

地学前缘 ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 247-264.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2025.1.30
杜保峰1,2(
), 李山坡2,3,*(
), 吴鸣谦1, 张荣臻2, 陈俊魁2, 王莉2, 李珊珊1, 邱昆峰1
收稿日期:2024-11-05
修回日期:2025-05-26
出版日期:2026-03-25
发布日期:2026-01-29
通信作者:
李山坡(1982—),男,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事成矿规律研究。E-maill: 作者简介:杜保峰(1985—),男,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事矿床学和成矿预测研究。E-mail: dubaofeng517@163.com
基金资助:
DU Baofeng1,2(
), LI Shanpo2,3,*(
), WU Mingqian1, ZHANG Rongzhen2, CHEN Junkui2, WANG Li2, LI Shanshan1, QIU Kunfeng1
Received:2024-11-05
Revised:2025-05-26
Online:2026-03-25
Published:2026-01-29
摘要:
栾川县水磨沟稀土矿床位于华北克拉通南缘,为一新发现以轻稀土为主的高品位稀土矿。稀土矿体呈不规则脉状展布于古元古代末期龙王
碱性花岗岩体中的北西-北西西向构造带内,赋矿围岩为富含稀土的中粗粒钠铁闪石正长花岗岩。本文对其开展了显微矿物学、稀土元素地球化学和氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb年代学研究,并探讨其成矿作用过程。矿物学研究显示,稀土矿石矿物主要为氟碳铈矿、氟碳钙铈矿、褐帘石和铈硅磷灰石,发育明显的交代结构,指示后期热液活动对稀土元素的富集成矿起着重要的作用。稀土元素地球化学特征显示矿石强烈富集轻稀土,轻重稀土分馏较强,稀土配分曲线呈具中等Eu负异常的右倾斜模式,与围岩龙王
碱性花岗岩稀土元素地球化学特征总体较为相似,指示其与龙王
碱性花岗岩体的亲缘性。氟碳铈矿激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法(laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer,LA-ICP-MS )U-Th-Pb测年获得主体Th-Pb加权平均年龄为(381.4±6.5)Ma,表明其主要形成时代属晚泥盆世早期。稀土成矿作用过程如下:古元古代末期,区域龙王
碱型花岗质岩浆在高度结晶分异过程中稀土元素进行了初步富集;泥盆纪时,受构造挤压作用碱性花岗岩体中稀土元素发生活化,并沿构造破碎带迁移富集沉淀成矿,为水磨沟稀土矿的主成矿期;中生代时,碱性花岗岩体及稀土矿体局部发生构造热事件,部分稀土元素再次活化迁移,沿原来矿体位置局部发生了改造富集。
中图分类号:
杜保峰, 李山坡, 吴鸣谦, 张荣臻, 陈俊魁, 王莉, 李珊珊, 邱昆峰. 华北克拉通南缘水磨沟稀土矿床成矿时代及成矿过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(2): 247-264.
DU Baofeng, LI Shanpo, WU Mingqian, ZHANG Rongzhen, CHEN Junkui, WANG Li, LI Shanshan, QIU Kunfeng. Metallogenic age and process of the Shuimogo REE deposit in the south margin of the North China Craton[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(2): 247-264.
图1 秦岭造山带构造构架图及龙王 岩体区域地质简图(a据文献[17]修改;b据文献[24]修改) a—秦岭造山带构造构架图;b—龙王 岩体区域地质简图。
Fig.1 Tectonic framework of the Qinling Orogenand regional geological map of the Longwangzhuang pluton. a modified after [17]; b modified after [24].
图3 水磨沟矿区岩矿石野外特征照片 a—钠铁闪石正长花岗岩;b—钠铁闪石正长花岗岩内的伟晶岩晶洞;c—K2含稀土构造带特征;d—K4稀土矿体特征;e—含矿构造带内发育的蚀变岩;f—块状矿石。Aln—褐帘石;Bsn—氟碳铈矿;Fl—萤石。
Fig.3 Field typical photography in the Shuimogou REE deposit
图5 水磨沟矿区矿物特征显微照片和背散射图像 a—氟碳铈矿和褐帘石交代钾长石;b—萤石、氟碳铈矿和褐帘石交代角闪石;c—萤石、褐帘石和氟碳铈矿共生;d—萤石交代早期氟碳铈矿的残余结构;e—自形柱状的氟碳铈矿;f—氟碳铈矿和黑云母交代角闪石的残余结构,可见自形褐帘石;g—氟碳铈矿、氟碳钙铈矿、萤石、褐帘石共生组合;h—自形-半自形氟碳铈矿;i—氟碳铈矿内包含共生的氟碳钙铈矿;j—氟碳铈矿和铈硅磷灰石沿角闪石裂隙充填交代,并沿褐帘石边缘交代;k—晚期自形柱状氟碳铈矿穿切早期氟碳铈矿和褐帘石;l—氟碳钙铈矿呈它形状沿氟碳铈矿晶间空隙充填。Amp—角闪石;Bsn—氟碳铈矿;Bt—黑云母;Bri—铈硅磷灰石;Kf—钾长石;Fl—萤石;Par—氟碳钙铈矿;Aln—褐帘石。
Fig.5 Photomicrographs and backscattered-electron images of main minerals in the Shuimogou REE deposit
图6 水磨沟矿区稀土矿石(a)及龙王 岩体岩石(b)球粒陨石标准化稀土配分图(标准化值据文献[34];龙王 岩体数据来源于文献[11,25,26,29,35])
Fig.6 Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns of Shuimogou REE deposit (a) and Longwangzhuang pluton (b). The chondrite data for normalization after [34];Dates of Longwangzhuang plutons from [11,25,26,29,35].
图7 水磨沟稀土矿区氟碳铈矿背散射图像、测点位置和208Pb/232Th年龄
Fig.7 Backscattered-electron images of bastnäsite that show location of analyzed spots and corresponding 208Pb/232Th ages in the Shuimogou REE deposit
| 点号 | wB/10-6 | 同位素比值 | 年龄/Ma | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Th | U | 207Pb/206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/235U | 1σ | 206Pb/238U | 1σ | 208Pb/232Th | 1σ | 208Pb/232Th | 1σ | |||
| LW-1-1 | 156.50 | 8 640 | 0.74 | 0.649 8 | 0.052 4 | 17.288 0 | 1.833 3 | 0.2231 | 0.021 7 | 0.018 0 | 0.000 2 | 360 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-2 | 89.55 | 4 758 | 0.42 | 0.664 1 | 0.035 5 | 33.707 8 | 2.289 2 | 0.3565 | 0.018 1 | 0.019 1 | 0.000 2 | 382 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-3 | 106.84 | 5 639 | 0.08 | 0.812 5 | 0.057 5 | 124.972 8 | 11.980 0 | 1.3162 | 0.129 6 | 0.019 2 | 0.000 2 | 384 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-4 | 166.22 | 8 731 | 0.70 | 0.476 3 | 0.033 4 | 7.642 2 | 0.448 0 | 0.1468 | 0.005 6 | 0.019 4 | 0.000 2 | 388 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-5 | 32.20 | 1 697 | 0.97 | 0.202 1 | 0.022 7 | 1.369 9 | 0.100 8 | 0.0725 | 0.002 9 | 0.019 3 | 0.000 2 | 387 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-6 | 17.62 | 2 545 | 0.34 | 0.500 9 | 0.048 5 | 10.051 7 | 1.042 7 | 0.1168 | 0.012 4 | 0.007 2 | 0.000 1 | 144 | 2 | ||
| LW-1-7 | 97.04 | 5 238 | 0.06 | 0.812 7 | 0.087 1 | 78.056 7 | 7.876 6 | 0.7695 | 0.094 5 | 0.019 1 | 0.000 3 | 382 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-8 | 15.13 | 2 146 | 0.54 | 0.153 6 | 0.023 3 | 1.196 7 | 0.146 2 | 0.0329 | 0.002 6 | 0.007 3 | 0.000 1 | 146 | 2 | ||
| LW-1-9 | 3.62 | 254 | 0.05 | 0.873 9 | 0.030 1 | 120.186 7 | 8.642 3 | 1.0190 | 0.070 3 | 0.011 2 | 0.000 3 | 224 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-10 | 175.36 | 9 174 | 0.71 | 0.594 8 | 0.044 3 | 9.2475 | 0.466 4 | 0.1549 | 0.006 5 | 0.019 7 | 0.000 2 | 394 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-11 | 83.11 | 4 635 | 1.07 | 0.570 7 | 0.026 2 | 12.021 6 | 0.437 5 | 0.1740 | 0.005 2 | 0.018 3 | 0.000 2 | 366 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-12 | 74.22 | 3 745 | 1.70 | 0.158 5 | 0.015 8 | 1.528 6 | 0.131 6 | 0.0775 | 0.003 1 | 0.020 1 | 0.000 3 | 403 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-13 | 71.49 | 3 801 | 1.43 | 0.167 7 | 0.013 5 | 1.487 1 | 0.103 4 | 0.0784 | 0.002 8 | 0.019 3 | 0.000 2 | 387 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-14 | 121.73 | 6 865 | 0.75 | 0.715 2 | 0.045 6 | 26.147 7 | 1.454 0 | 0.305 3 | 0.015 0 | 0.018 1 | 0.000 2 | 362 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-15 | 92.38 | 4 860 | 0.41 | 0.608 8 | 0.048 5 | 9.676 2 | 0.574 9 | 0.150 6 | 0.007 1 | 0.019 5 | 0.000 2 | 391 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-16 | 82.21 | 4 259 | 0.14 | 0.810 0 | 0.073 8 | 68.923 1 | 5.627 2 | 0.788 2 | 0.074 9 | 0.019 6 | 0.000 2 | 392 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-17 | 15.51 | 2 197 | 0.12 | 0.363 2 | 0.056 6 | 19.834 1 | 3.120 7 | 0.230 3 | 0.033 5 | 0.007 2 | 0.000 1 | 146 | 3 | ||
| LW-1-18 | 50.87 | 4 371 | 0.90 | 0.565 7 | 0.059 5 | 4.888 2 | 0.406 1 | 0.076 2 | 0.004 3 | 0.011 6 | 0.000 1 | 233 | 3 | ||
| LW-1-19 | 131.98 | 7 106 | 0.26 | 0.767 2 | 0.078 3 | 41.296 4 | 2.941 6 | 0.490 7 | 0.032 6 | 0.019 0 | 0.000 2 | 381 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-20 | 124.04 | 6 767 | 0.78 | 0.418 9 | 0.030 9 | 5.529 9 | 0.275 1 | 0.126 0 | 0.005 1 | 0.018 8 | 0.000 2 | 376 | 4 | ||
表3 水磨沟稀土矿区氟碳铈矿LA- ICP-MS U-Th-Pb同位素分析结果
Table 3 LA- ICP-MS Bastnäsite U-Th-Pb isotopic data from the Shuimogou REE deposit
| 点号 | wB/10-6 | 同位素比值 | 年龄/Ma | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Th | U | 207Pb/206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/235U | 1σ | 206Pb/238U | 1σ | 208Pb/232Th | 1σ | 208Pb/232Th | 1σ | |||
| LW-1-1 | 156.50 | 8 640 | 0.74 | 0.649 8 | 0.052 4 | 17.288 0 | 1.833 3 | 0.2231 | 0.021 7 | 0.018 0 | 0.000 2 | 360 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-2 | 89.55 | 4 758 | 0.42 | 0.664 1 | 0.035 5 | 33.707 8 | 2.289 2 | 0.3565 | 0.018 1 | 0.019 1 | 0.000 2 | 382 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-3 | 106.84 | 5 639 | 0.08 | 0.812 5 | 0.057 5 | 124.972 8 | 11.980 0 | 1.3162 | 0.129 6 | 0.019 2 | 0.000 2 | 384 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-4 | 166.22 | 8 731 | 0.70 | 0.476 3 | 0.033 4 | 7.642 2 | 0.448 0 | 0.1468 | 0.005 6 | 0.019 4 | 0.000 2 | 388 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-5 | 32.20 | 1 697 | 0.97 | 0.202 1 | 0.022 7 | 1.369 9 | 0.100 8 | 0.0725 | 0.002 9 | 0.019 3 | 0.000 2 | 387 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-6 | 17.62 | 2 545 | 0.34 | 0.500 9 | 0.048 5 | 10.051 7 | 1.042 7 | 0.1168 | 0.012 4 | 0.007 2 | 0.000 1 | 144 | 2 | ||
| LW-1-7 | 97.04 | 5 238 | 0.06 | 0.812 7 | 0.087 1 | 78.056 7 | 7.876 6 | 0.7695 | 0.094 5 | 0.019 1 | 0.000 3 | 382 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-8 | 15.13 | 2 146 | 0.54 | 0.153 6 | 0.023 3 | 1.196 7 | 0.146 2 | 0.0329 | 0.002 6 | 0.007 3 | 0.000 1 | 146 | 2 | ||
| LW-1-9 | 3.62 | 254 | 0.05 | 0.873 9 | 0.030 1 | 120.186 7 | 8.642 3 | 1.0190 | 0.070 3 | 0.011 2 | 0.000 3 | 224 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-10 | 175.36 | 9 174 | 0.71 | 0.594 8 | 0.044 3 | 9.2475 | 0.466 4 | 0.1549 | 0.006 5 | 0.019 7 | 0.000 2 | 394 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-11 | 83.11 | 4 635 | 1.07 | 0.570 7 | 0.026 2 | 12.021 6 | 0.437 5 | 0.1740 | 0.005 2 | 0.018 3 | 0.000 2 | 366 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-12 | 74.22 | 3 745 | 1.70 | 0.158 5 | 0.015 8 | 1.528 6 | 0.131 6 | 0.0775 | 0.003 1 | 0.020 1 | 0.000 3 | 403 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-13 | 71.49 | 3 801 | 1.43 | 0.167 7 | 0.013 5 | 1.487 1 | 0.103 4 | 0.0784 | 0.002 8 | 0.019 3 | 0.000 2 | 387 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-14 | 121.73 | 6 865 | 0.75 | 0.715 2 | 0.045 6 | 26.147 7 | 1.454 0 | 0.305 3 | 0.015 0 | 0.018 1 | 0.000 2 | 362 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-15 | 92.38 | 4 860 | 0.41 | 0.608 8 | 0.048 5 | 9.676 2 | 0.574 9 | 0.150 6 | 0.007 1 | 0.019 5 | 0.000 2 | 391 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-16 | 82.21 | 4 259 | 0.14 | 0.810 0 | 0.073 8 | 68.923 1 | 5.627 2 | 0.788 2 | 0.074 9 | 0.019 6 | 0.000 2 | 392 | 5 | ||
| LW-1-17 | 15.51 | 2 197 | 0.12 | 0.363 2 | 0.056 6 | 19.834 1 | 3.120 7 | 0.230 3 | 0.033 5 | 0.007 2 | 0.000 1 | 146 | 3 | ||
| LW-1-18 | 50.87 | 4 371 | 0.90 | 0.565 7 | 0.059 5 | 4.888 2 | 0.406 1 | 0.076 2 | 0.004 3 | 0.011 6 | 0.000 1 | 233 | 3 | ||
| LW-1-19 | 131.98 | 7 106 | 0.26 | 0.767 2 | 0.078 3 | 41.296 4 | 2.941 6 | 0.490 7 | 0.032 6 | 0.019 0 | 0.000 2 | 381 | 4 | ||
| LW-1-20 | 124.04 | 6 767 | 0.78 | 0.418 9 | 0.030 9 | 5.529 9 | 0.275 1 | 0.126 0 | 0.005 1 | 0.018 8 | 0.000 2 | 376 | 4 | ||
图8 水磨沟稀土矿区氟碳铈矿Tera-Wasserburg U-Pb年龄图解(a)和Th-Pb加权年龄图(b) Mean—加权平均值;MSWD—平均标准加权偏差。
Fig.8 Diagrams of Tera-Wasserburg U-Pb ages (a) and Th-Pb weighted average age (b) of the bastnäsite from the Shuimogou REE deposit
| 矿床名称 | 大地构造位置 | 矿床类型 | 年龄/Ma | 测试方法 | 文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 黄龙铺Mo-REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 221.5±0.3 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ |
| 222.0±7.0 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 225.0±7.6 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 213.6±4.0 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 华阳川U-Nb-REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 222.5±6.7 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 221.9±5.1 | 晶质铀矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 137.1±2.0 | 晶质铀矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 208.5±3.2 | 榍石U-Pb | [ | |||
| 196.8±2.4 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 驾鹿REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 234.7±6.5 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 217±5.0 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 黄水庵Mo-REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 213.5±2.9 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 209.5±4.2 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 208.4±3.6 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 206.5±3.8 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 211.7±3.1 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 太平镇REE矿床 | 北秦岭造山带 | 热液型 | 420.7±7.3 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 425.6±4.8 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 409±16 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 399.4±3.5 | 热液锆石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 庙垭Nb-REE矿床 | 南秦岭造山带 | 碳酸岩+碱性岩型 | 233.6±1.7 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 205.8±3.6 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 231.0±2.3 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 414±11 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 238.3±4.1 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 232.8±3.7 | 铌铁矿U-Pb | [ | |||
| 235.1±1.5 | 热液独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 杀熊洞Nb-REE矿床 | 南秦岭造山带 | 碳酸岩+碱性岩型 | 229±2 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 433.1±6.4 | 磷灰石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 水磨沟REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 热液型 | 381.4±6.5 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | 本文 |
表4 秦岭造山带稀土矿床成矿年龄表
Table 4 Geochronological data for the REE deposits in the Qinling orogenic belt
| 矿床名称 | 大地构造位置 | 矿床类型 | 年龄/Ma | 测试方法 | 文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 黄龙铺Mo-REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 221.5±0.3 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ |
| 222.0±7.0 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 225.0±7.6 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 213.6±4.0 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 华阳川U-Nb-REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 222.5±6.7 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 221.9±5.1 | 晶质铀矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 137.1±2.0 | 晶质铀矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 208.5±3.2 | 榍石U-Pb | [ | |||
| 196.8±2.4 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 驾鹿REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 234.7±6.5 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 217±5.0 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 黄水庵Mo-REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 碳酸岩型 | 213.5±2.9 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 209.5±4.2 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 208.4±3.6 | 辉钼矿Re-Os | [ | |||
| 206.5±3.8 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 211.7±3.1 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 太平镇REE矿床 | 北秦岭造山带 | 热液型 | 420.7±7.3 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 425.6±4.8 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 409±16 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 399.4±3.5 | 热液锆石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 庙垭Nb-REE矿床 | 南秦岭造山带 | 碳酸岩+碱性岩型 | 233.6±1.7 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 205.8±3.6 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 231.0±2.3 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 414±11 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 238.3±4.1 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 232.8±3.7 | 铌铁矿U-Pb | [ | |||
| 235.1±1.5 | 热液独居石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 杀熊洞Nb-REE矿床 | 南秦岭造山带 | 碳酸岩+碱性岩型 | 229±2 | 独居石U-Th-Pb | [ |
| 433.1±6.4 | 磷灰石U-Th-Pb | [ | |||
| 水磨沟REE矿床 | 华北克拉通南缘 | 热液型 | 381.4±6.5 | 氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb | 本文 |
图10 秦岭造山带稀土矿床成矿年龄分布图(数据来源于表4)
Fig.10 Summary of geochronological data for the REE deposits in the Qinling Orogenic Belt. The data and references are available in Table 4.
| [1] |
ZHANG W, CHEN W T, GAO J F, et al. Two episodes of REE mineralization in the Qinling Orogenic Belt, Central China: in situ U-Th-Pb dating of bastnäsite and monazite[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2019, 54(8): 1265-1280.
DOI |
| [2] |
YING Y C, CHEN W, CHAKHMOURADIAN A R, et al. Textural and compositional evolution of niobium minerals in the Miaoya carbonatite-hosted REE-Nb deposit from the South Qinling Orogen of Central China[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2023, 58(1): 197-220.
DOI |
| [3] | 高成, 康清清, 江宏君, 等. 秦岭造山带发现新型铀多金属矿: 华阳川与伟晶岩脉和碳酸岩脉有关的超大型铀-铌-铅-稀土矿床[J]. 地球化学, 2017, 46(5): 446-455 |
| [4] | 李靖辉, 陈化凯, 张宏伟, 等. 豫西太平镇轻稀土矿床矿化特征及矿床成因[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(2): 288-300. |
| [5] | 应元灿. 秦岭造山带碳酸岩的成矿机理研究: 以庙垭和驾鹿多金属矿床为例[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2022. |
| [6] | 胡寅秋, 邬斌, 任倩. 湖北庙垭杂岩体富硅碳酸岩成因及其对稀土成矿的指示意义[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2): 41-59. |
| [7] |
QU K, SIMA X Z, ZHOU H Y, et al. In situ LA-MC-ICP-MS and ID-TIMS U-Pb ages of bastnäsite-(Ce) and zircon from the Taipingzhen hydrothermal REE deposit: new constraints on the later Paleozoic granite-related U-REE mineralization in the North Qinling Orogen, Central China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 173: 352-363.
DOI URL |
| [8] | 王佳营, 李志丹, 张祺, 等. 东秦岭地区碳酸岩型钼-铀多金属矿床成矿时代:来自LA-ICP-MS独居石U-Pb和辉钼矿Re-Os年龄的证据[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(10): 2946-2964. |
| [9] | 王汉辉, 唐利, 杨勃畅, 等. 东秦岭黄水庵碳酸岩型Mo-REE 矿床方解石地球化学特征和氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb 年龄及其意义[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(1): 48-62. |
| [10] | 应元灿, 陈唯, 柳加俊, 等. 湖北庙垭碱性杂岩体中铌成矿作用:来自金红石矿物学和年代学的制约[J]. 高校地质学报, 2024, 30(3): 345-361. |
| [11] | 卢欣祥. 龙王幢A型花岗岩地质矿化特征[J]. 岩石学报, 1989, 5(1): 67-77. |
| [12] | 尤文卉, 李山坡, 吕宪河, 等. 豫西破山洞矿区碱性岩地球化学及稀土元素矿化特征[J]. 矿产勘查, 2022, 13(8): 1067-1079. |
| [13] |
SAL’NIKOVA E B, YAKOVLEVA S Z, NIKIFOROV A V, et al. Bastnaesite: a promising U-Pb geochronological tool[J]. Doklady Earth Sciences, 2010, 430(1): 134-136.
DOI URL |
| [14] | 涂家润, 肖志斌, 曲凯, 等. 氟碳铈矿U-Pb 定年技术研究[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(6): 945-951. |
| [15] |
YANG Y H, WU F Y, LI Y, et al. In situ U-Pb dating of bastnaesite by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2014, 29(6): 1017-1023.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 罗涛, 赵赫, 张文, 等. 激光剥蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱非基体匹配氟碳铈矿U-Th-Pb定年[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(6): 874-883. |
| [17] |
TANG L, WAGNER T, FUSSWINKEL T, et al. Magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of an unusual Mo-rich carbonatite: a case study using LA-ICP-MS fluid inclusion microanalysis and He-Ar isotopes from the Huangshui’an deposit, Qinling, China[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2021, 56(6): 1133-1150.
DOI |
| [18] | 张国伟, 孟庆任, 赖绍聪. 秦岭造山带的结构构造[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 1995, 25(9): 994-1003. |
| [19] | 张国伟, 张本仁, 袁学诚, 等. 秦岭造山带与大陆动力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. |
| [20] |
CHEN Y J, SANTOSH M. Triassic tectonics and mineral systems in the Qinling Orogen, Central China[J]. Geological Journal, 2014, 49(4/5): 338-358.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
DONG Y P, ZHANG G W, NEUBAUER F, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Qinling orogen, China: review and synthesis[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 41(3): 213-237.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
DONG Y P, SANTOSH M. Tectonic architecture and multiple orogeny of the Qinling Orogenic Belt, central China[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 29(1): 1-40.
DOI URL |
| [23] | 张国伟, 郭安林, 董云鹏, 等. 关于秦岭造山带[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019, 25(5): 746-768. |
| [24] | 赖素星, 李钢. 豫西龙王幢岩体地球化学特征及其演化探讨:来自锆石U-Pb定年以及岩石地球化学的约束[J]. 矿产勘查, 2019, 10(1): 8-16. |
| [25] | 陆松年, 李怀坤, 李惠民, 等. 华北克拉通南缘龙王幢碱性花岗岩U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2003, 22(12): 762-768. |
| [26] | 包志伟, 王强, 资锋, 等. 龙王幢A型花岗岩地球化学特征及其地球动力学意义[J]. 地球化学, 2009, 38(6): 509-522. |
| [27] |
WANG X L, JIANG S Y, DAI B Z, et al. Lithospheric thinning and reworking of Late Archean juvenile crust on the southern margin of the North China Craton: evidence from the Longwangzhuang Paleoproterozoic A-type granites and their surrounding Cretaceous adakite-like granites[J]. Geological Journal, 2013, 48(5): 498-515.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
WANG Y, YANG Y Z, SIEBEL W, et al. Geochemistry and tectonic significance of late Paleoproterozoic A-type granites along the southern margin of the North China Craton[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 86.
DOI PMID |
| [29] | 柳晓艳. 华北克拉通南缘古中元古代碱性岩岩石地球化学与年代学研究及其地质意义[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2011. |
| [30] | 向君峰, 毛景文, 裴荣富, 等. 南泥湖—三道庄钼(钨)矿的成岩成矿年龄新数据及其地质意义[J]. 中国地质, 2012, 39(2): 458-473. |
| [31] | 河南省有色金属地质矿产局第七地质大队. 河南省栾川县龙王幢稀土矿预查报告[R]. 郑州: 河南省有色金属地质矿产局第七地质大队, 2022. |
| [32] |
LIU Y S, HU Z C, ZONG K Q, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15): 1535-1546.
DOI URL |
| [33] | LUDWIG K R. Isoplot v. 4.15: a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[M]. Berkely: Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication, 2011. |
| [34] | SUN S S and MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:implications for mantle composition and processes[A]//SAUNDERS A D,NORRY M J. Magmatism in the ocean basins. Geological Society, London: Special Publication, 1989, 42: 313-345 |
| [35] | 段友强. 华北陆块南缘碱性岩地球化学硏究及其大地构造意义[D]. 合肥: 中国科技大学, 2016. |
| [36] |
SU H M, JIANG S Y, ZHU X Y, et al. Magmatic-hydrothermal processes and controls on rare-metal enrichment of the Baerzhe peralkaline granitic pluton, Inner Mongolia, northeastern China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 131: 103984.
DOI URL |
| [37] | 季浩, 李艳军, 李一鸣, 等. 碱性花岗岩型稀有稀土矿床类型及成矿作用研究进展[J/OL]. 地质科技通报, 2023, https://doi.org/10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220397. |
| [38] |
YANG W B, NIU H C, LI N B, et al. Enrichment of REE and HFSE during the magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of the Baerzhe alkaline granite, NE China: implications for rare metal mineralization[J]. Lithos, 2020, 358/359: 105411.
DOI URL |
| [39] | 杨武斌, 牛贺才, 单强, 等. 巴尔哲超大型稀有稀土矿床成矿机制研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(11): 2924-2932. |
| [40] |
LI X C, ZHOU M F. Multiple stages of hydrothermal REE remobilization recorded in fluorapatite in the Paleoproterozoic Yinachang Fe-Cu-(REE) deposit, Southwest China[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2015, 166: 53-73.
DOI URL |
| [41] |
QIU K F, YU H C, WU M Q, et al. Discrete Zr and REE mineralization of the Baerzhe rare-metal deposit, China[J]. American Mineralogist, 2019, 104(10): 1487-1502.
DOI URL |
| [42] | 范宏瑞, 牛贺才, 李晓春, 等. 中国内生稀土矿床类型、成矿规律与资源展望[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(33): 3778-3793. |
| [43] |
邓淼, 韦春婉, 许成, 等. 白云鄂博超大型稀土矿床成因评述[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 14-28.
DOI |
| [44] | 张婉珠, 凌明星, 魏颖. 稀土、铌在碳酸岩-碱性.岩体系中的地球化学行为[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2023, 47(6): 1442-1462. |
| [45] | 陈唯, 应元灿, 柳加俊, 等. 与碳酸岩-碱性岩有关的铌-稀土矿床成矿作用及成因机制[J/OL]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2024, DOI: 10.3724/j.issn.1007-2802.20240003. |
| [46] | 吴鸣谦, 马甲栋, 邓军, 等. 巴尔哲锆-铌-铍-稀土矿床成矿精细过程研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2024, 40(6): 1817-1836. |
| [47] |
WU M Q, QIU K F, DIAO X, et al. The giant Baerzhe rare-earth-element-Nb-Zr-Be deposit, Inner Mongolia, China, an Early Cretaceous analogue of the Strange Lake rare-metal deposit, Quebec[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2025, 551(1): 341-353.
DOI URL |
| [48] |
BELAND C M J, WILLIAMS-JONES A E. The mineralogical distribution of the REE in carbonatites: a quantitative evaluation[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 585: 120558.
DOI URL |
| [49] |
WU M Q, SAMSON I M, QIU K F, et al. Concentration mechanisms of rare earth element-Nb-Zr-Be mineralization in the Baerzhe deposit, Northeast China: insights from textural and chemical features of amphibole and rare metal minerals[J]. Economic Geology, 2021, 116(3): 651-679.
DOI URL |
| [50] |
WU M Q, SAMSON I M, QIU K F, et al. Multi-stage metasomatic Zr mineralization in the world-class Baerzhe rare earth element Nb-Zr-Be deposit, China[J]. American Mineralogist, 2023, 108(2): 389-405.
DOI URL |
| [51] | WU M Q, QIU K F, YANG J W. Ferrous iron (Fe+2) released from iron-rich chlorite as a reductant for unconformity-related uranium mineralization: insights from reactive fluid flow modeling[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2024, 129(12): e2024JB030063. |
| [52] |
STEIN H J, MARKEY R J, MORGAN J W, et al. Highly precise and accurate Re-Os ages for molybdenite from the East Qinling molybdenum belt, Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Economic Geology, 1997, 92(7/8): 827-835.
DOI URL |
| [53] | 黄典豪, 侯增谦, 杨志明. 东秦岭钼矿带内碳酸岩脉型钼(铅)矿床地质-地球化学特征、成矿机制及成矿构造背景[J]. 地质学报, 2009, 83(12): 1968-1984. |
| [54] |
SONG W L, XU C, QI L, et al. Genesis of Si-rich carbonatites in Huanglongpu Mo deposit, Lesser Qinling orogen, China and significance for Mo mineralization[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 64: 756-765.
DOI URL |
| [55] | 黄卉, 潘家永, 洪斌跃, 等. 陕西华阳川铀-多金属矿床晶质铀矿电子探针U-Th-Pb化学定年及其地质意义[J]. 矿床地质, 2020, 39(2): 351-368. |
| [56] |
ZHENG H, CHEN H Y, LI D F, et al. Timing of carbonatite-hosted U-polymetallic mineralization in the supergiant Huayangchuan deposit, Qinling Orogen: constraints from titanite U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os dating[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2020, 11(5): 1581-1592.
DOI URL |
| [57] | 曹晶, 叶会寿, 李洪英, 等. 河南嵩县黄水庵碳酸岩脉型钼(铅)矿床地质特征及辉钼矿Re-Os同位素年龄[J]. 矿床地质, 2014, 33(1): 53-69. |
| [58] |
FENG J Y, TANG L, YANG B C, et al. Bastnäsite U-Th-Pb age, sulfur isotope and trace elements of the Huangshui’an deposit: implications for carbonatite-hosted Mo-Pb-REE mineralization in the Qinling Orogenic Belt, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 143: 104790.
DOI URL |
| [59] |
XU C, CHAKHMOURADIAN A R, TAYLOR R N, et al. Origin of carbonatites in the South Qinling orogen: implications for crustal recycling and timing of collision between the South and North China Blocks[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2014, 143: 189-206.
DOI URL |
| [60] |
YING Y C, CHEN W, LU J, et al. In situ U-Th-Pb ages of the Miaoya carbonatite complex in the South Qinling orogenic belt, Central China[J]. Lithos, 2017, 290/291: 159-171.
DOI URL |
| [61] | LU J, XU C, YING Y, et al. In-situ chemical, isotopic and geochronological investigation of the Shaxiongdong carbonatite complex[A]. Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts, China, 2014: 1897. |
| [62] | 秦克章, 周起凤, 唐冬梅, 等. 东秦岭稀有金属伟晶岩的类型、内部结构、矿化及远景:兼与阿尔泰地区对比[J]. 矿床地质, 2019, 38(5): 970-982. |
| [63] | 周起凤, 秦克章, 唐冬梅, 等. 东秦岭古生代伟晶岩稀有金属成矿特色与成矿条件分析[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(10): 3115-3125. |
| [64] | 曾威, 孙丰月, 周红英, 等. 北秦岭官坡地区稀有金属伟晶岩锡石年代学、岩石地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(8): 2851-2871. |
| [65] | 刘新星, 张娟, 李肖龙, 等. 北秦岭卢氏龙潭沟-火炎沟锡矿床成矿作用探讨:来自花岗伟晶岩年代学、岩石地球化学的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2023, 39(5): 1484-1500. |
| [66] |
SONG W L, XU C, SMITH M P, et al. Genesis of the world’s largest rare earth element deposit, Bayan Obo, China: protracted mineralization evolution over 1 b. y[J]. Geology, 2018, 46(4): 323-326.
DOI URL |
| [67] |
CHEN W, LIU H Y, LU J, et al. The formation of the ore-bearing dolomite marble from the giant Bayan Obo REE-Nb-Fe deposit, Inner Mongolia: insights from micron-scale geochemical data[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2020, 55(1): 131-146.
DOI |
| [68] |
LI X C, YANG K F, SPANDLER C, et al. The effect of fluid-aided modification on the Sm-Nd and Th-Pb geochronology of monazite and bastnäsite: implication for resolving complex isotopic age data in REE ore systems[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2021, 300: 1-24.
DOI URL |
| [69] |
申俊峰, 闫国英, 张萌萌, 等. 白云鄂博矿床稀土富集过程: 来自成因矿物学的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 370-383.
DOI |
| [70] | 李厚民, 李立兴, 李以科, 等. 内蒙古白云鄂博铁-铌-稀土矿床矿化蚀变矿物组合及流体组成[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(1): 13-24. |
| [71] |
冯婷婷, 蔡诗柔, 张振杰. 基于知识图谱的碳酸岩型稀土矿成矿要素挖掘[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 262-279.
DOI |
| [72] | 赵国春, 孙敏, WILDE S A. 华北克拉通基底构造单元特征及早元古代拼合[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2002(7): 538-549. |
| [73] |
ZHAI M. Palaeoproterozoic tectonic history of the North China Craton: a review[J]. Precambrian Research, 2003, 122(1/2/3/4): 183-199.
DOI URL |
| [74] | 赵太平, 崔明国, 夏斌, 等. 熊耳群火山岩铅石SHRIMP年代学研究: 对华北克拉通盖层发育初始时间的制约[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(22): 2342-2349. |
| [75] | 赵太平, 庞岚尹, 仇一凡, 等. 古/中元古代界线: 1.8 Ga[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(8): 2281-2298. |
| [76] |
LI S S, PALIN R M, SANTOSH M. Contrasting mechanisms and timescales of subduction and exhumation as recorded by Paleoproterozoic and Late Paleozoic high-pressure granulites in the North China Craton[J]. GSA Bulletin, 2023, 135(1/2): 29-47.
DOI URL |
| [77] | 张成立, 刘良, 王涛, 等. 北秦岭早古生代大陆碰撞过程中的花岗岩浆作用[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(23): 2323-2329. |
| [78] | 王涛, 王晓霞, 田伟, 等. 北秦岭古生代花岗岩组合、岩浆时空演变及其对造山作用的启示[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2009, 39(7): 949-971 |
| [79] |
WANG X X, WANG T, ZHANG C L. Neoproterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic granitoid magmatism in the Qinling Orogen, China: constraints on orogenic process[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 72: 129-151.
DOI URL |
| [80] | 王晓霞, 王涛, 张成立. 秦岭造山带花岗质岩浆作用与造山带演化[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2015, 45(8): 1109-1125. |
| [81] | 王静雅, 任升莲, 董树文, 等. 华北板块南缘石人山岩块晚古生代陆内变形特征及侧向挤出构造[J]. 地质论评, 2019, 65(4): 810-824. |
| [82] | 宋传中, 张国伟, 牛漫兰, 等. 秦岭造山带北缘的斜向碰撞与汇聚因子[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(1): 48-55. |
| [83] | 任升莲, 李加好, 李龙明, 等. 洛南—栾川断裂带(栾川段)变形特征及形成环境研究[J]. 地质科学, 2016, 51(4): 1074-1089. |
| [84] | 韩旭, 任升莲, 李龙明, 等. 东秦岭卢氏地区奥陶系陶湾群的变质变形特征及形成环境分析[J]. 地质论评, 2018, 64(2): 378-391 |
| [85] |
WANG J Y, REN S L, LI J H, et al. Deformation of the Shirenshan block in the north Qinling[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 2017, 91(1): 351-352.
DOI URL |
| [86] | 任纪舜, 牛宝贵, 和政军, 等. 中国东部的构造格局和动力演化[A]//任纪舜, 杨巍然. 中国东部岩石圈结构与构造岩浆演化. 北京: 原子能出版社, 1998: 1-12. |
| [87] | 薛宪法, 邱昆峰, 何登洋, 等. 西秦岭甘南早子沟石英闪长玢岩岩石成因及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2023, 39(2): 463-483 |
| [88] | QIU K F, DENG J, HE D Y, et al. Evidence of vertical slab tearing in the Late Triassic Qinling Orogen (central China) from multiproxy geochemical and isotopic imaging[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2023, 128(4): e2022JB025514. |
| [89] |
QIU K F, DENG J, YU H C, et al. The Zaozigou orogenic gold-antimony deposit, West Qinling Orogen, China: Structural controls on multiple mineralization events[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2024, 136(9/10): 4218-4232.
DOI URL |
| [90] | 张德富, 王先广, 何涛, 等. 赣南加里东期重稀土矿赋矿母岩岩石成因及地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(4): 959-976. |
| [91] |
韦春伊, 余圣品, 白细民, 等. 离子吸附型稀土矿区水体硝酸盐分布、来源及其转化过程:以江西足洞稀土矿为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(1): 121-134.
DOI |
| [92] | 卢仁, 梁涛, 白凤军, 等. 豫西磨沟正长岩LA-ICP-MS 锆石U-Pb 年代学及Hf 同位素[J]. 地质论评, 2013, 59(2): 355-368. |
| [93] | 曹晶, 叶会寿, 李正远, 等. 东秦岭磨沟碱性岩体年代学/地球化学及岩石成因[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2015, 34(5): 665-684. |
| [94] | 毛景文, 谢桂青, 张作衡, 等. 中国北方中生代大规模成矿作用的期次及其地球动力学背景[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21(1): 169-188. |
| [95] | 杜保峰, 魏俊浩, 王启, 等. 中国东部钼矿成矿背景与成岩-成矿时差讨论[J]. 矿床地质, 2010, 29(6): 935-955. |
| [96] |
DENG J, WANG C M, BAGAS L, et al. Crustal architecture and metallogenesis in the south-eastern North China Craton[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 182: 251-272.
DOI URL |
| [97] |
DENG J, YANG L Q, GROVES D I, et al. An integrated mineral system model for the gold deposits of the giant Jiaodong province, eastern China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 208: 103274.
DOI URL |
| [98] | 何登洋, 邱昆峰, 于皓丞, 等. 华北克拉通胶莱盆地马山地区早白垩世粗面英安岩岩石成因及其构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(12): 3705-3720. |
| [99] | 邓军, 王庆飞, 张良, 等. 胶东型金矿成因模型[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2023, 53(10): 2323-2347. |
| [100] | QIU K F, ROMER R L, LONG Z Y, et al. The role of an oxidized lithospheric mantle in gold mobilization[J]. Science Advances, 2024, 10(41): eado6262. |
| [101] | HE D Y, QIU K F, et al. Mantle oxidation by sulfur drives the formation of giant gold deposits in subduction zones[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024, 121(52): e2404731121. |
| [102] | 兰君, 刘晓, 张鹏, 等. 山东微山稀土矿床成因研究: 稀土矿物学约束[J]. 现代地质, 2025, 39(3): 612-627. |
| [103] | 郭波, 朱赖民, 李犇, 等. 华北陆块南缘华山和合峪花岗岩岩体锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素组成与成岩动力学背景[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(2): 265-281. |
| [104] | 高昕宇, 赵太平, 原振雷, 等. 华北陆块南缘中生代合峪花岗岩的地球化学特征与成因[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(12): 3485-3506. |
| [105] | 毛景文, 叶会寿, 王瑞廷, 等. 东秦岭中生代钼铅锌银多金属矿床模型及其找矿评价[J]. 地质通报, 2009, 28(1): 72-79. |
| [106] | 杨阳, 王晓霞, 柯昌辉, 等. 豫西南泥湖矿集区石宝沟花岗岩体的锆石U-Pb年龄、岩石地球化学及Hf同位素组成[J]. 中国地质, 2012, 39(6): 1525-1542. |
| [107] | 张云辉, 张寿庭, 王世炎, 等. 东秦岭南泥湖钼(钨)矿床和秋树湾铜(钼)矿床成岩成矿特征对比研究[J]. 地质与勘探, 2014, 50(4): 700-711. |
| [1] | 侯增谦, 杨志明, 张洪瑞, 王瑞, 宋玉财, 刘琰, 郑远川, 许博, 王庆飞, 刘英超. 大陆碰撞成矿作用:新认识与新进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(6): 179-209. |
| [2] | 王新雨, 王书来, 刘明, 祝新友, 刘家军, 杨新雨, 王幻, 王玉往, 吴锦荣. 青海省祁漫塔格牛苦头铅锌矿床年代学与矿物微量元素特征研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(5): 326-344. |
| [3] | 邱林飞, 李子颖, 张字龙, 王龙辉, 李振成, 韩美芝, 王婷婷. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部下白垩统赋矿砂岩中有机质特征及其与铀成矿的关系[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 281-296. |
| [4] | 李建康, 李鹏, 黄志飚, 周芳春, 张立平, 黄小强. 湘北仁里伟晶岩型稀有金属矿田的地质特征及成矿机制概述[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(5): 1-25. |
| [5] | 董小宇, 孔若颜, 颜丹平, 邱亮, 邱骏挺. 辽东半岛青城子地区晚三叠世构造岩脉成因及其金成矿意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 215-238. |
| [6] | 张洪瑞, 侯增谦. 碰撞带热结构与碰撞成矿系统[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 1-13. |
| [7] | 刘宝山, 程招勋, 寇林林, 邓昌州, 杨晓平, 张春鹏, 李成禄, 韩仁萍. 黑龙江多宝山地区晚三叠世岩浆活动对蒙古—鄂霍茨克洋南向俯冲的响应[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 132-145. |
| [8] | 邓淼, 韦春婉, 许成, 石爱国, 李卓骐, 范朝熙, 匡光喜. 白云鄂博超大型稀土矿床成因评述[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 14-28. |
| [9] | 郑有业, 王达, 易建洲, 余泽章, 蒋宗洋, 李晓霞, 史功文, 许剑, 梁遇春, 豆孝芳, 任欢. 西藏北喜马拉雅成矿带锑金属成矿作用及找矿方向[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 200-230. |
| [10] | 郑有业, 次琼, 高顺宝, 吴松, 姜晓佳, 陈鑫. 西藏冈底斯西段银锡铜多金属成矿系列与找矿方向[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 379-402. |
| [11] | Svetlana S. Timofeeva, Evgeniy V. Kislov, Lyudmila I. Khudyakova. 俄罗斯贝加尔湖北部 Yoko-Dovyren 层状纯橄岩-橄长岩-辉长岩地块: 结构、成分以及作为矿物原材料的用途[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(5): 262-279. |
| [12] | 陈国超, 裴先治, 李瑞保, 李佐臣, 裴磊, 刘成军, 陈有炘, 王盟, 高峰, 魏均启. 东昆仑造山带东段晚古生代—早中生代构造岩浆演化与成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 33-48. |
| [13] | 刘家军, 翟德高, 王大钊, 高燊, 尹超, 柳振江, 王建平, 王银宏, 张方方. Au-(Ag)-Te-Se成矿系统与成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 79-98. |
| [14] | 刘家军,刘冲昊,王建平,朱赖民,张静,翟德高,王银宏,柳振江,张方方. 西秦岭地区金矿类型及其成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(5): 1-16. |
| [15] | 贺昕宇,王长明,袁继明,刘军,刘海鹏. 熊耳山—外方山矿集区中生代Au-Mo成矿系统[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(5): 33-52. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||