地学前缘 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 375-387.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.11.12
唐华风1,2,3,4(), 王寒非2, BenKENNEDY2, 张芯语4, MarcosROSSETTI2, AlanPatrickBISCHOFF2, AndrewNICOL2
收稿日期:
2020-09-25
修回日期:
2020-10-25
出版日期:
2021-01-25
发布日期:
2021-01-28
作者简介:
唐华风(1979—),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事火山地层和火山岩储层综合研究。E-mail: tanghfhc@jlu.edu.cn
基金资助:
TANG Huafeng1,2,3,4(), WANG Hanfei2, Ben KENNEDY2, ZHANG Xinyu4, Marcos ROSSETTI2, Alan Patrick BISCHOFF2, Andrew NICOL2
Received:
2020-09-25
Revised:
2020-10-25
Online:
2021-01-25
Published:
2021-01-28
摘要:
新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山是海底喷发形成的碎屑岩型火山,可代表浅埋藏火山岩的储层特征。本文根据5口钻井的孔隙度、渗透率、孔隙孔径和铸体薄片开展Kora火山的储层特征、储集空间组成、缝宽以及原生和次生孔隙之间关系的分析。研究结果如下:(1)储集空间主要为次生孔隙,然后是裂缝和原生孔隙;Kora火山具有高孔隙度和高渗透率特征,孔径具有双峰到单峰的分布特征。(2)炸裂缝、淬火缝和粒间孔形成于岩浆破碎和/或喷发期间;在晚Tortonian期间产生了网状构造裂缝,在Tortonian晚期至Messinian早期产生规则构造裂缝,二者形成时间均早于原油充注;筛状孔和铸模孔应由风化阶段和/或埋藏阶段的溶蚀作用形成,晶间微孔应由埋藏阶段的蚀变和/或重结晶作用形成。(3)原生孔隙控制次生孔隙的分布,特别是原生的裂缝;在Kora火山中控制筛状孔和铸模孔形成的缝宽的阈值约为9 μm,较宽的裂缝可优先促成筛状孔和铸模孔的形成。(4)再搬运火山颗粒含量的增加会显著降低高孔隙度岩石的总孔隙度;近源相带的孔隙度和渗透率高于远源相带,海底喷发火山远源相带发生的强烈钙质胶结可显著减少孔隙度和渗透率。相关认识可为火山岩储层形成、演化和分布规律研究提供依据。
中图分类号:
唐华风, 王寒非, BenKENNEDY, 张芯语, MarcosROSSETTI, AlanPatrickBISCHOFF, AndrewNICOL. 水下喷发火山碎屑岩储层特征及主控因素:以新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 375-387.
TANG Huafeng, WANG Hanfei, Ben KENNEDY, ZHANG Xinyu, Marcos ROSSETTI, Alan Patrick BISCHOFF, Andrew NICOL. Characteristics and controlling factors of volcanic reservoirs of subaqueous pyroclastic rocks: An analysis of the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(1): 375-387.
图1 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山位置图 (a)—Taranaki盆地的区域位置;(b)—Mohakatino火山带[30];(c)—Kora火山的顶面埋深(时间域)。
Fig.1 Maps showing the location of the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图4 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山的储集空间特征 a—Kora-1,1 990.1 m,凝灰岩富含晶屑,斜长石含有微裂缝;b—Kora-1a,1 894.12 m,凝灰质砾岩的安山岩岩屑;c—Kora-1,1 803.0 m,凝灰岩富含灰分,斜长石和基质中存在微裂缝;d—Kora-3,1 793.5 m,钙质胶结的凝灰质砂岩,高角度的规则裂缝充填方解石和石油;e—Kora-3,1 794.5 m,钙质胶结的凝灰质砂岩,中角度到高角度的规则裂缝充填方解石;f—Kora-3,1 781.5 m,钙质胶结的凝灰质砂岩,网状不规则裂缝充填方解石和石油;g—Kora-1,1 912.86 m,凝灰岩富含晶屑;h,i—Kora-1a,1 894.12 m,凝灰质砾岩中的安山岩岩屑;j—Kora-1a,1 790.98 m,凝灰岩;k—Kora-1,2 229.7 m,凝灰质砾岩中的凝灰岩碎屑;l—Kora-1,2 234.7 m,凝灰质砾岩中的凝灰岩碎屑。A—角闪石;P—斜长石;O—不透明矿物;C—炸裂缝;QF—冷凝收缩缝;TF—构造裂缝;IP—粒间孔;MP—铸模孔;SSP—筛状孔;CP—洞穴状孔;LP—晶屑中海绵状孔;SpP—基质中海绵状孔。图片是单偏光蓝色铸体照片,插图是正交偏光照片。
Fig.4 Void space characteristics of the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图5 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山的储集空间类型对总孔隙度的贡献特征 IP—粒间孔;MP—铸模孔;SSP—筛状孔;CP—洞穴状孔;LP—晶屑中海绵状孔;SpP—基质中海绵状孔;F—裂缝(包括炸裂缝、冷凝收缩缝和构造裂缝)。在Matlab软件中,通过蓝色图像的分割,结合人工区分各类孔隙,对IP、MP、SSP、CP和F的面孔率,即是图像的直接计算结果。LP和SpP两类孔隙的实际面孔率(φ(LP+SpP))需要通过公式φ(LP+SpP)=S(LP+SpP)×10%计算,S(LP+SpP)为LP和SsP区域的占比,根据蓝色铸体薄片的蓝色部分计算出来的面积比。10%是利用扫描电子显微镜估计的海绵状孔隙和内溶蚀微孔的几何平均值[34]。对Kora-1井、Kora-1a井和Kora-2井的52幅图像进行了面孔率计算。
Fig.5 Contribution of each kind of void space to the total porosity of rocks in the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图6 新西兰Taranaki 盆地中新世Kora火山的空隙度和渗透率特征(其他数据据文献[36,37]) n为样品数。在坎特伯雷大学完成强胶结凝灰质砾岩样品的测试。储层分区据文献[35]。
Fig.6 Porosity and Permeability characteristics of the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand (Other data from [36-37])
图7 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山的孔隙直径特征(数据据文献[38]) (a)—凝灰岩;(b)—块状强胶结的凝灰质砾岩;(c)—凝灰质砂岩、角砾岩和砂岩;(d)—凝灰质砾岩。
Fig.7 Pore aperture diameter characteristics of the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand (data after [38])
图8 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山的溶蚀溶解程度特征 颗粒支撑的凝灰岩如图Kora-1/1 803.0 m(a)、Kora-1/1 910.42 m(b)和Kora-1/1 912.86 m(c)所示,分别表现了弱、中、强程度的溶解作用。角砾岩中的熔结凝灰岩碎屑如图Kora-1a/1 911.95 m(d,e,f)所示,分别表现了弱、中、强程度的溶解和溶蚀作用。凝灰质砾岩中的熔岩碎屑如图Kora-1a/1 901.48 m(g)和Kora-1a/1 894.12 m(h,i)所示,分别表现了弱、中、强程度的溶解作用。A—角闪石;P—斜长石;O—不透明矿物;QF—冷凝收缩缝;TF—构造裂缝;IP—粒间孔;MP—铸模孔;SSP—筛状孔;CP—洞穴状孔;LP—晶屑中海绵状孔;SpP—基质中海绵状孔。镜下照片是单偏光蓝色铸体照片,插图是正交偏光照片。
Fig.8 Comparison of alteration intensity and dissolution diagenesis in pyroclastic rocks and tuffetite in the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图9 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山的储层演化示意图 A—角闪石;P—斜长石;O—不透明矿物;F—裂缝;IP—粒间孔;MP—铸模孔;SSP—筛状孔;LP—晶屑中海绵状孔;SpP—基质中海绵状孔。图片是单片光蓝色铸体照片。
Fig.9 Pore formation process in the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图10 新西兰Tarananki 盆地中新世Kora火山裂缝宽度特征 n为样品数。数据来自Kora-1井、Kora-1a井和Kora-2井22个薄片的118张照片。利用铸体薄片进行显微镜下测量得到缝宽。确定真实裂缝的依据有如下几方面:一是发生了溶蚀溶解作用;二是裂缝切割了岩屑或晶屑;三是裂缝中有硅质、钙质或泥质充填。由于岩石处于弱固结的状态,铸体薄片中也发现了一些样品制备过程中产生的诱导缝,该部分裂缝根据新鲜的切割边和良好的可拼合性特征进行排除。
Fig.10 Fracture aperture characteristics of the Miocene Kora Valcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图11 不同初始缝宽的裂缝与6μm裂缝的缝宽演化的对比示意图 图片仅讨论了流体对裂缝的渗透能力。流体和岩石具有相同的性质,假设水中酸性物质完全反应。
Fig.11 Comparisons of the pore evolution of the 6 μm diameter pore with others
图12 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山各类碎屑的储集空间构成和面孔率特征 n为样品数。F—裂缝;IP—粒间孔;MP—铸模孔;SSP—筛状孔;CP—洞穴状孔;LP—晶屑中海绵状孔;SpP—基质中海绵状孔。
Fig.12 Contribution of each kind of void space to total porosity in and surface porosity characteristics of volcanic particles from the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. (a,b) Tuff fragment; (c,d) Welded tuff fragment; and (e,f) Andesite fragment.
图13 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山再搬运火山碎屑含量与孔隙度的关系示意图
Fig.13 Relationship between the nonjuvenile particle content and porosity in the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
图14 新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山机构相带与孔隙度的关系 n—样品数。
Fig.14 Relationship between the facies belt and porosity in the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand
[1] |
SCHUTTER S R. Occurrences of hydrocarbons in and around igneous rocks[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003, 214(1):35-68.
DOI URL |
[2] |
FENG Z Q. Volcanic rocks as prolific gas reservoir: a case study from the Qingshen gas field in the Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(4/5):416-432.
DOI URL |
[3] |
CHEN Z H, WANG X Y, WANG X L, et al. Characteristics and petroleum origin of the Carboniferous volcanic rock reservoirs in the Shixi Bulge of Junggar Basin, western China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 80:517-537.
DOI URL |
[4] | CHEN Z Y, HUO Y, LI J S, et al. Relationship between Tertiary volcanic rocks and hydrocarbons in the Liaohe Basin, People’s Republic of China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83:1004-1014. |
[5] | 赵文智, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国陆上东、西部地区火山岩成藏比较研究与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1):1-11. |
[6] | 唐华风, 白冰, 边伟华, 等. 松辽盆地营城组火山机构地层结构定量模型[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(4):541-550. |
[7] |
CHEN Z H, LIU W, ZHANG Y, et al. Characterization of the paleocrusts of weathered Carboniferous volcanics from the Junggar Basin, western China: significance as gas reservoirs[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 77:216-234.
DOI URL |
[8] |
JIN Q, XU L, WAN C L, et al. Interactions between basalts and oil source rocks in rift basins: CO2 generation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 2007, 26(1):58-65.
DOI URL |
[9] |
FILHOA A T, MIZUSAKIB A M P, ANTONIOLI L. Magmatism and petroleum exploration in the Brazilian Paleozoic basins[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(2):143-151.
DOI URL |
[10] |
TAO S Z, LI C W, MA W J, et al. Geochemical analysis and origin of gas in volcanic reservoirs in the Songliao Basin[J]. Energy Exploration and Exploitation, 2017, 35(3):295-314.
DOI URL |
[11] | 唐华风, 李瑞磊, 吴艳辉, 等. 火山地层结构特征及其对波阻抗反演的约束[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(2):620-627. |
[12] |
ANTONIO P, GIOVANNI C, NICOLETTA F, et al. Influence of alteration on physical properties of volcanic rocks[J]. Tectonophysics, 2012, 566/567:67-86.
DOI URL |
[13] | 唐华风, 赵鹏九, 高有峰, 等. 盆地火山地层时空属性和岩石地层单位[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4):949-973. |
[14] | 唐华风, 孙海波, 高有峰, 等. 火山地层界面的类型、特征和储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5):1320-1329. |
[15] |
CHEN H Q, HU Y L, JIN J Q, et al. Fine stratigraphic division of volcanic reservoir by uniting of well data and seismic data: taking volcanic reservoir of member one of Yingcheng Formation in Xudong Area of Songliao Basin for an example[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2014, 25(2):337-347.
DOI URL |
[16] | 唐华风, 孔坦, 刘祥, 等. 松辽盆地下白垩统沉火山碎屑岩优质储层特征和形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(5):631-643. |
[17] |
LUO J L, ZHANG C L, QU Z H. Volcanic reservoir rocks-a case study of the Cretaceous Fenghuadian suite, Huanghua Basin, eastern China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1999, 22(4):397-415.
DOI URL |
[18] |
JONES S F, WIELENS H, WILLIAMSON M C, et al. Impact of magmatism on petroleum systems in the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Islands, Nunavut: a numerical modelling study[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2007, 30(3):237-256.
DOI URL |
[19] |
SRUOGA P, RUBINSTEIN N. Processes controlling porosity and permeability in volcanic reservoirs from the Austral and Neuquén basins, Argentina[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(1):115-129.
DOI URL |
[20] | 王璞珺, 吴河勇, 庞颜明, 等. 松辽盆地火山岩相: 相序、相模式与储层物性的定量关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006(5):805-812. |
[21] | TANG H F, CRYTON P, GAO Y F, et al. Types and characteristics of volcanostratigraphic boundaries and their oil-gas reservoir significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition), 2015, 89(1):163-174. |
[22] |
TANG H F, ZHAO X Y, LIU X, et al. Filling characteristics, reservoir features and exploration significance of a volcanostratigraphic sequence in a half-graben basin: a case analysis of the Wangfu Rift Depression in Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 113:104128.
DOI URL |
[23] |
NICOL A, CAMPBELL J K. Late Cenozoic thrust tectonics, Picton, New Zealand[J]. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1990, 33:485-494.
DOI URL |
[24] |
SUTHERLAND R. The Australia-Pacific boundary and Cenozoic plate motions in the SW Pacific: some constraints from Geosat data[J]. Tectonics, 1995, 14:819-831.
DOI URL |
[25] |
STROGEN D P, SEEBECK H, NICOL A, et al. Two-phase Cretaceous-Paleocene rifting in the Taranaki Basin region, New Zealand: implications for Gondwana break-up[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2017, 174:929-946.
DOI URL |
[26] |
KROEGER K F, THRASHERA G P, SARMAB M. The evolution of a Middle Miocene deep-water sedimentary system in northwestern New Zealand (Taranaki Basin): depositional controls and mechanisms[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 101:355-372.
DOI URL |
[27] |
BULL S, NICOL A, STROGEN D, et al. Tectonic controls on Miocene sedimentation in the Southern Taranaki Basin and implications for New Zealand plate boundary deformation[J]. Basin Research, 2019, 31:253-273.
DOI URL |
[28] | BERGMAN S C, TALBOT J P, THOMPSON P R. The Kora Miocene submarine Andesite stratovolcano hydrocarbon reservoir, Northern Taranaki Basin [C]∥GNS. Proceedings of the 1991 New Zealand Oil Exploration Conference. Wellington, New Zealand, 1992: 178-206. |
[29] | BISCHOFF A P, NICOL A, BEGGS M. Stratigraphy of architectural elements in a buried volcanic system and implications for hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Interpretation, 2017, 5(3):141-159. |
[30] |
SEEBECK HC, NICOL A, VILLAMOR P, et al. Structure and kinematics of the Taupo Rift, New Zealand[J]. Tectonics, 2014, 33:1178-1199.
DOI URL |
[31] |
KLUG C, CASHMAN K V. Permeability development in vesiculating magmas: implications for fragmentation[J]. Bulletin of Volcanology, 1996, 58(2):87-100.
DOI URL |
[32] | 刘万洙, 王璞珺, 门广田, 等. 松辽盆地北部深层火山岩储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003(1):28-31. |
[33] |
SRUOGA P, RUBINSTEIN N, HINTERWIMMER G. Porosity and permeability in volcanic rocks: a case study on the Serie Tobifera, South Patagonia, Argentina[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2004, 132(1):31-43.
DOI URL |
[34] | 高有峰, 吴艳辉, 刘万洙, 等. 松辽盆地南部英台断陷营城组火山岩晶间微孔特征及储层效应[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4):667-674. |
[35] | 国家能源局. 油气储层评价方法: SY/T 6285—2011[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011. |
[36] | Petroleum ARCO. Final well report, Kora-2. PPL 38447[R]. Wellington: Petroleum ARCO NZ Inc, 1988. |
[37] | Petroleum ARCO. Final well report, Kora-1 Kora-1A. PPL 38447[R]. Wellington: Petroleum ARCO NZ Inc, 1988. |
[38] | PetroTech Associates. Petroleum report PR4178, capillary pressure and XRD mineralogy study of kora wells[R]. Wellington: Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand, 2010. |
[39] |
KUTOVAYA A, KROEGER K F, SEEBECK H, et al. Thermal effects of magmatism on surrounding sediments and petroleum systems in the northern offshore Taranaki Basin, New Zealand[J]. Geosciences, 2019, 9(7):288.
DOI URL |
[40] | 邹才能, 赵文智, 贾承造, 等. 中国沉积盆地火山岩油气藏形成与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008(3):257-271. |
[41] | 唐华风, 徐正顺, 吴艳辉, 等. 松辽盆地营城组火山岩储层流动单元特征和控制因素[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(1):55-62. |
[42] |
LAUBACH S E, WARD M E. Diagenesis in porosity evolution of opening-mode fractures, Middle Triassic to Lower Jurassic La Boca Formation, NE Mexico[J]. Tectonophysics, 2006, 419:75-97.
DOI URL |
[43] |
INOUE A, MEUNIER A, PATRIER-MAS P, et al. Application of chemical geothermometry to low-temperature trioctahedral chlorites[J]. Clays and Clay Minerals, 2009, 57(3):371-382.
DOI URL |
[44] |
NOGUERA C, FRITZ B, CLÉMENT A. Simulation of the nucleation and growth of clay minerals coupled with cation exchange[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2011, 75:3402-3418.
DOI URL |
[45] | 罗静兰, 邵红梅, 杨艳芳, 等. 松辽盆地深层火山岩储层的埋藏-烃类充注-成岩时空演化过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(5):175-187. |
[46] |
ROWE M C, ELLIS B S, LINDEBERG A. Quantifying crystallization and devitrification of rhyolites by means of X-ray diffraction and electron microprobe analysis[J]. American Mineralogist, 2012, 97:1685-1699.
DOI URL |
[47] | 唐华风, 庞彦明, 边伟华, 等. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析[J]. 石油学报, 2008(6): 841-845+852. |
[48] |
WANG P J, CHEN S M. Cretaceous volcanic reservoirs and their exploration in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2015, 99(3):499-523.
DOI URL |
[49] |
YANG C, HOU L, HOU L H, et al. Controlling factors of volcanic hydrocarbon reservoirs in Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 2(4):219-228.
DOI URL |
[50] | DAI X J, TANG H F, ZHANG T, et al. Facies architecture model of the Shimentan Formation pyroclastic rocks in the Block-T Units, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin, and its exploration significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition), 2019, 93(4):1076-1087. |
[51] |
ALLEN S R, HAYWARD B W, MATHEWS E. A facies model for a submarine volcaniclastic apron: the Miocene Manukau Subgroup, New Zealand[J]. GSA Bulletin, 2007, 119(5/6):725-742.
DOI URL |
[52] |
TROFIMOVS J, SPARKS R S J, TALLING P J. Anatomy of a submarine pyroclastic flow and associated turbidity current: July 2003 dome collapse, Soufrière Hills volcano, Montserrat, West Indies[J]. Sedimentology, 2008, 55:617-634.
DOI URL |
[53] |
FUJIBAYASHI N, ASAKURA K, HATTORI T, et al. Pillow lava and spasmodic submarine fire fountaining in the middle Miocene marginal basin, Sado Island, Japan[J]. Island Arc, 2014, 23:344-364.
DOI URL |
[54] | WHITE J D L, SCHIPPER C I, KANO K. Submarine explosive eruption[M]∥SIGURDSSON H. Encyclopedia of volcanoes. New York: Academic Press, 2015: 553-569. |
[1] | 董宏坤, 万世明, 刘畅, 赵德博, 曾志刚, 李安春. 南海北部晚中新世红绿韵律层成因的矿物学和地球化学约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 42-54. |
[2] | 张宗言, 刘祥, 李响, 柯学, 张楗钰, 徐亚东. 广东雷州半岛晚渐新世—早更新世孢粉共存因子分析及古气候变化重建[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(2): 303-316. |
[3] | 殷志强, 魏刚, 秦小光, 李文娟, 赵无忌. 青藏高原东北缘黄河上游滑坡与堰塞湖研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(2): 46-57. |
[4] | 彭博, 刘成林, 祁柯宁, 刘大鹏, 王嘉琦, 李宗星, 马寅生, 胡俊杰. 柴达木盆地东部上泥盆统—下石炭统沉积分异特征及其主控因素讨论[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 104-114. |
[5] | 张满郎, 郭振华, 张林, 付晶, 郑国强, 谢武仁, 马石玉. 四川安岳气田龙王庙组颗粒滩岩溶储层发育特征及主控因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 235-248. |
[6] | 刘洪, 张林奎, 黄瀚霄, 李光明, 欧阳渊, 余槐, 梁维, 张洪铭, 陈小平. 冈底斯西段罗布真浅成低温热液型金银矿的成矿流体演化:来自流体包裹体、H-O同位素的证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 49-65. |
[7] | 肖良, 王兴, 李雪梅, 李相传, 贾慧, 孙楠, 梁嘉琪, 王钦, 李江啸, 雍媛媛. 浙东中新世菱属果实化石的数量分类[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(4): 110-123. |
[8] | 牛花朋,王贵文,鲜本忠,付健伟,焦小芹,李洪娟. 深层火山碎屑熔岩形成机理及其指相意义研究:以松辽盆地庆深气田为例 [J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(6): 281-288. |
[9] | 黄强兵,彭建兵,王飞永,刘妮娜. 特殊地质城市地下空间开发利用面临的问题与挑战[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(3): 85-94. |
[10] | 董少群,王涛,曾联波,刘凯,梁锋,尹启航,曹东升. 地下空间逾渗与裂缝属性的关系分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(3): 140-146. |
[11] | 曾维特,丁文龙,张金川,李玉喜,王濡岳,久凯. 渝东南—黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩微纳米级孔隙发育特征及主控因素分析 [J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(3): 220-235. |
[12] | 肖萌,袁选俊,吴松涛,曹正林,唐勇,谢宗瑞,王瑞菊. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组砾岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(1): 212-224. |
[13] | 窦立荣,王景春,王仁冲,魏小东. 中非裂谷系前寒武系基岩油气成藏组合[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2): 15-23. |
[14] | 朱筱敏,潘荣,朱世发,魏巍,叶蕾. 致密储层研究进展和热点问题分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2): 141-146. |
[15] | 王濡岳,龚大建,冷济高,王兴华,丛森,丁文龙,付福全,杨滔,赖富强. 黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩储层发育特征:以岑巩区块为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(6): 286-299. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||