地学前缘 ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 1-26.DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.2015.03.001

• 地球科学思维 • 上一篇    下一篇

沉积盆地类型划分及其相关问题讨论

刘池洋, 王建强, 赵红格, 张东东, 邓煜, 赵晓辰   

  1. 西北大学 大陆动力学国家重点实验室; 西北大学 含油气盆地研究所, 陕西 西安 710069
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-02 修回日期:2015-02-02 出版日期:2015-05-15 发布日期:2015-05-15
  • 作者简介:刘池阳,笔名刘池洋(1953—),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事盆地动力学、油气(能源)地质与勘探等方面科研与教学工作。E-mail:lcy@nwu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41330315,91214301,90814005);中国地质调查局专项项目(12120113039900,12120114009201);西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室科学技术部专项

The classification of sedimentary basins and discussion on relevant issues.

LIU Che-Xiang, WANG Jian-Jiang, DIAO Gong-Ge, ZHANG Dong-Dong, DENG Yu, DIAO Xiao-Chen   

  • Received:2015-01-02 Revised:2015-02-02 Online:2015-05-15 Published:2015-05-15

摘要:

沉积盆地类型划分是盆地及其相关领域研究的重要基础。已有的盆地分类方案较多,各有侧重和所长,但对陆内盆地的划分和研究较为薄弱。沉积盆地是一个典型的复杂巨系统,对其分类是一个复杂的系统工程。盆地分类的原则和结果应体现此系统的整体性、层次性、关联性、典型性(代表性)和可对比性(预测性)。盆地类型划分的依据主要包括盆地发育鼎盛时期所处的大地构造位置、地壳岩石圈类型、沉降机制和动力环境、盆地结构构造特征与基底性质、沉积环境及充填特征等。导致盆地沉降的动力主要源自地球深部,可分为热力、应力、重力及其复合4种。小行星等天体撞击地球所形成的盆地属特殊类型,将其划归重力成因盆地大类。还有一种值得注意的地貌成因盆地,其形成与内动力地质作用联系不密切,主要由地表负向地形存在而导致沉积物充填和水体汇聚。这类盆地在不同大地构造环境中均有发育,但其地球动力学意义和沉积矿产赋存条件等均与内动力成因的盆地差别颇大。故将其作为新的盆地和成因类型单独列出。根据上述沉积盆地分类的原则和基础,以全球板块构造动力环境、大陆内部动力活动的独立性、主动性和盆地沉降成因的主动力为主线,综合和归纳前人分类方案和盆地研究成果,将盆地发育的区域构造动力环境分为6大类(大洋和大陆板块内部,离散型、消减型、碰撞型、转换型大陆(板块)边缘),增加了天体撞击的特殊型和后期改造的复合型2大类与之并列;将前6大类构造动力环境中发育的沉积盆地分为44(亚)类,按构造动力环境、盆地主要构造力学性质(即应力)两大系统,分别进行了划分和归类。对本盆地分类方案中新的类型、或内涵有变、或需说明的部分盆地及术语,进行了进一步讨论或说明。这些盆地如后陆盆地、侧陆盆地、转换补偿盆地、拉裂盆地、地貌成因盆地、(天体)撞击盆地、中间地块盆地、陆内前陆盆地、改造(型)盆地等。本盆地分类方案是对不同地区相同或相近构造环境所发育盆地类型的理性归纳和综合,相对较为系统全面。但在地史上和现世界中,因地质条件的差异或发展进程的不同,其中某类盆地可能在具相同构造环境的某地并未出现,或发育特征并不典型。任一个全球沉积盆地分类方案,从问世之日起就处于检验、争议和修补之中,周而复始,日臻完善。

关键词: 沉积盆地类型划分, 盆地沉降动力, 地貌成因盆地, 后陆盆地, 转换补偿盆地, 大陆动力学

Abstract:

 The classification of sedimentary basins is fundamental for research on basins and related fields. Although there are a variety of basin classification schemes with different emphases and advantages, the study of the classification of intracontinental basins is still weak. A sedimentary basin represents a typical giant system and its classification is a complicated system engineering. The excellent classification for basins should reflect integrality, hierarchy, relevancy, typicality (representativeness) and comparability (predictability) of the basin system. The classification of basin types is mainly based on the factors, including tectonic position, lithospheric type, subsidence mechanism and dynamic environment, basinal texture and structure, basement property, sedimentary environment and filling feature, etc., during the formation and development of the basin. The forces which led to basin subsidence were mainly originated from the deep Earth and can be divided into four types: thermal, stress, gravity and combination of all the three. The basin formed by asteroid impact is a special case and could be classified into the gravityoriginated type. Another noteworthy basin type is the basin generated by landform genesis; the basin did not result from endogenic processes but caused by sediments and water body accumulating in lowland; this type of basin has been observed in different tectonic environments;their occurrence conditions of mineral deposits and geodynamic implications are quite different from those basins having endogenic genesis; therefore, the basin is separately treated as a basin type with distinctive origin. Based on previous classification schemes and studies of sedimentary basins and considering plate tectonics dynamic setting, independence and initiative of intracontinental internal dynamics, and main forces leading to basin subsidence, this paper divides the regional tectonic environment of basin development into 6 types: within oceanic plate, within continental plate, divergent, subduction, collision, and transform continental (plate) margin, plus newlyadded asteroidimpact and reformed composite types. Among the former 6 types, 44 subtypes of sedimentary basins are further classified according to their dynamic environments and major mechanical properties (stresses), respectively. We further discussed and explained about the newlyadded types and newlydefined types of basins and the terms which have been changed; these basins include backland basins, side continental basins, transformcompensation basins, pullrift basins, landform genesis basins, asteroidimpact basins, intermediate massif basins, intracontinental foreland basins, reformed basins and so on. This basin classification scheme is a rational and comprehensive induction based on the same or similar tectonic environment of the basins in various regions; it is relatively systematic and complete. In the geological history and today, a certain type of basin may have been absent or incompletely developed in somewhere having the same tectonic environment because of the differentiated geological conditions and changing of development processes. Every sedimentary basin classification scheme, from its birth, must be under test, controversy and construction. By doing this, it gradually becomes perfect.

Key words: classification of sedimentary basins, subsidence dynamics of basins, landform genesis basins, backland basins, transformcompensation basins, continental dynamics

中图分类号: