307-313.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
LI B, CHEN X, ZUZA A V, et al. Cenozoic cooling history of the North Qilian Shan, northern Tibetan Plateau, and the initiation of theHaiyuan fault: constraints from apatite- and zircon-fission track thermochronology[J]. Tectonophysics, 2019, 751: 109-124.
DOI URL |
| [35] |
CHEN X, YUAN W, XU J, et al. Tectonic activities inDongshangen polymetallic ore district, eastern Kunlun Mountains, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: evidences from fission track thermochronology[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2019, 112: 103065.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
PENG H, WANG J, LIU C, et al. Thermochronological constraints on the Meso-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of theHaiyuan-Liupanshan region, northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 183: 103966.
DOI URL |
| [37] | LI B, ZUZA A V, CHEN X, et al. Cenozoic multi-phase deformation in the Qilian Shan and out-of-sequence development of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonophysics, 2020, 782: 228423. |
| [38] |
TIAN P, YUAN W, YANG X, et al. Multi-stage tectonic events of the eastern Kunlun Mountains, northern Tibetan Plateau constrained by fission track thermochronology[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2020, 198: 104428.
DOI URL |
| [39] |
CHEN L, SONG C, WANG Y, et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic uplift/exhumation history of the Qilian Shan, NE Tibetan Plateau: constraints from low-temperature thermochronology[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9: 760100.
DOI URL |
| [40] | HE Z, GLORIE S, BOUTSALIS C, et al. Thermo-tectonic history of the Qilian Shan and adjacent areas: new insights from apatite U-Pb and fission track thermochronology[J]. Tectonics, 2025, 44(2): e2024TC008407. |
| [41] |
PENG H, WANG J, LIU C, et al. Meso-Cenozoic growth of the eastern Qilian Shan, northeastern Tibetan Plateau margin: insight from borehole apatite fission-trackthermochronology in the Xiji Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 143: 105798.
DOI URL |
| [42] | WANG F, LUO M, HE Z, et al. Mid-Cretaceous accelerated cooling of the Beishan Orogen, NW China: evidence from apatite fission track thermochronology[J]. Lithosphere, 2023, 14: 1-20. |
| [43] |
LIN X, JOLIVET M, CHENG F. Spatiotemporal evolution of central Qilian Shan (Northwest China) constrained by fission-track ages of detrital grains from the Huangshui River[J]. Minerals, 2023, 13(7): 890.
DOI URL |
| [44] |
FENG Z, YUAN W, ZHAO Z, et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic cooling, exhumation and tectonic implications of Chaqiabeishan-Shaliuquan Li-Be ore district in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Tectonophysics, 2023, 866: 230040.
DOI URL |
| [45] |
LIN X, JOLIVET M, LIU-ZENG J, et al. Paleozoic-Mesozoic multistage tectonic evolution of the North Qilian Shan revealed by detrital zircon U-Pb and fission-track double dating[J]. Geomorphology, 2024, 466: 109447.
DOI URL |
| [46] | FENG C, ZHENG W, ZHANG Y, et al. Multiphase tectonic processes in the Mesozoic and formation of early regional geomorphic pattern in the Qilian orogenic belt, northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Lithosphere, 2024, 3: 1-25. |
| [47] | JIANG L, LIU Y, LI W, et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic uplift of Qiman Tagh Range in northern Tibetan Plateau, western China[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2023, 136(3/4): 1050-1066. |
| [48] | 贠晓瑞, 蔡志慧, 何碧竹, 等. 青海共和盆地东北缘中-新生代热演化史: 来自沟后杂岩体及当家寺岩体的低温热年代学证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(10): 3241-3260. |
| [49] |
LI B, ZUZA A, CHEN X, et al. Pre-Cenozoic evolution of the Northern Qilian Orogen from zircon geochronology: framework for early growth of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2021, 562: 110091.
DOI URL |
| [50] |
ZHAO X, ZHAO S, LIU C, et al. Provenance analysis of the Cenozoic sedimentary successions in the Ningnan Basin, NE Tibetan Plateau: constraints on sedimentological and tectonomorphological evolution[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2024, 98(6): 1441-1460.
DOI URL |
| [51] | LI Y, NOCQUET J, SHAN X, et al. Geodetic observations of shallow creep on the Laohushan-Haiyuan Fault, northeastern Tibet[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2021, 126(6): e2020JB021576. |
| [52] |
乔鑫, 屈春燕, 单新建, 等. 基于时序InSAR的海原断裂带形变特征及运动学参数反演[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(6): 1481-1496.
DOI |
| [53] | 袁道阳, 贾亚会, 才树华, 等. 兰州马衔山北缘断裂带古地震初步研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 2002(1): 27-33. |
| [54] |
冯志强, 李萌, 郭元岭, 等. 中国典型大型走滑断裂及相关盆地成因研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(6): 206-223.
DOI |
| [55] | 周德敏, 甘卫军, 任金卫, 等. 基于GPS观测资料反演庄浪河断裂带、马衔山北缘断裂带的滑动速率[J]. 地震地质, 2005(4): 706-714. |
| [56] |
郭晓玉, 高锐, 高建荣, 等. 青藏高原东北缘马衔山断裂带构造属性的综合研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(2): 560-569.
DOI |
| [57] | 崔浇. 陇中盆地内部活动断裂及其动力学分析[D]. 兰州: 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 2023. |
| [58] | DEARNALEY G. Nuclear tracks in solids: principles and applications[J]. Physics Bulletin, 1981, 32(3): 80. |
| [59] |
GALLAGHER K, BROWN R, JOHNSON C. Fission track analysis and its applications to geological problems[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1998, 26(1): 519-572.
DOI URL |
| [60] |
KETCHAM R A, DONELICK R A, BALESTRIERI M L, et al. Reproducibility of apatite fission-track length data and thermal history reconstruction[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 284(3/4): 504-515.
DOI URL |
| [61] |
HURFORD A J, GLEADOW A J W. Calibration of fission track dating parameters[J]. Nuclear Track Detection, 1977, 1(1): 41-48.
DOI URL |
| [62] |
HURFORD A. Standardization of fission track dating calibration: recommendation by the Fission Track Working Group of the I.U.G.S.Subcommission on Geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 1990, 80(2): 171-178.
DOI URL |
| [63] |
HURFORD A J, GREEN P F. The zeta age calibration of fission-track dating[J]. Chemical Geology, 1983, 41: 285-317.
DOI URL |
| [64] |
KETCHAM R A, CARTER A, DONELICK R A, et al. Improved modeling of fission-track annealing in apatite[J]. American Mineralogist, 2007, 92(5/6): 799-810.
DOI URL |
| [65] | GALLAGHER K. Transdimensional inverse thermal history modeling for quantitative thermochronology[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2012, 117(B2): 2011JB008825. |
| [66] |
SOBEL E R, CHEN J, HEERMANCE R V. Late Oligocene-Early Miocene initiation of shortening in the southwestern Chinese Tian Shan: implications for Neogene shortening rate variations[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 247(1/2): 70-81.
DOI URL |
| [67] |
KETCHAM R, DONELICK R, CARLSON W. Variability of apatite fission-track annealing kinetics: III. Extrapolation to geological time scales[J]. American Mineralogist, 1999, 84(9): 1235-1255.
DOI URL |
| [68] |
DONELICK R A, O’SULLIVAN P B, KETCHAM R A. Apatite fission-track analysis[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2005, 58(1): 49-94.
DOI URL |
| [69] |
GREEN P F, DUDDY I R, LASLETT G M, et al. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 4.Quantitative modelling techniques and extension to geological timescales[J]. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 1989, 79(2): 155-182.
DOI URL |
| [70] |
BRAUN J. Quantitative constraints on the rate of landform evolution derived from low-temperature thermochronology[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2005, 58(1): 351-374.
DOI URL |
| [71] |
REINERS P W, BRANDON M T. Using thermochronology to understand orogenic erosion[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2006, 34(1): 419-466.
DOI URL |
| [72] |
DAI J, WANG C, HOURIGAN J, et al. Multi-stage tectono-magmatic events of the eastern Kunlun Range, Northern Tibet: insights from U-Pb geochronology and (U-Th)/He thermochronology[J]. Tectonophysics, 2013, 599: 97-106.
DOI URL |
| [73] |
KAPP P, DECELLES P G, GEHRELS G E, et al. Geological records of the Lhasa-Qiangtang and Indo-Asian collisions in the Nima area of central Tibet[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2007, 119(7/8): 917-933.
DOI URL |
| [74] | RATERMAN N S, ROBINSON A C, COWGILL E S. Structure and detrital zircon geochronology of the Domar fold-thrust belt: evidence of pre-Cenozoic crustal thickening of the western Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 2014, 507: 89-114. |
| [75] | 李林林, 郭召杰, 管树巍, 等. 柴达木盆地西南缘新生代碎屑重矿物组合特征及其古地理演化[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2015, 45(6): 780-798. |
| [76] |
LEASE R O, BURBANK D W, HOUGH B, et al. Pulsed Miocene range growth in northeastern Tibet: insights from Xunhua Basin magnetostratigraphy and provenance[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2012, 124(5/6): 657-677.
DOI URL |
| [77] |
STAISCH L M, NIEMI N A, HONG C, et al. A Cretaceous-Eocene depositional age for the Fenghuoshan Group, Hoh Xil Basin: implications for the tectonic evolution of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonics, 2014, 33(3): 281-301.
DOI URL |
| [78] |
HE P, SONG C, WANG Y, et al. Cenozoic two-phase topographic growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau derived from two thermochronologic transects across the southern Qilian Shan thrust belt[J]. Tectonophysics, 2022, 837: 229432.
DOI URL |
| [79] |
HU C, YUAN W, ZHAO Z, et al. Uplift and exhumation of the Chakabeishan ore district in the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin, China: constraints from fission track thermochronology[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2023, 247: 105596.
DOI URL |
| [80] |
LIN X, CHEN H, WYRWOLL K, et al. The uplift history of the Haiyuan-Liupan Shan region northeast of the present Tibetan Plateau: integrated constraint from stratigraphy and thermochronology[J]. The Journal of Geology, 2011, 119(4): 372-393.
DOI URL |
| [81] |
PANG J, YU J, ZHENG D, et al. Constraints of new apatite fission-track ages on the tectonic pattern and geomorphic development of the northern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 181: 103909.
DOI URL |
| [82] |
SONG D, GLORIE S, XIAO W, et al. Tectono-thermal evolution of the southwestern Alxa tectonic belt, NW China: constrained by apatite U-Pb and fission track thermochronology[J]. Tectonophysics, 2018, 722: 577-594.
DOI URL |
| [83] |
WU C, ZUZA A, LI J, et al. Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic cooling history of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau and its foreland derived from low-temperature thermochronology[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2021, 133(11/12): 2393-2417.
DOI URL |
| [84] |
YU J, ZHENG D, PANG J, et al. Miocene range growth along the Altyn Tagh Fault: insights from apatite fission track and (U-Th)/He thermochronometry in the western Danghenan Shan, China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2019, 124(8): 9433-9453.
DOI URL |
| [85] |
LEASE R O, BURBANK D W, CLARK M K, et al. Middle Miocene reorganization of deformation along the northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geology, 2011, 39(4): 359-362.
DOI URL |
| [86] | 戚帮申, 胡道功, 杨肖肖, 等. 祁连山新生代古海拔变化的碳氧同位素记录[J]. 地球学报, 2015, 36(3): 323-332. |
| [87] | 戚帮申. 祁连山新生代构造地貌演化特征[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2014. |
| [1] | 冯乾乾, 邱楠生, 腾格尔, 龙康杰, 李萱. 磷灰石裂变径迹和(U-Th)/He约束下雪峰山隆起北缘中—新生代构造抬升过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(3): 354-362. |
| [2] | 韩飞, 李建江, 秦宇龙, 赵海波, 杨学俊, 叶春林, 李峥, 贾小川, 黄柏鑫, 张彤, 熊昌利, 黄永高, 罗改. 西藏冈底斯南缘新生代隆升剥露历史及地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(2): 440-450. |
| [3] | 任战利, 杨鹏, 祁凯, 崔军平, 于强, 程鑫, 黄雷, 陈刚, 姚举文. 羌塘盆地构造——热演化史研究现状及进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(5): 12-27. |
| [4] | 张亚峰, 施泽明, 苗国文, 许光, 金戈, 马风娟, 姬丙艳, 姚振, 马瑛. 青藏高原东北缘土壤锌硒锗富集靶区优选及健康潜力评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 342-352. |
| [5] | 王国灿, 赵子豪, 申添毅, 马骋, 周亚波. 从中亚岩石冷却的时空差异性浅析天山中新生代隆升剥露的动力来源[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(1): 322-342. |
| [6] | 刘金萍, 王改云, 简晓玲, 朱传庆, 胡小强, 袁晓蔷, 王超. 北黄海东部次盆地构造热机制与成烃效应[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 206-218. |
| [7] | 张进江, 郑剑磊, 王海滨, 郭磊, 刘江, 戚国伟. 内蒙古大青山-盘羊山晚中生代-早新生代构造事件及其对华北北缘构造演化的启示[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 127-141. |
| [8] | 任纪舜, 刘建辉, 朱俊宾. 中国东部中生代上叠造山系[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 142-153. |
| [9] | 刘德民, 王杰, 姜淮, 赵悦, 郭铁鹰, 杨巍然. 青藏高原形成演化动力机制及其远程效应[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 154-169. |
| [10] | 段金宝, 潘磊, 石司宇, 姜振学, 李平平, 邹玉涛, 张文睿. 川东涪陵地区15号走滑断裂带几何学、运动学特征及演化过程研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(6): 57-68. |
| [11] | 程永志, 高锐, 卢占武, 李文辉, 王光文, 陈司, 吴国炜, 蔡玉国. 青藏高原东北缘祁连造山带东段深部结构及其动力学过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(5): 314-333. |
| [12] | 仝霄飞, 徐啸, 郭晓玉, 李春森, 向波, 余嘉豪, 罗旭聪, 袁梓昭, 林燕琪, 时宏城. 接收函数成像揭示东昆仑断裂带及其周缘地壳结构[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 270-282. |
| [13] | 吴晨, 陈宣华, 丁林. 祁连造山带构造演化与新生代变形历史[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3): 262-281. |
| [14] | 吕钊, 许展, 庞建章, 王继春, 王建平, 袁硕浦. 内蒙古白乃庙铜金矿区侵入岩锆石和磷灰石裂变径迹年代学及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3): 386-398. |
| [15] | 郭知鑫, 杨永太, 任祎, 王正庆, 冯志刚, 陈亮, 唐振平. 二连盆地吉尔嘎朗图凹陷南部基底花岗岩形成演化及其大地构造背景研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 259-271. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||