地学前缘 ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 253-265.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.2016.03.029

• 非主题来稿选登 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地代家坪地区长6致密油储层孔隙结构特征及分类评价

周翔,何生,刘萍,俱云娟   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 资源学院, 湖北 武汉 430074
    2. 河南油田 第二采油厂, 河南 南阳 474780
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-14 修回日期:2016-02-21 出版日期:2016-05-15 发布日期:2016-05-15
  • 作者简介:周翔(1988—),男,博士研究生,从事油气田开发地质研究。E-mail:zhouxiang2206@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05005001);高等学校学科创新引智计划资助项目(B14031)

Characteristics and classification of tight oil pore structure in reservoir Chang 6 of Daijiaping area, Ordos Basin

ZHOU Xiang, HE Sheng, LIU Ping   

  1. 1. Faculty of Resource, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
    2. No.2 Production Plant, Henan Oilfield Branch Company, Nanyang 474780, China
  • Received:2015-07-14 Revised:2016-02-21 Online:2016-05-15 Published:2016-05-15

摘要:

利用取心井铸体薄片、扫描电镜、X衍射、压汞测试等分析化验资料,在系统研究鄂尔多斯盆地代家坪地区长6致密油储层微观孔隙结构特征、成因机理的基础上对其进行分类评价。结果表明长6储层储集空间以粒内溶孔、残余粒间孔为主,次为粒间溶孔、岩屑溶孔,喉道类型以片状、弯片状和缩颈型喉道为主。沉积作用形成的岩石组构和成分差异决定了储层原始孔渗条件,并影响到后期成岩作用的类型和强度;各成岩事件对物性影响定量计算表明,强烈的压实和碳酸盐胶结是造成储层原生孔隙结构被破坏的主要原因;构造挤压则加剧了孔隙结构的非均质性;结合盆地埋藏史将孔隙演化分为浅埋藏胶结减孔带、中埋藏压实减孔带、深埋藏溶蚀增孔带和深埋藏胶结减孔带等4个阶段。通过微观孔喉结构参数与储层宏观物性相关性分析,优选最大连通喉道半径、主要流动喉道半径、分选系数、排驱压力和中值压力等5个孔隙结构参数作为分类依据;进一步采用Q型聚类分析将长6储层分为4种类型,结果表明Ⅰ、Ⅱ类储层孔隙结构较好,为研究区有利开发目标区。

关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 长6油层组, 致密油, 孔隙结构, 储层评价

Abstract:

Based on the data such as cast thin section, scanning electron microscope, Xray diffractometry and mercuryinjection, this paper has researched the micropore structure classification and evaluation of tight oil reservoir Chang 6 in Daijiaping area according to the feature and genetic analysis. The results showed that the reservoir space of reservoir Chang 6 is mainly characterized by intragranular dissolved pore and residual intergranular pore, and secondly by intergranular dissolved pore and debris dissolved pore associating with flaky, curved lamellar throat and necking throat mainly. The differences between rock fabric and clastic composition during sedimentation decided the original porosity and permeability, and influenced the diagenesis type and strength in the later stage. The results of the quantity calculation about the influence of diagenesis on reservoir quality suggest that compaction and cement of carbonate are the principal reason causing the damage of primary pore; whereas tectonic compression strengthened the heterogeneity of reservoir pore.We divided the porosity evolution into four stage, such as shallow burial cement, middle burial compaction porosity decrease, deep burial dissolve porosity increase and deep burial cement porosity decrease according to burial history analysis. Based on the correlation analysis among pore structure parameters and physical properties, we selected the largest connected throat radius, the main flow throat radius, sorting coefficient, displacement pressure and median pressure as the basis parameters for classification of reservoir. Further, this paper divides the reservoir of Chang 6 member into four types by Qcluster analysis, in which Ⅰ and Ⅱ types of reservoir pore structure are more favorable to be as development target play.

Key words: Ordos Basin, oil bearing layer Chang 6, tight oil, pore structure, reservoir evaluation

中图分类号: