胶东台上-水旺庄巨型金矿床矿体空间分布规律及深部找矿预测

doi:10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.12.52

地学前缘 ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 331-347.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.12.52

• 战略矿产成矿规律与找矿预测 • 上一篇下一篇

胶东台上-水旺庄巨型金矿床矿体空间分布规律及深部找矿预测

刘向东¹(), 丁正江¹^,^*(), 邱昆峰¹^,², 闫春明¹, 范家盟¹, 张亮亮¹, 于皓丞², 解天赐¹, 李珊珊², 刘国栋¹, 周晓萍¹, 张慧君¹

1.山东省地质矿产勘查开发局第六地质大队/自然资源部深部金矿勘查开采技术创新中心/深部金矿探测大数据应用开发山东省工程研究中心, 山东威海 264209
2.中国地质大学(北京) 地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2024-08-10 修回日期:2024-12-30 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-01-29
通信作者: *丁正江(1977—),男,博士,研究员,从事热液矿床成矿作用及地质矿产勘查理论技术方法研究。E-mail: ytdzhj@126.com
作者简介:刘向东(1989—),男,博士,高级工程师,从事金成矿作用与找矿勘查研究工作。E-mail: liuxd1989@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC2906900);山东省重点研发计划项目(2023CXGC011001);泰山学者人才专项(tstp20240847);深部金矿探测大数据应用开发山东省工程研究中心开放课题(SDK202211);深部金矿探测大数据应用开发山东省工程研究中心开放课题(SDK202214);山东省地质矿产勘查开发局科技攻关项目(KY202208)

Spatial distribution pattern of orebodies and deep ore prospecting prediction of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang giant gold deposit in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China

LIU Xiangdong¹(), DING Zhengjiang¹^,^*(), QIU Kunfeng¹^,², YAN Chunming¹, FAN Jiameng¹, ZHANG Liangliang¹, YU Haocheng², XIE Tianci¹, LI Shanshan², LIU Guodong¹, ZHOU Xiaoping¹, ZHANG Huijun¹

1. No.6 Geological Team of Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources/Deep Gold Exploration and Mining Technology Innovation Center of Ministry of Natural Resources/Shandong Engineering Research Center of Application and Development of Big Data for Deep Gold Exploration, Weihai 264209, China
2. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received:2024-08-10 Revised:2024-12-30 Online:2026-03-25 Published:2026-01-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

巨型矿床是矿产勘查的理想目标,其形成与定位是当前地球科学领域重大国际研究前沿。矿体空间分布规律对认识巨型矿床形成与定位和预测找矿至关重要。胶东作为世界第三大金矿集区,产出焦家、三山岛、玲珑3处超千吨巨型金矿床,成为研究巨型金矿床的热点地区。台上-水旺庄金矿床位于胶东金矿集区招平断裂带北段,近年来在500~2 500 m深度取得重大找矿突破,累计探明金资源量700余吨,达到巨型规模,是研究巨型金矿床矿体空间分布规律和找矿模型的理想对象。本文在系统梳理浅部和深部勘查成果的基础上,剖析了矿体的空间分布规律,提出了分段富集规律,构建了深部找矿模型,并进行了深部矿体定位预测、定量预测和靶区验证。研究发现:(1) 主矿体的空间分布受控于招平断裂带,呈较规则的脉状赋存于主裂面下盘的黄铁绢英岩化蚀变带内,沿走向和倾向具有膨胀夹缩和尖灭再现的特点;(2)矿化强度与控矿断裂倾角变化密切相关,控矿断裂倾角陡-缓转折部位和倾角相对较缓(倾角为10°~35°)部位易富集成矿;(3)主矿体总体向NEE侧伏,沿侧伏方向具有分段富集且富矿段之间具近似等间距的分布规律;(4)Ⅰ号矿体53~149号勘探线-2 800~-1 200 m标高范围为深部有利赋矿位置;(5)体含矿率法预测-5 000~-2 000 m潜在金资源量为642~723 t;(6)靶区验证结果证明本文建立的预测方法科学有效,为矿区及胶东同类型金矿的深部找矿提供了有力指导。

关键词: 空间分布规律, 分段富集, 找矿预测, 台上-水旺庄, 巨型金矿床, 胶东

Abstract:

Giant deposits are prime targets in mineral exploration, and understanding their formation and localization is a major research frontier in earth sciences. The spatial distribution pattern of ore bodies is crucial for this understanding and for prospecting. The Jiaodong Peninsula, the world’s third-largest gold province, is a hotspot for giant gold deposit studies, hosting multi-hundred-ton deposits like Jiaojia, Sanshandao, and Linglong. The Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang deposit, located in the northern Zhaoping Fault belt, is a recent successful exploration case at depths of 500 to 2 500 m, with proven resources exceeding 700 tons, making it an ideal site for studying ore body distribution and prospecting models. Based on a systematic review of shallow and deep exploration results, this study analyzes the spatial distribution pattern of ore bodies, proposes sectional enrichment characteristics, constructs a deep exploration model, and performs predictive targeting and verification. The results show that: (1) The distribution of the main orebodies is strictly controlled by the Zhaoping Fault. They are hosted in pyrite-sericite-quartz altered rocks beneath the main fault plane and exhibit pinch-and-swell structure and recurrence along strike and dip. (2) Mineralization intensity correlates with variations in the fault’s dip angle. Enrichment zones are primarily found where the fault transitions from steep to gentle dips and in the gently dipping segments with angles between 10° and 35°. (3) The main orebodies generally pitch towards NEE, showing a sectional enrichment pattern along pitch with approximately equally spaced gold-enriched zones. (4) The elevation range of -2 800 to -1 200 m between exploration lines 53 and 149 of No.Ⅰ orebody is highly prospective for deep ore bodies. (5) The potential gold resources from -50 00 to -2 000 m elevation are predicted to be 642-723 tons using the volume -grade method. (6) Verification in the target area confirmed the effectiveness of this predictive methodology, providing robust guidance for deep prospecting.

Key words: spatial distribution pattern, sectional enrichment characteristics, prospecting prediction, the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit, giant gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula

中图分类号:

P618
P612

刘向东, 丁正江, 邱昆峰, 闫春明, 范家盟, 张亮亮, 于皓丞, 解天赐, 李珊珊, 刘国栋, 周晓萍, 张慧君. 胶东台上-水旺庄巨型金矿床矿体空间分布规律及深部找矿预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(2): 331-347.

LIU Xiangdong, DING Zhengjiang, QIU Kunfeng, YAN Chunming, FAN Jiameng, ZHANG Liangliang, YU Haocheng, XIE Tianci, LI Shanshan, LIU Guodong, ZHOU Xiaoping, ZHANG Huijun. Spatial distribution pattern of orebodies and deep ore prospecting prediction of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang giant gold deposit in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2026, 33(2): 331-347.

图/表 15

图1 胶东大地构造位置图(a)及区域地质和金矿分布图(b)(据文献[42-43]) GJF—郭城—即墨断裂; HQF—海阳—青岛断裂; JJF—焦家断裂带; MRF—牟平—乳山断裂; SSDF—三山岛断裂带; TCF—桃村断裂; XDF—西林—陡崖断裂; ZDF—朱吴—店集断裂; ZPF—招平断裂带。

Fig.1 Simplified tectonic map of the Jiaodong gold province(a) and sketch map of regional geology and gold deposits distribution in the Jiaodong Peninsula (b). Modified after [42-43].

图2 台上-水旺庄金矿区地质简图(据文献[31,36]修改)

Fig.2 Geological map of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit. Modified after [31,36].

图3 台上-水旺庄金矿床联合勘探线剖面图(据文献[68-72])

Fig.3 Combined cross-sections of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit. Modified after [68-72].

图4 台上-水旺庄金矿床水旺庄矿段-1 600 m中段平面图(a)及A-A'剖面图(b)(据文献[36])

Fig.4 Sketch map of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit, showing the orebodies and hydrothermal alteration. (a) Plan view of -1 600 m. (b) Geological cross-sections along lines A-A'. Modified after [36].

图5 台上-水旺庄金矿床典型金矿石及金矿物照片 a, d, g—浸染状-细脉状-网脉状黄铁绢英岩化碎裂岩型矿石;b, e, h—细脉状黄铁绢英岩化花岗质碎裂岩型矿石;c, f, i—细脉状-网脉状黄铁绢英岩化花岗岩型矿石;j—黄铁矿内包体金;k—黄铁矿内裂隙金;l—黄铁矿和石英之间晶隙金及石英内包体金。Au—金矿物;Kf—钾长石;Pl—斜长石;Py—黄铁矿;Qz—石英;Ser—绢云母。

Fig.5 Photographs and photomicrographs of main gold ore types and gold minerals in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图6 台上-水旺庄金矿床主矿体水平投影图(a)和垂直投影图(b)

Fig.6 Horizontal projection diagram (a) and Vertical projection diagram (b) of the main orebodies in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图7 台上-水旺庄金矿床控矿断裂坡度变化及其与矿化关系 a—控矿断裂坡度三维分布图(据文献[26]); b—矿体品位×厚度三维分布图(据文献[27]); c—控矿断裂倾角直方图; d—矿体厚度×品位与控矿断裂倾角散点图。

Fig.7 Diagram showing the relationships between the fault dip angle and the mineralization enrichment areas of main orebodies along with the fault dip direction in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图8 台上-水旺庄金矿床主矿体厚度×品位水平投影等值线图(a)和垂直投影等值线图(b)

Fig.8 Horizontal projection contour map (a) and vertical projection contour map (b) of main orebodies thickness × gold grade in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图9 台上-水旺庄金矿床深部矿体预测模型

Fig.9 Prediction model of deep-seated orebodies in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图10 台上-水旺庄金矿床深部预测靶区示意图

Fig.10 Diagram of deep prediction target areas in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

表1 台上-水旺庄金矿床资源评价参数表

Table 1 Resource evaluation parameter of Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

标高/m	查明资源储量		面积/km²	平均厚度/ m	体积/ 10⁶m³	体含矿率
标高/m	矿石量/10⁶t	金属量/t	面积/km²	平均厚度/ m	体积/ 10⁶m³	矿石含矿率/ (t·m^-3)	金属含矿率/ (g·m^-3)
-600~100	53	165	4.39	10.48	46.06	1.15	3.58
-2 000~-600	149	535	12.28	13.71	168.31	0.89	3.18

表2 台上-水旺庄金矿床深部潜在资源预测统计表

Table 2 Statistical table for prediction of deep potential resources of Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

标高/m	面积/km²	平均厚度/m	体积/10⁶m³	预测潜在资源
				矿石量/10⁶t		金属量/t
				最小值	最大值	最小值	最大值
-3 000~-2 000	9.16	11.60	106.23	94	123	338	381
-5 000~-3 000	8.25	11.60	95.66	85	110	304	343
合计				179	233	642	723

图11 台上-水旺庄金矿床深部潜在资源预测成果图

Fig.11 Prediction results of deep potential resources in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图12 台上-水旺庄金矿床深部成矿预测及深部钻探验证图

Fig.12 Deep metallogenic prediction and deep drilling hole verification of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit

图13 台上-水旺庄金矿床ZK3401钻孔柱状图(据文献[92])

Fig.13 Histogram of ZK3401 drilling hole in the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit. Modified after [92].

参考文献 92

[1]	GROVES D I, SANTOSH M, GOLDFARB R J, et al. Structural geometry of orogenic gold deposits: implications for exploration of world-class and giant deposits[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2018, 9(4): 1163-1177. DOI URL
[2]	杨立强, 邓军, 宋明春, 等. 巨型矿床形成与定位的构造控制: 胶东金矿集区剖析[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(3): 431-446.
[3]	邓军, 王庆飞, 张良, 等. 胶东型金矿成因模型[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2023, 53(10): 2323-2347.
[4]	杨立强, 邓军, 张良, 等. 胶东型金矿[J]. 岩石学报, 2024, 40(6): 1691-1711.
[5]	QIU K F, ROMER R L, LONG Z Y, et al. The role of an oxidized lithospheric mantle in gold mobilization[J]. Science Advances, 2024, 10(41): eado6262.
[6]	宋明春, 宋英昕, 丁正江, 等. 胶东焦家和三山岛巨型金矿床的发现及有关问题讨论[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(1): 92-110.
[7]	李世勇, 李杰, 宋明春, 等. 胶东玲珑金矿田成矿特征和成矿作用[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(9): 3234-3260.
[8]	DENG J, QIU K F, WANG Q F, et al. In situ dating of hydrothermal monazite and implications for the geodynamic controls on ore formation in the Jiaodong gold province, Eastern China[J]. Economic Geology, 2020, 115(3): 671-685. DOI URL
[9]	QIU K F, DENG J, LAFLAMME C, et al. Giant Mesozoic gold ores derived from subducted oceanic slab and overlying sediments[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2023, 343: 133-141. DOI URL
[10]	HE D Y, QIU K F, et al. Mantle oxidation by sulfur drives the formation of giant gold deposits in subduction zones[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024, 121(52): e2404731121.
[11]	吕承训, 王建平, 陈小龙. 胶东金矿成岩成矿深度测算方法探讨[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(4): 910-921.
[12]	王宗永, 吕古贤, 张宝林, 等. 胶东大尹格庄金矿田构造物理化学参量急变带成矿特征[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(4): 1043-1053.
[13]	李金辉, 张海东, 雷万杉. 胶东地区夏甸金矿床构造蚀变带中金富集作用与微量元素迁移关系分析[J]. 现代地质, 2025, 39(4): 981-994.
[14]	陈永清, 郑澳月, 费金娜, 等. 应用二维经验模分解(2D-EMD)-主成分分析(PCA)组合模型定量圈定与评价胶东金与关键金属找矿靶区[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(1): 266-282. DOI
[15]	李博文, 王永志, 丁正江, 等. 基于大模型与GraphRAG的胶东金矿智能搜索技术[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 155-164. DOI
[16]	宋明春, 伊丕厚, 徐军祥, 等. 胶西北金矿阶梯式成矿模式[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2012, 42(7): 992-1000.
[17]	DENG J, YANG L Q, LI R H, et al. Regional structural control on the distribution of world-class gold deposits: an overview from the Giant Jiaodong Gold Province, China[J]. Geological Journal, 2019, 54(1): 378-391. DOI URL
[18]	王偲瑞, 杨立强, 成浩, 等. 基底构造对矿床定位的控制机制: 焦家金矿带构造应力转移模拟[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(5): 1529-1546.
[19]	MAO X C, REN J, LIU Z K, et al. Three-dimensional prospectivity modeling of the Jiaojia-type gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, Eastern China: a case study of the Dayingezhuang deposit[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 203: 27-44. DOI URL
[20]	WANG S R, YANG L Q, WANG J G, et al. Geostatistical determination of ore shoot plunge and structural control of the Sizhuang world-class epizonal orogenic gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Minerals, 2019, 9(4): 214.
[21]	YANG L, ZHAO R, WANG Q F, et al. Fault geometry and fluid-rock reaction: combined controls on mineralization in the Xinli gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2018, 111: 14-26. DOI URL
[22]	ZHANG L, GROVES D I, YANG L Q, et al. Relative roles of formation and preservation on gold endowment along the Sanshandao gold belt in the Jiaodong gold province, China: importance for province- to district-scale gold exploration[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2020, 55(2): 325-344. DOI
[23]	鲍中义, 孙忠全, 刘国栋, 等. 破头青断裂水旺庄矿区矿床地质特征及找矿方向[J]. 山东国土资源, 2014, 30(2): 29-33.
[24]	刘国栋, 宋国政, 鲍中义, 等. 胶东招平断裂北段深部找矿新突破及对断裂空间展布的新认识[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(2): 226-234.
[25]	刘国栋, 李娟. 胶东招平断裂-2200 m特大型金矿体地质特征与找矿标志[J]. 山东国土资源, 2019, 35(1): 1-7.
[26]	王永庆, 李山, 杨真亮, 等. 胶东玲南-水旺庄巨型金矿床三维地质特征及断裂控矿规律[J]. 地质通报, 2022, 41(6): 977-985.
[27]	王永庆, 钮涛, 杨真亮, 等. 招平断裂带台上-水旺庄段三维地质模型构建及矿体空间分布规律[J]. 山东国土资源, 2022, 38(7): 12-19.
[28]	赵利青, 邓军, 原海涛, 等. 台上金矿床蚀变带短波红外光谱研究[J]. 地质与勘探, 2008, 44(5): 58-63.
[29]	周凤英, 李兆麟. 胶东台上金矿床矿物中包裹体研究[J]. 矿物学报, 1991, 11(4): 403-412.
[30]	陈炳翰, 王中亮, 李海林, 等. 胶东台上金矿床成矿流体演化:载金黄铁矿稀土元素和微量元素组成约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(9): 2518-2532.
[31]	YANG L Q, DENG J, GUO L N, et al. Origin and evolution of ore fluid, and gold-deposition processes at the giant Taishang gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, Eastern China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2016, 72: 585-602. DOI URL
[32]	周凤英, 李兆麟. 胶东台上金矿成矿机制模拟实验研究[J]. 地质论评, 1994, 40(5): 456-465.
[33]	李杰, 张丽鹏, 宋明春, 等. 胶东水旺庄金矿床成矿机制: 来自S-H-O同位素和流体包裹体的制约[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(5): 1569-1584.
[34]	万多. 山东胶东地区招平断裂带北段金矿成矿规律与成矿预测[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014.
[35]	刘国栋, 温桂军, 刘彩杰, 等. 招平断裂北段水旺庄深部超大型金矿床的发现、特征和找矿方向[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2017, 25(3): 38-45. DOI
[36]	刘向东, 周明岭, 徐韶辉, 等. 胶西北水旺庄金矿床3000 m深度找矿预测[J]. 地质通报, 2022, 41(6): 946-957.
[37]	ZHU R X, CHEN L, WU F Y, et al. Timing, scale and mechanism of the destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2011, 54(6): 789-797. DOI URL
[38]	毛景文, 华仁民, 李晓波. 浅议大规模成矿作用与大型矿集区[J]. 矿床地质, 1999, 18(4): 291-299.
[39]	翟明国, 范宏瑞, 杨进辉, 等. 非造山带型金矿-胶东型金矿的陆内成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(1): 85-98.
[40]	范宏瑞, 蓝廷广, 李兴辉, 等. 胶东金成矿系统的末端效应[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(9): 1504-1523.
[41]	杨立强, 邓军, 王中亮, 等. 胶东中生代金成矿系统[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(9): 2447-2467.
[42]	DENG J, YANG L Q, GROVES D I, et al. An integrated mineral system model for the gold deposits of the giant Jiaodong province, Eastern China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 208: 103274. DOI URL
[43]	DENG J, WANG Q F, SANTOSH M, et al. Remobilization of metasomatized mantle lithosphere: a new model for the Jiaodong gold province, Eastern China[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2020, 55(2): 257-274. DOI
[44]	李守军. 山东侏罗-白垩纪地层划分与对比[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 22(1): 4-7,111.
[45]	李金良, 张岳桥, 柳宗泉, 等. 胶莱盆地沉积-沉降史分析与构造演化[J]. 中国地质, 2007, 34(2): 240-250.
[46]	任凤楼, 柳忠泉, 邱连贵, 等. 胶莱盆地莱阳期原型盆地恢复[J]. 沉积学报, 2008, 26(2): 221-232.
[47]	AMES L, ZHOU G Z, XIONG B C. Geochronology and isotopic character of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism with implications for collision of the Sino-Korean and Yangtze cratons, Central China[J]. Tectonics, 1996, 15(2): 472-489. DOI URL
[48]	刘利双, 刘福来, 冀磊, 等. 北苏鲁超高压变质带内多成因类型的变花岗质岩石及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(6): 1557-1580.
[49]	WALLIS S, ENAMI M, BANNO S. The Sulu UHP terrane: a review of the petrology and structural geology[J]. International Geology Review, 1999, 41(10): 906-920. DOI URL
[50]	CHEN J F, XIE Z, LI H M, et al. U-Pb zircon ages for a collision-related K-rich complex at Shidao in the Sulu ultrahigh pressure terrane, China[J]. Geochemical Journal, 2003, 37(1): 35-46. DOI URL
[51]	高天山, 陈江峰, 谢智, 等. 苏鲁超高压变质带中三叠纪石岛杂岩体的地球化学研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2004, 20(5): 1025-1038.
[52]	郭敬辉, 陈福坤, 张晓曼, 等. 苏鲁超高压带北部中生代岩浆侵入活动与同碰撞-碰撞后构造过程: 锆石U-Pb年代学[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21: 1281-1301.
[53]	陈竟志, 姜能. 胶东晚三叠世碱性岩浆作用的岩石成因-来自锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf-O同位素的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(12): 3557-3574.
[54]	ZHANG J, ZHAO Z F, ZHENG Y F, et al. Postcollisional magmatism: geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids in the Sulu orogen, China[J]. Lithos, 2010, 119(3/4): 512-536. DOI URL
[55]	JIANG N, CHEN J Z, GUO J H, et al. In situ zircon U-Pb, oxygen and hafnium isotopic compositions of Jurassic granites from the North China Craton: evidence for Triassic subduction of continental crust and subsequent metamorphism-related ¹⁸O depletion[J]. Lithos, 2012, 142/143: 84-94. DOI URL
[56]	MA L, JIANG S Y, DAI B Z, et al. Multiple sources for the origin of Late Jurassic Linglong adakitic granite in the Shandong Peninsula, Eastern China: zircon U-Pb geochronological, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence[J]. Lithos, 2013, 162/163: 251-263. DOI URL
[57]	YANG L Q, DILEK Y, WANG Z L, et al. Late Jurassic, high Ba-Sr Linglong granites in the Jiaodong Peninsula, East China: lower crustal melting products in the eastern North China Craton[J]. Geological Magazine, 2018, 155(5): 1040-1062. DOI URL
[58]	刘跃, 邓军, 王中亮, 等. 胶西北新城金矿床二长花岗岩岩石地球化学、锆石U-Pb年龄及Lu-Hf同位素组成[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(9): 2559-2573.
[59]	耿科, 王瑞江, 李洪奎, 等. 胶西北丛家花岗闪长岩体SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年代学研究[J]. 地球学报, 2016, 37(1): 90-100.
[60]	GOSS S C, WILDE S A, WU F Y, et al. The age, isotopic signature and significance of the youngest Mesozoic granitoids in the Jiaodong Terrane, Shandong Province, North China Craton[J]. Lithos, 2010, 120(3/4): 309-326. DOI URL
[61]	DENG J, LIU X F, WANG Q F, et al. Isotopic characterization and petrogenetic modeling of Early Cretaceous mafic diking: lithospheric extension in the North China Craton, eastern Asia[J]. GSA Bulletin, 2017, 129(11/12): 1379-1407. DOI URL
[62]	LIU X F, DENG J, LIANG Y Y, et al. Petrogenesis of Early Cretaceous intermediate-felsic dikes in the Jiaodong Peninsula, south-eastern North China Craton: constraints from geochronology, geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopes[J]. Gondwana Research, 2018, 60: 69-93. DOI URL
[63]	李士先, 刘长春, 安郁宏, 等. 胶东金矿地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2007: 8-290.
[64]	刘向东, 邓军, 张良, 等. 胶西北寺庄金矿床热液蚀变作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(5): 1551-1565.
[65]	SONG M C, DING Z J, ZHANG J J, et al. Geology and mineralization of the Sanshandao supergiant gold deposit (1200 t) in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China: a review[J]. China Geology, 2021, 4(4): 1-34.
[66]	LIU X D, DING Z J, SONG M C, et al. Geology and mineralization of the Dayin’gezhuang supergiant gold deposit (180 t) in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China: a review[J]. China Geology, 2022, 5: 1-26.
[67]	QIU K F, ROMER R L, LONG Z Y, et al. Potassium isotopes as a tracer of hydrothermal alteration in ore systems[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2024, 368: 185-196. DOI URL
[68]	山东省第六地质矿产勘查院. 山东省招远市玲南矿区深部及外围金矿补充详查报告[R]. 北京: 全国地质资料馆, 2016.
[69]	山东省第三地质矿产勘查院. 山东省玲珑金矿田东风矿床171号脉金矿补充详查报告[R]. 济南: 山东省自然资源资料档案馆, 2011.
[70]	山东省第六地质矿产勘查院. 山东省招远市李家庄矿区金矿详查报告[R]. 北京: 全国地质资料馆, 2015.
[71]	山东省第六地质矿产勘查院. 山东省招远市水旺庄矿区深部及外围金矿详查报告[R]. 北京: 全国地质资料馆, 2015.
[72]	山东招金地质勘查有限公司. 山东省招远市栾家河地区金矿详查报告[R]. 北京: 全国地质资料馆, 2015.
[73]	SONG M C, WANG B, SONG Y X, et al. Spatial coupling relationship between faults and gold deposits in the Jiaodong ore concentration area and the effect of thermal doming-extension on mineralisation[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2023, 153: 105277. DOI URL
[74]	宋明春, 丁正江, 刘向东, 等. 胶东型金矿床控矿构造及成矿模式[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(5): 1774-1802.
[75]	宋明春, 王洪军, 刘洪波, 等. 胶西北金矿控矿断裂深部特征及对找矿的启示:来自地球物理探测的证据[J]. 中国地质, 2024, 51(1): 1-16.
[76]	陈国达. 成矿构造研究法[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1978: 413.
[77]	翟裕生, 林新多. 矿田构造学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1993: 214.
[78]	HOBBS B E, ORD A, REGENAUER-LIEB K. The thermodynamics of deformed metamorphic rocks: a review[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2011, 33(5): 758-818. DOI URL
[79]	ORD A, HOBBS B E, LESTER D R. The mechanics of hydrothermal systems: I. Ore systems as chemical reactors[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2012, 49: 1-44. DOI URL
[80]	杨立强, 杨伟, 张良, 等. 热液成矿系统构造控矿理论[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 239-266. DOI
[81]	QIU K F, DENG J, SAI S X, et al. Low-temperature thermochronology for defining the tectonic controls on heterogeneous gold endowment across the Jiaodong Peninsula, Eastern China[J]. Tectonics, 2023, 42: e2022TC007669.
[82]	COX S F. The dynamics of permeability enhancement and fluid flow in overpressured, fracture-controlled hydrothermal systems[M]//ROWLAND J V, RHYS D A. Applied structural geology of ore-forming hydrothermal systems. Washington: Society of Economic Geologists, 2020, 21: 25-82.
[83]	刘石年. 山东玲珑式金矿床矿体空间定位形式及其形成机制的探讨[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 1984(4): 47-56.
[84]	吕古贤, 孔庆存. 胶东玲珑-焦家式金矿地质[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993: 253.
[85]	汪劲草, 王国富, 汤静如. 玲珑-焦家地区金矿成矿构造体制的新认识[J]. 桂林工学院学报, 2002(1): 1-4.
[86]	DENG J, WANG Q F, YANG L Q, et al. The structure of ore-controlling strain and stress fields in the Shangzhuang gold deposit in Shandong Province, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 2008, 82(4): 769-780. DOI URL
[87]	路彦明, 肖力. 中深成系脉型金矿矿体分段富集律及成生机制: 以玲珑金矿田九曲矿段为例[J]. 长春科技大学学报, 1999, 29(2): 122-126, 147.
[88]	SONG M C, YI P H, XU J X, et al. A step metallogenetic model for gold deposits in the northwestern Shandong Peninsula, China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2012, 55(6): 940-948. DOI URL
[89]	宋明春, 林少一, 杨立强, 等. 胶东金矿成矿模式[J]. 矿床地质, 2020, 39(2): 215-236.
[90]	朱裕生. 成矿预测方法[J]. 中国地质, 1988(11): 30-32.
[91]	赵鹏大. 成矿定量预测与深部找矿[J]. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(5): 1-10.
[92]	山东省地质矿产勘查开发局第六地质大队. 山东省招远市水旺庄-李家庄大型金矿床深部及外围金矿调查评价报告[R]. 北京: 全国地质资料馆, 2020.

胶东台上-水旺庄巨型金矿床矿体空间分布规律及深部找矿预测

Spatial distribution pattern of orebodies and deep ore prospecting prediction of the Taishang-Shuiwangzhuang giant gold deposit in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 92

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王斌, 高永宝, 任涛, 寇少磊, 杨可, 王占彬, 刘基, 宋伊圩, 马振宇, 杜宛鸽. 龙门山构造带辛家咀金矿三维原生晕特征及深部找矿预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2026, 33(2): 311-330.
[2]	王斌, 周明岭, 丁正江, 张琪彬, 刘向东, 吕军阳, 周晓萍. 胶西北蚀变岩型金矿构造控矿机制与三维深部定位预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 140-154.
[3]	李博文, 王永志, 丁正江, 王斌, 温世博, 董宇浩, 纪政. 基于大模型与GraphRAG的胶东金矿智能搜索技术[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 155-164.
[4]	周圣荃, 李以科, 王永志, 刘海明, 李楠, 柯昌辉, 李瑞萍, 赵永岗, 张丽. 生成式AI技术在地学研究中的应用现状及发展趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 303-316.
[5]	王业明, 雷万杉, 张海东, 王腾, 赵博, 田洪浩. 胶东半岛英格庄金矿床钠长花岗岩与闪长玢岩的岩相学、年代学研究:对存在多期金矿化事件的启示[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(4): 405-421.
[6]	张晓飞, 唐相伟, 庞振山, 薛建玲, 陈辉, 王珺璐, 隗含涛, 雷晓力. 河南桐柏围山城地区金矿找矿预测综合信息模型构建与靶区预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(2): 357-370.
[7]	陈永清, 郑澳月, 费金娜, 赵婕, 赵鹏大. 应用二维经验模分解(2D-EMD)-主成分分析(PCA)组合模型定量圈定与评价胶东金与关键金属找矿靶区[J]. 地学前缘, 2025, 32(1): 266-282.
[8]	严丽萍, 谢先明, 汤振华. 基于物质来源解析的汕头市土壤重金属环境容量研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(4): 403-416.
[9]	朱平平, 刘岳, 成秋明. 定量确定胶东毕郭地区勘查地球化学异常的分布方向及地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 440-446.
[10]	吕承训, 张达, 许亚青, 郭涛, 王宗永, 霍庆龙, 袁月蕾. 胶东金矿成矿深度的构造校正测算及成矿预测[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(1): 427-438.
[11]	邵雪维, 彭永明, 王功文, 赵显勇, 唐佳洋, 黄蕾蕾, 刘晓宁, 赵宪东. 短波红外光谱、X 射线荧光光谱、黄铁矿热电性分析在胶东新城金矿田深部找矿中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 236-251.
[12]	陈辉, 林鲁军, 庞振山, 程志中, 薛建玲, 陶文, 马一行, 龚灵明, 申红涛. 四川会理拉拉铜矿找矿预测模型构建与找矿示范[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(3): 309-327.
[13]	倪培, 迟哲, 潘君屹. 斑岩型和浅成低温热液型矿床成矿流体与找矿预测研究:以华南若干典型矿床为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(2): 60-78.
[14]	李瑞红，王学求，迟清华，张必敏，柳青青，刘汉粮. 胶东水系沉积物金地球化学异常分布规律及其意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(4): 221-230.
[15]	毛先成，王迷军，刘占坤，陈进，邓浩. 基于勘查数据的胶东大尹格庄金矿床控矿地质因素定量分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(4): 84-93.