深层含水层地下储热技术的发展现状与展望

doi:10.13745/j.esf.2020.1.3

地学前缘 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 17-24.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.2020.1.3

深层含水层地下储热技术的发展现状与展望

黄永辉¹^,²^,³(), 庞忠和¹^,²^,⁴^,^*(), 程远志¹^,²^,⁴, 孔彦龙¹^,²^,⁴, 汪集旸¹^,²^,⁴

1.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所; 中国科学院页岩气与地质工程重点实验室, 北京 100029
2.中国科学院地球科学研究院, 北京 100029
3.Department of Environmental Informatics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
4.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2019-03-31 修回日期:2019-05-11 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-01-20
通讯作者: 庞忠和
作者简介:黄永辉(1989—),男,博士,主要从事热储工程数值模拟研究。E-mail: yh.huang@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项资助项目(XDA21050500)

The development and outlook of the deep aquifer thermal energy storage (deep-ATES)

HUANG Yonghui¹^,²^,³(), PANG Zhonghe¹^,²^,⁴^,^*(), CHENG Yuanzhi¹^,²^,⁴, KONG Yanlong¹^,²^,⁴, WANG Jiyang¹^,²^,⁴

1. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100029, China
2. Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
3. Department of Environmental Informatics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2019-03-31 Revised:2019-05-11 Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-01-20
Contact: PANG Zhonghe

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

深层含水层储热是一种利用深度>500 m的深层含水层作为储热介质的储热技术,储热对象通常为50~150 ℃的热水。它通过地下水井从深层含水层中抽取和灌入地下水,实现热能储存和回收。深层含水层储热技术是弥补能源供需时空分布的不平衡,综合利用多种可再生能源,实现节能减排的有效途径,是国内外研究的前沿和热点。文中首先阐述了深层含水层储热系统在世界范围内的历史发展,归纳储热系统的热工性能,在总结前人研究工作的基础上分析影响其热回收效率的关键参数,并对各个参数对热回收效率的敏感性做了综述。在此基础上,本文还讨论了限制深层含水层储热系统发展的技术瓶颈,并针对系统的经济效益和市场潜力做了预测和展望。

关键词: 深层含水层储热系统, 热回收效率, 地热, 水文地质, 经济效益

Abstract:

The deep aquifer thermal energy storage (deep-ATES) is a technology that uses deep aquifer (> 500 m) as the thermal storage medium. Storage and recovery of thermal energy are achieved by extracting and injecting groundwater from deep aquifers through groundwater wells. Using geothermal energy as basic carrier, deep-ATES achieves balancing among multiple energy resources, and guarantees a steady supply of energy. Deep-ATES is an effective and critical technology for matching up heat supply and demand over time and space. In this paper, we presented a comprehensive review of the worldwide development of deep-ATES projects and summarized its thermal performance indicators. Thereby, we investigated the key processes and dominant hydrogeological and operational parameters controlling the thermal recovery efficiency of a deep-ATES system. We further discussed the technological bottlenecks in deep-ATES on the basis of previous researches. The last but not least, we evaluated and predicted the economic and market potentials of the deep-ATES system.

Key words: hot temperature aquifer thermal energy storage, thermal recovery efficiency, geothermal energy, hydrogeology, economical-potential

中图分类号:

P314
P641.25

黄永辉, 庞忠和, 程远志, 孔彦龙, 汪集旸. 深层含水层地下储热技术的发展现状与展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 17-24.

HUANG Yonghui, PANG Zhonghe, CHENG Yuanzhi, KONG Yanlong, WANG Jiyang. The development and outlook of the deep aquifer thermal energy storage (deep-ATES)[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(1): 17-24.

图/表 7

图1 深层含水层储热系统储/供能流程示意图:以地下水为水源的情形

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of energy storage/supply in deep aquifer energy storage system

表1 综合比较三组跨季节地下储能方式的主要特点(修改自文献[6])

Table 1 Comparison of three seasonal underground thermal energy storage (UTES) scheme. Modified from [6].

特点	水箱蓄热	浅层含水层储热	深层含水层储热
储热媒介	水	地下水/岩石	地下水/岩石
地质要求	+	+ +	+ + +
储热体积	+	+ + +	+ + +
可储热量	+	+ +	+ + +
空间需求	+ + +	+	+
投资	+ + +	+	+
环境影响	+ +	++	+

表2 国际上深层含水层储能系统工程案例表[9]

Table 2 Overview of deep aquifer energy storage project[9]

年份	地点/工程名称	当前状态	热源	注入温度/℃	深度/ m
1976	Auburn University, Mobile/AL, USA	实验/已关闭	电厂余热	55	40~61
1982	SPEOS, Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland	已关闭	废水处理厂余热	69	未知
1982	Hørsholm, Denmark	示范工程/已关闭	垃圾处理厂余热	100	10
1982	University of Minnesota, St. Paul, USA	实验/已关闭	未知	115 (150)	180~240
1987	Plaisir, Thiverval-Grignon, France	实验/已关闭	未知	180	500
1991	De Uithof, Universiteit Utrecht, Netherlands	示范工程/已关闭	热电联供	90	4~45
1998	Hooge Burch, Zwammerdam near Gouda, Netherlands	示范工程/已关闭	热电联供	90	未知
1999	Reichstag, Berlin, Germany	示范工程/正在运行	热电联供	70	300
2004	Neubrandenburg, Germany	运行中	热电联供	75~80	1 250
2015	Duiven, Netherlands	可行性研究	垃圾处理厂余热	140	未知
2016	BMW, TU Munich, Germany	示范工程/运行中	未知	130	500~700
2017	Hamburg, Germany	运行中	垃圾处理厂余热	80~90	400~500
2017	Bern, Switzerland	计划	垃圾处理厂余热	90~100	500

表3 深层含水层储能系统的热工性能指标

Table 3 The thermal performance indicators for high-temperature aquifer thermal storage system

指标	定义	方程式
热干扰强度	一口井附近区域的水温受另一口井的水温影响的变化程度	热突破时间^[15,16]:t_b= $π H d 2 ρ aq c aq 3 Q ρ w c w$
热回收效率	从含水层中开采出来的热量与注入含水层中的热量的比值	热回收效率^[15]:η= $E extract E inject$
瑞利数 (Rayleigh number)	含水层中自然对流和扩散热量、质量传递之比	瑞利数^[10]:Ra= $αρgH · C α · k α v · Δ T μ λ α$

表3 深层含水层储能系统的热工性能指标

Table 3 The thermal performance indicators for high-temperature aquifer thermal storage system

指标	定义	方程式
热干扰强度	一口井附近区域的水温受另一口井的水温影响的变化程度	热突破时间^[15,16]:t_b= $π H d 2 ρ aq c aq 3 Q ρ w c w$
热回收效率	从含水层中开采出来的热量与注入含水层中的热量的比值	热回收效率^[15]:η= $E extract E inject$
瑞利数 (Rayleigh number)	含水层中自然对流和扩散热量、质量传递之比	瑞利数^[10]:Ra= $αρgH · C α · k α v · Δ T μ λ α$

表4 综合比较不同储热模式的热回收效率

Table 4 Comprehensive comparison of thermal recovery efficiencies of different thermal storage systems

储热模式	热回收率	参考文献
深层含水层储热系统	60%~80%	[8,10,17]
浅层含水层储热系统	45%~85%	[8,18]
地埋管储热系统	40%~70%	[19-20]
水箱蓄热	80%~90%	[20]

表5 模拟含水层中的流体流动和传热的主流模拟软件及其特点

Table 5 Numerical simulation softwares and their characteristics for modeling groundwater flow and heat transport in aquifer

模型	数值离散方法	特征与应用条件
AQUA3D^[21]	有限元	3-D;模拟地下水流动、质量传输与热传导过程
DuMu^{x [22]}	有限体积	3-D;开源模拟多孔介质与裂隙介质中的非等温多相流传输
FEFLOW^[23]	有限元	3-D;多组分多相流的质量传输、热传导
FEHM^[24]	控制体积有限元	3-D;多组分多相流的质量传输、热传导以及化学反应耦合过程
HST2D/3D^[25]	有限差分	模拟饱和流体在多孔介质中的流动,可模拟地下水流随温度/压力的变化
TOUGH2^[26]	积分式有限差分	3-D; 模拟非饱和/饱和流体在多孔介质与裂隙介质中的流动和传输过程
MT3DMS^[27]	有限差分	3-D; 通常与MODFLOW进行耦合,可用于模拟地下水流动、质量传输与热传导过程
OpenGeoSys^[28]	有限元	3-D;多孔介质与裂隙介质中的水力-传热-力学-化学(THMC)多物理场模拟

表6 大型深层含水层储能系统中提取每GJ热能的成本价格[8]

Table 6 Cost price per GJ of thermal energy for the large high-temperature aquifer thermal storage system[8]

大型深度含水层储能系统中注入热水的温度/℃	成本价格/ (欧元·GJ^-1)
75	3.5
93	1.9

参考文献 33

[1]	SCHMIDT T. The central solar heating plant with aquifer thermal energy store in Rostock: results after four years of operation [C]//Proceedings of Eurosun. Freiburg, Germany: International Solar Energy Society, 2004: 20-23.
[2]	JEON J, LEE S, PASQUINELLI L, et al. Sensitivity analysis of recovery efficiency in high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage with single well[J]. Energy, 2015, 90:1349-1359. DOI URL
[3]	刘雪玲, 朱家玲, 刘立伟. 热泵耦合含水层储能技术应用研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2009, 36:132-135.
[4]	赵新颖, 万曼影, 马捷. 地下含水层储能及其对环境影响的评估[J]. 能源研究与利用, 2004, 1:51-54.
[5]	马捷, 王明育, 戴斌. 地下含水层的储能和过程特性的分析[J]. 华北电力大学学报, 2004, 31:57-60.
[6]	FLEUCHAUS P, GODSCHALK B, STOBER I, et al. Worldwide application of aquifer thermal energy storage:a review[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 94:861-876.
[7]	WESSELINK M, LIU W, KOORNNEEF J, et al. Conceptual market potential framework of high temperature aquifer thermal energy storage:a case study in the Netherlands[J]. Energy, 2018, 147:477-489. DOI URL
[8]	DRIJVER B, VAN AARSSEN M, ZWART B D. High-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage ( HT-ATES ) : sustainable and multi-usable [C]//Proceedings of the 12th international conference on energy storage.Lleida, Spain: International Energy Agency, 2012.
[9]	HOLSTENKAMP L, NEIDIG P, STEFFAHN J, et al. Interdisciplinary review of medium-deep aquifer thermal energy in north Germany[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 142:327-336.
[10]	SCHOUT G, DRIJVER B, GUTIERREZ-NERI M, et al. Analysis of recovery efficiency in high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage: a Rayleigh-based method[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2014, 22:281-291. DOI URL
[11]	KABUS F, WOLFGRAMM M, SEIBT A, et al. Aquifer thermal energy storage in Neubrandenburg: monitoring throughout three years of regular operation [C]//Proceedings of the EFFSTOCK conference. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Society of HVAC Engineers, 2009: 1-8.
[12]	UECKERT M, BAUMANN T. Hydrochemical aspects of high-temperature aquifer storage in carbonaceous aquifers: evaluation of a field study[J]. Geothermal Energy, 2019, 7(1):4. DOI URL
[13]	GAO L, ZHAO J, AN Q, et al. A review on system performance studies of aquifer thermal energy storage[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 142:3537-3545. DOI URL
[14]	RANDOLPH J B, SAAR M. Combining geothermal energy capture with geologic carbon dioxide sequestration[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38:10.
[15]	GAO L, ZHAO J, AN Q, et al. Thermal performance of medium-to-high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage systems[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 146:898-909. DOI URL
[16]	ZHOU X, GAO Q, CHEN X, et al. Developmental status and challenges of GWHP and ATES in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 42:973-985 DOI URL
[17]	VAN LOPIK J H, HARTOG N, ZAADNOORDIJK W J. The use of salinity contrast for density difference compensation to improve the thermal recovery efficiency in high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage systems[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2016, 24:1255-1271. DOI URL
[18]	BAKR M, VAN OOSTROM N, SOMMER W. Efficiency of and interference among multiple aquifer thermal energy storage systems: a Dutch case study[J]. Renewable Energy, 2013, 60:53-62. DOI URL
[19]	WENZLAFF C, WINTERLEITNER G, SCHÜTZ F. Controlling parameters of a mono-well high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage in porous media, northern Oman[J]. Petroleum Geoscience, 2019: 2018-104.
[20]	LANAHAN M, TABARES-VELASCO P. Seasonal thermal-energy storage: a critical review on BTES systems, modeling, and system design for higher system efficiency[J]. Energy, 2017, 10(6):743.
[21]	TRAN M, ZUBA M, LE S, et al. Aqua-3D: an underwater network animator[J]. Oceans IEEE, 2012: 1-5.
[22]	FLEMISCH B, DARCIS M, ERBERSEDER K, et al. DuMux: DUNE for multi-{phase, component, scale, physics, …} flow and transport in porous media[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2011, 34:1102-1112. DOI URL
[23]	DIERSCH H J G, BAUER D, HEIDEMANN W, et al. Finite element modeling of borehole heat exchanger systems[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2011, 37:1122-1135.
[24]	ZYVOLOSKI G, FEHM: a control volume finite element code for simulating subsurface multi-phase multi-fluid heat and mass transfer[J]. Los Alamos Unclassif, 2007: Rep. LA-UR-07-3359.
[25]	KIPP K L Jr. Guide to the revised heat and solute transport simulator: HST3D Version 2[R]//Water-resources investigations report. Virginia:United States Geological Survey, 1997, 97:4157.
[26]	PRUESS K, OLDENBURG C, MORIDIS G. TOUGH2 user's guide. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2012: Rep. LBNL-43134.
[27]	ZHENG C M. MT3D: a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems[R]. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama, 1992.
[28]	KOLDITZ O, GÖRKE U J, SHAO H, et al. Thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical processes in fractured porous media: modelling and benchmarking[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[29]	WINTERLEITNER G, SCHÜTZ F, WENZLAFF C, et al. The impact of reservoir heterogeneities on high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage systems: a case study from northern Oman[J]. Geothermics, 2018, 74:150-162. DOI URL
[30]	KILKI&͐, &͐ F, WANG C, BJÖRK F, et al. Cleaner energy scenarios for building clusters in campus areas based on the rational exergy management model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 155:72-82. DOI URL
[31]	RÉVEILLÈRE A, HAMM V, LESUEUR H, et al. Geothermal contribution to the energy mix of a heating network when using aquifer thermal energy storage: modeling and application to the Paris basin[J]. Geothermics, 2013, 47:69-79. DOI URL
[32]	WERNER J. Environmental footprint of high temperature aquifer thermal energy storage[D]. Utrecht, Netherlands: University Utrecht, 2016.
[33]	WESSELINK M, LIU W, KOORNNEEF J, et al. Conceptual market potential framework of high temperature aquifer thermal energy storage:a case study in the Netherlands[J]. Energy, 2018, 147:477-489. DOI URL

深层含水层地下储热技术的发展现状与展望

The development and outlook of the deep aquifer thermal energy storage (deep-ATES)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何雨江, 刘肖, 邢林啸, 谭现锋, 卜宪标. 河北保定岩溶地热结垢过程模拟及防垢对策[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(4): 430-437.
[2]	文冬光, 宋健, 刁玉杰, 张林友, 张福存, 张森琦, 叶成明, 朱庆俊, 史彦新, 金显鹏, 贾小丰, 李胜涛, 刘东林, 王新峰, 杨骊, 马鑫, 吴海东, 赵学亮, 郝文杰. 深部水文地质研究的机遇与挑战[J]. 地学前缘, 2022, 29(3): 11-24.
[3]	张小文, 何江涛, 黄冠星. 石家庄地区浅层地下水铁锰分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 206-218.
[4]	王迪, 汪新伟, 毛翔, 武明辉, 刘慧盈, 张瑄, 王婷灏. 河北武城凸起地热田地热地质特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(3): 269-280.
[5]	王贵玲, 刘彦广, 朱喜, 张薇. 中国地热资源现状及发展趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 1-9.
[6]	罗文行, 孙国强, 周洋, 刘德民, 陈棋. 试论地球深部地热能传输机理[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 10-16.
[7]	朱戈, 刘绍文, 李香兰, 吴迪. 长江下游区域地温场特征及其能源意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 25-34.
[8]	康志强, 张起钻, 管彦武, 刘德民, 袁金福, 杨志强, 陆济璞, 王新宇, 张勤军, 张美玲, 冯民豪. 广西干热岩地热资源赋存条件分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 55-62.
[9]	张根袁, 刘德民, 张婧琪, 温琛, 康志强, 关俊鹏. 广东省惠州市博罗—大亚湾NW-SE向断陷系统地热资源分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 63-71.
[10]	何治亮, 张英, 冯建赟, 罗军, 李朋威. 基于工程开发原则的干热岩目标区分类与优选[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 81-93.
[11]	天娇, 庞忠和, 张睿. FixAl及同位素方法在EGS返排液研究中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 112-122.
[12]	马月花, 唐保春, 苏生云, 张盛生, 李成英. 青海共和盆地地热流体地球化学特征及热储水-岩相互作用过程[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 123-133.
[13]	庞忠和, 罗霁, 程远志, 段忠丰, 天娇, 孔彦龙, 李义曼, 胡圣标, 汪集旸. 中国深层地热能开采的地质条件评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 134-151.
[14]	李亭昕, 蔡永丰, 刘彦广, 刘桂宏, 张宏亮, 秦祥熙. 献县地热田碳酸盐岩热储示踪试验与模拟[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 152-158.
[15]	郭清海, 何曈, 庄亚芹, 骆进, 张灿海. 化学刺激法提高花岗岩类岩石裂隙渗透性的实验研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(1): 159-169.