

地学前缘 ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 311-330.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2025.1.17
王斌1,2,3(
), 高永宝1,2,*(
), 任涛3, 寇少磊1,2, 杨可1,2, 王占彬1,2, 刘基1,2, 宋伊圩1,2, 马振宇1,2, 杜宛鸽1,2
收稿日期:2024-08-09
修回日期:2025-02-11
出版日期:2026-03-25
发布日期:2026-01-29
通信作者:
高永宝(1982—),男,博士,研究员,主要从事矿床学和矿床地球化学研究。E-mail: 作者简介:王 斌(1993—),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事金矿找矿预测研究。E-mail: geo_wangb@163.com
基金资助:
WANG Bin1,2,3(
), GAO Yongbao1,2,*(
), REN Tao3, KOU Shaolei1,2, YANG Ke1,2, WANG Zhanbin1,2, LIU Ji1,2, SONG Yiwei1,2, MA Zhenyu1,2, DU Wange1,2
Received:2024-08-09
Revised:2025-02-11
Online:2026-03-25
Published:2026-01-29
摘要:
金矿是我国重要的战略性矿产之一,随着在浅地表发现新矿床的难度日益增加,深部找矿已成为当前的勘查重点区。传统基于二维尺度的构造叠加晕测量在深部找矿实践中取得了较好成效,但在定量构建原生晕组合、精细刻画深部矿体分布和揭示矿化作用过程方面还存在局限性。随着计算机科学的快速发展,应用数理统计分析方法定量化表征前缘晕、近矿晕和尾晕的元素组合关系,从而建立三维原生晕找矿预测模型成为解决这一科学问题的重要途径。为此,本文选取位于龙门山构造带的辛家咀金矿开展三维原生晕深部找矿预测研究。首先,通过野外地质调查掌握了区域演化背景和矿区地质特征,并利用金品位等值线图发现矿体为北西倾,并向南西方向侧伏,推测流体为自南西向北东、由深至浅的侧向运移方向。根据矿区矿化蚀变特征,系统采集辛家咀金矿Ⅰ号矿体主成矿阶段17件构造叠加晕样品和围岩中626件三维原生晕样品。分别利用基于长度的浓度-长度(C-L)分形模型提取了寒武系和志留系中各元素的异常阈值,使用z-score方法消除元素背景差异。然后,使用层次聚类分析方法将构造叠加晕10种元素划分为3个簇,根据元素组合特征与我国热液金矿床理想原生晕组合对比得到矿区前缘晕、近矿晕和尾晕指示元素分别为As和Sb,Au、Ag和W,Co、Mo、Cu、Zn和Ni;并利用主成分分析方法定量化表征各元素间的线性关系。使用Micromine软件建立矿区三维原生晕深部找矿预测模型,根据深部原生晕找矿指标,并结合地质认识,预测辛家咀金矿I号主矿体在南西深部还有一定延伸,II号矿体在深部300 m范围内可能存在盲矿体,III号矿体向南西方向的延伸为300~560 m。三维原生晕预测结果与地质和物探结果可相互验证,表明圈定靶区具有较高的可靠性和准确性。
中图分类号:
王斌, 高永宝, 任涛, 寇少磊, 杨可, 王占彬, 刘基, 宋伊圩, 马振宇, 杜宛鸽. 龙门山构造带辛家咀金矿三维原生晕特征及深部找矿预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(2): 311-330.
WANG Bin, GAO Yongbao, REN Tao, KOU Shaolei, YANG Ke, WANG Zhanbin, LIU Ji, SONG Yiwei, MA Zhenyu, DU Wange. 3D primary halo and deep prospecting prediction of Xinjiazui gold deposit in the Longmenshan tectonic belt, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(2): 311-330.
图1 龙门山构造带地质构造简图(a据文献[42]修改;b据文献[48]修改) a—龙门山构造带大地构造简图;b—龙门山构造带北段地质简图。
Fig.1 Simplified regional geological map of the Longmenshan tectonic belt. a modified after [42]; b modified after [48].
| 元素 | 测试方法 | 单位 | 检出限 | 元素 | 测试方法 | 单位 | 检出限 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au | GF-AAS | 10-9 | 0.3 | W | ICP-MS | 10-6 | 0.5 |
| Ag | ES | 10-6 | 0.03 | Mo | ICP-MS | 10-6 | 0.5 |
| As | HG-AFS | 10-6 | 1 | Co | ICP-MS | 10-6 | 1 |
| Sb | HG-AFS | 10-6 | 0.2 | Ni | ICP-OES | 10-6 | 3 |
| Cu | ICP-OES | 10-6 | 1.5 | Zn | ICP-OES | 10-6 | 10 |
表1 各元素测试方法和检出限
Table 1 Testing methods and detection limits for each element
| 元素 | 测试方法 | 单位 | 检出限 | 元素 | 测试方法 | 单位 | 检出限 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au | GF-AAS | 10-9 | 0.3 | W | ICP-MS | 10-6 | 0.5 |
| Ag | ES | 10-6 | 0.03 | Mo | ICP-MS | 10-6 | 0.5 |
| As | HG-AFS | 10-6 | 1 | Co | ICP-MS | 10-6 | 1 |
| Sb | HG-AFS | 10-6 | 0.2 | Ni | ICP-OES | 10-6 | 3 |
| Cu | ICP-OES | 10-6 | 1.5 | Zn | ICP-OES | 10-6 | 10 |
| 元素 | 元素平均含量 | 标准离差 | 标准离差S | 全球岩石圈 元素丰度 | 扬子板块上 地壳元素丰度 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 围岩 (n=171) | 围岩S (n=455) | 矿体 (n=6) | 矿体S (n=23) | |||||
| Au | 12.55 | 4.12 | 156.27 | 207.67 | 7.55 | 0.76 | 1.9 | 1.32 |
| Ag | 3.46 | 1.01 | 2.44 | 2.55 | 1.69 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.049 |
| Cu | 134.97 | 42.77 | 42.68 | 39.69 | 77.75 | 9.81 | 44 | 31 |
| As | 71.40 | 55.24 | 235.90 | 225.63 | 31.91 | 17.63 | 1.1 | 3.3 |
| Sb | 13.74 | 2.33 | 9.29 | 6.77 | 5.82 | 0.31 | 0.2 | 0.24 |
| Zn | 392.06 | 128.86 | 142.87 | 104.12 | 204.21 | 25.4 | 66 | 61 |
| W | 8.74 | 7.27 | 3.45 | 4.47 | 4.58 | 1.85 | 0.5 | 0.54 |
| Mo | 22.54 | 3.58 | 6.79 | 1.92 | 12.6 | 11.5 | 0.7 | 0.63 |
| Co | 13.50 | 15.00 | 16.12 | 16.77 | 3.93 | 4.37 | 130 | 14 |
| Ni | 81.75 | 39.76 | 54.22 | 38.40 | 28.16 | 12.2 | 1 200 | 33 |
表2 辛家咀地区各地层中钻孔元素含量平均值对比
Table 2 Comparative analysis of mean elemental concentrations from drilling in stratigraphic units of the Xinjiazui gold deposit
| 元素 | 元素平均含量 | 标准离差 | 标准离差S | 全球岩石圈 元素丰度 | 扬子板块上 地壳元素丰度 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 围岩 (n=171) | 围岩S (n=455) | 矿体 (n=6) | 矿体S (n=23) | |||||
| Au | 12.55 | 4.12 | 156.27 | 207.67 | 7.55 | 0.76 | 1.9 | 1.32 |
| Ag | 3.46 | 1.01 | 2.44 | 2.55 | 1.69 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.049 |
| Cu | 134.97 | 42.77 | 42.68 | 39.69 | 77.75 | 9.81 | 44 | 31 |
| As | 71.40 | 55.24 | 235.90 | 225.63 | 31.91 | 17.63 | 1.1 | 3.3 |
| Sb | 13.74 | 2.33 | 9.29 | 6.77 | 5.82 | 0.31 | 0.2 | 0.24 |
| Zn | 392.06 | 128.86 | 142.87 | 104.12 | 204.21 | 25.4 | 66 | 61 |
| W | 8.74 | 7.27 | 3.45 | 4.47 | 4.58 | 1.85 | 0.5 | 0.54 |
| Mo | 22.54 | 3.58 | 6.79 | 1.92 | 12.6 | 11.5 | 0.7 | 0.63 |
| Co | 13.50 | 15.00 | 16.12 | 16.77 | 3.93 | 4.37 | 130 | 14 |
| Ni | 81.75 | 39.76 | 54.22 | 38.40 | 28.16 | 12.2 | 1 200 | 33 |
图6 辛家咀金矿钻孔原生晕寒武系各元素C-L分形模型双对数图
Fig.6 Double logarithmic diagrams of C-L fractal models for various elements in the Cambrian primary halo from the Xinjiazui gold deposit a—Au;b—Ag;c—W;d—As;e—Sb;f—Zn;g—Cu;h—Mo;i—Co;j—Ni。
图7 辛家咀金矿钻孔原生晕志留系各元素C-L分形模型双对数图
Fig.7 Double logarithmic diagrams of C-L fractal models for various elements in the Silurian primary halo from the Xinjiazui gold deposit a—Au;b—Ag;c—W;d—As;e—Sb;f—Zn;g—Cu;h—Mo;i—Co;j—Ni。
| 元素 | 元素含量异常临界点阈值 | |
|---|---|---|
| 围岩 (n=171) | 围岩S (n=455) | |
| Au | 25.00 | 9.30 |
| Ag | 3.60 | 0.70 |
| W | 9.30 | 6.07 |
| As | 76.49 | 42.34 |
| Sb | 13.42 | 1.50 |
| Zn | 364.85 | 114.71 |
| Cu | 135.30 | 45.00 |
| Mo | 22.20 | 2.00 |
| Co | 14.00 | 18.77 |
| Ni | 82.80 | 46.28 |
表3 辛家咀地区不同地层内各元素含量异常临界点阈值
Table 3 The threshold for anomaly of various elements in different stratigraphic units in the Xinjiazui gold deposit
| 元素 | 元素含量异常临界点阈值 | |
|---|---|---|
| 围岩 (n=171) | 围岩S (n=455) | |
| Au | 25.00 | 9.30 |
| Ag | 3.60 | 0.70 |
| W | 9.30 | 6.07 |
| As | 76.49 | 42.34 |
| Sb | 13.42 | 1.50 |
| Zn | 364.85 | 114.71 |
| Cu | 135.30 | 45.00 |
| Mo | 22.20 | 2.00 |
| Co | 14.00 | 18.77 |
| Ni | 82.80 | 46.28 |
| 前缘晕 | 近矿晕 | 尾晕 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 元素 | PC1 | PC2 | 元素 | PC1 | PC2 | 元素 | PC1 | PC2 | ||
| As | 0.71 | 0.71 | Au | 0.57 | 0.72 | Co | 0.33 | 0.77 | ||
| Sb | 0.71 | -0.71 | Ag | 0.59 | -0.03 | Mo | 0.39 | -0.61 | ||
| W | 0.57 | -0.70 | Cu | 0.50 | -0.08 | |||||
| Zn | 0.50 | -0.10 | ||||||||
| Ni | 0.49 | 0.15 | ||||||||
| 特征值 | 1.64 | 0.36 | 特征值 | 1.80 | 0.64 | 特征值 | 3.64 | 0.99 | ||
| 贡献率/% | 82.00 | 18.00 | 贡献率/% | 60.08 | 21.22 | 贡献率/% | 72.90 | 19.75 |
表4 辛家咀金矿前缘晕、近矿晕和尾晕元素主成分分析结果
Table 4 Results of principal component analysis of elements in the front, near and tail halos from the Xinjiazui gold deposit
| 前缘晕 | 近矿晕 | 尾晕 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 元素 | PC1 | PC2 | 元素 | PC1 | PC2 | 元素 | PC1 | PC2 | ||
| As | 0.71 | 0.71 | Au | 0.57 | 0.72 | Co | 0.33 | 0.77 | ||
| Sb | 0.71 | -0.71 | Ag | 0.59 | -0.03 | Mo | 0.39 | -0.61 | ||
| W | 0.57 | -0.70 | Cu | 0.50 | -0.08 | |||||
| Zn | 0.50 | -0.10 | ||||||||
| Ni | 0.49 | 0.15 | ||||||||
| 特征值 | 1.64 | 0.36 | 特征值 | 1.80 | 0.64 | 特征值 | 3.64 | 0.99 | ||
| 贡献率/% | 82.00 | 18.00 | 贡献率/% | 60.08 | 21.22 | 贡献率/% | 72.90 | 19.75 |
图9 辛家咀金矿前缘晕(a)、近矿晕(b)和尾晕(c)主成分分析载荷图
Fig.9 Principal component analysis loading plot of front (a), near (b) and tail (c) halos in Xinjiazui gold deposit
图10 辛家咀金矿前缘晕(a-c)、近矿晕(d-f)和尾晕(g-i)三维空间分布特征
Fig.10 The 3D spatial distribution characteristics of front halos (a-c) near halo (d-f) and tail halos (g-i) of Xinjiazui gold deposit
图12 辛家咀金矿ZK002电阻率曲线及0勘探线音频大地电磁测深剖面图
Fig.12 ZK002 resistivity curve and 0 exploration line audio magnetotelluric sounding profile map of Xinjiazui gold deposit
| [1] |
XIE X J, MU X Z, REN T X. Geochemical mapping in China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1997, 60(1): 99-113.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
CARRANZA E J M, SADEGHI M. Primary geochemical characteristics of mineral deposits: implications for exploration[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2012, 45: 1-4.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
LI H, WANG Z N, LI F G. Ideal models of superimposed primary halos in hydrothermal gold deposits[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1995, 55(1/2/3): 329-336.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
GROVES D I, SANTOSH M, GOLDFARB R J, et al. Structural geometry of orogenic gold deposits: implications for exploration of world-class and giant deposits[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2018, 9(4): 1163-1177.
DOI URL |
| [5] | 李惠, 张国义, 王支农, 等. 构造叠加晕法在预测金矿区深部盲矿中的应用效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2003, 27(6): 438-440. |
| [6] | 禹斌, 魏江, 李惠, 等. 构造叠加晕找盲矿研究-建模-预测理论与方法[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2023. |
| [7] |
WANG W L, YUAN C J, TANG J, et al. Enhancing deep orebody prediction and localization through the revelation of geochemical primary halo patterns in drill holes[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2024, 171: 106100.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
WANG C M, CARRANZA E J M, ZHANG S T, et al. Characterization of primary geochemical haloes for gold exploration at the Huanxiangwa gold deposit, China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 124: 40-58.
DOI URL |
| [9] | 王斌, 宋伊圩, 孙彪, 等. 甘肃寨上金矿南矿带构造叠加晕实用模型及深部找矿预测[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(6): 1504-1514. |
| [10] | 俞炳, 曾庆栋, 夏凡, 等. 辽宁五龙金矿构造叠加晕研究[J]. 地质与勘探, 2020, 56(5): 898-914. |
| [11] | 章永梅, 顾雪祥, 程文斌, 等. 内蒙古柳坝沟金矿床原生晕地球化学特征及深部成矿远景评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(2): 209-221. |
| [12] |
AN W T, CHEN J P, LI Y C, et al. The superposition characteristics of primary halo in the Daping gold deposit, Yunnan Province, China and its significance for exploration[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 228: 106809.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
ZHENG C J, LUO X R, WEN M L, et al. Axial primary halo characterization and deep orebody prediction in the Ashele copper-zinc deposit, Xinjiang, NW China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 213: 106509.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
LI Y Q, ZHANG D H, DAI L, et al. Characteristics of structurally superimposed geochemical haloes at the polymetallic Xiasai silver-lead-zinc ore deposit in Sichuan Province, SW China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 169: 100-122.
DOI URL |
| [15] | 李惠, 禹斌, 魏江, 等. 勘查(新)区构造叠加晕研究方法及预测参照实用理想模型[J]. 地质与勘探, 2021, 57(2): 351-359. |
| [16] | WENG G M, LIU J J, CARRANZA E J M, et al. Scheelite texture and geochemistry as a recorder of nature and timing of metallogenesis: an example from the Zhaishang Au-Sb-W deposit, western Qinling, Central China[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2024, 179(2): 14. |
| [17] |
SONG Y W, YANG L, YANG K, et al. Characteristics, geochronology, and formation conditions of W mineralization and its relationship with Au mineralization in the Zhaishang gold deposit, West Qinling Orogen, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2023, 163: 105763.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 钟宏, 宋谢炎, 黄智龙, 等. 近十年来中国矿床地球化学研究进展简述[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2021, 40(4): 819-844, 1001. |
| [19] |
陈华勇. 对我国矿床学未来发展方向的思考[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 99-105.
DOI |
| [20] |
YOTOVA G, PADAREVA M, HRISTOVA M, et al. Establishment of geochemical background and threshold values for 8 potential toxic elements in the Bulgarian soil quality monitoring network[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 643: 1297-1303.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
CAO M X, LU L J. Application of the multivariate canonical trend surface method to the identification of geochemical combination anomalies[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 153: 1-10.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
HOSSEINI S T, ASGHARI O, HARONI H A. Multivariate anomaly modeling of primary geochemical halos by U-spatial statistic algorithm development: a case study from the Sari Gunay epithermal gold deposit, Iran[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2020, 127: 103845.
DOI URL |
| [23] | 陈建平, 于淼, 于萍萍, 等. 重点成矿带大中比例尺三维地质建模方法与实践[J]. 地质学报, 2014, 88(6): 1187-1195. |
| [24] |
XIAO K Y, LI N, PORWAL A, et al. GIS-based 3D prospectivity mapping: a case study of Jiama copper-polymetallic deposit in Tibet, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 71: 611-632.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
MAO X C, SU Z, DENG H, et al. Three-dimensional mineral prospectivity modeling with geometric restoration: application to the Jinchuan Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide deposit, northwestern China[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2024, 33(1): 75-105.
DOI |
| [26] | 袁峰, 张明明, 李晓晖, 等. 成矿预测: 从二维到三维[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(12): 3863-3874. |
| [27] | 王强. 胶东金矿三维地球化学模型构建: 以莱州曲家金矿为例[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2022. |
| [28] |
WANG Y, CHEN J P, JIA D H. Three-dimensional mineral potential mapping for reducing multiplicity and uncertainty: Kaerqueka polymetallic deposit, Qinghai Province, China[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2020, 29(1): 365-393.
DOI |
| [29] | 王功文, 张智强, 李瑞喜, 等. 华北重点矿集区大数据三维/四维建模与深层次集成的资源预测评价[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(9): 1594-1610. |
| [30] |
李楠, 曹瑞, 叶会寿, 等. 内蒙古浩尧尔忽洞金矿三维建模与深部成矿预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 170-189.
DOI |
| [31] | SILLITOE R H, GOLDFARB R J, ROBERT F, et al. Geology of the world’s major gold deposits and provinces[M]. Littleton: Society of Economic Geologists, Inc., 2020. |
| [32] | 李惠, 禹斌, 李德亮. 构造叠加晕找盲矿法及找矿效果[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011. |
| [33] |
RAN X C, XI Y, LU Y G, et al. Comprehensive survey on hierarchical clustering algorithms and the recent developments[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(8): 8219-8264.
DOI |
| [34] |
ZHOU S G, ZHOU K F, WANG J L, et al. Application of cluster analysis to geochemical compositional data for identifying ore-related geochemical anomalies[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2018, 12(3): 491-505.
DOI |
| [35] |
LIU H M, HARRIS J, SHERLOCK R, et al. Mineral prospectivity mapping using machine learning techniques for gold exploration in the Larder Lake area, Ontario, Canada[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 253: 107279.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
SHEVYREV S, CARRANZA E J M. Application of maximum entropy for mineral prospectivity mapping in heavily vegetated areas of Greater Kurile Chain with Landsat 8 data[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2022, 142: 104758.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
WANG H C, YUAN Z X, CHENG Q M, et al. Geochemical anomaly mapping using sparse principal component analysis in Jining, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 234: 106936.
DOI URL |
| [38] |
ESMAEILOGHLI S, TABATABAEI S H, CARRANZA E J M. 3DU-TA: a new multifractal model involving surface topography for separation of geochemical anomalies[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 241: 107061.
DOI URL |
| [39] |
DONG Y P, SUN S S, SANTOSH M, et al. Crossorogenic belts in Central China: implications for the tectonic and paleogeographic evolution of the East Asian continental collage[J]. Gondwana Research, 2022, 109: 18-88.
DOI URL |
| [40] | 董云鹏, 惠博, 孙圣思, 等. 中国中央造山系原-古特提斯多阶段复合造山过程[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(10): 3426-3448. |
| [41] | YAN D P, ZHOU M F, LI S B, et al. Structural and geochronological constraints on the Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Longmen Shan thrust belt, Eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonics, 2011, 30(6): TC6005. |
| [42] |
YAN D P, QIU L, WELLS M L, et al. Structural and geochronological constraints on the Early Mesozoic North Longmen Shan thrust belt: foreland fold-thrust propagation of the SW Qinling orogenic belt, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonics, 2018, 37(12): 4595-4624.
DOI URL |
| [43] | 李佐臣. 扬子地块西北缘后龙门山造山带(北段)物质组成、构造特征及其形成演化[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2009. |
| [44] |
DENG B, LIU S G, JANSA L, et al. Sedimentary record of Late Triassic transpressional tectonics of the Longmenshan thrust belt, SW China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2012, 48: 43-55.
DOI URL |
| [45] |
XUE S, BAI D H, CHEN Y, et al. Contrasting crustal deformation mechanisms in the Longmenshan and West Qinling orogenic belts, NE Tibet, revealed by magnetotelluric data[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 176: 120-128.
DOI URL |
| [46] | ZHOU Z C, YAN D P, QIU L, et al. Multi-phase non-coaxial orogenic growth: propagation of the Longmen Shan thrust belt on the Eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Tectonics, 2023, 42(9): e2023TC007814. |
| [47] | 李智武, 刘树根, 陈洪德, 等. 龙门山冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 35(4): 440-454. |
| [48] |
LIU J, BAO X S, KOU S L, et al. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and geological significance of two types of monazite in the Xinjiazui gold deposit, Northwestern margin of Yangtze Block, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2023, 161: 105626.
DOI URL |
| [49] | 江宏君, 陈华勇, 王朋, 等. 龙门山造山带北段黄泥坪金矿床蚀变矿化特征与SWIR勘查应用研究[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2023, 47(6): 1291-1306. |
| [50] | 杨伟, 寇少磊, 杨可, 等. 后龙门山北东段辛家咀地区新发现一脆-韧性剪切带型金矿[J]. 中国地质, 2024, 51(1): 362-363. |
| [51] | 张蜀冀, 韩旭, 杨栓海. 川陕丁家林金矿区探矿权的评估[J]. 黄金地质, 2004, 10(1): 71-75. |
| [52] | 向肖宇. 广元市太阳坪金矿地质特征及成因探讨[J]. 四川地质学报, 2015, 35(201): 59-62. |
| [53] | 王柘, 阳明, 王本达. 四川广元市董家院金矿剪切带构造特征及控矿作用[J]. 云南地质, 2015, 34(1): 104-108. |
| [54] | 王斌. 龙门山辛家咀金矿三维地球化学特征及其找矿预测研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2024. |
| [55] | 江宏君, 陈华勇, 王朋, 等. 龙门山造山带北段黄泥坪金矿床的矿床地质和元素地球化学特征[J]. 地球化学, 2023, 52(6): 721-733. |
| [56] | 付于真. 西秦岭八卦庙和丁马含金剪切带构造地球化学对比研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015. |
| [57] | LIU J, BAO X S, GAO Y B, et al. Composition andgeochemical characteristics of pyrite and quartz: constraints on the origin of the Xinjiazui gold deposit, Northwestern margin of the Yangtze Block, China[J]. Minerals, 2022, 12(6): 688. |
| [58] | 刘基, 杨可, 张晓星, 等. 后龙门山造山带辛家咀金矿床地质特征及成因探讨[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(1): 378-388. |
| [59] | 寇少磊, 刘基, 王占彬, 等. 后龙门山构造带辛家咀金矿床成矿流体特征及其演化: 来自流体包裹体与H-O同位素的证据[J]. 现代地质, 2025, 39(5): 1193-1208. |
| [60] |
GOLDFARB R J, PITCAIRN I. Orogenic gold: is a genetic association with magmatism realistic?[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2023, 58(1): 5-35.
DOI |
| [61] | HUSTON D, GUTZMER J. Isotopes ineconomic geology, metallogenesis and exploration[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. |
| [62] |
COOKE D R, WILKINSON J J, BAKER M, et al. Usingmineral chemistry to aid exploration: a case study from the resolution porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Arizona[J]. Economic Geology, 2020, 115(4): 813-840.
DOI URL |
| [63] | 叶天竺, 吕志成, 庞振山, 等. 勘查区找矿预测理论与方法: 总论[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014. |
| [64] | 颜丹平, 邱亮, 孙铭, 等. 四川盆地盆缘前陆逆冲带的复合与联合扩展研究综述[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(10): 3314-3331. |
| [65] | 黎彤, 袁怀雨. 大洋岩石圈和大陆岩石圈的元素丰度[J]. 地球化学, 2011, 40(1): 1-5. |
| [66] |
GAO S, LUO T C, ZHANG B R, et al. Chemical composition of the continental crust as revealed by studies in East China[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1998, 62(11): 1959-1975.
DOI URL |
| [67] |
RICHARDS J P, LÓPEZ G P, ZHU J J, et al. Contrastingtectonic settings and sulfur contents of magmas associated with Cretaceous porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au and intrusion-related iron oxide Cu-Au deposits in Northern Chile[J]. Economic Geology, 2017, 112(2): 295-318.
DOI URL |
| [68] |
CHENG Q M, ZHAO P D. Singularity theories and methods for characterizing mineralization processes and mapping geo-anomalies for mineral deposit prediction[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2011, 2(1): 67-79.
DOI URL |
| [69] |
YANG L, WANG Q F, LIU X F. Correlation between mineralization intensity and fluid-rock reaction in the Xinli gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, China: constraints from petrographic and statistical approaches[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 71: 29-39.
DOI URL |
| [70] |
CHENG Q M. Fractal density and singularity analysis of heat flow over ocean ridges[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 19167.
DOI PMID |
| [71] | 王斌, 任涛, 宋伊圩, 等. 西秦岭常家山地区水系沉积物地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(3): 911-922. |
| [72] |
WANG C, WANG G W, LIU J J, et al. 3D geochemical modeling for subsurface targets of Dashui Au deposit in Western Qinling (China)[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 203: 59-77.
DOI URL |
| [73] |
POURGHOLAM M M, AFZAL P, YASREBI A B, et al. Detection of geochemical anomalies using a fractal-wavelet model in Ipack area, Central Iran[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 220: 106675.
DOI URL |
| [74] |
WANG H C, ZUO R G. A comparative study of trend surface analysis and spectrum-area multifractal model to identify geochemical anomalies[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 155: 84-90.
DOI URL |
| [75] | 翟裕生, 姚书振, 蔡克勤. 矿床学[M]. 3版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011. |
| [76] |
GERANIAN H, CARRANZA E J M. Mapping ofregional-scale multi-element geochemical anomalies using hierarchical clustering algorithms[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31(4): 1841-1865.
DOI |
| [77] | 赵明. 矿物学导论[M]. 2版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010. |
| [78] | 付于真, 方维萱, 刘家军, 等. 陕川丁家林-太阳坪-董家院金矿带的矿田构造-岩相学研究[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2014, 38(4): 787-801. |
| [79] |
ALIYARI F, AFZAL P, LOTFI M, et al. Delineation of geochemical haloes using the developed zonality index model by multivariate and fractal analysis in the Cu-Mo porphyry deposits[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2020, 121: 104694.
DOI URL |
| [80] | 吕鹏瑞. 黑龙江省高松山金矿床原生晕地球化学特征及深部成矿预测[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012. |
| [81] | 王建新, 臧兴运, 郭秀峰, 等. 格里戈良分带指数法的改良[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007, 37(5): 884-888. |
| [82] | 郭旭飞. 陕西省山阳县夏家店金矿床地质特征及成因研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020. |
| [83] |
徐林刚, 付雪瑞, 叶会寿, 等. 南秦岭地区下寒武统黑色页岩赋存的千家坪大型钒矿地球化学特征及成矿环境[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 160-175.
DOI |
| [84] | 丁乐乐. 南秦岭金矿床地质-地球化学及其成矿动力学背景研究:以八卦庙、马鞍桥和夏家店金矿床为例[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2022. |
| [85] | 刘思聪, 宁淑媛, 郑德顺. 南秦岭地区下寒武统水沟口组黑色岩系成因及其沉积环境[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(2): 549-564. |
| [86] |
刘家军, 翟德高, 王大钊, 等. Au-(Ag)-Te-Se成矿系统与成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 79-98.
DOI |
| [87] | 李佐臣, 裴先治, 刘战庆, 等. 扬子地块西北缘后龙门山南华纪—早古生代沉积地层特征及其形成环境[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2011, 33(2): 117-124. |
| [88] | 伍岳. 上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩岩相特征及沉积演化[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2016. |
| [89] | 罗超. 上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩特征研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014. |
| [90] | 向葵, 严良俊, 胡华, 等. 四川盆地前寒武系重磁电物性特征与建模[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(5): 1160-1168, 938. |
| [91] | 李智武, 宋天慧, 王自剑, 等. 川西-龙门山盆山系统走向差异演化的变形、隆升和沉积记录及关键构造变革期讨论[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(3): 257-282. |
| [92] | 陈柏林, 董法先, 李中坚. 韧性剪切带型金矿成矿模式[J]. 地质论评, 1999, 45(2): 186-192. |
| [93] | 魏立勇. 陕川丁家林—太阳坪金矿带地质特征及成因探讨[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2008. |
| [94] | 刘树根, 罗志立, 赵锡奎, 等. 中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式: 以龙门山造山带—川西前陆盆地系统为例[J]. 地质学报, 2003, 77(2): 177-186. |
| [95] | XU G Q, KAMP P J J. Tectonics and denudation adjacent to the Xianshuihe fault, Eastern Tibetan Plateau: constraints from fission track thermochronology[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2000, 105(B8): 19231-19251. |
| [96] |
GROVES D I, GOLDFARB R J, GEBRE-MARIAM M, et al. Orogenic gold deposits: a proposed classification in the context of their crustal distribution and relationship to other gold deposit types[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 1998, 13(1/2/3/4/5): 7-27.
DOI URL |
| [97] | 杨林, 王庆飞, 赵世宇, 等. 造山型金矿构造控矿作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2023, 39(2): 277-292. |
| [98] | FENG T. Chapter 2 exploration and mining in China[M]//CHANG Z S, GOLDFARB R J. Mineral deposits of China. Littleton: Society of Economic Geologists, 2019: 13-20. |
| [99] | GOLDFARB R, QIU K F, DENG J, et al. Chapter 8 orogenic gold deposits of China[M]//CHANG Z S, GOLDFARB R J. Mineral deposits of China. Littleton: Society of Economic Geologists, 2019: 263-324. |
| [100] |
DENG J, WANG Q F. Gold mineralization in China: metallogenic provinces, deposit types and tectonic framework[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 36: 219-274.
DOI URL |
| [101] | VANCE T C, HUANG T, BUTLER K A. Big data in Earth science: emerging practice and promise[J]. Science, 2024, 383(6688): eadh9607. |
| [102] |
ZUO R G, CARRANZA E J M. Machinelearning-based mapping for mineral exploration[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2023, 55(7): 891-895.
DOI |
| [103] | 薛建玲, 庞振山, 程志中, 等. 深部找矿基本问题及方法[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(8): 1125-1136. |
| [104] | 陈华勇, 肖兵, 张世涛, 等. 蚀变矿物勘查标识体系[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021. |
| [105] |
BERTHIER C, PERRET J, EGLINGER A, et al. Pyrite as amicrotextural and geochemical tracer of ore-forming processes, central zone orogenic gold deposit, gabgaba district, Sudan[J]. Economic Geology, 2023, 118(5): 1031-1053.
DOI URL |
| [106] |
LI Y, ZHANG R Q, HE S, et al. Pulsed exsolution of magmatic ore-forming fluids in tin-tungsten systems: a SIMS cassiterite oxygen isotope record[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2022, 57(3): 343-352.
DOI |
| [1] | 李惠, 张国义, 禹斌, 李德亮. 构造叠加晕找盲矿法及其在矿山深部找矿效果[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(1): 287-293. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||